Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 V12Evo2 vs Fleva V701, Almost similar in price range but...

views
     
ViktorJ
post Sep 4 2018, 03:18 PM

Dancy Drinky Doggo
******
Senior Member
1,004 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
Not sure if my impression is wrong, but this is what I think about it:

Yeah, indeed the sidewall did feel a tad soft.

After a high-speed turn in, it does take a moment for the car to 'settle in', but when it does, it grips without complaining much, if at all.

I'm not sure, but I THINK that a softer side-wall compliments most passenger car's soft suspension set up, so to not 'load' the suspension too suddenly which can cause the tires to skip.

Driving very predictably albeit quickly, I think this tire ultimately has very high dry and wet grip.

The downside is that incredibly quick lane changes feel unsettling, and a somewhat slow response, like when you are zipping between lanes in very heavy traffic at high speeds.

But we shouldn't be driving like that anyway! tongue.gif

I think the tire is suitable for all SUVs and sedans, even sports sedans.

Probably not so good for our sporty JDM friends (MX-5, S15, R34, MR-S etc) and their MY counterparts (modded Wira, Satria etc) who drive on average 50 km/h faster than us even during traffic jam.

This post has been edited by ViktorJ: Sep 4 2018, 03:23 PM
ViktorJ
post Sep 4 2018, 04:58 PM

Dancy Drinky Doggo
******
Senior Member
1,004 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
QUOTE(6UE5T @ Sep 4 2018, 04:50 PM)
Agree it's pretty similar to F1D5 but I think the V12E2 has higher grip overall and definitely more silent.
Well it might give the impression of slow response in quick directional changes due to the softer sidewall. But to me I don't feel hampered when I need to drive fast/more aggressively. I think it's still fine for sporty cars too, it all depends on driver's feel and preference of how they like their cars to behave. IMHO tires that have very stiff sidewall also not really suitable in Malaysia as the road sometimes not smooth and like you said will instead make the tires easier to skip and loose traction while the softer ones may still grip better.
*
Yup. In fact, I would say it doesn't actually have a soft side-wall per se, just soft in comparison to its category, i.e. UHP.

Could probably remedy that easily: just go ultra low profile!

When I wanted to go for lower profile, the tire shop guy gave me a funny look and pretty much ignored me and just changed the stock setup anyway.

For reference, its a D segment with 215/50/17, I wanted to go 45 or even 40 tongue.gif

This post has been edited by ViktorJ: Sep 4 2018, 05:01 PM
ViktorJ
post Sep 4 2018, 05:44 PM

Dancy Drinky Doggo
******
Senior Member
1,004 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
QUOTE(6UE5T @ Sep 4 2018, 05:30 PM)
You need to upsize rims to 18x8.5 then use 245/40/18.  My d-segment now is already using 245/40/18 and for me personally that is the thinnest profile I'd go and would not go even lower than 9.8-10cm sidewall height coz it will be too harsh! Actually IMHO 10-11cm sidewall height (195/55, 205/50, 215/50, 225/45, 235/45, 245/45, 255/40) offer the best compromise between look, performance/stiffness, and comfort. When going around 9.6-9.8cm sidewall height (195/50, 215/45, 245/40) then start to feel a bit harsh and that's the borderline, then going even further below that is a big no already for me.
*
IIRC, Kia Forte comes with 215/45/17

Its crazy harsh to me, but I always thought it was more due to the suspension setup rather than its tire profile

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0176sec    0.24    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 10:00 PM