the original movie in 1998 and the new 2010 movie. and owh, david hasselhoff was nick fury in the 1998 film
perhaps firedauz should add nick fury's movies into the timeline?
Movies The AVENGERS: Movie Series Thread, Next: Avengers: Infinity War 25/4/2018
|
|
May 6 2008, 05:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
10,672 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam |
just for ur information, nick fury have already had a movie on himself, and there's another upcoming movie with him at the centre in 2010.
the original movie in 1998 and the new 2010 movie. and owh, david hasselhoff was nick fury in the 1998 film perhaps firedauz should add nick fury's movies into the timeline? |
|
|
|
|
|
May 10 2008, 06:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
10,672 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam |
QUOTE(firedauz @ May 10 2008, 08:41 AM) This had became a debate of: i think it's quite clear that they're gonna release virtually all characters in the eventual avenger movie as a solo superhero movie first. and then they're gonna use the same actor as the same actor who plays them in the avenger movie. it's gonna be a full all-star cast, i'm sure, and might be the most expensive film in terms of paying the actors of all time. well, that's what marvel intends. - Who are the actual prominent members in The Avengers? - Who, of these prominent members, SHOULD be in that Avenger movie? - Who should be the leader? iron man is the first film fully owned by marvel. it was a bold move to produce it independently from any other studios, but it was success, mainly becoz of their ability to stay true to the comics. so lets assume that they're gonna keep this up, we're gonna see similar qualities in the avenger movie. my opinion is, if samuel l jackson is nick fury, there's a high possibility that they will follow the spirit of the ultimate avenger. so the lineup might be: i. steve rogers/captain america as the leader ii. bruce banner/the hulk iii. tony stark/iron man iv. hank pym/ant man v. janet pym/wasp vi. natalia romanoff/black widow vii. thor viii. nick fury agent of SHIELD oh wait, where's spiderman? well, i'm sure they're gonna squeeze him in somewhere. |
|
|
May 12 2008, 05:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
10,672 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam |
i was hoping that x-men would be done in this format - introducing individual characters in several different films before going into an ultimate x-men movie.
but then again, x-men comics have always been a team first, individuals later, while the avengers were individuals first, team later. oh well, i still prefer individual characters though. wolverine and magneto is a good start. |
|
|
Oct 17 2011, 01:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
10,672 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: shah alam - skudai - shah alam |
somehow i feel that mark ruffalo is more suitable as banner than eric bana or edward norton. bana's too well built and do not have that geekish look that often portrayed in the comics. edward norton is just way too different - he's way too athletic and agile.
|
| Change to: | 0.0693sec
0.58
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 03:16 AM |