Jensen is salty af hahaha! I wonder what it is like at the Su/Huang Family reunion haha!

Is it confirmed that 1100 series is coming out? was it announced at CES? I missed that.

I think the G-sync pricing is not consumer friendly.  my guess is Nvidia has no choice but to embrace free-sync in order to gain wider markets.  To those who are filthy rich, can go buy their g-sync BFGD products. Poorfaqs just settled with g-sync compatible products. So far only free-sync 2(HDR) monitor is properly supported because of the LFC. which 1st gen free-sync monitor lacks off.

Nvidia knows those people who can afford a Gsync monitor has already bought their GPU and the monitor.

Now they are targeting people with RX470/580 who may or may not have a Free Sync monitor... They will buy a Nvidia GPU...

I'm more eager to see a 3840x1600 144hz instead of a full 4k screen

DLSS is console quality man. For that much of a card, that's unacceptable. It's not even decent. The quality loss is so apparent that you just wanted that whole shenanigan off.

I wish it came 5 years earlier

Now jadi boss hardly got time 2 play tech

Retarded price. Only ~5-7% faster than regular 2080.

Better go buy regular 2080 second hand or "clearance" deals instead for lower price.

this is madness.... 

2070 > 1080ti.... 

They'll whip out their 3080 Ti the moment AMD RX 5900 XT is faster than Nvidia 2080 Ti.

Gpu tech has overtaken cpu(speed)

So unless theres a
1. new api with graphic tech (better than dx12 and totally dont need cpu in driver.. gpu pipeline)
2. New graphic tech (like higher version of ray tracing)
3. 4k 120hz 1ms ips monitors becomes a standard..

Theres going to be serious issues. Nvidia can blow away amd anytime.. just change back those extra tensor cores etc into cuda cores.. make a 1680ti etc.. make a smaller die. Bump the cores more. Clock higher.. heck just do a AMD. Ftw.

But whats the point. Its going to be cpu bound unless 4k gaming with high refresh rate becomes a standard. Thats highly unlikely because of the cost and mainstream competitive gaming.. nobody wants that cause the frames are unstable and increases input lag. 1440p 120hz gaming just became sort of mainstream just last year..

Rtx came in because of all the cpu bound scenarios. Might as well develop more graphic tech. Every dx version had a tech that slaughtered gpus. Dx12 was to improve fps. With nvidia and amd now having a pipeline that does shader/vector computation simultaneously... better cuda/core performance on instruction per cycle... cpu bound..

Cpu battle shifted now to core count with about the same single threaded performance you get from a 4790k/6700k (6700k beats 4790k with its native pcie 3.0 and ddr4... clock to clock with about same ram speed not much diff).. thats how out dated cpu ipc improvement are until now its masked into higher clock speed.

So unless intel does a core 2 duo again (major ipc improvement where a way lower clock cpu beat da shit out of pentium 4 and athlon 2 i think ) ..this issue wont be solved. Current cpu core count trend improves on multitasking etc etc.. not really on gaming

At this moment even 1080p 240hz has tons of issues. On graphic intensive games.. even if a gpu can hit those refresh rate.. the game engine will have problems trying to coordinate all the math involve in that scene on environment, objects, the user experience etc.. it will be glitching.. havent you guys noticed alot of jap game developers limit the fps.

So this 360hz monitor for who?? Csgo/dotards etc??

Meh, as long as AMD don't make an effort to improve their drivers - pointless with all that hardware behind it. 5700XT and 5700 are still crashing after 5 months since release lol.

Still holding to my 1080 Ti... personally I'd like the 30 series next time to have an option if they want RTX or GTX.. would be an easier choice for me.. no thanks for rtx cards, and I can live without it.

Hoping too much.. surely Nvidia don't care at this point.. 6k/8k+ for the next Ti for sure..

Eye candy is one thing la bro, but performance in game is also another thing. That's why just aiming for non RTX if there is an option next time from Nvidia. RTX double the price wey, I'm not willing to pay that much for just better reflection, looking a little bit more realistic in game when the performance isn't good enough. Maybe next time la.

Long has been the days where graphic is that important in games, when the thing that lacks in game this days is better gameplay.

True true. Getting a nvidia card you wont feel da enthusiast feel.

Amd.. broken drivers, bsod, throttling... ITUlah feeling of original true enthusiast.

its just a matter of when ..
some new game.. some windows update..position of da sun..jho low bmi..something will make it go haywire where you will need to ddu twice and install the same driver..

Not mine. Last month had a ton of crap troubleshooting for nephew on his 3600x with Asus strix  on a asus strix x470 with
some acer nitro 27inch 1080p 144hz monitor.

Its very random until i think the drivers are piling some garbage files thats causing it. Every-time DDU twice and everything will work again for a week. Its always some issue with driver after 40-50 hours of gaming on a comp thats always on.

Games was BF, Call of duty , overwatch destiny 2 (the later dlc). For xmas few of us (uncles.. ) got him a 2060super. Havent heard a complaint this whole jan.

Currently what I thought as well, but yeah just needed some input on AMD CPU considering they are better over than Intel, just not for gaming yet. Thanks for the input

Haha deng

Miss those days where i can game for 12 consecutive hours

That was in 2007

Haha true

Now netflix also chop 3/4 of my total hours playing already deng

At least back in the day i gave up torrenting after streamyx blocked all torrenting 4 good so can focus back in gaming hahahaha

just fed up . when ppl start using marketing cons. and then u watch dumbass not realising it because fell into da trap

what i know. 6900xt is overpriced and doesnt scale well compared to 6800xt if the claims are true. it has 10 percent more cu etc and u would think since 3090 beats 3080 by 10-15%.. that be enough.. but no.. it needed rage mode+smart cache to compete.

so thats where i started doubting everything. rage mode is variable resolution scaling based on input lag. do if u enjoy upscaling based on a fix refresh rate . that nuts

where the 1080p?? where the synthetic benchmarks which amd loves ?!

reviewers also cannot trust. guess its up to me again. got to get botu cards. and then a dumbass 5900x which all x570 mobo sux so no choice strix b550 itx.

just see apple marketing when they didnt talk about battery. no need to see reviews already know it sux compared to 11 series and also this explains why they didnt do high refresh rate screens.

seems like every launches now kindda simple.. when they dont talk about it.. means it sux. so rdna 2 sux at 1080p.

Went and got the Zotac 3080 Trinity OC earlier today.

I know the card's length will be an issue for me. The card is 317mm and the maximum length for my case with front fan installed is 315mm. After seeing some posts in reddit mentioning that they managed to fit the GPU, albeit barely or touching the fan case, I went ahead and got it. but then...

[attachmentid=10661583]
This is how much I'm missing. dammit... I had to remove my bequiet 140mm fan and replaced it with the stock Fractal 120mm fan. Open up the front PSU shroud cover, push my HDD cage further back and mount the Fractal 120mm fan slightly lower. sigh...
[attachmentid=10661584]
This thing is stupidly long. dammit...