Jun 17 2019, 04:55 PM
QUOTE(dk999 @ Mar 17 2019, 11:57 PM)
Hi, just dropping my review of es32 Tyre
I'm using Accord 2004 with 215 60 r16 tyres. Doing a lot of highway driving.
Changed from cc6 with about 30% left to es32. Main reason is the cc6 very easy to aquaplane during wet weather on highway at the current wear suspected due to cc6 thinner longkang.
Choose es32 because it seem to be global Tyre which able to find overseas reviews on it and the longkang is much wider than cc6
After using more than half year, sound seems similar compared to old cc6, but very little aquaplane on highway rain driving. Conclusion is cc6 is ok for normal City driving should be very quiet and comfortable. But long distance can't control weather surface would much prefer es32 less ap in wet. No regret just around 300 each for 4 pcs 215 60r16.
Unscientific experience
Old cc6, highway normal rain 120 will ap, heavy rain 90 will ap.
New es32, highway normal and heavy rain 110 is no problem.
sounds good.. how is the performance now after few mths?I'm using Accord 2004 with 215 60 r16 tyres. Doing a lot of highway driving.
Changed from cc6 with about 30% left to es32. Main reason is the cc6 very easy to aquaplane during wet weather on highway at the current wear suspected due to cc6 thinner longkang.
Choose es32 because it seem to be global Tyre which able to find overseas reviews on it and the longkang is much wider than cc6
After using more than half year, sound seems similar compared to old cc6, but very little aquaplane on highway rain driving. Conclusion is cc6 is ok for normal City driving should be very quiet and comfortable. But long distance can't control weather surface would much prefer es32 less ap in wet. No regret just around 300 each for 4 pcs 215 60r16.
Unscientific experience
Old cc6, highway normal rain 120 will ap, heavy rain 90 will ap.
New es32, highway normal and heavy rain 110 is no problem.
Quote
0.0228sec
0.88
7 queries
GZIP Disabled