Setia Alam by SP Setia, Township project in Shah Alam
Setia Alam by SP Setia, Township project in Shah Alam
|
|
Jan 11 2015, 05:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
Heard long queue on the CAFFRA 20 x 65 2.5 / 3 storey units, starting from 783k... 100 units almost fully grabbed, true?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 11 2015, 06:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2015, 06:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 11 2015, 07:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2015, 01:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Jan 12 2015, 08:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 12 2015, 10:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Eithanius @ Jan 12 2015, 06:26 PM) That may change though... Yeah, key person from PNB enter the SPS board ..SP Setia top brass moots plan for its takeover by Sime Darby... Not sure if this is good news or bad news... According to the article, the weekend property launch was part of the projects that came after the departure of the original founder. This post has been edited by samkps: Jan 12 2015, 10:36 PM |
|
|
Jan 14 2015, 09:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
Claims:
"Still a lot of units left when I went there yesterday noon. Sales are not as strong compared with 2 years back." In the paper: 99% sale http://biz.sinchew.com.my/node/108761 So, should trust which one... |
|
|
Sep 27 2015, 12:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Rabel @ Sep 26 2015, 10:25 PM) So far what I know is yes. RA can not do anything If the owner refuses to pay the maintenance fee even they signed the DMC. Boss, in my opinion, the terms "Gated and Guarded" are referring to the security features rather than title. As long as the the project able to obtain the formal approval from local authority for full perimeter fencing, guard house and top notch security feature, for me it is already a "Gated and Guarded" housing, clearly dictated by the names itself. Coz Landed GNG only can under strata title according to law. DMC VS LAW. Which one is bigger? The thing become worse after MOT done and got more and more sub sale transaction. 1. sub sale buyer no need to obtain letter of consent from RA or developer to proceed the MOT. 2. Since no need to involve the RA or developer. If u are the sub sale buyer. Will u pandai pandai go and sign the DMC with RA or developer ? If they ask u sign. U oso NO need to bother them. Since the RA hv no right to stop ppl for entering ( some more the guy got property) and the RA oso can NOT STOP anybody to proceed the MOT. So..... By the way, if my understanding is not correct. Pls share ur experience Tq in advance . Strata or individual title for me is just a "tool" on how effectively the RA/JMB/MC can undertake and maintain the "GnG" scheme. The main difference between Strata and Individual in implementing the GnG scheme shall be as following: 1.) Maintenance fees collection - For strata title, there is a protection from the strata title act on this maintenance fees collection. If one owner not paying the maintenance fee, JMB/MC may initiate a legal process against the owner. It maybe easy to be stated in the act, but to implement it, it is not as easy as illustrated. JMB/MC need to file a summon, obtain a court order, to get a warrant of attachment, etc... It's definitely not Ah Beng or Ah Lian can do it, most likely JMB/MC shall employ a lawyer for this purpose and thus incur charges. That's why we still can see that Strata title is not a 100% guarantee for maintenance fees collection. For example, I believe almost all condo/service apt in KV is under strata title, but how many of them actually can get 100% maintenance fees collection every month? Nevertheless, with the protection from strata title act, especially for those convicts who may face RM 5k fine and imprison for 3 years, I presume the percentage of maintenance fees collection shall be higher and hence more effective in GnG implementation. - For individual title, there is no such act protecting the fees collection, rather a DMC normally applied. A DMC actually an agreement under seal, which from my perception is legal document. JMB/MC can actually execute legal exercise on those purchaser who didn't pay the maintenance fees. Of course the loophole would be on the subsale purchaser who doesn't sign the DMC during purchase. They may claim they are not aware about this maintenance fees (though everyone also knew they are lying). Nevertheless, the DMC that I signed before normally have clause saying the the DMC apply to both current purchaser and subsequent purchaser. There is even a clause mentioning the as long as the subsequent purchaser is not undertaking the DMC, they shall not be allowed to access to the project. I am not legal expert and not sure the validity of this claim and whether the JMB/MC can sue the first purchaser who didn't comply with the DMC clauses. Nevertheless, there are still some legal protection according to DMC, although it is not as strong as the Strata Title Act. Or course, they will be still stubborn parasite who refuse to pay the maintenance fee before legal action taken against them, but I believe it should not be the majority. These stupid maniac of course can lodge a court case to challenge the validity of the guard house etc, but there is already a precedent case mentioning guard house and boom gate actually is legal. http://www.thesundaily.my/news/1365490 Therefore, as long as the JMB/MC able to secure enough fund, the GnG scheme shall be able to be continued. Nevertheless, the percentage of maintenance fees collection I presume should be lower than those strata title. 2.) Access to the property - Strata title only regulate about the maintenance fees payment, but if one owner is not paying or delaying the maintenance fees, I don't think JMB/MC can prohibit them to enter to their property as well. Please enlighten if you know more. If the non-paying owners have friend / relative come to visit him, I think somehow their access cannot be blocked as well, although the road is belonging to the JMB/MC. Please correct if I am wrong. For public who just wants to come inside for visiting the park or jalan-jalan, the guard can block them directly since it is priviate property. - For individual title, either the owner is paying or no paying the maintenance fees, he will still allowed to go to his property. Of course more restrictions shall apply. If the non-paying owners have friend / relative come to visit him, they are allowed to go in with restrictions of course. For public who just wants to come inside for visiting the park or jalan-jalan, by law the guard should allow so, but in real life mostly will reject. Of course that particular person can lodge a court case to challenge why he is not allowed to do so since it is public road / park, but in reality how many will really spending time, money and effort to do this, simply because they are not allowed to enter into the park in fencing area just for leisure? So, in conclusion either it is strata title or individual title, for me both of them also Guarded and Gated community. Nevertheless, strata title has more advantage and more effective to implement it due to the strata act. Nevertheless, as long as JMB/MC/RA for the individual title neighbourhood collect enough funds to implement the security features that are approved by the local authority, I would definitely consider it is a GnG neighbourhood as well. Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Sep 27 2015, 12:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Rabel @ Sep 27 2015, 11:16 AM) The legal action only can be taken for for those signed DMC for strata title. Boss, strata title for condo/service apt already long time.. Have you heard of any legal case before? If dun mind. Pls help to find any case, owner sued by developer or RA due to refuse to pay maintenance ( the property after MOT done ) which the property is GNG under individual title. Really wanna to know the outcome oso. So far, what I know is RA only can keep issuing remind letter |
|
|
Sep 27 2015, 07:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Rabel @ Sep 27 2015, 02:53 PM) Lol, rabel boss... I presume Banana from Jade Hill and TKJ from SEH precinct 3 shall strongly against this, since both are individual title... This post has been edited by samkps: Sep 27 2015, 07:22 PM |
|
|
Sep 27 2015, 07:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(Rabel @ Sep 27 2015, 03:04 PM) Boss, indirectly u get the answer from ur own statement " no legal taken so far for individual title or strata title property owner coz refuse to pay maintenance fee" Yes that y I ask for help to find some cases as example. 1. Individual title. Owner can sell the property, even they dun pay the maintance fee for long time coz the sub sale deal no need to obtain the letter of consent to proceed the MOT. 2. Strata title Owner unable to sell the property cow sub sale transaction need to obtain letter of consent from RA to proceed MOT. So, RA will instruction u to pay all the maintenance fee plus interest only they will release the letter. Tis is very big diff. If u hold the individual title, maybe u will refuse to pay. Let say example u dun stay there or u r not happy with management. Right? Coz u still can sell the house. Somebody will think " why should I pay since dun stay there or why should I pay, the RA management is lousy? Some more they can not tk legal action and they oso can not stop me to sell house. But if hold the strata title. Even u dun stay there or u not happy with the RA. U still need to pay. Becoz at the end, u hv to pay if u want to sell ur property. The ppl dun pay, nvm lor. At the end , they still need to pay. If they want to sell house. When the condo/apartment owner already obtained the individual strata title, still need to get the letter of consent from MC for the subsale? I knew if still under master title, the first purchaser need to get the letter of consent from the developer/JMB for subsale. But after the strata title already issued, the owner still need to get a letter of consent from the MC to proceed to the MOT? This is exactly same like for landed, under master title, need to get consent from the developer. But after individual title is issued, the owner can do the subsale and conduct the MOT freely, no? |
|
|
Sep 27 2015, 08:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 27 2015, 11:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 27 2015, 11:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2015, 09:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2015, 09:00 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2015, 02:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
|
|
|
Sep 28 2015, 09:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(keane04 @ Sep 28 2015, 09:28 PM) The final balance will only giv me after i sent in the maintenance fees, water, electricity bills then only handover. This is the last step. Whatver steps before this i cant recall already. Do you get an official receipt from the MC for example on the maintenance fees deducted by the buyer lawyer? The lawyer can deduct from the final balance any fees due? Or the lawyer force u to clear it first? I dunno. |
|
|
Sep 28 2015, 09:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,454 posts Joined: Nov 2011 |
QUOTE(keane04 @ Sep 28 2015, 09:32 PM) Oic, good citizen.. Based on my experience on individual title subsale (which is not GnG), the lawyer also request the same - TNB / Syabas / IWK etc as well. Perhaps it is routine? The question here would be just in case if there is seller who already have the strata title is owing maintenance fees, is it a rule that MOT then cannot be transferred? If the lawyer who is doing this transaction is same to the seller as well, they will do the same also? I just wondering whether is it a "must have" procedure for the lawyer to check the maintenance fees bill before completing the subsale transaction, with strata title. This post has been edited by samkps: Sep 28 2015, 09:48 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0396sec
0.41
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 03:14 PM |