Since when buying high-end phone will untung one? Even used for a month then sell like Uncle Benny also rugi few hundreds. Let alone for your 1 years old phone.
That's why I won't waste anymore money on sp, skin, etc. Just bought a durable case and use it naked. The RV going to drop anyway. Why let the buyer enjoy the brand new screen when you who paid the premium didn't get to enjoy it.
That's only if you have the Samsung Screen warranty..
Still too much contrast on the edges especially, over sharpening and excessive Noise Reduction killing the details. Looks extremely unnatural. This has been the problem with the Samsung phones all these while.
Go figure why Google Pixel devices are still the best for photography.
p/s: I have yet to see the RAW files though so I won't comment on that.
Really? For me the pictures looks really good already.. maybe i'm not camera savvy, but saying it is extremely unnatural is exaggerated? But i hope to see you do side by side comparison of the camera with the phone that u think with good camera, so that i could understand if its really looks extremely unnatural (by seeing a natural one)
Watch at 2:06. I know these are 2 older devices but the current Samsung phones still retain such characteristics...
Most non-photography enthusiast won't even notice/care about this to be honest.
Pretty sure sniper on the roof would agree with me
This post has been edited by -kytz-: Mar 3 2018, 02:25 PM
As a Pixel 2 XL user, i was able to have a quick hands on demo with the Samsung S9+ in person while at Gandaria City Mall (Jakarta) at the flagship Samsung Retail store and i walked away pretty impressed by the variable aperture setting.
During my short time tinkering with the pro mode, i have to say i was pretty impressed with how it handled white balance although sometimes it was a hit or miss.
Time will tell how this new hardware feature will ultimately play out to the average and pro consumers hands.
Feb 26 2018, 10:43 PM
Quote
0.2310sec
0.43
7 queries
GZIP Disabled