QUOTE(seantang @ Apr 29 2009, 09:42 PM)
But alas, it's not up to you to define what rich means.
The dictionary defines rich as 'having a great deal of money'. And instinctively, that's absolutely correct.
People who have a lot of money ie. earn, inherit or are given a lot of money are rich. So what if they spend all of it? They are still rich. If you earn 100K a month, and you spend 100K a month, you're rich. Simply because you are capable of benefiting from 100K of goods & services (ie. value) each month.
People who have little money but save a big proportion of it are not rich. They are poor, and will always be poor because of the simple fact that they have little money. Living within your means is not rich. That's simply thrifty. If you earn 1K a month, but only spend 10 bucks, saving 990, you still only have 990. You're poor. You can take all your 'ultra savings' and you still only buy nothing of any real value.
So, it's not how much you spend or how much you save. It's how much you have (to spend or save).
That still depends on a person definition of rich. Some ppl think if you earn more then 3k you are considered rich. Then there are ppl who say you are poor even if you earn more then 8k a month.
Some ppl say you can buy a car means your rich, but then ppl will nit pick and say you bough a proton so your poor. You gotta pay for a Honda in cash then your considered rich. Cant really compare how a person who has a high salary definition of rich to a less well off person.
Usually those with high net income will always say that a poor person perception of "rich" is wrong since they supercede it with their own view of what rich really means. Like greed, there is no end to what is considered rich.