Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

7 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Quadcore QX6700 Thread, OC and Benchmark

views
     
raymond5105
post Jun 4 2007, 03:58 PM

Newbie
*******
Senior Member
5,341 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Just maybe your PSU is the culprit of causing mobo failure.Any plan to get better PSU ?
Quazacolt
post Jun 4 2007, 04:01 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


haha since thread closed ill tumpang here:

QUOTE
Multipler is there for intel to set to mark on their processor speed for the market according to the grade of the processors based on stable default speed at a certain voltage.

QX6700 and all the extreme processors are unique in that you are free to set the multiplier to that u desire.

Your problem is most likely that you are pushing your RAMs too hard, When you get a stable cpu speed at 1:1 you can adjust the ratio to 2:3 or 4:5 so that your RAMs would be at 1000MHz or so.. adjust the RAM timings (5/5/5/18..6/6/6/24.. 4/5/5/18 etc..5/6/6/20) and voltage accordingly(up to 2.2 would be ok)

If 280 fsb is all you can do the by all means increase the multiple to 11.. that would bring the cpu to 3.08GHz. I reach 370 by dropping my multipler to 9.. to get to 400 and beyond I may have to drop to 8 or 7, all the while keeping the cpu vcore within 10% the default voltage. There is also chipset/FSB/bus voltages to consider. Increase FSB speed would be better than multipler increase is because it increases bandwithwidth for more data feeding the 4 cores.


so basically i should be maximizing FSB more by lowering the multipliers? can provide more specific details on doing so? like the vcore/vfsb voltage settings etc etc
BeastX
post Jun 4 2007, 04:28 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jun 4 2007, 04:01 PM)
haha since thread closed ill tumpang here:
so basically i should be maximizing FSB more by lowering the multipliers? can provide more specific details on doing so? like the vcore/vfsb voltage settings etc etc
Trial and error(and a lot of time/testing).. no short cut .. could also be a limitation of the chipset.. (generally I dont increase voltage of any part more than 10%) ... that is why if you are impeded by fsb.. increase the multiplier. 3.0GHz at default voltage is no problem for My 2 quad cores.
Quazacolt
post Jun 4 2007, 05:20 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(BeastX @ Jun 4 2007, 04:28 PM)
Trial and error(and a lot of time/testing).. no short cut .. could also be a limitation of the chipset.. (generally I dont increase voltage of any part more than 10%) ... that is why if you are impeded by fsb.. increase the multiplier. 3.0GHz at default voltage is no problem for My 2 quad cores.
*
ok so first push the FSB, then multiplier when its at its limit i take it? ill try with 8-9 multipliers then and push the fsb more for now. and aim for 3.0 ghz with default vcore (the heat is insane sad.gif)

and may i know the default vcore again? i forgot already and lazy to reload bios defaults again (sorry yea, and at office still sweat.gif ) ur also on QX6700 right? so should be ok to use the same vcores and push from there(~10% from what you said) and see how far i can go... not expecting much anyways since i dont wanna fry my cpu, but im considered lucky since ive been vcore'ing it on 1.5v and even few times goin 1.6v lol (asus there indicator reading blue (ok) color somehow rofl!) but didnt manage to boot for the most part, and if able to boot, the temperature is kinda retarded.
BeastX
post Jun 4 2007, 05:43 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jun 4 2007, 05:20 PM)
and may i know the default vcore again?
1.35volts ..... most likely
Quazacolt
post Jun 5 2007, 09:08 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(BeastX @ Jun 4 2007, 05:43 PM)
1.35volts ..... most likely
*
k this time manage to push it to 3.2ghz... 350x9

everything fine until i orthos 4th core... keep getting error... but i ignore it, and test the other 3 cores over night... morning wake up blue screen doh.gif doh.gif

think overheated? thats my guess since the 3 cores runnin on ~90celcius before i sleep.

think ill go for a 1:2 fsb/ram ratio as my ram default clock speed is high already... but how much fsb can i push? 350 seems to be the limit and anything more results in a non bootable pc sad.gif
BeastX
post Jun 5 2007, 03:03 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


So this thread has evolved to a quad core thread again... I started one 7 mnths ago... but was combined with the dual core conroes..

Quazacolt... try backing the fsb a little.. say 345MHz... to make sure it is not Ram speed issue try running one instance of orthos stressing the RAM... My cpu core 3(4th) is also a culprit that prevents me from going beyond 370.... Primming only the 1st 3 cores (1 hour or so).. i was able to go to 3.7/3.8GHz and ran some Pi test
Quazacolt
post Jun 5 2007, 04:22 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(BeastX @ Jun 5 2007, 03:03 PM)
So this thread has evolved to a quad core thread again... I started one 7 mnths ago... but was combined with the dual core conroes..

Quazacolt... try backing the fsb a little.. say 345MHz... to make sure it is not Ram speed issue try running one instance of orthos stressing the RAM... My cpu core 3(4th) is also a culprit that prevents me from going beyond 370.... Primming only the 1st 3 cores (1 hour or so).. i was able to go to 3.7/3.8GHz and ran some Pi test
*
hehe maybe previously not many quadcore users, even now, also not many still.

ram shouldnt be the issue, since ive ran extended ram test and orthos ram stress previously on stock speed (1066mhz) but now on this oc'ing attempt im running pure 1:1 ratio (underclocked my rams basically) and having 5-5-5-15 default latency. so shouldnt be a problem on ram side.

still curious on how ur able to get the fsb up this high and still able to boot, cuz i wanna try that and able to have my ram oc'ed or 1:1 ratio at a much better end clock speed.
SlayerXT
post Jun 5 2007, 04:24 PM

PRIDE!
*******
Senior Member
2,042 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



Why is that happen? So when u disable core 2 and 4, is that mean ur system is not rock stable right?
Quazacolt
post Jun 5 2007, 04:39 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(§layerXT @ Jun 5 2007, 04:24 PM)
Why is that happen? So when u disable core 2 and 4, is that mean ur system is not rock stable right?
*
...wtf disable core 2 and 4?
aloy237
post Jun 7 2007, 04:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
67 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Klang



Does anyone here know if the Kentsfield QX6700 ES has any problems with the Asus P5W DH Deluxe mobo ?
toughnut
post Jun 7 2007, 08:59 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,239 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
QUOTE(aloy237 @ Jun 7 2007, 04:24 AM)
Does anyone here know if the Kentsfield QX6700 ES has any problems with the Asus P5W DH Deluxe mobo ?
*
ask Asus via email or try their forum (if it exist)
t3chn0m4nc3r
post Jun 7 2007, 08:13 PM

Teh Necron Lord
*******
Senior Member
4,139 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Internet


hmmm... i always wondered how come dual core has lower clock... hmm.gif
Quazacolt
post Jun 8 2007, 08:55 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Jun 7 2007, 08:13 PM)
hmmm... i always wondered how come dual core has lower clock... hmm.gif
*
prolly limited by heat? (wild ass guess) if you've ever used core temp on dual/quad core CPUs you'll notice that the cores are much much hotter than the actual CPU chip/die itself.

anyways, managed to clock my cpu to 3.1 ghz with 310 fsb and 10 multiplier. everything is stable cept my core 4 is always throwing a fit on me on orthos :/

anyone else having probs with core 4? or is it normal?
SlayerXT
post Jun 8 2007, 10:26 AM

PRIDE!
*******
Senior Member
2,042 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



I think this is the result of having 2 conroe on one chip. Maybe need water cooling to get higher.
BeastX
post Jun 8 2007, 05:44 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jun 8 2007, 08:55 AM)
anyways, managed to clock my cpu to 3.1 ghz with 310 fsb and 10 multiplier. everything is stable cept my core 4 is always throwing a fit on me on orthos :/
my 4th core is stable at 3.4Ghz at 1.4/1.425v cpu voltage. beyond that will error no matter voltage applied. The other 3 can go to 3.7/3.8 or so. at 1.55v or so

Quazacolt
post Jun 9 2007, 11:44 AM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,366 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(BeastX @ Jun 8 2007, 05:44 PM)
my 4th core is stable at 3.4Ghz at 1.4/1.425v cpu voltage. beyond that will error no matter voltage applied. The other 3 can go to 3.7/3.8 or so. at 1.55v or so
*
this time pushed 3.15 ghz, but multiplier at 9 with 350 FSB. up'ed some vcores and vfsb, testing orthos now... but again, after test 4-5 stupid core 4 throwing fits again vmad.gif

think i can ignore the error on core 4? lol
gengstapo
post Jun 9 2007, 03:02 PM

Retired enthusiast
********
All Stars
10,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Jun 7 2007, 08:13 PM)
hmmm... i always wondered how come dual core has lower clock... hmm.gif
*
nowadays, manufacturer of processor wont bother bout cpu clock
the important is speed of the processor not the larger number of clocks

This post has been edited by gengstapo: Jun 9 2007, 03:02 PM
SlayerXT
post Jun 9 2007, 10:37 PM

PRIDE!
*******
Senior Member
2,042 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL



Whatever it is, its nice to see benchmarks score gain for those overclocks.
edwin3210
post Jun 9 2007, 10:41 PM

lll
*****
Senior Member
808 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
wanna ask quad core user here. u guys are getting high score benchmarks. but wanna ask, did u feel any real world benefit? was asking coz may get a quad core year end.

7 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0265sec    0.40    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 11:06 PM