Just maybe your PSU is the culprit of causing mobo failure.Any plan to get better PSU ?
Quadcore QX6700 Thread, OC and Benchmark
Quadcore QX6700 Thread, OC and Benchmark
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 03:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,341 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Just maybe your PSU is the culprit of causing mobo failure.Any plan to get better PSU ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 04:01 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
haha since thread closed ill tumpang here:
QUOTE Multipler is there for intel to set to mark on their processor speed for the market according to the grade of the processors based on stable default speed at a certain voltage. QX6700 and all the extreme processors are unique in that you are free to set the multiplier to that u desire. Your problem is most likely that you are pushing your RAMs too hard, When you get a stable cpu speed at 1:1 you can adjust the ratio to 2:3 or 4:5 so that your RAMs would be at 1000MHz or so.. adjust the RAM timings (5/5/5/18..6/6/6/24.. 4/5/5/18 etc..5/6/6/20) and voltage accordingly(up to 2.2 would be ok) If 280 fsb is all you can do the by all means increase the multiple to 11.. that would bring the cpu to 3.08GHz. I reach 370 by dropping my multipler to 9.. to get to 400 and beyond I may have to drop to 8 or 7, all the while keeping the cpu vcore within 10% the default voltage. There is also chipset/FSB/bus voltages to consider. Increase FSB speed would be better than multipler increase is because it increases bandwithwidth for more data feeding the 4 cores. so basically i should be maximizing FSB more by lowering the multipliers? can provide more specific details on doing so? like the vcore/vfsb voltage settings etc etc |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 04:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon |
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jun 4 2007, 04:01 PM) haha since thread closed ill tumpang here: Trial and error(and a lot of time/testing).. no short cut .. could also be a limitation of the chipset.. (generally I dont increase voltage of any part more than 10%) ... that is why if you are impeded by fsb.. increase the multiplier. 3.0GHz at default voltage is no problem for My 2 quad cores.so basically i should be maximizing FSB more by lowering the multipliers? can provide more specific details on doing so? like the vcore/vfsb voltage settings etc etc |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 05:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(BeastX @ Jun 4 2007, 04:28 PM) Trial and error(and a lot of time/testing).. no short cut .. could also be a limitation of the chipset.. (generally I dont increase voltage of any part more than 10%) ... that is why if you are impeded by fsb.. increase the multiplier. 3.0GHz at default voltage is no problem for My 2 quad cores. ok so first push the FSB, then multiplier when its at its limit i take it? ill try with 8-9 multipliers then and push the fsb more for now. and aim for 3.0 ghz with default vcore (the heat is insane and may i know the default vcore again? i forgot already and lazy to reload bios defaults again (sorry yea, and at office still |
|
|
Jun 4 2007, 05:43 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon |
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jun 4 2007, 05:20 PM) and may i know the default vcore again? 1.35volts ..... most likely |
|
|
Jun 5 2007, 09:08 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(BeastX @ Jun 4 2007, 05:43 PM) k this time manage to push it to 3.2ghz... 350x9everything fine until i orthos 4th core... keep getting error... but i ignore it, and test the other 3 cores over night... morning wake up blue screen think overheated? thats my guess since the 3 cores runnin on ~90celcius before i sleep. think ill go for a 1:2 fsb/ram ratio as my ram default clock speed is high already... but how much fsb can i push? 350 seems to be the limit and anything more results in a non bootable pc |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 5 2007, 03:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon |
So this thread has evolved to a quad core thread again... I started one 7 mnths ago... but was combined with the dual core conroes..
Quazacolt... try backing the fsb a little.. say 345MHz... to make sure it is not Ram speed issue try running one instance of orthos stressing the RAM... My cpu core 3(4th) is also a culprit that prevents me from going beyond 370.... Primming only the 1st 3 cores (1 hour or so).. i was able to go to 3.7/3.8GHz and ran some Pi test |
|
|
Jun 5 2007, 04:22 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(BeastX @ Jun 5 2007, 03:03 PM) So this thread has evolved to a quad core thread again... I started one 7 mnths ago... but was combined with the dual core conroes.. hehe maybe previously not many quadcore users, even now, also not many still.Quazacolt... try backing the fsb a little.. say 345MHz... to make sure it is not Ram speed issue try running one instance of orthos stressing the RAM... My cpu core 3(4th) is also a culprit that prevents me from going beyond 370.... Primming only the 1st 3 cores (1 hour or so).. i was able to go to 3.7/3.8GHz and ran some Pi test ram shouldnt be the issue, since ive ran extended ram test and orthos ram stress previously on stock speed (1066mhz) but now on this oc'ing attempt im running pure 1:1 ratio (underclocked my rams basically) and having 5-5-5-15 default latency. so shouldnt be a problem on ram side. still curious on how ur able to get the fsb up this high and still able to boot, cuz i wanna try that and able to have my ram oc'ed or 1:1 ratio at a much better end clock speed. |
|
|
Jun 5 2007, 04:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
Why is that happen? So when u disable core 2 and 4, is that mean ur system is not rock stable right?
|
|
|
Jun 5 2007, 04:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 04:24 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
67 posts Joined: Oct 2005 From: Klang |
Does anyone here know if the Kentsfield QX6700 ES has any problems with the Asus P5W DH Deluxe mobo ?
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 08:59 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,239 posts Joined: Jun 2005 |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 08:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,139 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Internet |
hmmm... i always wondered how come dual core has lower clock...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 08:55 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(t3chn0m4nc3r @ Jun 7 2007, 08:13 PM) prolly limited by heat? (wild ass guess) if you've ever used core temp on dual/quad core CPUs you'll notice that the cores are much much hotter than the actual CPU chip/die itself.anyways, managed to clock my cpu to 3.1 ghz with 310 fsb and 10 multiplier. everything is stable cept my core 4 is always throwing a fit on me on orthos :/ anyone else having probs with core 4? or is it normal? |
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 10:26 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
I think this is the result of having 2 conroe on one chip. Maybe need water cooling to get higher.
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 05:44 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,987 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon |
QUOTE(Quazacolt @ Jun 8 2007, 08:55 AM) anyways, managed to clock my cpu to 3.1 ghz with 310 fsb and 10 multiplier. everything is stable cept my core 4 is always throwing a fit on me on orthos :/ my 4th core is stable at 3.4Ghz at 1.4/1.425v cpu voltage. beyond that will error no matter voltage applied. The other 3 can go to 3.7/3.8 or so. at 1.55v or so |
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 11:44 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,366 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: KL Malaysia |
QUOTE(BeastX @ Jun 8 2007, 05:44 PM) my 4th core is stable at 3.4Ghz at 1.4/1.425v cpu voltage. beyond that will error no matter voltage applied. The other 3 can go to 3.7/3.8 or so. at 1.55v or so this time pushed 3.15 ghz, but multiplier at 9 with 350 FSB. up'ed some vcores and vfsb, testing orthos now... but again, after test 4-5 stupid core 4 throwing fits again think i can ignore the error on core 4? lol |
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 03:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 10:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,042 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: KL |
Whatever it is, its nice to see benchmarks score gain for those overclocks.
|
|
|
Jun 9 2007, 10:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
808 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
wanna ask quad core user here. u guys are getting high score benchmarks. but wanna ask, did u feel any real world benefit? was asking coz may get a quad core year end.
|
| Change to: | 0.0265sec
0.40
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 11:06 PM |