Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Could we have a swf tag?

views
     
SUSDiligent Sloth
post Apr 26 2007, 11:06 PM, updated 19y ago

Lowyat VPN provider
*****
Senior Member
880 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Sibu, Sarawak



As per topic, we have IMG / Youtube tag, could we have a SWF tag as well?
wKkaY
post Apr 26 2007, 11:48 PM

misutā supākoru
Group Icon
VIP
6,008 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Won't happen due to cross-site scripting concerns.

If you like a particular flash widget, you can suggest it and we'll add it if it comes from a trusted source (subject to approval on a case-by-case basis).
SUSDiligent Sloth
post Apr 27 2007, 02:01 AM

Lowyat VPN provider
*****
Senior Member
880 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Sibu, Sarawak



Would it be possible to get a flash signature?
wKkaY
post Apr 27 2007, 07:25 AM

misutā supākoru
Group Icon
VIP
6,008 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Link?
Dark Steno
post Apr 27 2007, 11:55 AM

baaaaaaa
Group Icon
VIP
4,567 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Bangi, Selangor



QUOTE(Diligent Sloth @ Apr 27 2007, 02:01 AM)
Would it be possible to get a flash signature?
*
Although having a flash object within the forum is actually cool, but having a flash stuff for signature is not that really practical. We couldn't get to know the real filesize of the flash file since a flash file could inlude another flash file and so on.
karhoe
post Apr 27 2007, 01:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,238 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Kuala Lumpur


remmember the astro max flash ads? someone could use that type of siggy which is annoying
pipedream
post Apr 27 2007, 01:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,353 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
i tot flash siggy arent allowed? for good reason

the best example is the stupid msn flash ads, rollover to expand silly videos that lags my computer
waynelyp90
post Apr 27 2007, 02:38 PM

Nonsense Hater
******
Senior Member
1,141 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Sunway University College



Flash files will cause the forum to load very slow and if it is in the siggy, those spammerz with a flash siggy will cause 56k users to suffer kao kao...
We have Broadband but you see, when TMNuts is behaving like nuts, the only site we can come is LYN since it loads so fast... rclxms.gif
wKkaY
post Apr 27 2007, 03:30 PM

misutā supākoru
Group Icon
VIP
6,008 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(wKkaY @ Apr 27 2007, 01:48 AM)
Won't happen due to cross-site scripting concerns.
*

Yes, there's the issue of the flash files being an annoyance, large to download, etc etc. But this reason above is the deal killer - it's trivial to write swfs that steal cookies. If you're allowed to embed any swf you like, we (or at least those who have the flash player installed) will all be open to this attack.
Nation of Sensation
post Apr 27 2007, 05:28 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
554 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: 127.0.0.1
QUOTE(wKkaY @ Apr 26 2007, 11:48 PM)
Won't happen due to cross-site scripting concerns.

If you like a particular flash widget, you can suggest it and we'll add it if it comes from a trusted source (subject to approval on a case-by-case basis).
*
Yea,
Gotta agree with you!

Nowadays, it is not safe to allow flash signatures to be used in forums as some script kiddies might take this opportunity to implement their very own 'hijacking' or 'annoyance' script within the flash file and thus, showing off their evil side. Cookie session hijacking, page redirection, annoying popups, auto-logout and so forth are one of the example scripts that could be executed when a person is viewing a topic which contains a flash file located in a user's signature!
momochi zabuza
post Apr 27 2007, 05:43 PM

I never think about money, beautiful things make money
*****
Senior Member
719 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: cyberjaya, ampang, malaysia


im a flash lover.. but im against this idea
natakaasd
post Apr 27 2007, 08:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,188 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Disagree with this idea. Very dangerous as all sorts of Vulnerabilities exist. MS Patched on one Vulnerability, imagine if Those with Flash Player visited LYN that is full of swf's at that time? Disaster.

And on the 56k thingy. I am on 56k, Going through certain subforums is already a pain (especially those with a lot of pictures), introducing swf is going to make it more than worse.

Cheers!
SUSDiligent Sloth
post Apr 27 2007, 09:51 PM

Lowyat VPN provider
*****
Senior Member
880 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Sibu, Sarawak



QUOTE(natakaasd @ Apr 27 2007, 08:24 PM)
Disagree with this idea. Very dangerous as all sorts of Vulnerabilities exist. MS Patched on one Vulnerability, imagine if Those with Flash Player visited LYN that is full of swf's at that time? Disaster.

And on the 56k thingy. I am on 56k, Going through certain subforums is already a pain (especially those with a lot of pictures), introducing swf is going to make it more than worse.

Cheers!
*
Barring the cross-scripting, assuming the flash files are smaller than the allowed limit, I don't see why that'd affect you tongue.gif
eXPeri3nc3
post May 2 2007, 07:25 PM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



As it is animated GIFs serves its purpose well, I really don't see a point of having a flash signature.
Dark Steno
post May 2 2007, 07:43 PM

baaaaaaa
Group Icon
VIP
4,567 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Bangi, Selangor



QUOTE(eXPeri3nc3 @ May 2 2007, 07:25 PM)
As it is animated GIFs serves its purpose well, I really don't see a point of having a flash signature.
*
While I believe it's attractive and more interactive things could be added. That's actually a point of having flash signature. Yet, no forums really implement such thing like reasons above.
linkinstreet
post May 2 2007, 09:51 PM

Red Bull Addict
Group Icon
Moderator
9,277 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said

It will make the forum slower and vurnurble to attack.Thus I don't agree. And what's wrong with using only static or gif images? if you're creative enough, you should be able to make a good one without resorting to using swf.

This post has been edited by linkinstreet: May 2 2007, 09:51 PM
eXPeri3nc3
post May 3 2007, 02:11 AM

It's coming! 3ɔu3ıɹǝdxǝ ♥
*******
Senior Member
9,257 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Not so sure myself Status: 1+3+3=7



QUOTE(Dark Steno @ May 2 2007, 07:43 PM)
While I believe it's attractive and more interactive things could be added. That's actually a point of having flash signature. Yet, no forums really implement such thing like reasons above.
*
But one should remember that you cannot check where a link leads to in Flash. What if, if someone do something dirty?
Yes I do agree that it'll be more interactive with flash, but so far demand for it is still low, hence my point that I find it still not necessary.

QUOTE(linkinstreet @ May 2 2007, 09:51 PM)
It will make the forum slower and vurnurble to attack.Thus I don't agree. And what's wrong with using only static or gif images? if you're creative enough, you should be able to make a good one without resorting to using swf.
*
Erm, under certain rules, the forum loading issue should be fine, the only thing is the safety precaution. Just my 2 cents.
SUSDiligent Sloth
post May 3 2007, 05:26 PM

Lowyat VPN provider
*****
Senior Member
880 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: Sibu, Sarawak



I could still have a flash tag if I wanted to lol, just parse a known extension on my webserver as php or something and include my swf .. presto~ ..

But I won't :"P

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0161sec    0.25    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 06:59 AM