Dec 5 2017, 08:34 PM
QUOTE(wkc5657 @ Dec 5 2017, 03:22 PM)
If you go check the 1.2L turbo power numbers, it is quite close to the 1.8. Just that the response definitely different.
Still overpriced, but at least feel a little more worth it.
or maybe he left the automotive industry permanently already....all his kaki-kaki strategy tiba-tiba lost direction
anyway, let's wait patiently when he resurface up (or maybe he never will, just like the argentinian sub...)
I miss my idol!!!Still overpriced, but at least feel a little more worth it.
or maybe he left the automotive industry permanently already....all his kaki-kaki strategy tiba-tiba lost direction
anyway, let's wait patiently when he resurface up (or maybe he never will, just like the argentinian sub...)
This price range can get Tiguan 1.4T, Tucson 1.6T, or top up a bit for CR-V 1.5T. I believe all of them will be more fuel efficient than the CH-R 1.8NA, from my Elantra 1.6T experience.
The modern tiny turbo engine is really something. My combined mileage is over 13km/l on average, with average speed on odo only 32km/h. I spent quite some time in traffic light/jam, which pull down the average. 17km/l on highway 110km/h, 15km/l on highway 130-140km/h, with 160-180km/h on small occasion.
Civic 1.5T should be 10-15% more economy than mine. So I really think not using 1.2T doesn't only lose on power, it also has huge disadvantage on fuel economy unlese it sell at 90K like HR-V. Consider paying 50K for fancy bodykit on a HR-V. Haha
Also Toyota insists on proprietary infotainment globally, meaning no android auto, no apple carplay even for 2018 Camry in US.
This post has been edited by constant_weight: Dec 5 2017, 08:34 PM
Quote
0.0173sec
0.81
7 queries
GZIP Disabled