QUOTE(piscesguy @ Jan 7 2008, 08:47 AM)
wow that much yeah?Home Theatre HDMI CABLE, Cheap & expensive same quality?
Home Theatre HDMI CABLE, Cheap & expensive same quality?
|
|
Jan 7 2008, 09:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,684 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Central Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 30 2008, 07:56 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,684 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Central Region |
m using the ultra 800 ones...good PQ to my eyes I would say
This post has been edited by iman_210: Nov 30 2008, 07:57 AM |
|
|
Dec 5 2008, 09:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,684 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Central Region |
QUOTE(kkng77 @ Dec 2 2008, 04:49 PM) Hi all, need assistance from u guys... depend on ur 32 inch lcd capabilities...my best guess it can only upscale max 720p with the HDMI cable. check my sig if u want a hdmi cable mateI am using component cable for my dvd player (do not have HDMI) with my 32" LCD, show that it is running at 576p... will I get better quality if I invest a HDMI DVD player and link to my 32"LCD? will I get 720p or 1080i or 1080p? |
|
|
Dec 10 2008, 01:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,684 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Central Region |
|
|
|
Dec 12 2008, 08:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,684 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Central Region |
QUOTE(attap @ Dec 12 2008, 04:15 PM) so not worth spending on cables? |
|
|
Dec 14 2008, 07:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,684 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Central Region |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 13 2008, 02:00 PM) looks like exposure levels/lighting conditions from camera's each shot are different... (did you use the SOP** i.e. "graycard" and manual white balance, shot in RAW) i can c that the contrast bit too strong on top part and below pic looks more natural. same length for both HDMI cables?could say that the top one is more white balanced (bottom photo, lefthand blue screen side looks white washed).. but then again the the bottom one can see more details near the right side, on the darker feathers.. so how? maybe a rm1k HDMI cable would have best from both images? "The single WhiBal card is light Gray, certified to recommended Luminance level of L* = ~75, which is optimum for use in all RAW converters. Having a "GrayCard" reference is the best assurance that the digital pictures that you capture will have the ability to be properly White Balanced. Only with a proper White Balance can you be ensured of proper and accurate color, regardless of lighting conditions. Unlike your eyes, a digital camera does not automatically see whites as white. It sees the color of the light reflected from it, hence blue-ish in Daylight and Orange-ish in incandescent lighting. By photographing a Gray Card reference for each lighting situation that you are in, you are assured of being able to achieve a proper White Balance for all of your pictures.The Gray Card reference picture can be used with today's software to balance the color casts that various lighting conditions produce with all digital cameras. The best method to properly White Balance your digital pictures is by using a Gray Card properly and shooting RAW. RAW Conversion Software such as Adobe Camera Raw and RawShooter can then perfectly adjust all the captures that were shot under the same lighting conditions." |
| Change to: | 0.0185sec
0.22
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 04:25 PM |