Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Home Theatre HDMI CABLE, Cheap & expensive same quality?

views
     
iman_210
post Jan 7 2008, 09:10 AM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(piscesguy @ Jan 7 2008, 08:47 AM)
Anybody heard about Rogers HDMI cable? Desa is selling for more than 200 bucks ! shocking.gif
*
wow that much yeah?
iman_210
post Nov 30 2008, 07:56 AM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


m using the ultra 800 ones...good PQ to my eyes I would say

This post has been edited by iman_210: Nov 30 2008, 07:57 AM
iman_210
post Dec 5 2008, 09:01 AM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(kkng77 @ Dec 2 2008, 04:49 PM)
Hi all, need assistance from u guys...

I am using component cable for my dvd player (do not have HDMI) with my 32" LCD, show that it is running at 576p...

will I get better quality if I invest a HDMI DVD player and link to my 32"LCD? will I get 720p or 1080i or 1080p?
*
depend on ur 32 inch lcd capabilities...my best guess it can only upscale max 720p with the HDMI cable. check my sig if u want a hdmi cable mate
iman_210
post Dec 10 2008, 01:30 PM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(kamen rider #1 @ Dec 9 2008, 06:36 PM)
Question guys...

When I watch Spiderman 3 BD,

There's noise at black part...

why aaa ?...

i watch with ps3, HD ready, 100hz 32"...

Does the problem come with cheap HDMI ?...

I dont have any other BD to test );
*
I believe u have to set the LCD tV.
iman_210
post Dec 12 2008, 08:13 PM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(attap @ Dec 12 2008, 04:15 PM)
Another interesting article on HDMI cable.

Spend more on Cables?
*
so not worth spending on cables?
iman_210
post Dec 14 2008, 07:34 PM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 13 2008, 02:00 PM)
looks like exposure levels/lighting conditions from camera's each shot are different... (did you use the SOP** i.e. "graycard" and manual white balance, shot in RAW)

could say that the top one is more white balanced (bottom photo, lefthand blue screen side looks white washed)..
but then again the the bottom one can see more details near the right side, on the darker feathers.. so how?

maybe a rm1k HDMI cable would have best from both images?  tongue.gif


"The single WhiBal card is light Gray, certified to recommended Luminance level of L* = ~75, which is optimum for use in all RAW converters.

Having a "GrayCard" reference is the best assurance that the digital pictures that you capture will have the ability to be properly White Balanced. Only with a proper White Balance can you be ensured of proper and accurate color, regardless of lighting conditions. Unlike your eyes, a digital camera does not automatically see whites as white. It sees the color of the light reflected from it, hence blue-ish in Daylight and Orange-ish in incandescent lighting. By photographing a Gray Card reference for each lighting situation that you are in, you are assured of being able to achieve a proper White Balance for all of your pictures.The Gray Card reference picture can be used with today's software to balance the color casts that various lighting conditions produce with all digital cameras. The best method to properly White Balance your digital pictures is by using a Gray Card properly and shooting RAW. RAW Conversion Software such as Adobe Camera Raw and RawShooter can then perfectly adjust all the captures that were shot under the same lighting conditions."

*
i can c that the contrast bit too strong on top part and below pic looks more natural. same length for both HDMI cables?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0185sec    0.22    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 04:25 PM