Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Home Theatre HDMI CABLE, Cheap & expensive same quality?

views
     
TSpiscesguy
post Apr 22 2007, 08:18 PM, updated 9y ago

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Just bought a new HDMI cable to replace my faulty PHILIPS cable.
Costs me RM 180 for 2 meters. Actually didn't feel any difference in terms of picture quality if compare to the more expensive PHILIPS cable.

timothyy
post Apr 22 2007, 08:31 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
HDMI cable is digital.

What is "0" and what is "1" already been fixed.
In Digital transmission, its either u get the number or you don't at all. There is no half half.
Unless the cable is broken, the signal should be the same for good cables and normal cables.
Ngto
post Apr 22 2007, 08:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Apr 22 2007, 08:18 PM)
Just bought a new HDMI cable to replace my faulty PHILIPS cable.
Costs me RM 180 for 2 meters. Actually didn't feel any difference in terms of picture quality if compare to the more expensive PHILIPS cable.
*
You just wasted a fortune on your previous expensive Philips and your current RM180/- purchase.

Just buy a 1.5m RM99/- cable at Lowyat and it will be 100% the same picture quality as whatever expensive HDMI cable because unlike analog signal, digital signal does not depend on signal strength. It's either you get a signal or you don't.

It's just like someone flash a S.O.S signal at you with a torchlight. As long as you can see the signal whether weak or strong you will still interprete the same message.


neoardi
post Apr 22 2007, 09:24 PM

Membanteras Pembenci
****
Senior Member
645 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: The future


QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 22 2007, 08:54 PM)
You just wasted a fortune on your previous expensive Philips and your current RM180/- purchase.

Just buy a 1.5m RM99/- cable at Lowyat and it will be 100% the same picture quality as whatever expensive HDMI cable because unlike analog signal, digital signal does not depend on signal strength. It's either you get a signal or you don't.

It's just like someone flash a S.O.S signal at you with a torchlight. As long as you can see the signal whether weak or strong you will still interprete the same message.
*
Yup, u're right. Click here to see what i've found out. thumbup.gif
BTW, i just bought a 1.8 m hdmi for RM65 at Sg. Wang and it's flawless. rclxms.gif
Ngto
post Apr 22 2007, 09:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(neoardi @ Apr 22 2007, 09:24 PM)
Yup, u're right. Click here to see what i've found out. thumbup.gif
BTW, i just bought a 1.8 m hdmi for RM65 at Sg. Wang and it's flawless. rclxms.gif
*
Wow you found even a cheaper one than me rclxms.gif .
htkaki
post Apr 22 2007, 10:30 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



If u guys want, I sell to u all at RM30/pc. 1 metre long. Any taker?
TSpiscesguy
post Apr 22 2007, 10:51 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Damn !! I didn't know the cable can be so cheap !! cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif
anuarnor
post Apr 23 2007, 04:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
232 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Maybe the expensive one can send a higher bit rate without loss. Just speculate, never touch this hdmi thingy before. biggrin.gif


timothyy
post Apr 23 2007, 10:19 AM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(anuarnor @ Apr 23 2007, 04:32 AM)
Maybe the expensive one can send a higher bit rate without loss. Just speculate, never touch this hdmi thingy before. biggrin.gif
*
blink.gif blink.gif blink.gif

Donno and you wanna give comment? Danger la.

The torch light theory is a nice way of putting it... Yeah!!
anuarnor
post Apr 23 2007, 10:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
232 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Well i said maybe. It is at least plausible. Heheh.
timothyy
post Apr 23 2007, 10:40 AM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(anuarnor @ Apr 23 2007, 10:36 AM)
Well i said maybe. It is at least plausible. Heheh.
*
I feel like this now...
user posted image


sunauto
post Apr 23 2007, 11:46 AM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



I guess those normal HDMI cables are not shielded and constructed with high quality materials but they do get the job done if you're not too fussy about the picture quality.
dirtrun
post Apr 23 2007, 11:57 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
My 2 cts,

If short, try de cheap ones first and if tat is not too ur liking upgrade to de branded ones lo...

But if setting up for Front PJs then de long ones are a bit of a problem, as even cheap ones given de long lengths will not be so ; and if it is not too your liking and later, getting de better branded ones are going to hurt a hell of a lot more than just getting de better ones outrite...

But tats just me and my pocket talking
Dirtrun

This post has been edited by dirtrun: Apr 23 2007, 11:59 AM
Fusion
post Apr 23 2007, 12:20 PM

.:ATI:.
******
Senior Member
1,201 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


i dont think there would be any difference for a 1m cable but i think there will b some difference when the cable is more than 10m.....i read this in some review saying that there is a correction algorithm in the video processor converting digital to analog where additional bits will be inserted to replace the missing bits during transmission through a series of calculation

previously i have a 12m supra HDMI cable ....the signal lost was so bad that my projector couldnt detect the signal but it works on another projector ...the cable stated that for a 15m supra cable, the maximum transmission capable is only 1080i but it doesnt support 1080p....i have tried several cables(all above 10m) and some of the cables will produce some sparkling pixel.....i was told that this was due to signal loses of the cable ......

in terms of picture quality, the difference between cable is minimal and most of the time u couldnt even tell the difference between each cable.....
TSpiscesguy
post Apr 23 2007, 01:38 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(sunauto @ Apr 23 2007, 11:46 AM)
I guess those normal HDMI cables are not shielded and constructed with high quality materials but they do get the job done if you're not too fussy about the picture quality.
*
R u now saying that cheap and expensive cables DO MAKE a difference in picture quality? brows.gif
Red Maniac
post Apr 23 2007, 02:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
347 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: mAlAySia


QUOTE(htkaki @ Apr 22 2007, 10:30 PM)
If u guys want, I sell to u all at RM30/pc. 1 metre long. Any taker?
*
I want... I want... Can COD ah???
dirtrun
post Apr 23 2007, 03:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,136 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Aiya,

If scared to waste money go for de better branded ones straight .... pay for it - for piece of mind but in most instances if de cheaper one can work then you save sum money but if it doesn't then you have no choice to buy de branded anyway unless you wanna junk de player or go lower connectivity...unless you can borrow to test out first but who is gonna do tat - most buy tis type of cables for a purpose - to use so you wont be able to test ...

For instance I asked around before I bought any hardware on de type of Pj used with de source player and HDMI cable used and even though I ended up wif de diff Pj wif a diff source player too(was looking at panny pjs and denon 1920/30) my 10m hdmi cable works fine (but then again I paid a hell of a lot for it...)

Cheers
Dirtrun
timothyy
post Apr 23 2007, 04:12 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
I bought a cheap S Video cable... RM55 for 20m.

Hmmm... I am having problem with it as the wiring inside is not so good... picture come out sometime and sometime no.

So, getting a good cables might just reassure you that it won't spoil easily.
PcWork
post Apr 23 2007, 04:21 PM

Audio Phreak
*******
Senior Member
6,489 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Serdang
QUOTE(timothyy @ Apr 23 2007, 04:12 PM)
I bought a cheap S Video cable... RM55 for 20m.

Hmmm... I am having problem with it as the wiring inside is not so good... picture come out sometime and sometime no.

So, getting a good cables might just reassure you that it won't spoil easily.
*
it can be repair if the failure is at the plug place.
but i found some nice quality S-video plug.
which the plug alone is enough for u to get another 20 m of it.
think think so no point repair also.
haha
empire23
post Apr 23 2007, 04:33 PM

Team Island Hopper
Group Icon
Staff
9,417 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory
Bestest brand for HDMI cables would be in my view simply, MOLEX, cheap, shielded and with good materials, you can't go wrong with them since they bloody wrote the standard for connections in HDMI. Around around 80 will get you a great interconnect from them.

Although finding them might be an issue since only electronics retailers carry them.
timothyy
post Apr 23 2007, 05:18 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
Do you really need shielding for HDMI?
empire23
post Apr 23 2007, 06:06 PM

Team Island Hopper
Group Icon
Staff
9,417 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory
QUOTE(timothyy @ Apr 23 2007, 05:18 PM)
Do you really need shielding for HDMI?
*
IIRC they only specify it for longer ranges and the connectors. Although i'd like to make the point that it is the problem of the signalling itself rather than the evironmentals that make up the bulk of the transmission issue.
TSpiscesguy
post Apr 24 2007, 05:49 AM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Since HDMI is a digital cable, 1m and 100m cable will have no impact in quality? rclxub.gif
empire23
post Apr 24 2007, 06:16 AM

Team Island Hopper
Group Icon
Staff
9,417 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Bladin Point, Northern Territory
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Apr 24 2007, 05:49 AM)
Since HDMI is a digital cable, 1m and 100m cable will have no impact in quality? rclxub.gif
*
As long as the voltage level remain readable. The simplest answer is NO.
sunauto
post Apr 24 2007, 11:08 AM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



There's a limit actually, branded HDMI cables from QED and Wireworld will cap its length to 15 metres. If you're running 1080P signals, it's note advisable to use a lenghty HDMI cable and besides, why do you need 100m for? It's not that you'll put your player downstairs and your HDTV panel upstairs. hmm.gif

I guess for normal 1m is more than enough and for projectors, I think 5m to 10m will be more than enough. HDMI cables are just like speakers cables, the shorter, the better.

QUOTE(piscesguy @ Apr 24 2007, 05:49 AM)
Since HDMI is a digital cable, 1m and 100m cable will have no impact in quality? rclxub.gif
*
timothyy
post Apr 24 2007, 11:35 AM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(sunauto @ Apr 24 2007, 11:08 AM)
There's a limit actually, branded HDMI cables from QED and Wireworld will cap its length to 15 metres. If you're running 1080P signals, it's note advisable to use a lenghty HDMI cable and besides, why do you need 100m for? It's not that you'll put your player downstairs and your HDTV panel upstairs.  hmm.gif

I guess for normal 1m is more than enough and for projectors, I think 5m to 10m will be more than enough. HDMI cables are just like speakers cables, the shorter, the better.
*
May be he is working in the hotel line leh?
Anyway, a lot of engineering calculation on cable length, resistance hve to be involved before any of us dare to comment when the cable is too long.

But for basic home use, don't think we will have problem.

But your question has been answered.<-- That is, nope-Quality of HDMI cable does not affect the image quality.
Ngto
post Apr 24 2007, 01:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(htkaki @ Apr 22 2007, 10:30 PM)
If u guys want, I sell to u all at RM30/pc. 1 metre long. Any taker?
*
Already bought last month. Too bad for me you didn't offer earlier.


Added on April 24, 2007, 1:43 pm
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Apr 23 2007, 01:38 PM)
R u now saying that cheap and expensive cables DO MAKE a difference in picture quality? brows.gif
*
Those with shielding are just marketing gimmick, to justify charging more. HDMI not affected by interference so won't make a diff cheap or expensive.


Added on April 24, 2007, 1:47 pm
QUOTE(timothyy @ Apr 23 2007, 04:12 PM)
I bought a cheap S Video cable... RM55 for 20m.

Hmmm... I am having problem with it as the wiring inside is not so good... picture come out sometime and sometime no.

So, getting a good cables might just reassure you that it won't spoil easily.
*
You are off topic lah biggrin.gif . S-Video is analog cable where signal strength and quality plays an important part in picture quality unlike HDMI.


Added on April 24, 2007, 1:50 pm
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Apr 24 2007, 05:49 AM)
Since HDMI is a digital cable, 1m and 100m cable will have no impact in quality? rclxub.gif
*
As long as the 100m one can transmit the signal strong enough over the long distance to be detected by the receiver the PQ will be the same.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Apr 24 2007, 01:55 PM
timothyy
post Apr 24 2007, 01:59 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 24 2007, 01:39 PM)
Already bought last month. Too bad for me you didn't offer earlier.


Added on April 24, 2007, 1:43 pm
Those with shielding are just marketing gimmick, to justify charging more. HDMI not affected by interference so won't make a diff cheap or expensive.


Added on April 24, 2007, 1:47 pm

You are off topic lah  biggrin.gif . S-Video is analog cable where signal strength and quality plays an important part in picture quality unlike HDMI.

Added on April 24, 2007, 1:50 pm

As long as the 100m one can transmit the signal strong enough over the long distance to be detected by the receiver the PQ will be the same.
*
Aiyo... u got me wrong la... I am referring to cheap vs expensive cables conection quality. The S Video is just an example that I got what I paid for...

Ngto
post Apr 24 2007, 02:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(timothyy @ Apr 24 2007, 01:59 PM)
Aiyo... u got me wrong la... I am referring to cheap vs expensive cables conection quality. The S Video is just an example that I got what I paid for...
*
Not sure what you meant by connection quality.

Anyway using analog to compare with digital cable physical quality is not appropriate.

Since analog cable PQ is dependent very much on the physical quality of the cable itself, even a slight degradation can make a diff in PQ.

On the other hand digital cable will only lose signal with a very poor quality cable at a minimum threshold point . The signal just won't get detected and there will be no picture.

Anything above the minimum quality, whether it's a very good cable or just a so-so cable will give you the exact same picture quality.

So if you buy a HDMI cable don't buy one which is so cheap and poor that no signal can be detected.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Apr 24 2007, 02:16 PM
htkaki
post Apr 24 2007, 04:27 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(Red Maniac @ Apr 23 2007, 02:10 PM)
I want... I want...  Can COD ah???
*

Can. Just PM me smile.gif

TSpiscesguy
post Apr 25 2007, 06:47 AM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 24 2007, 02:14 PM)
Not sure what you meant by connection quality.

Anyway using analog to compare with digital cable physical quality is not  appropriate.

Since analog cable PQ is dependent very much on the physical quality of the cable itself, even a slight degradation can make a diff in PQ.

On the other hand digital cable will only lose signal with a very poor quality cable at a minimum threshold point . The signal just won't get detected and there will be no picture.

Anything above the minimum quality, whether it's a very good cable or just a so-so cable will give you the exact same picture quality.

So if you buy a HDMI cable don't buy one which is so cheap and poor that no signal can be detected.
*
Very well explained. rclxms.gif
bond
post Apr 25 2007, 07:48 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(piscesguy @ Apr 25 2007, 06:47 AM)
Very well explained. rclxms.gif
*
Just bought a cheap no brand HDMI cable for RM40 and it is working fine. Found the cheapest branded is panasonic for RM89. Very tempting but i suspect the result is the same.
Ngto
post Apr 25 2007, 09:58 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(bond @ Apr 25 2007, 07:48 AM)
Just bought a cheap no brand HDMI cable for RM40 and it is working fine. Found the cheapest branded is panasonic for RM89. Very tempting but i suspect the result is the same.
*
Let's put it this way. If the cable is not good quality and becomes defective (i.e losing signal etc.) after months, years or probably never, you can always buy another better one with the savings you have made with your current purchase. By that time even the branded ones will have come down sharply in price as more and more people become aware of the truth behind HDMI cables and PQ.
Red Maniac
post Apr 25 2007, 02:26 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
347 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: mAlAySia


QUOTE(bond @ Apr 25 2007, 07:48 AM)
Just bought a cheap no brand HDMI cable for RM40 and it is working fine. Found the cheapest branded is panasonic for RM89. Very tempting but i suspect the result is the same.
*
Mind sharing with us where you get the cable.
Ngto
post Apr 25 2007, 09:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(Red Maniac @ Apr 25 2007, 02:26 PM)
Mind sharing with us where you get the cable.
*
Read the earlier posts. 'Htaki' is selling for only RM30/- each.
sunauto
post Apr 25 2007, 09:43 PM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 24 2007, 01:39 PM)
Already bought last month. Too bad for me you didn't offer earlier.


Added on April 24, 2007, 1:43 pm
Those with shielding are just marketing gimmick, to justify charging more. HDMI not affected by interference so won't make a diff cheap or expensive.


Added on April 24, 2007, 1:47 pm

You are off topic lah  biggrin.gif . S-Video is analog cable where signal strength and quality plays an important part in picture quality unlike HDMI.


Added on April 24, 2007, 1:50 pm

As long as the 100m one can transmit the signal strong enough over the long distance to be detected by the receiver the PQ will be the same.
*
It depends on how you view such cables, to me, whether the signal is analog or digital, a good cable will always give you good results, it's not a marketing gimmick as you claimed even though, you'll say it is madness to spend thousands on a good cable. If you're talking about HDMI cable, try bringing yours to CMY Sungei Wang and try their QED HDMI-P cable for a start, that's around RM450 (can still nego lah), try to compare the quality on their plasma. They're willing to demo it to you. That day I was asking them about their Siltech SPX-20 (around RM900) and QED Conduit (around RM400 plus) power cords, they played Eagle's Hotel California song and tested these two cables and also the stock power cord that came with the Cambridge Audio's cd player. The openess, mids and highs can be immediately felt on the pricier Siltech power cord, QED did improve on the sound but not as much as the latter. I do believe that good cables can give an extra boost to the picture and sound quality but some may argue that with the money, you can either get a better display or player. Well, that's up to you to judge actually.
bond
post Apr 26 2007, 12:53 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
83 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
QUOTE(Red Maniac @ Apr 25 2007, 02:26 PM)
Mind sharing with us where you get the cable.
*
I got it from SS2 Legend... but Tong kong is selling pana cable for 89
Jack28HT
post Apr 26 2007, 02:02 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
150 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


Here is something regarding HDMI cables. It doesn't seem to be as simple as 0 or 1 only because it carries differential signals in cable pairs. Anyone got a chance verify it for 1080P signal ?

HDMI Part 8 - Cables for 1.3
Ngto
post Apr 26 2007, 11:04 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(Jack28HT @ Apr 26 2007, 02:02 AM)
Here is something regarding HDMI cables. It doesn't seem to be as simple as 0 or 1 only because it carries differential signals in cable pairs. Anyone got a chance verify it for 1080P signal ?

HDMI Part 8 - Cables for 1.3
*
That's a different specification (1.3) you are comparing altogether. Different specs require different cable requirements due to the higher transmission speeds. When 1.3 becomes mainstream in the future for more advanced HDMI features than it will require higher quality cables because of the higher speeds. The LCD-TV must also be HDMI 1.3 ready to support the new specs.

In the meantime Current mainstream specs are only 1.0-1.2 and our discussions are based on that, so can't compare with 1.3 that way.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Apr 26 2007, 11:07 AM
Red Maniac
post Apr 26 2007, 11:17 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
347 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: mAlAySia


QUOTE(bond @ Apr 26 2007, 12:53 AM)
I got it from SS2 Legend... but Tong kong is selling pana cable for 89
*
Thanks... can you get 720p and 1080i with this cable? Is the plug gold plated?

I've tried hdmi cable from Roger ($100) and Supra (~$400). Can't really differentiate the differences in quality with my AV setup at home. That's why I opt for a cheap cable.
sunauto
post Apr 26 2007, 11:18 AM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



As far as I know, Wireworld, QED and Audioquest HDMI cables are certified to carry 1080P signals. I'm not sure whether normal HDMI cables will be able to carry such signals without any signals degraded.

QUOTE(Jack28HT @ Apr 26 2007, 02:02 AM)
Here is something regarding HDMI cables. It doesn't seem to be as simple as 0 or 1 only because it carries differential signals in cable pairs. Anyone got a chance verify it for 1080P signal ?

HDMI Part 8 - Cables for 1.3
*
Ngto
post Apr 26 2007, 11:18 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(sunauto @ Apr 25 2007, 09:43 PM)
It depends on how you view such cables, to me, whether the signal is analog or digital, a good cable will always give you good results, it's not a marketing gimmick as you claimed even though, you'll say it is madness to spend thousands on a good cable. If you're talking about HDMI cable, try bringing yours to CMY Sungei Wang and try their QED HDMI-P cable for a start, that's around RM450 (can still nego lah), try to compare the quality on their plasma. They're willing to demo it to you. That day I was asking them about their Siltech SPX-20 (around RM900) and QED Conduit (around RM400 plus) power cords, they played Eagle's Hotel California song and tested these two cables and also the stock power cord that came with the Cambridge Audio's cd player. The openess, mids and highs can be immediately felt on the pricier Siltech power cord, QED did improve on the sound but not as much as the latter. I do believe that good cables can give an extra boost to the picture and sound quality but some may argue that with the money, you can either get a better display or player. Well, that's up to you to judge actually.
*
I am not sure about those cables you mentioned, but aren't those power chords you are talking about? Are they even related to HDMI? Power cords have a direct relation to the receiver electrical power itself and not related to HDMI data digital connection to DVD player smile.gif


Added on April 26, 2007, 11:24 am
QUOTE(sunauto @ Apr 26 2007, 11:18 AM)
As far as I know, Wireworld, QED and Audioquest HDMI cables are certified to carry 1080P signals. I'm not sure whether normal HDMI cables will be able to carry such signals without any signals degraded.
*
Even if cheap 'normal' HDMI cables are unable to carry 1080 signals (based on ver 1-2 HDMI specs) which is unlikely, there will just be a loss of signal, that's all. Probably a blank screen with a 'No Signal' indicator. You won't get a more blurry image or a dull image etc. That's what I have been trying to say about HDMI cables all this while.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Apr 26 2007, 11:31 AM
ken3011
post Oct 28 2007, 01:25 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
317 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: Malaysia Ipoh



although it is digital but if the shield protection not enuf good it also will interrence with other.. so if more expensive 1 the 1 0 1 0 wit sent smoothly
timothyy
post Oct 28 2007, 05:54 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(ken3011 @ Oct 28 2007, 01:25 PM)
although it is digital but if the shield protection not enuf good it also will interrence with other.. so if more expensive 1 the 1 0 1 0 wit sent smoothly
*
Elo... where got such thing one?
If got interference... meaning you lose your picture.
Ever see those pirate VCD? Those checkers thing? Those are when your signals not smooth. But you won't get noise distort or what.

Or for layman... you are supposed to see Jessica Alba's face but end up, you see Badawi come out. Coz its totally different signal come out.
lamusiqa
post Oct 29 2007, 04:41 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
397 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
You guys should just get HDMI cables from Play-Asia.

http://www.play-asia.com/paOS-13-71-2q-77-...mi-70-1z5x.html

This deluxe cable is just RM27 and its 3 metres long. Free shipping to Malaysia too. All of my stuff from Play-Asia came after 5-8 days. Quality-wise, a lot of people who bought it loves it. 1080p max and no signal loss.


Leolabs
post Oct 29 2007, 10:15 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
600 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Bukit Mertajam,Penang State


From technical point of view,cheap and expensive cables do have the differences,no matter it's for digital or analog.

Cables are consist of resistance,capacitance and inductance which will 'influence' any signal pass through them.Depends on what type/speed of the signal,difference may be significant or not so.

And don't forget shielding capability of the cables too.
timothyy
post Oct 29 2007, 06:29 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(Leolabs @ Oct 29 2007, 10:15 AM)
From technical point of view,cheap and expensive cables do have the differences,no matter it's for digital or analog.

Cables are consist of resistance,capacitance and inductance which will 'influence' any signal pass through them.Depends on what type/speed of the signal,difference may be significant or not so.

And don't forget shielding capability of the cables too.
*
Correct if if I am wrong. And in terms of technicality, I am quite noob.
But what do you mean by
"From technical point of view,cheap and expensive cables do have the differences,no matter it's for digital or analog.?

A conductor is a conductor. And in terms of digital... a 1010 is a 1010 or no signal at all.
So, if a digital signal is bad coz by "influence", it should either have signal or no signal.

So, in your explaination... technically, how can cheap or expensive cables "influence" the performance?

Please advise. laugh.gif laugh.gif
Ngto
post Oct 29 2007, 07:01 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(Leolabs @ Oct 29 2007, 10:15 AM)
From technical point of view,cheap and expensive cables do have the differences,no matter it's for digital or analog.

Cables are consist of resistance,capacitance and inductance which will 'influence' any signal pass through them.Depends on what type/speed of the signal,difference may be significant or not so.

And don't forget shielding capability of the cables too.
*
Here's my take on this issue.

Although quality of cables might affect the signal, but as far as Digital is concerned it's all or nothing. Even if a signal is poor but as long as it is carried through intact it will be the same as using quality cables.

A strong signal carrying a digital 10001 will be exactly the same as a weak signal carrying 10001. That's because the 10001 itself is the info, not the strength of it.

If the signal is so weak as to produce errors then the Digital info will be corrupted. If the built-in error correction can't recover the error you will get a No Signal error or something similar.

There won't be a halfway, like a blurry pic or a less colourful pic. In digital world it's all or nothing.

For Analog it's different. The quality of the image itself is dependent on the signal. So the better the quality of the signal the better the image.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Oct 29 2007, 07:09 PM
sunauto
post Oct 29 2007, 07:57 PM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



Well, you should do less worrying about the quality of the HDMI cable, rule of the thumb, the cable should be around 5% to 10% the amount of your hardware so if you're using for example, a Denon 3930 dvd player, your HDMI cable should around RM190 to RM380 price range but if you're using a Cap Ayam dvd player from Tesco costing RM99, don't bother getting a Monster Cable HDMI cable as you won't see any difference at all.
schizophrenic
post Oct 29 2007, 11:24 PM

Tribute to Tun Mohamed Suffian Hashim (1917-2000)
******
Senior Member
1,645 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: London

QUOTE(sunauto @ Oct 29 2007, 07:57 PM)
Well, you should do less worrying about the quality of the HDMI cable, rule of the thumb, the cable should be around 5% to 10% the amount of your hardware so if you're using for example, a Denon 3930 dvd player, your HDMI cable should around RM190 to RM380 price range but if you're using a Cap Ayam dvd player from Tesco costing RM99, don't bother getting a Monster Cable HDMI cable as you won't see any difference at all.
*
LOL I should be looking for a hdmi cable worth Rm40-50 then.


Leolabs
post Oct 30 2007, 11:22 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
600 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Bukit Mertajam,Penang State


Digital signals are not just 1001101,but also consist of various clocks/timings/pulse with lengths,don't you guys agree????
TSpiscesguy
post Oct 30 2007, 02:42 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
until now I m still not sure....haha.
Leolabs
post Oct 31 2007, 09:45 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
600 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Bukit Mertajam,Penang State


My point is there will be differences between cheap and expensive cables,no matter they are for digital or analog.

The main point is whether the differences are SIGNIFICANT or so MINOR,which can be considered as NELIGIBLE.

Cuz there is no such thing as 'NO DIFFERENT' when a signal pass through a cable,but just 'BIG DIFFERENT' or 'SO SMALL DIFFERENT'.

Ngto
post Oct 31 2007, 10:25 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(Leolabs @ Oct 31 2007, 09:45 AM)
My point is there will be differences between cheap and expensive cables,no matter they are for digital or analog.

The main point is whether the differences are SIGNIFICANT or so MINOR,which can be considered as NELIGIBLE.

Cuz there is no such thing as 'NO DIFFERENT' when a signal pass through a cable,but just 'BIG DIFFERENT' or 'SO SMALL DIFFERENT'.
*
No one is doubing there is a difference in quality of signal using different cables.

But Like I have mentioned so many times, in Digital data the quality of the signal (or lack of it) won't cause a dimmer picture or a blurry pic etc. It will just cause a complete corruption of data resulting in errors.

Do you know that each pixel is represented by a series of 10001....etc. If the poor quality of cable causes just one bit to be interpreted as a 0 instead of 1 it will mean a completely different thing than the original. Example let's say 100001 is wronlgy interpreted as 000001. It will become nonsense data, nothing related to the original data.

If , assuming there is no error correction for the sake of argument, then the screen will probably just be filled with random coloured pixels or square blocks that has nothing to do with the original picture in the first place. There won't be a halfway.

So coming back to digital data, if a poor quality cable can still interprete 10001 as 10001 without errors, then the data will be exactly the same as a Super Duper cable which also interpretes 10001 as 10001.

So the rule of digital data is, even if different quality cables result in diff signal strength, the 10001 carried by a weak cable is still the same 10001 carried by a strong cable (provided there is no error).

This post has been edited by Ngto: Oct 31 2007, 10:43 AM
mavric
post Oct 31 2007, 06:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
104 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


ah cable discussion! i like....

i posted this question at another thread..maybe here would be more appropriate.

those free hdmi cables that comes together when we purchase dvd player/lcd/plasma.....how good are they?

i know PQ and sound is subjective and obviously can't compare these HDMI freebies with monster cables..qed etc but just wondering how would u guys rate such freebies.

i got a free hdmi cable from sharp..it's called evo. have yet to put it to use and wondering if it's worth the extra investment to get so called 'better' HDMI cables
timothyy
post Oct 31 2007, 07:18 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(mavric @ Oct 31 2007, 06:12 PM)
ah cable discussion! i like....

i posted this question at another thread..maybe here would be more appropriate.

those free hdmi cables that comes together when we purchase dvd player/lcd/plasma.....how good are they?

i know PQ and sound is subjective and obviously can't compare these HDMI freebies with monster cables..qed etc but just wondering how would u guys rate such freebies.

i got a free hdmi cable from sharp..it's called evo. have yet to put it to use and wondering if it's worth the extra investment to get so called 'better' HDMI cables
*
You can.

Expensive digital cable is just to make money.

Strangely... why can't you guys understand the difference between digital and analogue?
doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif
Ngto
post Oct 31 2007, 09:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Ya loh. Just only explained above, and immediately the next post after mine still ask about the difference in HDMI cables ... doh.gif

This post has been edited by Ngto: Oct 31 2007, 09:15 PM
sunauto
post Nov 1 2007, 04:29 AM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



I guess this is not the proper way to compare HDMI cables because most of you feel that they're the same whether it is a Cap Ayam brand or a branded one. Certain brands like Monster Cable for example has HDMI cables with a length of 12 metres and above and it can still output 1080p signals with no problems but try using a Cap Ayam brand, you'll notice that there's nothing on the screen. There are many cheap Made In China HDMI cables costing only RM50 for a 7 metre length but what most people didn't realise is that such cables can't carry HD resolutions at this length, it works fine with 480p but not with 720p. When you manage to get one, then you'll know where branded HDMI cables will shine.

Next, if you know, uncompressed audio is transmitted via HDMI and we're talking about a very large bandwidth involved here so that the signal strength must be strong and stable, the resistance in the cable must be kept to a minimum. No two HDMI cables carry the same bandwidth as they're made with different materials and if you're using them merely for an upscaling dvd player or video game consoles, you won't notice any difference until you're passing uncompressed audio to those next-gen amps which are already out in the market now.

Most people think that as long as it's digital, it doesn't matter that much but for the trained ears, you can detect the difference. It's true even for coaxial and optical cables too, better ones do make a difference but if you're having a budget setup, then it's not feasible to get expensive cables as a poor source won't do any good even if you have high quality cables. Lets not argue about this, just suit your pocket, if you feel that it's not worth dumping extra $$$ on cables, then lets just move on.
wKkaY
post Nov 1 2007, 07:54 AM

misutā supākoru
Group Icon
VIP
6,008 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Good idea. There's no point arguing with audiophile lunatics, especailly those who think that a RM900 1 meter power cord can perceivably influence a player's sound (notwithstanding that electricity is supplied with gimmick-free cabling from the nearest neighborhood TNB station kilometers away!).

Anyway, my take in this is that if a cheap cable works out for you, keep using it. The risk with buying a cheap cable is that you may have to buy a second cable if it turns out that it doesn't work (and thus spend more) or when your requirements increase. It has happened to me before when the 5m cable for hooking my DVI-D monitor to the computer in the closet didn't work past 800x600.
Leolabs
post Nov 1 2007, 09:44 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
600 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Bukit Mertajam,Penang State


You got a good point here,sunauto. biggrin.gif
Ngto
post Nov 1 2007, 09:59 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(sunauto @ Nov 1 2007, 04:29 AM)
I guess this is not the proper way to compare HDMI cables because most of you feel that they're the same whether it is a Cap Ayam brand or a branded one. Certain brands like Monster Cable for example has HDMI cables with a length of 12 metres and above and it can still output 1080p signals with no problems but try using a Cap Ayam brand, you'll notice that there's nothing on the screen. There are many cheap Made In China HDMI cables costing only RM50 for a 7 metre length but what most people didn't realise is that such cables can't carry HD resolutions at this length, it works fine with 480p but not with 720p. When you manage to get one, then you'll know where branded HDMI cables will shine.

Next, if you know, uncompressed audio is transmitted via HDMI and we're talking about a very large bandwidth involved here so that the signal strength must be strong and stable, the resistance in the cable must be kept to a minimum. No two HDMI cables carry the same bandwidth as they're made with different materials and if you're using them merely for an upscaling dvd player or video game consoles, you won't notice any difference until you're passing uncompressed audio to those next-gen amps which are already out in the market now.

Most people think that as long as it's digital, it doesn't matter that much but for the trained ears, you can detect the difference. It's true even for coaxial and optical cables too, better ones do make a difference but if you're having a budget setup, then it's not feasible to get expensive cables as a poor source won't do any good even if you have high quality cables. Lets not argue about this, just suit your pocket, if you feel that it's not worth dumping extra $$$ on cables, then lets just move on.
*
But we weren't talking about extreme length of cables. smile.gif

You have just reinforced what I have been saying. If the HDMI cable is too long you just don't get a signal that's all. There's no in between like a blur pic or a dull pic.

Most cap ayam brand even up to 5 meters can carry a signal without problem. So whether Cap Ayam or Expensive Cables there's no diffference.

As for Optical and Coaxial, I don't want to comment there because both are using different technologies. The peculiarities of the implementation of the signals and the conversion of the signals to analog might give rise to some differences. smile.gif


Added on November 1, 2007, 10:11 am
QUOTE(wKkaY @ Nov 1 2007, 07:54 AM)
Good idea. There's no point arguing with audiophile lunatics, especailly those who think that a RM900 1 meter power cord can perceivably influence a player's sound (notwithstanding that electricity is supplied with gimmick-free cabling from the nearest neighborhood TNB station kilometers away!).

Anyway, my take in this is that if a cheap cable works out for you, keep using it. The risk with buying a cheap cable is that you may have to buy a second cable if it turns out that it doesn't work (and thus spend more) or when your requirements increase. It has happened to me before when the 5m cable for hooking my DVI-D monitor to the computer in the closet didn't work past 800x600.
*
Power chords has nothing to do with what we were discussing. We were discussing digital HDMI signals on different quality cables. smile.gif

If I buy a cheap RM30/- HDMI cable and it loses signal after 1 year, I just buy another one.

I still save tons of money rather than buying an expensive one which does the same thing smile.gif

Cheap HDMI cables = If it works, it works. No difference with Super Duper Cable.

Cheap HDMI cables = If it doesn't work, just loss of signal that's all (Image won't dim or blur). Buy a better one. Still cheaper than buy an expensive one.

smile.gif Peace, Just friendly discussion.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Nov 1 2007, 10:14 AM
Drian
post Nov 1 2007, 10:50 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,999 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


Question:- where can I get cheap cap ayam dvi to hdmi cable? approx 3m will do.

Ngto
post Nov 1 2007, 11:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(Drian @ Nov 1 2007, 10:50 AM)
Question:- where can I get cheap cap ayam dvi to hdmi cable? approx 3m will do.
*
Try the computer shops like All IT Hypermart. They might have. But not too sure they are cap Ayam or not.

It's easier to find Cap Ayam HDMI Cable nowadays, but for DVI-HDMI converter cable not as common, so don't know much about Cap Ayam.


This post has been edited by Ngto: Nov 1 2007, 11:09 AM
Endless9930
post Nov 1 2007, 03:28 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
757 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


How about explanation like this ??

Expensive Cable: Got image
Cheap Cable: No image or got image

After few years

Expensive Cable: Still got image
Cheap Cable: Might be no image output

HAHAHAHa
Ngto
post Nov 1 2007, 08:49 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Haha not that bad lah. biggrin.gif . Only if really extremely bad quality, or very long length, then no image.

If you are buying just 2 meter length cap ayam cable it shouldn't have any problem at all. Maybe can even last longer than your TV. Just don't damage the cable especially the connection ends that's all. If you buy longer than 3m then better get better quality ones.

Don't worry, even if no image after few years can buy another cheap one. By that time even very expensive ones already become cheap. So save a lot of money in long run. Price difference now between cheap cable and very expensive cable can be >5 times the price.

Most important is both Cheap and Expensive cable also give the same image quality.

htkaki
post Nov 2 2007, 04:38 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



The cost of the HDMI cable must be justifiable to your system setup. no point buying hi-end HDMI which cost near to a thousand when you are just using HTiB system costing RM2-3K or so connected to a 32".

In this case, a normal or mid-range HDMI will do the job.
sunauto
post Nov 2 2007, 11:29 PM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang





I just believe a high grade cable will give the best picture quality when partnered with the right equipment. I have done A-B comparisons before so there's a difference in picture quality, it's not about whether the picture appears or not, you have to look closely, the finer details in the background, the noise, colour saturation, blah, blah, blah. Of course, if your HT setup is in the budget range, most likely these cables won't do much difference to your HT setup and you might be cursing non-stop that these cables don't work at all. A high grade cable will be made with the best materials and some with silver plating, 24K gold plated connectors.

Even for power cords, they're neither analogue or digital but a better power cord will make a difference. To convince yourself that they do make a difference, try going to CMY Sungei Way (the other outlet on the top floor), find this guy, Richard. You can make an A to B comparison with their QED, Siltech or Richard Gray power cords, QED HDMI cables, bring your own software and test it on their HT setup, you'll be amazed wit what you're hearing and seeing. Of course, you can go to A&L Sungei Wang as well to try out their Audioquest stuff. Well, even my old Supra power cords connected to my pc gaming rig, made a difference in the picture and sound quality. It's not necessary that such cables are expensive as there are some which are value for money and rated editor's choice too.

Since talking about cables can also turn into a heated argument. sweat.gif Well, I rest my case here. It's your money, it's your call but I believe what's best for myself. For me I wouldn't want to mess up my HT setup which I've spent a fortune on, I wouldn't want a few 'Cap Ayam' cables to hold it back.
Ngto
post Nov 3 2007, 02:38 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Not really heated argument, don't take it the wrong way smile.gif . Just that some of us are expressing different opinions that's all.

When testing it need to be done on same display using same player and same input. That's because different inputs can have different memory settings. One can even adjust one HDMI input to make cap ayam look better than an Expensive cable on another HDMI input on the same panel. You never know the tricks used.

The best is to ask someone to randomly connect the player to the same HDMI input using the Cap Ayam and the Expensive cable while your back is turned. Do it 5 to 10 times randomly without the person telling you which cable he is using. HE then notes down the sequence and you also notes down what your guess is.

Then compare whether you have got it 100% correct. If you have mixed results then all I can say is it's all in your mind smile.gif

I also realised I have dwelled to much on this topic. So I guess I have said all I have to say. Just realised that some people here might be selling these expensive cables, so don't want to affect their ricebowl with my comments smile.gif

This post has been edited by Ngto: Nov 3 2007, 02:40 AM
mavric
post Nov 3 2007, 02:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
104 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


i know a richard in CMY Pyramid. Not sure if it's the same guy you are referring to. Maybe transferred there or whatever....
sunauto
post Nov 3 2007, 11:13 AM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



QUOTE(Ngto @ Nov 3 2007, 02:38 AM)
Not really heated argument, don't take it the wrong way  smile.gif . Just that some of us are expressing different opinions that's all.

When testing it need to be done on same display using same player and same input. That's because different inputs can have different memory settings. One can even adjust one HDMI input to make cap ayam look better than an Expensive cable on another HDMI input on the same panel. You never know the tricks used.

The best is to ask someone to randomly connect the player to the same HDMI input using  the Cap Ayam and the Expensive cable while your back is turned. Do it 5 to 10 times randomly without the person telling you which cable he is using. HE then notes down the sequence and you also notes down what your guess is.

Then compare whether you have got it 100% correct. If you have mixed results then all I can say is it's all in your mind smile.gif

I also realised I have  dwelled to much on this topic. So I guess I have said all I have to say. Just realised that some people here might be selling these expensive cables, so don't want to affect their  ricebowl with my comments  smile.gif
*
I will say get cables from reputable brands than getting those unknown brands costing thousands and not a single review in the magazines. There are those so called branded cables, imported from Sweden lah, Germany lah, blah, blah, blah .... they dun even have a website but some shops will tell you, they're better than Monster Cable, VDH, IXOS, Wireworld, Cardas, etc. Most Hi-Fi shops think we're waterfish by pushing unknown brands to us, have went to a few Hi-Fi shops in KL, some of them tried to push these rubbish to me. They didn't know I won't fall for their tricks. wink.gif

Cap Ayam cables also got good quality ones but you need to test it on the spot to see if it lives up to your expectation, not all Cap Ayam cables are bad but I'm saying the majority ones in the market are bad so it leaves a very bad impression when we mention about Cap Ayam ones. I noticed, we'll have less problems with Cap Ayam audio cables, digital cables and analogue video cables (i.e. s-video, component video) than HDMI or DVI cables. My friend bought a HDMI cable at a very cheap price from Japan Pasar, RM25 for 3 metres and you'll be surprised to know, it can't do 1080i / 1080p, the screen will go blank but it's okay if played at 720p resolution and below. The shop refused to replace or refund back his money saying that they don't guarantee such cables to work at high resolution. vmad.gif Very dishonest I must say.

Ngto is right, whatever cables we wanna buy, definitely must test kaw kaw before buying, no point buying something that doesn't improve even a little bit in the picture or sound quality department. I usually bring my own softwares to test and I'll inspect everything as well, I'll make sure that they're actually using the cable I want to test, some Hi-Fi shops have a bypass switch hidden somewhere. Unsuspecting buyers will kena for sure especially when they're testing a pair of small speakers, they have a subwoofer hidden nearby which is actually connected to the amp so people might think that wow, such small speakers can produce such good bass, imagine go home and test, the sound even worst than a pair of Altec Lansing. doh.gif

If not, some Hi-Fi shops use all those high end cables in their audio room so even if you buy a budget range Hi-Fi setup, chances are you won't be listening to the same sound quality when you listen them at home. Don't forget such places even have a power conditioner that cost thousands. With all these goodies, anything dull sounding, will sound slightly better.


QUOTE(mavric @ Nov 3 2007, 02:40 AM)
i know a richard in CMY Pyramid. Not sure if it's the same guy you are referring to. Maybe transferred there or whatever....
*
It's possible, it's the same guy that I'm talking about as the previous time I went to Sungei Way, I didn't see him there, only a girl and another man. I thought he was on leave that day. laugh.gif

You can ask him to test anything you want, he's a very nice guy and he told me that it's okay if I dun buy anything from him, most importantly I'm satisfied with the sound, if not, what's the point of buying. Very sporting, eh? wink.gif
mavric
post Nov 3 2007, 11:31 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
104 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


wah this richard has been based in pyramid for like around 2 years la.....hmm.when was the last time u went to sungei way first? tongue.gif

abt testing the cables...i'm more into movies than music and since hdmi is the best we can get for video...a lot of shops i went to are trying to push their HDMI cable to me. but they said cannot open up and test the cable. and i'm not gonna be taken for a ride and believe everything they say abt their cables, so it's a catch 22 situation
Ngto
post Nov 3 2007, 02:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
I agree with Sunauto that a RM25/- HDMI cable is really pushing it too far. I am not surprised that it has no signal for anything above 720P.

On the topic of HDMI ver 1.3 1080P, I myself wouldn't go for anything below RM100/- for a 2meter length cable. The Specs for V1.3 itself require better quality cables to carry the signal through.

I figure very soon we will see cables labeled as HDMI 1.3 compliant if not already so.
timothyy
post Nov 3 2007, 05:01 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
Got signal... got picture... no signal. no picture.
So, our so called theory is still correct.

Cheap or expensive... it will not affect the quality of the picture. That's all.
But yeah... cheap quality cable might just fail you. MIGHT!
Ngto
post Nov 3 2007, 08:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
In short the LCD TV doesn't care what quality the HDMI cable is as long as it is good enough to carry all the data intact without errors.

Just like installing Windows XP using a low quality pirated disc and an original high quality disc. As long as the low quality pirated disc is error free you still get the same Windows XP. If the disc is really bad you just get a corrupted computer that hang that's all.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Nov 3 2007, 08:41 PM
sunauto
post Nov 4 2007, 03:38 AM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



QUOTE(Ngto @ Nov 3 2007, 08:40 PM)
In short the LCD TV doesn't care what quality the HDMI cable is as long as it is good enough to carry all  the data intact without errors.

Just like installing Windows XP using a low quality pirated disc and an original high quality disc. As long as the low quality pirated disc is error free you still get the same Windows XP. If the disc is really bad you just get a corrupted computer that hang that's all.
*
If the Windows XP is an audio cd or if the multimedia contents are streamed off the disc, there will be a difference if it's pirated. I never buy pirated audio cds because of this but for movies, I got no choice lah, not all movies are released here locally.

Well, some people feels that spending money on cables are a waste of money but they can afford to buy a LCD / Plasma costing a few months of their salary. It's the same like some people that I know, can afford to buy a BMW but using cheapo Sime tyres. Their argument, the car can move enough lah. doh.gif
BeastX
post Nov 4 2007, 07:01 AM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


Digital is digital...1 and 0 of info... HDMI is essentially SL-DVI ... there is no distinction whether the 1 and 0 travels through gold/sliver/platinum or even plain copper/tin/graphite... No HDMI cable should cost more than an ordinary SL-DVI cable.

A more accurate comparison would be... The same coke from the supermarket or served at a high class restaurant at 10x the price... same liquid in tummy but with a less money in the pocket.

This post has been edited by BeastX: Nov 4 2007, 07:28 AM
Ngto
post Nov 4 2007, 12:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(sunauto @ Nov 4 2007, 03:38 AM)
If the Windows XP is an audio cd or if the multimedia contents are streamed off the disc, there will be a difference if it's pirated. I never buy pirated audio cds because of this but for movies, I got no choice lah, not all movies are released here locally.

Well, some people feels that spending money on cables are a waste of money but they can afford to buy a LCD / Plasma costing a few months of their salary. It's the same like some people that I know, can afford to buy a BMW but using cheapo Sime tyres. Their argument, the car can move enough lah. doh.gif
*
Let me clarify if you don't mind smile.gif

I was merely using WinXP example to illustrate how digital data arrives intact over different quality medium.

You example of Pirated disc contents (Audio CD/Movies) , is not related to our subject of discussion. That deals with the quality of the source data itself. We were discussing about the medium over which the data is transferrred i.e the HDMI cable.

You example of Audio CD is also interesting. We have been saying all along that Analog is different from digital (Unless you were referring to digital Audio.)

Your use of Cheap Sime tyres as an example is also interesting.

Let me ask you a question if you don't mind smile.gif If the cheap Sime tyres can perform exactly like a RM10,000/- set of tyres (EXACTLY in every way, not just "the car can move enough lah") , would you still buy the RM10,000/- tyres?

Hehe, I have a feeling you would still say yes. smile.gif

This post has been edited by Ngto: Nov 4 2007, 04:22 PM
timothyy
post Nov 6 2007, 08:57 AM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(BeastX @ Nov 4 2007, 07:01 AM)
Digital is digital...1 and 0 of info... HDMI is essentially SL-DVI ... there is no distinction whether the 1 and 0 travels through gold/sliver/platinum or even plain copper/tin/graphite... No HDMI cable should cost more than an ordinary SL-DVI cable.

A more accurate comparison would be... The same coke from the supermarket or served at a high class restaurant at 10x the price... same liquid in tummy but with a less money in the pocket.
*
ya loh...
And I donno why this thread been 4 pages but still cannot conclude...
Ngto
post Nov 6 2007, 09:43 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Hehe , it's my fault also. I am really long winded, it's in my nature. biggrin.gif

I always seem to stir up people to respond. Next time I will really try not to click on this topic.

Sunauto knows I am really edgy regarding certain unresolved matters (not with him smile.gif ), so have to channel my frustrations somewhere.

This post has been edited by Ngto: Nov 6 2007, 09:46 AM
Drian
post Nov 6 2007, 10:50 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,999 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(sunauto @ Nov 4 2007, 03:38 AM)
If the Windows XP is an audio cd or if the multimedia contents are streamed off the disc, there will be a difference if it's pirated. I never buy pirated audio cds because of this but for movies, I got no choice lah, not all movies are released here locally.

Well, some people feels that spending money on cables are a waste of money but they can afford to buy a LCD / Plasma costing a few months of their salary. It's the same like some people that I know, can afford to buy a BMW but using cheapo Sime tyres. Their argument, the car can move enough lah. doh.gif
*
Pirated audio cd comes from mp3. If you take an original music cd , rip it off from a good cd writer digitally to wave format and then manufacture it again,it will sound the same.



This post has been edited by Drian: Nov 6 2007, 10:51 AM
timothyy
post Nov 6 2007, 06:34 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(Drian @ Nov 6 2007, 10:50 AM)
Pirated audio cd comes from mp3.  If you take an original music cd , rip it off from a good cd writer digitally to wave format and then manufacture it again,it will sound the same.
*
And that has anythng to do with HDMI cable? whistling.gif whistling.gif whistling.gif
xetajones
post Nov 11 2007, 09:22 PM

Connecting Brains
****
Senior Member
586 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: under MPSJ



QUOTE(htkaki @ Nov 2 2007, 04:38 PM)
The cost of the HDMI cable must be justifiable to your system setup. no point buying hi-end HDMI which cost near to a thousand when you are just using HTiB system costing RM2-3K or so connected to a 32".

In this case, a normal or mid-range HDMI will do the job.
*
Yeap thats the right thing to look for. Buy something according to the price of the item you are connecting too. HDMI cable is just a cable and is it worth that hundreds and thousands for the extra 10% it is really up to own perceive of value. smile.gif
TSpiscesguy
post Jan 7 2008, 08:47 AM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
Anybody heard about Rogers HDMI cable? Desa is selling for more than 200 bucks ! shocking.gif
SUSMatrix
post Jan 7 2008, 08:55 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(Ngto @ Nov 1 2007, 08:49 PM)
Haha not that bad lah. biggrin.gif . Only if really extremely bad quality, or very long length, then no image.

If you are buying just 2 meter length cap ayam cable it shouldn't have any problem at all. Maybe can even last longer than your TV. Just don't damage the cable especially the connection ends that's all.  If you buy longer than 3m then better get better quality ones.

Don't worry, even if no image after few years can buy another cheap one. By that time even very expensive ones already become cheap. So save a lot of money in long run. Price difference now between cheap cable and very expensive cable can be >5 times the price.

Most important is both Cheap and Expensive cable also give the same image quality.
*
I agreed. After all, this is digital cable,not analog,it's just zero's and one's, should be same image quality. Like those free HDMI cable that comes with HDMI DVD players...sure all cheap cables.

2 years down the road, the cables will be much cheaper, no need to worry.

If somebody do a blind test with a cheap and expensive HDMI cable on the exact same system....i doubt anyone here can tell the difference..

This post has been edited by Matrix: Jan 7 2008, 08:57 AM
iman_210
post Jan 7 2008, 09:10 AM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(piscesguy @ Jan 7 2008, 08:47 AM)
Anybody heard about Rogers HDMI cable? Desa is selling for more than 200 bucks ! shocking.gif
*
wow that much yeah?
yfyap69
post Jan 7 2008, 05:38 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
852 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Penang


QUOTE(piscesguy @ Jan 7 2008, 08:47 AM)
Anybody heard about Rogers HDMI cable? Desa is selling for more than 200 bucks ! shocking.gif
*
I'm using Roger. They offered it to me for RM200 when I bought the LCD from them together with a HDMI DVD player.

mADmAN
post Jan 7 2008, 05:41 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,530 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley


QUOTE(piscesguy @ Jan 7 2008, 08:47 AM)
Anybody heard about Rogers HDMI cable? Desa is selling for more than 200 bucks ! shocking.gif
*
yeah im using 1 now ( v1.3 )

roughly the same offer i got as yfyap69 when i bought my 42" plasma and DivX DVD Player... (also bought a power conditioner for around same price moneyflies.gif )
yfyap69
post Jan 7 2008, 06:22 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
852 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Penang


QUOTE(mADmAN @ Jan 7 2008, 05:41 PM)
yeah im using 1 now ( v1.3 )

roughly the same offer i got as yfyap69 when i bought my 42" plasma and DivX DVD Player... (also bought a power conditioner for around same price moneyflies.gif )
*
Comparing to the other cable I have (RM80 from Tye Huat) I don't see any difference. Maybe my eye and ear not sharp enough to differentiate
mADmAN
post Jan 7 2008, 06:27 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,530 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley


dunno about that la...im not that good at differentiating image quality between cables... sound can la..image cannot tongue.gif

but i can differentiate between HDMI n PC Input though.. HDMI waaaaaaaaayyy better laugh.gif
htkaki
post Jan 7 2008, 11:16 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



Panasonic HDMI cable is just as good. Actually, it is selling at premium price over here. Bought a 5M HDMI cable from online. The price is less than RM100.

Then again, I have the Pioneer complimentary HDMI cable, as well as Panasonic 1.5m gold plated HDMI cable and Audioquest 2m HDMI cable. Erm, actually I dont see much difference among three of them.
timothyy
post Jan 8 2008, 11:35 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(yfyap69 @ Jan 7 2008, 06:22 PM)
Comparing to the other cable I have (RM80 from Tye Huat) I don't see any difference. Maybe my eye and ear not sharp enough to differentiate
*
Sure no diff la. Digital cable is digital cable.




Guys... guys... unless your HDMI cable is 20m long (like mine) then the quality of the cable is important... but a mere 1.5m long... close eye also can la.

It is not because what... just that at 20m, if lousy one, the cable might not be connected properly (happened to my S Video) and then, you will waste your money.
singleguy
post Jan 13 2008, 10:54 PM

relax lah!
******
Senior Member
1,090 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malaysia~Singapore


i think maybe the difference is in long run.. maybe those expensive ones can last longer? Me also using a cheap one.. hehe
TSpiscesguy
post Jan 14 2008, 07:40 AM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(singleguy @ Jan 13 2008, 10:54 PM)
i think maybe the difference is in long run.. maybe those expensive ones can last longer? Me also using a cheap one.. hehe
*
For expensive cables, better material used therefore it should last longer..
SUSMatrix
post Jan 14 2008, 02:13 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(timothyy @ Jan 8 2008, 11:35 PM)
Sure no diff la. Digital cable is digital cable.
Guys... guys... unless your HDMI cable is 20m long (like mine) then the quality of the cable is important... but a mere 1.5m long... close eye also can la.

It is not because what... just that at 20m, if lousy one, the cable might not be connected properly (happened to my S Video) and then, you will waste your money.
*
I think this is excellent advice. Buy high quality cable only if u need long cables!

Digital is digital, there is no difference in quality unless there's a break in the cable or loss of signal over long distance.
ar188
post Jan 14 2008, 02:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
the diff is in the bandwidth capability.. if you are not maxing it out.. then should not have any issues
htkaki
post Jan 14 2008, 10:10 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(ar188 @ Jan 14 2008, 02:17 PM)
the diff is in the bandwidth capability.. if you are not maxing it out.. then should not have any issues
*

Taikor, I have this feeling that V1.3b will supercede V1.3a by mid 2008.

scotty
post Jan 15 2008, 11:50 AM

THX Certified Conman
Group Icon
Staff
4,380 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya



is the such thing as version 1.3 hdmi cable?
Ngto
post Jan 15 2008, 12:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,350 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(scotty @ Jan 15 2008, 11:50 AM)
is the such thing as version 1.3 hdmi cable?
*
For the higher 1.3 bandwidth, it needs a better quality cable to carry the signal through, that's all. If your ordinary HDMI can do the job without signal loss, then it's means the quality is good enough. If it can't then just buy a better quality one smile.gif.


JinBeng
post Apr 4 2008, 08:14 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
170 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: SP, Kedah and Penang Island


hi, may i ask if my player display HDMI error when on but when i select the LCD input to HDMI then the error will go off izit this is normal?
sunauto
post Apr 5 2008, 12:38 PM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



QUOTE(Ngto @ Jan 15 2008, 12:02 PM)
For the higher 1.3 bandwidth, it needs a better quality cable to carry the signal through, that's all. If your ordinary HDMI can do the job without signal loss, then it's means the quality is good enough. If it can't then just buy a better quality one  smile.gif.
*
For the time being, high bandwidth HDMI cables costing thousand plus from Monster Cable and other brands are not necessary, we don't need that much bandwidth actually, ordinary HDMI cables can carry 1080p signals and lossless audio codecs easily for up to 6m. Unless in the future, we have a thing called Ultra HD (1440p) with 36-bit colour space, then, there's a need for such cables. For the time being, just enjoy what we have first, there's not such thing as future proof, who knows, maybe later got HDMI v1.4 cable leh? Right?

QUOTE(JinBeng @ Apr 4 2008, 08:14 AM)
hi, may i ask if my player display HDMI error when on but when i select the LCD input to HDMI then the error will go off izit this is normal?
*
That's normal if the player failed to communicate with your LCD, it's a handshake problem. Always select the HDMI input on your LCD first then switch on your player.
JinBeng
post Apr 13 2008, 11:36 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
170 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
From: SP, Kedah and Penang Island


QUOTE(sunauto @ Apr 5 2008, 12:38 PM)
For the time being, high bandwidth HDMI cables costing thousand plus from Monster Cable and other brands are not necessary, we don't need that much bandwidth actually, ordinary HDMI cables can carry 1080p signals and lossless audio codecs easily for up to 6m. Unless in the future, we have a thing called Ultra HD (1440p) with 36-bit colour space, then, there's a need for such cables. For the time being, just enjoy what we have first, there's not such thing as future proof, who knows, maybe later got HDMI v1.4 cable leh? Right?
That's normal if the player failed to communicate with your LCD, it's a handshake problem. Always select the HDMI input on your LCD first then switch on your player.
*
Thanks for reply.
hackwire
post Apr 22 2008, 01:10 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
so what is in between cap ayam and branded HDMI?

Can we find a mid price brand HDMI at this moment?
megatron007
post Apr 22 2008, 02:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,000 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: SomeWhereNearU
http://www.play-asia.com/paOS-13-71-2q-49-en-70-1z5w.html
htkaki
post May 14 2008, 10:38 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



saw HDMI cable 5M, 12M and 1M at Aeon Bkt Tinggi. Price still slightly above LPS. THE 12M is selling at RM179.
ron4
post Jun 8 2008, 09:08 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,123 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: KL



My situation is like this, i just bought a new HDMI Dvd player (Toshiba) and it came with free hdmi cable (cheap one), when i try to play movie (Dvd9) with my lcd tv (Sony Bravia) using both 1080i and 720P, i quite disappointed with the picture quality (distortion and a bit blur).
But then i changed the cable to Composite S-Video Cable (Yellow, red, white) instead of Hdmi cable, walla the picture quality is quite good now, without distortion and more sharpness compare when using with the cheap hdmi cable. How in the hell the old generation cable like composite cable can produce better picture quality than hdmi cable. It just make no sense to me, but then i think the cause maybe from the cheap hdmi cable that came free with my dvd player.

After this i think i want to try use it with the expensive hdmi cable like monster or gold plated hdmi cable. Is it true picture quality can be better if i use the gold plated one?

This post has been edited by ron4: Jun 8 2008, 09:09 PM
kiasunkiasi
post Jun 8 2008, 09:54 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
597 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


It's damn hard to find a HDMI cable longer than 6m over here... I'm thinking of going online to source for 10~15m HDMI cable, any recommendation?
htkaki
post Jun 9 2008, 08:17 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



kiasunkiasi, pls refer to my previous post (#104) for long HDMI cable
megatron007
post Jun 9 2008, 08:20 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,000 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: SomeWhereNearU
LPS is a good choice rclxms.gif
htkaki
post Jun 9 2008, 08:28 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



I bought one from them last week. The last piece. LOL
iamsobloodysick
post Jun 9 2008, 08:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,006 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Truly Malaise
QUOTE(kiasunkiasi @ Jun 8 2008, 09:54 PM)
It's damn hard to find a HDMI cable longer than 6m over here... I'm thinking of going online to source for 10~15m HDMI cable, any recommendation?
*
HDMI cable is best within 5m.
htkaki
post Jun 9 2008, 09:01 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



Not really. It depends on the build quality. Nowadays, very rare to have signal loss for a 10M length.
hedfi
post Jun 9 2008, 09:43 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
649 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


got a Philips gold series HDMI 1.5m(RM179) and a Audioquest 2M(RM289) for PS3 and DVD player but dont see any difference, but better than my in box HDMI, so better HDMI cable does make a difference but no need for high price ones.

sunauto
post Jun 9 2008, 01:28 PM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



QUOTE(iamsobloodysick @ Jun 9 2008, 08:53 AM)
HDMI cable is best within 5m.
*
Generic brands is fine if less than 5m but if you need 20m, must be HDMI v1.3 ready, then you'll need to look at HDMI cables from Supra, Audioquest, Monster Cable, etc.
choontoy
post Jun 22 2008, 09:26 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(ron4 @ Jun 8 2008, 09:08 PM)
My situation is like this, i just bought a new HDMI Dvd player (Toshiba) and it came with free hdmi cable (cheap one), when i try to play movie (Dvd9) with my lcd tv (Sony Bravia) using both 1080i and 720P, i quite disappointed with the picture quality (distortion and a bit blur).
But then i changed the cable to Composite S-Video Cable (Yellow, red, white) instead of Hdmi cable, walla the picture quality is quite good now, without distortion and more sharpness compare when using with the cheap hdmi cable. How in the hell the old generation cable like composite cable can produce better picture quality than hdmi cable. It just make no sense to me, but then i think the cause maybe from the cheap hdmi cable that came free with my dvd player.

After this i think i want to try use it with the expensive hdmi cable like monster or gold plated hdmi cable. Is it true picture quality can be better if i use the gold plated one?
*
Bro,you need to do some adjustment on yr Sony lcd tv and Toshiba HDMI dvd player.Likewise i was tested Pioneer DV696AV HDMI Dvd player at the shop.But before this,i was previously own Pioneer DV655A and tested with Sharp lcd tv.At 1st i hook up my DV655A with component cbl then switch to progresive scan and i notice there are still noise at background of the pics which i was also dissapointed.Then later i brought the same disc(Transformer,D9) to the shop to test Pioneer DV696AV with HDMI connection with Sharp lcd tv,then i was also shock observe there are still noise at background pics.And then the shop fellow did some adjustment on DV696AV setting,then WOW!!.The pics quality are really superb,even also with component connection but i notice that with component cbl hook up are more brighter and HDMI connection are darker which we're totally different between analog and digital connection.My suggestion is you may need to adjust both to get best pics quality.Hope this will help you.
kianwee
post Jun 22 2008, 10:42 PM

Cube
*******
Senior Member
6,562 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(choontoy @ Jun 22 2008, 09:26 PM)
Bro,you need to do some adjustment on yr Sony lcd tv and Toshiba HDMI dvd player.Likewise i was tested Pioneer DV696AV HDMI Dvd player at the shop.But before this,i was previously own Pioneer DV655A and tested with Sharp lcd tv.At 1st i hook up my DV655A with component cbl then switch to progresive scan and i notice there are still noise at background of the pics which i was also dissapointed.Then later i brought the same disc(Transformer,D9) to the shop to test Pioneer DV696AV with HDMI connection with Sharp lcd tv,then i was also shock observe there are still noise at background pics.And then the shop fellow did some adjustment on DV696AV setting,then WOW!!.The pics quality are really superb,even also with component connection but i notice that with component cbl hook up are more brighter and HDMI connection are darker which we're totally different between analog and digital connection.My suggestion is you may need to adjust both to get best pics quality.Hope this will help you.
*
What an unfortunate name you have, if your nick is your actual name.
megatron007
post Jun 23 2008, 08:37 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,000 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
From: SomeWhereNearU
QUOTE(choontoy @ Jun 22 2008, 09:26 PM)
Bro,you need to do some adjustment on yr Sony lcd tv and Toshiba HDMI dvd player.Likewise i was tested Pioneer DV696AV HDMI Dvd player at the shop.But before this,i was previously own Pioneer DV655A and tested with Sharp lcd tv.At 1st i hook up my DV655A with component cbl then switch to progresive scan and i notice there are still noise at background of the pics which i was also dissapointed.Then later i brought the same disc(Transformer,D9) to the shop to test Pioneer DV696AV with HDMI connection with Sharp lcd tv,then i was also shock observe there are still noise at background pics.And then the shop fellow did some adjustment on DV696AV setting,then WOW!!.The pics quality are really superb,even also with component connection but i notice that with component cbl hook up are more brighter and HDMI connection are darker which we're totally different between analog and digital connection.My suggestion is you may need to adjust both to get best pics quality.Hope this will help you.
*
Wow...trasnformer D9 disc at demo? mean not original & those "self made/compress" movie to compare ?

Good luck notworthy.gif
sunauto
post Jun 23 2008, 11:32 PM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



It's best to use an original disc to test when going for a demo unless you wanna test whether the Pioneer can play pasar malam dvds.
crosswidecr
post Aug 19 2008, 03:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(Ngto @ Apr 22 2007, 08:54 PM)
You just wasted a fortune on your previous expensive Philips and your current RM180/- purchase.

Just buy a 1.5m RM99/- cable at Lowyat and it will be 100% the same picture quality as whatever expensive HDMI cable because unlike analog signal, digital signal does not depend on signal strength. It's either you get a signal or you don't.

It's just like someone flash a S.O.S signal at you with a torchlight. As long as you can see the signal whether weak or strong you will still interprete the same message.
*
Hi there,

Just needed some advice, just purchased a BENQ 512st projector for movie viewing for my hse. This projector comes with a HDMI output and the length of cable required to attched my dvd player is approx 12m. Can u suggest me something cheap and good and where can i purchase. And does the lenght of cable matters when you want to get a good output as well the quality of the cable. Pls advice thx.

Rey
DigitalTech
post Aug 19 2008, 05:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



All I can say is that, expensive branded cables are better than cap ayam brand. It depends whether you appreciate PQ or not. If you don't then cap ayam will do.

rx330
post Aug 19 2008, 05:18 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,809 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
to me digital cable still same, no difference
but like the one u selling, s video monster, tat one ibelip got diffence over cap ayam s video
aiman04
post Aug 19 2008, 05:23 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


I think we talked about this millionth time already. laugh.gif

For HDMI, it's digital, each cable should be the same. Maybe look for material/built quality to last longer.

For analogue signals (composite, s-video, speaker cables), cable plays big role. This one don't get cap ayam one. It will affect you PQ/AQ.
rx330
post Aug 19 2008, 05:24 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,809 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
my speaker cable also cap ayam one biggrin.gif bought in hardware shop tongue.gif
ALPS2008
post Aug 19 2008, 05:24 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(rx330 @ Aug 19 2008, 05:18 PM)
to me digital cable still same, no difference
but like the one u selling, s video monster, tat one ibelip got diffence over cap ayam s video
*
How about the one Digitaltech sales one - HDMI cable??? hmm.gif hmm.gif

Good or not......if that one directly connect to AVR....will the sound better than digital cable (eg. Coaxial or optical)
and later from AVR to TV

Still not decide yet...dunno want to order or not.....cost ..a bit high end HDMI cable hmm.gif hmm.gif hmm.gif
rx330
post Aug 19 2008, 05:27 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,809 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
well, if ur player has hdmi, use hdmi lor, one cable will do, save the hassle, no need additional optical/coaxial cable
ALPS2008
post Aug 19 2008, 08:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(rx330 @ Aug 19 2008, 05:27 PM)
well, if ur player has hdmi, use hdmi lor, one cable will do, save the hassle, no need additional optical/coaxial cable
*
I have one cable already...but now the HDMI cable connect directly to TV and DVD player now connect using coaxial to AVR.

If using HDMI to AVR, then I need another one la......one to AVR and one out from AVR to TV...

Thinking want to invest or not..if no sound different.....

Remember this is just DVD only......the best DVD I can get is just 6.1 channel which DTS ES

flex.gif flex.gif flex.gif


arremie
post Aug 19 2008, 08:36 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Simplicity...the reason I'm so lazy to compare coaxial and hdmi. Hdmi to amp then hdmi to TV...abis cerita.
callmevil
post Aug 19 2008, 10:30 PM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(arremie @ Aug 19 2008, 08:36 PM)
Simplicity...the reason I'm so lazy to compare coaxial and hdmi. Hdmi to amp then hdmi to TV...abis cerita.
*
rclxms.gif support this~ digital all the way.. if only my speakers have hdmi in.. then no more hassle of getting out-of-this world priced analogue wires for them.. id rather pay for speakers with built in soundcard+hdmi ins than wires....
TSpiscesguy
post Aug 19 2008, 10:42 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Aug 19 2008, 08:02 PM)
I have one cable already...but now the HDMI cable connect directly to TV and DVD player now connect using coaxial to AVR.

If using HDMI to AVR, then I need another one la......one to AVR and one out from AVR to TV...

Thinking want to invest or not..if no sound different.....

Remember this is just DVD only......the best DVD I can get is just 6.1 channel which DTS ES

flex.gif  flex.gif  flex.gif
*
For dvd, u can also get 7.1 channel sound..using DTS-ES or DD Ex using coaxial.

But that is using the AVR decoder to expand the back surround sound... wink.gif



This post has been edited by piscesguy: Aug 19 2008, 10:46 PM
rx330
post Aug 20 2008, 12:30 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,809 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
wat u call tat.. matrix is it?

dvd > hdmi > avr > hdmi > tv
aiman04
post Aug 20 2008, 07:01 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


Yup, matrix. But for DTS-ES Discrete on DVD it is 6.1 with all discrete channel. biggrin.gif
DigitalTech
post Aug 20 2008, 12:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



Edited

This post has been edited by DigitalTech: Aug 20 2008, 02:07 PM
rx330
post Aug 20 2008, 12:48 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,809 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
now tis one is sellin thread?
arremie
post Aug 20 2008, 05:52 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
bro rx sudah marah tongue.gif

effective though notworthy.gif
aiman04
post Aug 20 2008, 06:28 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


RX is a lonely guy now. Don't try to upset him. laugh.gif tongue.gif
fentanyl
post Aug 20 2008, 09:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
Have anyone bought online from Cable-Shop.co.uk.?
Plan to buy cables from them:

user posted image

What do u all think? hmm.gif

ALPS2008
post Aug 20 2008, 09:17 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 20 2008, 09:02 PM)
Have anyone bought online from Cable-Shop.co.uk.?
Plan to buy cables from them:

user posted image

What do u all think? hmm.gif
*
Well, please tell me if you can do it cause I try to buy on-line for the cable but fail from amazon.com...they don't ship to Malaysia blush.gif


I also would like to buy same HDMI cable and subwoofer cable?

This post has been edited by ALPS2008: Aug 20 2008, 09:32 PM
fentanyl
post Aug 20 2008, 09:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Aug 20 2008, 09:17 PM)
Well, please tell me if you can do it cause I try to buy on-line for the cable but fail from amazon.com...they don't ship to Malaysia blush.gif
*
Yeap they do ship to Malaysia but is the price above acceptable?

This post has been edited by fentanyl: Aug 20 2008, 09:36 PM
ALPS2008
post Aug 20 2008, 09:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 20 2008, 09:32 PM)
Yeap they do ship to Malaysia but is the price acceptable?
*
By the way, how you get the discount price???? I try to do the same item to purchase but cannot get the discount amount?? hmm.gif Why ah???
fentanyl
post Aug 20 2008, 09:38 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Aug 20 2008, 09:33 PM)
By the way, how you get the discount price???? I try to do the same item to purchase but cannot get the discount amount??  hmm.gif Why ah???
*
Do you sign in as a Malaysian? They exclude the VAT lar. wink.gif

aiman04
post Aug 20 2008, 09:39 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


Fentanyl, I bought my cables from FutureShop.co.uk, very good service, your order will be shipped the next day. thumbup.gif

I've tried to order from Cable-Shop.co.uk, they took 3 to even process, by the fourth day, the transaction in my Paypal still pending. So I decided to cancel.

ALPS2008, after you selected your shipping address outside of EU, the 17.5% VAT will be voided, so it will be cheaper. Before that, or before you login, the price is with VAT.
ALPS2008
post Aug 20 2008, 09:41 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 20 2008, 09:38 PM)
Do you sign in as a Malaysian? They exclude the VAT lar. wink.gif
*
Now I register and login....ah...the price is cheaper.... flex.gif flex.gif

I am not sure the price...but I also wanna to buy HDMI cable and subwoofer cable..... biggrin.gif biggrin.gif

What do you think the price...?? hmm.gif hmm.gif


Added on August 20, 2008, 9:44 pm
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 20 2008, 09:39 PM)
Fentanyl, I bought my cables from FutureShop.co.uk, very good service, your order will be shipped the next day. thumbup.gif

I've tried to order from Cable-Shop.co.uk, they took 3 to even process, by the fourth day, the transaction in my Paypal still pending. So I decided to cancel.

ALPS2008, after you selected your shipping address outside of EU, the 17.5% VAT will be voided, so it will be cheaper. Before that, or before you login, the price is with VAT.
*
Ah...thanks Aiman04......for the info

any choice of cable do you recommned??? I am not sure the price...wanna to look for HDMI and subwoofer cable

This post has been edited by ALPS2008: Aug 20 2008, 09:44 PM
aiman04
post Aug 20 2008, 09:47 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


I'm using cap ayam HDMI cable bro. But analogue cables I try to get the best. I use this for my sub:

http://www.futureshop.co.uk/qed-qunex-silv...e-3m-p-874.html
ALPS2008
post Aug 20 2008, 10:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 20 2008, 09:47 PM)
I'm using cap ayam HDMI cable bro. But analogue cables I try to get the best. I use this for my sub:

http://www.futureshop.co.uk/qed-qunex-silv...e-3m-p-874.html
*
okie....I have one Girafe HDMI cable(free when I brought the tV) and another one is cap ayam HDMI cable (free when I purchased Pioneer DVD).......

May be I need to try the Cap ayam cable first also after I get my new AVR???
Now from DVD =>HDMI (Girafe one ) => TV ; Coaxial => AVR old unit
Thinking DVD=> HDMI (Girafe)=> AVR(New Unit) => HDMI (cap ayam)=>TV....see any different in picture... hmm.gif

Then I need to on-hold first....Anyway, I will keep on survey laugh.gif


arremie
post Aug 20 2008, 10:15 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Yep most of my QEDs bought from Futureshop. Much cheaper than buying locally and took only 1 week to be here. I only buy one single 3m SA XT from Lelong for RM275 use by my center speaker coz I needed it urgently. Next purchase would be 30m QED silver micro unterminated for my surround. That will cost me about 90 quid plus shipping (RM560). Not sure whether they willing to under value it a bit when they send as not to exceed RM500 limit. Hopefully they would. Good shop nonetheless thumbup.gif
fentanyl
post Aug 20 2008, 10:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 20 2008, 09:39 PM)
Fentanyl, I bought my cables from FutureShop.co.uk, very good service, your order will be shipped the next day. thumbup.gif

I've tried to order from Cable-Shop.co.uk, they took 3 to even process, by the fourth day, the transaction in my Paypal still pending. So I decided to cancel.

ALPS2008, after you selected your shipping address outside of EU, the 17.5% VAT will be voided, so it will be cheaper. Before that, or before you login, the price is with VAT.
*
Orite! Thanks for the heads up! Will try FutureShop.co.uk. nod.gif


Added on August 20, 2008, 10:30 pm
QUOTE(arremie @ Aug 20 2008, 10:15 PM)
Yep most of my QEDs bought from Futureshop. Much cheaper than buying locally and took only 1 week to be here. I only buy one single 3m SA XT from Lelong for RM275 use by my center speaker coz I needed it urgently. Next purchase would be 30m QED silver micro unterminated for my surround. That will cost me about 90 quid plus shipping (RM560). Not sure whether they willing to under value it a bit when they send as not to exceed RM500 limit. Hopefully they would. Good shop nonetheless thumbup.gif
*
U bought from Solehah, right?

This post has been edited by fentanyl: Aug 20 2008, 10:30 PM
arremie
post Aug 20 2008, 10:32 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Yep that single SA XT from Solehah. Nice old chap.
htkaki
post Aug 21 2008, 09:04 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



I bought my QED coaxial from him too.
llsaw
post Aug 21 2008, 09:08 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
29 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
Using Wireworld Island 52 HDMI cable
aiman04
post Aug 21 2008, 09:13 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


I thought that Solehah is a she? hmm.gif
fentanyl
post Aug 21 2008, 09:51 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 21 2008, 09:13 AM)
I thought that Solehah is a she? hmm.gif
*
Bought QED Silver Anniversary Speaker cable from her/him too. Solehah is his wife? I ain't sure. wink.gif

arremie
post Aug 21 2008, 01:58 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Unless she's almost bald with grey beard and mustache...I don't think that's her laugh.gif
aiman04
post Aug 21 2008, 02:27 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


I don't know, some posted here before saying it's a she, can't remember who. never mind lah. laugh.gif
fentanyl
post Aug 21 2008, 07:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 20 2008, 09:39 PM)
Fentanyl, I bought my cables from FutureShop.co.uk, very good service, your order will be shipped the next day. thumbup.gif
You are right! I ordered my cables yesterday and they are already dispatched today. Maybe I will order speaker cables from them someday but just wanna ask u. If they ask for quantity of cable, does it stand for pair or unit? Let's say I put 1, it means 1 unit or 1 pair? hmm.gif

user posted image

arremie
post Aug 21 2008, 08:05 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
1 unit la bro not 1 pair. If not I'm very happy already tongue.gif
fentanyl
post Aug 21 2008, 08:18 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(arremie @ Aug 21 2008, 08:05 PM)
1 unit la bro not 1 pair. If not I'm very happy already tongue.gif
*
blush.gif Hey thanks for the info bro. But still cheaper than buying locally.

arremie
post Aug 21 2008, 08:20 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Yep. Exactly biggrin.gif
aiman04
post Aug 21 2008, 10:03 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 21 2008, 07:53 PM)
You are right! I ordered my cables yesterday and they are already dispatched today. Maybe I will order speaker cables from them someday but just wanna ask u. If they ask for quantity of cable, does it stand for pair or unit? Let's say I put 1, it means 1 unit or 1 pair? hmm.gif

user posted image
*
Yup, only one. But still cheap right? thumbup.gif

You'll receive your package within one week. My last order valued more than RM800, not tax or whatsoever. Just like Amazon UK, Royal Mail does excellent job. But it's more secured because this one you need to sign for it when it arrives. biggrin.gif
fentanyl
post Aug 22 2008, 09:18 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 21 2008, 10:03 PM)
Yup, only one. But still cheap right? thumbup.gif

You'll receive your package within one week. My last order valued more than RM800, not tax or whatsoever. Just like Amazon UK, Royal Mail does excellent job. But it's more secured because this one you need to sign for it when it arrives. biggrin.gif
*
U need to sign? It is registered then? That's good. Yeap I normally receive my items from UK in 5-7 days time. nod.gif

ALPS2008
post Aug 22 2008, 10:05 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 22 2008, 09:18 AM)
U need to sign? It is registered then? That's good. Yeap I normally receive my items from UK in 5-7 days time. nod.gif
*
Waa....good good...

By the way what is the exchange rate for pound to Malaysia now normaly charge you?
Silly question, are you using credit card to purchase right? any authentication problem?

I want to do some calculation also.....keeee
fentanyl
post Aug 22 2008, 10:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Aug 22 2008, 10:05 AM)
Waa....good good...

By the way what is the exchange rate for pound to Malaysia now normaly charge you?
Silly question, are you using credit card to purchase right? any authentication problem?

I want to do some calculation  also.....keeee
*
Not sure abt exchange rate for pound to RM but yeah i'm using my cc and so far no problemo.

rx330
post Aug 22 2008, 11:24 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,809 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
shud be ard 6.5/6


shich80
post Aug 22 2008, 11:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: May 2008


QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Aug 20 2008, 10:17 PM)
Well, please tell me if you can do it cause I try to buy on-line for the cable but fail from amazon.com...they don't ship to Malaysia blush.gif
I also would like to buy same HDMI cable and subwoofer cable?
*
If you don't mind, instead of buying online you can try to search for second hand cables. There is a HiFi shop selling lots of second hand cables at Amcorp Mall second floor, I bought RGB Monster Cable there for RM80. thumbup.gif They have lot of type of cables there, maybe you can find what you are looking for there. smile.gif

This post has been edited by shich80: Aug 22 2008, 11:49 AM
JiauBoy
post Aug 22 2008, 11:37 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
727 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: KL
ya ke? didnt notice that also. which part of 2nd floor?
shich80
post Aug 22 2008, 11:55 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: May 2008


QUOTE(JiauBoy @ Aug 22 2008, 12:37 PM)
ya ke? didnt notice that also. which part of 2nd floor?
*
Go to the escalator near Asia Sound, go up 1 level from the escalator and u will be able to see it at the back of you. That shop sell a lot of HiFi stuff, u can search around there. They also place a lot of unbranded speakers beside of their shop (another shop just beside it) which look like a stock room. biggrin.gif
arremie
post Aug 22 2008, 06:59 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 21 2008, 10:03 PM)
Yup, only one. But still cheap right? thumbup.gif

You'll receive your package within one week. My last order valued more than RM800, not tax or whatsoever. Just like Amazon UK, Royal Mail does excellent job. But it's more secured because this one you need to sign for it when it arrives. biggrin.gif
*
I wonder why I never need to sign any package from UK so far hmm.gif
aiman04
post Aug 22 2008, 11:13 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(arremie @ Aug 22 2008, 06:59 PM)
I wonder why I never need to sign any package from UK so far hmm.gif
*
Even from FutureShop? hmm.gif

When I received mine, it was like a registered post. Need signature. My Amazon UK standard Royal Mail delivery no need to sign. nod.gif
arremie
post Aug 22 2008, 11:25 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Come to think of it...I never home when the package arrive. My mom or maid might have sign it for me doh.gif
Usually I never look at it. Just take and rip the package apart and get it over with laugh.gif
ALPS2008
post Aug 26 2008, 09:44 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 22 2008, 11:13 PM)
Even from FutureShop? hmm.gif

When I received mine, it was like a registered post. Need signature. My Amazon UK standard Royal Mail delivery no need to sign. nod.gif
*
I already ordered the subwoofer cable since last saturaday everning and today afternoon only confirm the delivery...May be I am new customer....why take so slow...I brought from futureshop.co.uk la

By the way, I request to send on saturday or 1 - 2 sept...which I will at home...what happen if no one at home which they sent at other day....I am using normal service Royal Mail only.....means will go through Pos Malaysia kah??

Do I need to sign anything?
If no one home, are the parcel required to collect at pos office???? hmm.gif


unsure.gif unsure.gif unsure.gif
htkaki
post Aug 26 2008, 10:29 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



Nope, they will leave it in your post box. No need to sign since it is not registered parcel.
arremie
post Aug 27 2008, 01:54 AM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
My order always ship the next day. Once got ship on the same day. I always make sure when I purchase their time is business hour in the morning and tomorrow is not Sunday.
aiman04
post Aug 27 2008, 08:06 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(htkaki @ Aug 26 2008, 10:29 PM)
Nope, they will leave it in your post box. No need to sign since it is not registered parcel.
*
Mine was registered bro, had to sign for it. biggrin.gif

ALPS2008, they don't ship on weekends I believe. And yup, the Pos Malaysia will deliver it to you. biggrin.gif
ALPS2008
post Aug 27 2008, 10:02 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 27 2008, 08:06 AM)
Mine was registered bro, had to sign for it. biggrin.gif 

ALPS2008, they don't ship on weekends I believe. And yup, the Pos Malaysia will deliver it to you. biggrin.gif
*
Aiya.....registered???? How ah?

Only two option: 1) Royal Mail 2) Fexdex - expensive la

hmm.gif hmm.gif hmm.gif

Tell me then next time I can regirster the mail when purchased from futureshop.co.uk.......by the way, how much extra charge??? hmm.gif


mikapoh
post Aug 28 2008, 02:36 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,263 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak.
I am currently using component cables to route my dvd player to plasma tv. Do you guys think I can achieve big improvement in PQ by using normal hdmi cable ? If yes, by how far is the improvement ?

I want t make sure it is worth to invest in another dvd player with hdmi output so thatthe PQ can be improve.

Pls advice, thanks.
99below0
post Aug 28 2008, 03:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
251 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Puchong


Depends on how far away you're sitting. Good HDMI players at 1080p upscale better than the Panny, but the extra detail only really noticeable at under 6 feet. At 10 feet you can't really tell the difference.
mikapoh
post Aug 28 2008, 04:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,263 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak.
QUOTE(99below0 @ Aug 28 2008, 03:42 PM)
Depends on how far away you're sitting. Good HDMI players at 1080p upscale better than the Panny, but the extra detail only really noticeable at under 6 feet. At 10 feet you can't really tell the difference.
*
So you mean dvd players upscaling is always better than the plasma tv itself right ??

Can the improvement in PQ be felt by a layman's eyes instead of a AV specialist ??
99below0
post Aug 28 2008, 04:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
251 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Puchong


Well, the Panny's upscaling is softer, meaning less detail but able to hide artifacts very well. Color is also deep. That's why Astro looks good on it.

The DVD players upscale sharper, so there's more detail, but if your DVD is not a fantastic copy, artifacts are easy to make out.

To the layman, the difference will not be readily discernable. Both will look good. Even if you're really looking for differences, you'll have to sit under 6 feet or closer (I do it at 3-4 feet to make out the difference).

If you're on a tight budget, you'll be pleased to know you're not losing out that much on PQ if you stick with your current set-up, not at 10ft+ anyway.

If you decide later to blow a few hundred bucks on good component cables, then that's the time to consider switching to HDMI. smile.gif

This post has been edited by 99below0: Aug 28 2008, 04:38 PM
fentanyl
post Aug 28 2008, 05:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Aug 22 2008, 11:13 PM)

When I received mine, it was like a registered post. Need signature. My Amazon UK standard Royal Mail delivery no need to sign. nod.gif
*
It is 1st Class Royal Mail. So i think it is registered post. Damn today is day 7 but still no sign of my cables. This is weird. sad.gif

mikapoh
post Aug 28 2008, 05:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,263 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Kuching, Sarawak.
QUOTE(99below0 @ Aug 28 2008, 04:36 PM)
Well, the Panny's upscaling is softer, meaning less detail but able to hide artifacts very well. Color is also deep. That's why Astro looks good on it.

The DVD players upscale sharper, so there's more detail, but if your DVD is not a fantastic copy, artifacts are easy to make out.

To the layman, the difference will not be readily discernable. Both will look good. Even if you're really looking for differences, you'll have to sit under 6 feet or closer (I do it at 3-4 feet to make out the difference).

If you're on a tight budget, you'll be pleased to know you're not losing out that much on PQ if you stick with your current set-up, not at 10ft+ anyway.

If you decide later to blow a few hundred bucks on good component cables, then that's the time to consider switching to HDMI. smile.gif
*
Good answer, TQ. To sum up,

1) For DVD play, I am now at a disadvantage coz I cannot enjoy the upscaling feature and the quality of HDMI as oppose to component. SO, u mean getting a new dvd player with HDMI out will certainly improve much on my plasma PQ rite?

2) P/s help me to do review on Monster S-Video cable selling here. Will it make a big impact on astro PQ than the compliement s-video cable from Panny ?


aiman04
post Aug 28 2008, 05:51 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 28 2008, 05:01 PM)
It is 1st Class Royal Mail. So i think it is registered post. Damn today is day 7 but still no sign of my cables. This is weird.  sad.gif
*
You must have patience, Luke. Don't fall to the dark side as I did. laugh.gif

Maybe tomorrow bro. biggrin.gif
ALPS2008
post Aug 28 2008, 10:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 28 2008, 05:01 PM)
It is 1st Class Royal Mail. So i think it is registered post. Damn today is day 7 but still no sign of my cables. This is weird.  sad.gif
*
Sure the 1st Class Royal Mail is registered post......
Then My order also the same la....
I order last Saturday...hm....I hope can received this Saturday also.....can test with my new AVR....huraaayyy thumbup.gif

fentanyl
post Aug 29 2008, 01:13 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
Received my items today from futureshop.co.uk rclxms.gif

user posted image


Next : Silver Anniversary XT biggrin.gif
ALPS2008
post Aug 29 2008, 01:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 29 2008, 01:13 PM)
Received my items today from futureshop.co.uk  rclxms.gif

user posted image
Next : Silver Anniversary XT  biggrin.gif
*
waaa....good good.....Do you need to sign anything?

I also waiting my cable to come.....

Which model HDMI and subwoofer cable you order???

icon_rolleyes.gif icon_rolleyes.gif
99below0
post Aug 29 2008, 03:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
251 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Puchong


QUOTE(mikapoh @ Aug 28 2008, 05:21 PM)
Good answer, TQ. To sum up,

1) For DVD play, I am now at a disadvantage coz I cannot enjoy the upscaling feature and the quality of HDMI as oppose to component. SO, u mean getting a new dvd player with HDMI out will certainly improve much on my plasma PQ rite?

2) P/s help me to do review on Monster S-Video cable selling here. Will it make a big impact on astro PQ than the compliement s-video cable from Panny ?
*
1) Your TV also has an internal upscaler or it wouldn't be able to fill the screen. The Panny has a good upscaler, so don't feel too disadvantaged at not having a HDMI DVD. If you're sitting over 10ft, you won't really see a difference and may regret squeezing out an extra RM400 for a new player. Of course, if you already plan to buy a new one, then by all means go ahead. Just that not having one doesn't mean your TV will suck. Plasmas are very forgiving of the source unlike LCDs.

2) I'm using Monster THX, my mom is using the panny freebie. The Monster is a little sharper and brighter. The Panny freebie is still highly watchable. Monster is nice to have if you got some extra budget but not essential to enjoying your Plasma. That's why so many forumers like Plasma. It's highly forgiving of the source and integrates into your existing system well without needing substantial upgrading.

This post has been edited by 99below0: Aug 29 2008, 03:34 PM
fentanyl
post Aug 29 2008, 04:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Aug 29 2008, 01:27 PM)
waaa....good good.....Do you need to sign anything?

I also waiting my cable to come.....

Which model HDMI and subwoofer cable you order???

icon_rolleyes.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Forgot to ask my sister in-law whether she signed or not.

This post has been edited by fentanyl: Aug 29 2008, 05:12 PM
ALPS2008
post Aug 29 2008, 05:31 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 29 2008, 04:53 PM)
Forgot to ask my sister in-law whether she signed or not.
*
Ok let me know when you find out...I am still waiting for my unit biggrin.gif
fentanyl
post Aug 29 2008, 06:01 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Aug 29 2008, 05:31 PM)
Ok let me know when you find out...I am still waiting for my unit biggrin.gif
*
Yeap. She did sign it. nod.gif

aiman04
post Aug 29 2008, 06:52 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


See? Got to sign for the package. So it's more secure, the posmen can't just leave it on the mailbox. thumbup.gif
ALPS2008
post Aug 29 2008, 09:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 29 2008, 06:01 PM)
Yeap. She did sign it.  nod.gif
*
ok Thanks.....how many days from the time you placed order and reached?

Then I can count when my unit will reach... biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by ALPS2008: Aug 29 2008, 09:20 PM
fentanyl
post Aug 29 2008, 09:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Aug 29 2008, 09:19 PM)
ok Thanks.....how many days from the time you placed order and reached?

Then I can count when my unit will reach... biggrin.gif
*
Se7en days.

arremie
post Aug 30 2008, 02:10 AM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Always 7 days never late thumbup.gif
Anyway, u got any particular reason for buying that QED sub cable? Does it come with Y splitter?
fentanyl
post Aug 30 2008, 09:04 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
478 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
QUOTE(arremie @ Aug 30 2008, 02:10 AM)
Always 7 days never late thumbup.gif
Anyway, u got any particular reason for buying that QED sub cable? Does it come with Y splitter?
*
Coz I don't have one. biggrin.gif No it doesn't come with Y splitter. What sub cable are u using now?

arremie
post Aug 30 2008, 11:44 AM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
4.5m Audioquest Copperhead. This one has built in Y splitter especially for sub. Got it on ebay tongue.gif
sunauto
post Aug 30 2008, 04:28 PM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



QUOTE(arremie @ Aug 30 2008, 11:44 AM)
4.5m Audioquest Copperhead. This one has built in Y splitter especially for sub. Got it on ebay tongue.gif
*
Did you buy it from a Malaysian seller selling Audioquest stuff on eBay? Just wondering. brows.gif
arremie
post Aug 30 2008, 08:15 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Any chance that Malaysian's name is Curtis Howard? tongue.gif
sunauto
post Sep 1 2008, 02:30 AM

<< Blu-Ray Rocks >>
*******
Senior Member
4,017 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Georgetown, Penang



QUOTE(arremie @ Aug 30 2008, 08:15 PM)
Any chance that Malaysian's name is Curtis Howard? tongue.gif
*
Opppsss ......... sorry my bad. notworthy.gif
ALPS2008
post Sep 1 2008, 10:36 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


Hm....my order have not arrived....might be I order last last saturday...and they only start to deliver on last tuesday....then I think my order shall arrive tommorow la......


AstroCreep
post Sep 1 2008, 11:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
104 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Shah Alam


Looks like I will be ordering from Futureshop soon too.
What you guys think of those thin IXOS speaker cable at futureshop... the cheapest and probably the most suitable for surround speakers that I can find.

Maybe to get the Chord HDMI also, but is it really worth it aside from 'Yeah! I have Chord HDMI'?
I fail to see difference between my free Panny HDMI and Giraffe.... or maybe both are at different level.... or simply beacuse of the many points discussed before = simply digital!

ALPS2008
post Sep 1 2008, 03:45 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(AstroCreep @ Sep 1 2008, 11:24 AM)
Looks like I will be ordering from Futureshop soon too.
What you guys think of those thin IXOS speaker cable at futureshop... the cheapest and probably the most suitable for surround speakers that I can find.

Maybe to get the Chord HDMI also, but is it really worth it aside from 'Yeah! I have Chord HDMI'?
I fail to see difference between my free Panny HDMI and Giraffe.... or maybe both are at different level.... or simply beacuse of the many points discussed before = simply digital!
*
I am using the girafe HDMI cable also, last sat night (after test my AVR for 3-4 hours), suddenly, my audio signal suddenly flashing...my AVR panel always changing from different surround....waa....I so scare initially....Later I switch my HDMI audio to Digital Coaxial Cable...but still maintain the video for HDMI....everything solve.....later the sound become ok......and video also still go through my AVR...Do not know why....really

Today, I switch everythng to HDMI, become normal back.....really puzzle me

1) may be the audio signal disturb through HDMI cable.....hm.....
2) My new AVR have problem....I don't think so la....do tell me this ...keeeee

I believe (1) will be the problem...keeee .....I am thinking to run my AVR again tommorow for 5-6 hours again cause on leave.....and wait for my new cable to arrive from futureshop...hurray...

ALPS2008
post Sep 1 2008, 08:54 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


Ha.....I get my answer myself already.....

Cannot use HDMI conection if just audio....when TV is off....

doh.gif Read the HDMI warning from the manual..... icon_rolleyes.gif icon_rolleyes.gif
AstroCreep
post Sep 1 2008, 11:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
104 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Shah Alam


QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Sep 1 2008, 08:54 PM)
Ha.....I get my answer myself already.....

Cannot use HDMI conection if just audio....when TV is off....

doh.gif  Read the HDMI warning from the manual..... icon_rolleyes.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Ha! Found this out the hard way too. My BD30 flashing U73 error code, which means HDMI problem, if playing Music CD while TV off.
But if play with TV first switched on, and turn off later while playing, then ok.

Maybe shud connect optical/digital directly to 'CD' in, for listeing to music CD.
Ok ka? Will try...

callmevil
post Sep 1 2008, 11:26 PM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(ALPS2008 @ Sep 1 2008, 08:54 PM)
Ha.....I get my answer myself already.....

Cannot use HDMI conection if just audio....when TV is off....

doh.gif  Read the HDMI warning from the manual..... icon_rolleyes.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
hmm nvr faced this problem before with my ps3 hdmi to v663 hdmi to tv.. like i just 'pure direct' the sound still on with the tv off.. or when i just turn of tv, the sound still on..
Blackhart
post Sep 2 2008, 10:29 AM

Like a rolling stone
****
Senior Member
508 posts

Joined: Nov 2005


Yeah on my older Pioneer DVD player there won't be audio if I switch off the TV.On my PS3 and Toshiba HD DVD player I can do that but there won't be any sound for a few seconds when I switch off the TV or switch to pure direct mode.
ALPS2008
post Sep 2 2008, 12:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
349 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Subang


QUOTE(fentanyl @ Aug 29 2008, 09:37 PM)
Se7en days.
*
Today already 7 day from the dispatched date......Poslaju just send parcel to my neighbour blush.gif blush.gif
Posman also already deliver the letter to my pos......but don't have my parcel from futureshop.co doh.gif
cry.gif cry.gif cry.gif


Vistatic
post Sep 3 2008, 01:24 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
Very interesting topic with many opinions on whether investment is necessary for HDMI cable. For info, Version 1.3 is not alone. There are V1.3 Class A (1080i) and V1.3 Class B (1080p). Wont be elaborating much but those with this knowledge of information will know what is the Class A and B. Nowadays, alot of HDMI claims to be supportive of V1.3 but to what extend? None of them dare to show which side they are relating to the end-user. Even for V1.3, there is types of speeds involving. One of reason why manufactures (only talking about mainly Free HDMI Cables) never mention about the category of their cables and speed due to not having their HDMI cables being certified.

The only cable I know giving Future Proof and ease of mind HDMI cable is Monster Cable Model MC1000HD. Price is probably very expensive to a lot of people but the worth-buying is this model not only being Life-Time Warrantee but also Future Proof Cable (with icon of Cable For Life). This statement means once you own this cable, never ever will you invest in another HDMI in the future. This is because once this cable can't support the future version, say V2.0 or V3.0, you can bring it back and exchange with the highest grade of Monster HDMI Cable in the market (that time) without topping up any additional money.

There are so many misleading information by many parties about HDMI. Some said HDMI is built only for 0 and 1, some said as long as got picture and sound, the end of story. This kinda information is making alot of end-users wanting for the best quality of video and sound will never have it in their own home. The misconception will be Cables are only Accessories, therefore NOT ESSENTIAL at all.

Truth is, High Quality HDMI Cable is to be treated as A Component for HD. You have Blue-Ray player, Full HD TV, AV Receiver capable of DTS True HD and Master Audio, but yet using a cheap-skate free HDMI cable. Put in this scenario, a Subaru WRX with HP of 280 (if not mistaken) but only using 13" rim/tyres. Makes sense?

If you need any clarification or further information, I'll try to share as much as I can. If I'm wrong, don't shoot me but correct me. I'm trying to learn too.
tongue.gif
callmevil
post Sep 3 2008, 01:42 AM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(Vistatic @ Sep 3 2008, 01:24 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
ah if u rajin go through avs and avforums or any other reputable av forums, u will find a mutual sentiment that they all frown upon monster cables.. selling hype more more than functionality. there is no difference in performance of a monster cable and a cheap hdmi cable even up to 15ft cable length.

now about hdmi 1.2/3/a/b. this has nothing to do with the cables.. its all to with the reciever n transmitter being able to give and take the 1.2/3/a/b signal or not.. AND 1.3a is not 1080i btw.. infact even hdmi 1.0 supports 1080p.. haha. and for ure 'high quality hdmi cable' well as long as construction of the cable is proper, then no point in paying more for the same result.
Vistatic
post Sep 3 2008, 02:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
Thanks for correcting me on the 1080P on Version 1.0

Thanks for the feedback. As I was trying to say, different people has different opinion. Personally I tested with free cables and "High Quality Cables" with proper HD Audio and Video set-up (in sense of everything were in True HD), I couldnt say more.

In terms of proper construction of cable that you had mentioned, mind to 'elaborate' more on the meaning of proper construction?.

Probably SimPlay Labs gave the wrong information to me when they said all HDMI cables are not the same. Probably data streaming down the pipeline of HDMI are not to be constructed to contain high band-width. Probably the data transmission between the source and the input are just 2 way-lane, not the multi-lane where signals are meant to be constantly transmitted in more than 4.4 GBPS.

Or probably you are trying to correct me in saying 'any proper constructed HDMI' in today's market can be used in next year 2160P Flat Panel, or 200HZ Refresh Rate Plasma/LCD.

Maybe in your opinion, the usage of cheap HDMI cables are cable to transmit data containing 1080P, 12Bit Color/XY Color, 120Hz Refresh Rate, CEC, and Lossless Audio (7.1ch/True HD/Master of Bitstream)

But thanks for correcting my statement on the 1080P V1.0 thingy
callmevil
post Sep 3 2008, 08:02 AM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(Vistatic @ Sep 3 2008, 02:22 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
aisehh another goat with skirt comment.. lol ok
1. fyi, its not my opinion. its science. ur theory on hdmi cables applies to analogue cables. not on hdmi cable which does not convert anything into anything else to be converted into something else again. hdmi just takes information as it is 'raw' and pass it over to the other side 'raw'. so material used makes no difference as long as its properly constructed

2. proper construction = wire isnt damage and bot ends are properly terminated

3. as i have not read the statement from 'SimPlay' myself, i will not comment whether its right or wrong smile.gif. but about ur comment after that, ever heard of someone changing their rj45 cable when they upgrade their internet speed from say 128kbits to 2mbps? or.. everheard of any telco worker telling u that they needed to change the fiber optics laid in the ground to FTTX to accomodate faster bandwidth?? hehe of curz u havnt. because its not about the cables. its about the source and the receiving end able to take and give that speed.. another example, if uve been around long enough, u would know that our network card now is already in gigabit as appose to the 100mbps cap before.. did u have to buy a new rj45 cable? hehe of curz u didnt

4. next year's panel will be 2160P? 200hz refresh rate plasma/lcd ?? hehe funny.. next step up is on hdmi 1.3 is 1600P, not 2160P.. and it will only be done over 60frames MINIMUM. but again this has nothing to do with the cable smile.gif. Did u know that dvi and hdmi works the same way? if u do then lemme tell u that, over the years, ive been upping my screen reso from 1024x, to 1280x, to 1440x, to 1600x, to 2kx.. did u know that all i had to change to attain this NEW resolutions (aka same thing as those 1080) was that i need to make sure my Monitor and my GPU supports feeding and displaying those reso.. i never once had to change my DVI cable. neither did i ever hear anyone making a big deal over it smile.gif

5. Sorry Ive never heard of Master of Bitstream standard yet.. and currently MOST panels/receivers can only do 10bit.. and fyi hdmis can do up to 48bit.. but thts only for 1080P.. but again this as i mentioned prior to this sentence dependant on the panels/receivers. not the hdmi cable. it dont matter if its cheap or expensive, as long as its constructed properly (see 2) itll perform the same even up to 15ft distance smile.gif

just a heads up, commercial reviews and comments are usually skewed to benefit those reviewed.. did u know that some companies would give special discounts and 'gifts' for a good review? i advise u to read no 4 clearly before u shoot ur next

This post has been edited by callmevil: Sep 3 2008, 08:14 AM
99below0
post Sep 3 2008, 09:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
251 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Puchong


Well, simple analogy:

HDMI is a digital cable like your USB. Heard of anyone needing a Monster USB cable for "extra-high quality" transference of data? Thought not. wink.gif

HDMI transfers "data" not analogue signals like your old component/s-video/composite cables. You either get the data or you don't, much like either your USB cable works 100% or it's broke.

Cable companys have to instill the high-quality HDMI cable myth into everyone cause they'd be out of business if everyone switches from thousand-dollar component cables to RM50 HDMI cables. smile.gif
pierreye
post Sep 3 2008, 10:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,308 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Penang & Ipoh


QUOTE(99below0 @ Sep 3 2008, 09:49 AM)
Well, simple analogy:

HDMI is a digital cable like your USB. Heard of anyone needing a Monster USB cable for "extra-high quality" transference of data? Thought not. wink.gif

HDMI transfers "data" not analogue signals like your old component/s-video/composite cables. You either get the data or you don't, much like either your USB cable works 100% or it's broke.

Cable companys have to instill the high-quality HDMI cable myth into everyone cause they'd be out of business if everyone switches from thousand-dollar component cables to RM50 HDMI cables. smile.gif
*
Actually it's not true for HDMI. USB is different as it is Serial (so it can go high speed without data resync on different cable). HDMI had heavy duty task to transfer both video and audio. Also, with HDMI, there is a built in error correction (like your CD player. Which is why some CD player sound better than others cause the best CD player actually read the disc few times to ensure the bit is correct + jitter issue). Timing is important in HDMI cable too. Error Correction can only recover certain bit and if it is loss, then a good circuit will try to find the best pixel to represent the loss pixel. That's why it's not like either it work or it wouldn't work. It still pass through the signal but might have some data loss (certain torelance) before you see snow on your screen.
s6xs9x
post Sep 3 2008, 10:37 AM

My Stars Not Growing?
*****
Senior Member
904 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: KUL (MYS)


one question,
from DVDp >HDMI> AVR. can I out component to my TV?
pierreye
post Sep 3 2008, 10:43 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,308 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Penang & Ipoh


QUOTE(s6xs9x @ Sep 3 2008, 10:37 AM)
one question,
from DVDp >HDMI> AVR. can I out component to my TV?
*
Most likely no. Reason is your AVR. If it can do transcoding from HDMI to component, then no issue. Problem is most AVR will only transcode from other source to HDMI. Cheaper AVR wouldn't do any transcoding.
s6xs9x
post Sep 3 2008, 11:26 AM

My Stars Not Growing?
*****
Senior Member
904 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: KUL (MYS)


hmmm, guessed so. because from the manual it only upconvert to HDMI but it never goes down.
How will PS3 be if I were to connect them via component .. does it have component? I never checked
Vistatic
post Sep 3 2008, 11:27 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
sigh, another Who-Knows-Everything

I do like your constructive reply, seriously.

1.I did not mention that HDMI convert anything from my statement. I was trying to say High-contain-Data/Big-Size-Data require to have proper constructed 'Lane' to move to and fro output to input and the otherwise. If a HDMI cable is made just to transmit basic video and sound, normally a cheap/free HDMI cable will do the job. Yet, from Blue-Ray disc itself containing so much data, a cheap/free HDMI cable will not be able to accomodate everything from features I had mentioned earlier. Therefore, it's not just a give and take 'raw' information.

As for material use for HDMI construction, not every manufacturer especially free given or cheap HDMI take much of consideration few features such as 75 ohms construction of each cooper use inside, Dielectric injection, Foil-shielding(how many layer), capability to reject EMI/RFI and few more. Even for some cable claim to be 24K Plated connected, but to what extend. I had 'dissected' quite a few of those free/cheap HDMI cables together with expensive cables. The result, those cheap cables only covering the head only but not the shouldering area.

2. Cable will not damage, but how can you guarantee that? Abuse given to the cables such as snapping the cable body rather than the connector, going to in-wall to hide the cable for wall-mounting Flat Screen, and few more will affect the transmission of high-speed data. Only a few HDMI manufacturer in the world introducing "Stress Relief" constraint to avoid conductors to be disconnected from the connector due to hard plug/unplug situation.

3. Talking about networking, I am not that familiar (is this still relating to HDMI? ). Put my arguement into this, 4 cars trying to move fast but squeezing into 1 Lane road. Will those 4 cars/data able to transmit smoothly? Probably, 1 car/data will be left behind. Go figure.

4. This year 2008 ICES already displayed a 2160P TV Samsung 3840 x 2160, DLP manufacturing 240HZ and 2009 ICES will be showing more technologies(hope I'm going Las Vegas). Oh yes, I do know DVI and HDMI works the very same way but in case you don't know, DVI doesnt send audio. *wink.

At first I thought you change your Plasma from 1024x to 1600x, haha, heck no, you were only playing around with computer resolution. LOL. So you only changing only on computer monitor, not from Blue Ray/AV Receiver/Full-HD TV. Hahahaha. Now only I know, probably I can rest my case here as my statement only applies to Blue Ray/AV Receiver/Full-HD TV, nothing to do with computer.

5. Ops, typo error on Master of Bitstream. Suppose to be True HD Audio/ Master Audio running on Bitstream. HDMI today only supports 4.4GB p/s but some applications/hardwares are already on 6.68Gbps. If the mentality that all HDMI are the same, you are already far way behind. The HDMI built yesteryear will not be able to support the tremendous amount of high speed data transmit from the sources to the inputs. No way it will be giving a total 100%. And HDMI is not just about 0 and 1. Only a typical cheap-skate who not willing to spend on Performance cables for their expensive Full HD TV/Receiver/Blu-Ray player will have that kinda thinking. Never ever compromise the need for speed on HDMI cables.

Additional
6. My arguement on HDMI is not meant just to video. It applies to the features of audio, CEC, bit colors, speed-rating, refresh rates and many more.

I serious do recommending you to understand my statements here before you commenting relating to computer monitor, which is not my point of statements at all. Oh yes, some companies do pay good $$ for gettng review. Try do researches into SimPlay Labs website to see which cables had been certified.

I do stand to be corrected.

This post has been edited by Vistatic: Sep 3 2008, 11:28 AM
DigitalTech
post Sep 3 2008, 11:38 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



QUOTE(Vistatic @ Sep 3 2008, 11:27 AM)
sigh, another Who-Knows-Everything

I do like your constructive reply, seriously.

1.I did not mention that HDMI convert anything from my statement.  I was trying to say High-contain-Data/Big-Size-Data require to have proper constructed 'Lane' to move to and fro output to input and the otherwise.  If a HDMI cable is made just to transmit basic video and sound, normally a cheap/free HDMI cable will do the job.  Yet, from Blue-Ray disc itself containing so much data, a cheap/free HDMI cable will not be able to accomodate everything from features I had mentioned earlier.  Therefore, it's not just a give and take 'raw' information.

As for material use for HDMI construction, not every manufacturer especially free given or cheap HDMI take much of consideration few features such as 75 ohms construction of each cooper use inside, Dielectric injection, Foil-shielding(how many layer), capability to reject EMI/RFI and few more.  Even for some cable claim to be 24K Plated connected, but to what extend.  I had 'dissected' quite a few of those free/cheap HDMI cables together with expensive cables.  The result, those cheap cables only covering the head only but not the shouldering area.

2.  Cable will not damage, but how can you guarantee that?  Abuse given to the cables such as snapping the cable body rather than the connector, going to in-wall to hide the cable for wall-mounting Flat Screen, and few more will affect the transmission of high-speed data.  Only a few HDMI manufacturer in the world introducing "Stress Relief" constraint to avoid conductors to be disconnected from the connector due to hard plug/unplug situation.

3.  Talking about networking, I am not that familiar (is this still relating to HDMI? ).  Put my arguement into this, 4 cars trying to move fast but squeezing into 1 Lane road. Will those 4 cars/data able to transmit smoothly?  Probably, 1 car/data will be left behind.  Go figure.

4.  This year 2008 ICES already displayed a 2160P TV Samsung 3840 x 2160, DLP manufacturing 240HZ and 2009 ICES will be showing more technologies(hope I'm going Las Vegas).  Oh yes, I do know DVI and HDMI works the very same way but in case you don't know, DVI doesnt send audio. *wink. 

At first I thought you change your Plasma from 1024x to 1600x, haha, heck no, you were only playing around with computer resolution. LOL.  So you only changing only on computer monitor, not from Blue Ray/AV Receiver/Full-HD TV.  Hahahaha. Now only I know, probably I can rest my case here as my statement only applies to Blue Ray/AV Receiver/Full-HD TV, nothing to do with computer.

5.  Ops, typo error on Master of Bitstream.  Suppose to be True HD Audio/ Master Audio running on Bitstream.  HDMI today only supports 4.4GB p/s but some applications/hardwares are already on 6.68Gbps.  If the mentality that all HDMI are the same, you are already far way behind.  The HDMI built yesteryear will not be able to support the tremendous amount of high speed data transmit from the sources to the inputs.  No way it will be giving a total 100%.  And HDMI is not just about 0 and 1.  Only a typical cheap-skate who not willing to spend on Performance cables for their expensive Full HD TV/Receiver/Blu-Ray player will have that kinda thinking.  Never ever compromise the need for speed on HDMI cables.

Additional
6.  My arguement on HDMI is not meant just to video.  It applies to the features of audio, CEC, bit colors, speed-rating, refresh rates and many more.

I serious do recommending you to understand my statements here before you commenting relating to computer monitor, which is not my point of statements at all.  Oh yes, some companies do pay good $$ for gettng review.  Try do researches into SimPlay Labs website to see which cables had been certified.

I do stand to be corrected.
*
Very well said indeed. I strongly agree that a branded cable with help in picture and sound quality. The build of the cable is important.

What's the point of having a great lcd/plasma tv and excellent ps3/blueray player without a good bridging between these devices via good cable?

Bottom line is, it boils down to your own budget and aprreciation on picture and sound quality and also your passion in this.

Do you think sitting 12 feet from your 42" lcd/plasma, you can tell the difference between 1080p and 720p quality? Many ppl still buy full hd lcd/plasma. Those people are passionate and appreciate quality with certain standards in life.

No right or wrong answer here.

This post has been edited by DigitalTech: Sep 3 2008, 12:00 PM
callmevil
post Sep 3 2008, 02:26 PM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(Vistatic @ Sep 3 2008, 11:27 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
Epic! lol. ok ill try keep the reply short and sum it up icon_rolleyes.gif

1. Noted and agree with the first 3 sentences from 1st Para. disagree with the last 2 sentences (ill get to it, relax smile.gif) on the 2nd para, i shouldve been more clear with my definition of proper constructed cables.. lemme add in 1 more line to it.. "obeys basic hdmi standards"

2. if they do damage, then they fall from my definition of proper constructed cables smile.gif so point 2 is moot

3. if the hdmi cables follow those basic standards, it WILL be able to accommodate those 4 cars. unless the feeder if sending a non-standard bandwidth, then its not the cables fault now is it?

4. noted first para, and i never said dvi sends audio wink.gif. for the 2nd para, zoom out, turn left, then zoom in.. u were focusing on the wrong point.. my point was simply, with increased resolution (i.e. increased bandwidth) one didnt have to change dvi cables. n yes like uve pointed out that its a matter of media (bluray/hdtv/etc) but if u look at the cable and what its doing ull see that its essentially doing the same thing, sending signals. eventhough dvi only contains video and not audio, IT still pushes more resolution than the current 1.3 hdmi can support. and sigh, even then u dont hear anyone changing their dvi cable do u?

5. noted ur typo. But i never said all HDMI are the same. I am talking about HDMI Cables. not the HDMI standard. lol pointless angst in between there, now on ur last sentence, as long as it follows a proper construction then u will not be compromising anything but waste smile.gif

6. noted. but we're talking about the cables. not the standards.

now, sorry for my short reply for 1-6, dont worry, theres more to come smile.gif . firstly i do understand what ur saying. u seem like u understand mine. but as i said in no.4, u gotta zoom out and turn left then zoom in again. If you digg my first 2 replies to u, im sure u will fine this line
QUOTE
itll perform the same even up to 15ft distance
comparing monsters to the masses..

now i will post a test done by audioholics.com for different HDMI cables transmitting various signals over various length in their HDMI cables test
user posted image
hehe notice that all of them performed the same under short distance?? hehe

A test done by Popularmechanics.com yielded the following link
The Results
None of our editors could tell the difference. The fact is, HDMI is digital, meaning you either get the feed or you don’t. High prices and gimmicks like gold-plating don’t affect 1s and 0s. Our advice: Purchase your wiring online for cheap, and use the saved money to upgrade to a larger flat screen

go to the link and read what other engineers, tv broadcasters, and other experienced technical guys have to say about it smile.gif. real world > test labs ftw

now for another real world test from Gizmodo. link
where they conlcluded the following:
• It never pays to buy a Monster cable first. It doesn't even make sense to buy the "marked down" $50 cable you can buy if you don't want Monster. Go online, order your cables, and wait.
• Even if you're going for the long haul, try a cheaper cable from a reliable vendor first. Monoprice isn't the only one. During this process I've spoken with good people at FireFold, DataPro International, and others, and tested an assortment of discount products, with no noticeable problems. I am confident that, if a vendor has a solid return policy and satisfaction guarantee, you should feel free to buy even a super-long cable from a discount house. In the case of my 50-footer noise, a quick return would have been all that was required.
• Monster has a point about future-proofing. I have no doubt, given our testing, that Monster cables can outperform other cables in video formats that are not yet in use. What does this mean for a consumer? Does it make sense to spend $300 now on a 50-foot cable, assuming you will spend thousands to upgrade all of your video equipment around it in the next few years? Logic dictates that the answer is no.
• The only people who should buy Monster cable are people who light cigars with Benjamins. Fortunately for Monster, there are plenty of those people. They're not even suckers, they are just rich as hell, and want the best. This testing did not prove that Monster is not the best. It just proved that the best is, for the most part, unnecessary.
-----
now.. As an engineer, I'm not against spending good money on cables.. in fact, i just bought bettercables interconnect cable for my sub, and a silly VDH cables for my astro needs... but at least the science makes sense (i.e. cable structure has a impact on signal strength/quality/RFI etc), even if the end result is questionable to some people.

Unfortunately, when you go digital its just not as relevant -'unless' you are going long distances.... So, for your bluray, ps3 etc to a screen <15ft away, please dont spend upwards of 200rm on a cable... bottom line, if ur cheap hdmi cable dont work, then it is merely faulty, just go back and change for a new one smile.gif i shall repeat, the premise of my 1st reply was and still is that at distance of < 15ft away, then it does not pay to buy EXPENSIVE MONSTERS smile.gif

-- Pong

This post has been edited by callmevil: Sep 3 2008, 02:28 PM
arremie
post Sep 3 2008, 02:31 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(callmevil @ Sep 3 2008, 02:26 PM)
ok ill try keep the reply short and sum it up icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Dude...that is not short sweat.gif
s6xs9x
post Sep 3 2008, 02:42 PM

My Stars Not Growing?
*****
Senior Member
904 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: KUL (MYS)


well might be short oredi .. he might even take out the whole entire page (consider long)...
but i guess it's worth the page length.
DigitalTech
post Sep 3 2008, 03:21 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



This is an example of what I meant by good strong & solid built of a branded Monster HDMI cable:

Attached Image

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=756134

This post has been edited by DigitalTech: Sep 3 2008, 03:46 PM
callmevil
post Sep 3 2008, 03:47 PM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(arremie @ Sep 3 2008, 02:31 PM)
Dude...that is not short sweat.gif
*
aa blush.gif sorry!! lol i tried too~~ i used the simplest sentence structure i could think off edi to keep it as short as possible.. lol fogip me puhleezz

--more from audioholics about hdmi cable structure
Here is an example of how one particular geometry of HDMI cable would look if you sliced it open:

user posted image

Looking at the image above you will see that there are 4 primary paired connections which represent the TDMS (Transition Minimized Differential Signaling) channels plus a drain wire. This can be thought of as the red, green, and blue color information (note that the colors are presented solely for illustrative purposes), multi-channel audio information and also the clock. The multi-channel audio is "easy" to pass along the line and is therefore interspersed among the much denser video information carried across these cables. Because of this, there are no dedicated wires for audio. While the three color/audio TDMS channels run at very high speed, the clock channel has much less demands put on it.

The central pair, in this particular cable configuration, are for DDC (Display Data Channel) clock/data which reads EDID (Extended Display IDentification) information from the display and which also handles the HDCP handshaking. EDID essentially tells the HDMI transmitter what type of signal and display it is dealing with. These wires are absolutely critical since without this information the entire signal is compromised. If HDCP isn't happy - there simply isn't going to be a signal.

The four single wires are a +5V line, a DDC ground, a hot plug detect wire (a signal that is used to monitor hot plug events so that a new HDCP negotiation can be made), and one for CEC. CEC (Consumer Electronics Control) is the two-way single wire control system which allows all the devices connected on an HDMI chain to communicate and automate settings and control functions, reducing the amount of controls and remotes needed to operate the components. In theory this is one of the coolest aspects of HDMI. In reality it is an underutilized, disappointing, buggy feature set that is mostly limited to intra-company products. The 5th solo wire is unused.

--- edit: another read from HDGuru - http://hdguru.com/?p=12

This post has been edited by callmevil: Sep 3 2008, 04:08 PM
ronaldjoe
post Sep 29 2008, 06:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
I'm not really into the technical stuffs but as long as the cable doesn't cost a bomb...
then I am willingly to give a go...
To my surprise some Yamaha speakers also use monster cable for its internal circuits shocking.gif
I do believe there is a reason why Yahama pick Monster cable wink.gif I wont go far if I stick to the same choice cool.gif
Do pardon me for my ignorance as I'm a newbie in AVR thingy
user posted image

law1777
post Sep 29 2008, 07:41 PM

DreamMan
*******
Senior Member
2,654 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


i personally think theres a difference between how cheap and how expensive hdmi cables. rm30/cable take this as a cheap one and rm500/monster hdmi. i strongly think the better built one can give better PQ and SQ. its about the range between the most cheap and the very expensive one. you dont nid to worry those hdmi cables selling rm1000+ in malaysia you cannot afford. just go on to ebay u can get them 80% cheaper the same real thing. cheers
ronaldjoe
post Sep 29 2008, 10:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(law1777 @ Sep 29 2008, 07:41 PM)
i personally think theres a difference between how cheap and how expensive hdmi cables. rm30/cable take this as a cheap one and rm500/monster hdmi. i strongly think the better built one can give better PQ and SQ. its about the range between the most cheap and the very expensive one. you dont nid to worry those hdmi cables selling rm1000+ in malaysia you cannot afford. just go on to ebay u can get them 80% cheaper the same real thing. cheers
*
In Ebay can get Monster 8ft at RM200 +/- laugh.gif
arremie
post Sep 29 2008, 10:13 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Might be fake if its too cheap. A lot of so called OEM China made Monster on eBay. Just make sure the one you buy comes with original packaging. Don't buy loose package unless the seller claim their cables is 100% original. Even that would not guarantee anything sweat.gif
ronaldjoe
post Sep 30 2008, 09:35 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(arremie @ Sep 29 2008, 10:13 PM)
Might be fake if its too cheap. A lot of so called OEM China made Monster on eBay. Just make sure the one you buy comes with original packaging. Don't buy loose package unless the seller claim their cables is 100% original. Even that would not guarantee anything sweat.gif
*
Need to be careful when selecting seller in Ebay...
Ha ha. It's a premium trusted seller with 100% 33k+ positive feedbacks and transactions...
The seller sells both retail and non-retail pack cables nod.gif
Went to US...shop around...there's a reason why they could sell so cheap brows.gif
Monster in M'sia is overpriced doh.gif Same to Rockford Fosgate, Bose and some other premium brand sweat.gif

This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Sep 30 2008, 09:37 AM
law1777
post Sep 30 2008, 11:22 AM

DreamMan
*******
Senior Member
2,654 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Sep 29 2008, 10:08 PM)
In Ebay can get Monster 8ft at RM200 +/-  laugh.gif
*
yes i know only rm200+ thats why i said up to 80% cheaper. so why not getting one right? buy from the premium seller although the price is higher abit but u can at least 'fong sam' =)
djlah
post Sep 30 2008, 12:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
7,723 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
for my personal opinion, cheap or expensive HDMI cable might still have the little different but not huge as compare to analog cable. I do agree the concept of digital that carry 1 and 0 only but when talking about the length/etc criteria, there might have a different. I'm not pro in this but just normal end user thinking.

somehow, HDMI just using similar DVI technology which is consider old de.... what next potential hot connection?
I predict is DisplayPort

user posted image

at this moment only carry video, not sure got any latest news or not, [pls share if already have any product exist with both]
but there is already have the Optional, 1-8 channels, 16 or 24 bit linear PCM, 48/96/192 kHz sampling rate, uncompressed, max. 6.144 Mbit/s bit rate that on implement anytimes when designer want use to it.
ronaldjoe
post Sep 30 2008, 06:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(law1777 @ Sep 30 2008, 11:22 AM)
yes i know only rm200+ thats why i said up to 80% cheaper. so why not getting one right? buy from the premium seller although the price is higher abit but u can at least 'fong sam' =)
*
Already bought a few for myself and my bro...
Monster 800 HDMI cables , Sub cable, S video cables, THX speaker cables & Monster THX Optical cables brows.gif
But sad, customs taxed me 40% on invoiced value + shipping costs... doh.gif
law1777
post Sep 30 2008, 06:38 PM

DreamMan
*******
Senior Member
2,654 posts

Joined: Dec 2007


QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Sep 30 2008, 06:24 PM)
Already bought a few for myself and my bro...
Monster 800 HDMI cables , Sub cable, S video cables, THX speaker cables & Monster THX Optical cables  brows.gif
But sad, customs taxed me 40% on invoiced value + shipping costs... doh.gif
*
monster 800?? rm200+?? so expensive lo.. mine is monster m1000hd (latest) rm250+
rthj
post Sep 30 2008, 07:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
frankly speaking....i have yet to see significant difference in the quality of expensive and less expensive HDMI cables....my personal opinion is as long as they're built properly..especially the connectors and the housings are not loose and/or with out-of-spec gaps and such..i guess they work fine.

i am currently using audioquest, cardass and clicktronic....also tried with those that came free with DVD player and media player.....doesnt make much difference with the signal quality.....though the audioquest and cardass looks good in appearance...then again they're hiding behind the furniture


ronaldjoe
post Sep 30 2008, 08:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(law1777 @ Sep 30 2008, 06:38 PM)
monster 800?? rm200+?? so expensive lo.. mine is monster m1000hd (latest) rm250+
*
HD800 8 ft RM200+...
Wow M1000hd RM250+ nice price thumbup.gif


Added on September 30, 2008, 8:24 pmI see m100 HD being sold at +/- USD100 without shipping.
Do you still have the link of the seller? Pls PM me
I might need to get some later. icon_question.gif

This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Sep 30 2008, 08:24 PM
arremie
post Sep 30 2008, 08:53 PM

hmm...
*******
Senior Member
4,865 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
Somehow I still prefer QED cables over others. I only buy Monster to replace any cap ayam cables. I know it would be better but I don't really care by how much. The one that I care I will go with QED.
htkaki
post Oct 3 2008, 10:46 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(rthj @ Sep 30 2008, 07:07 PM)
frankly speaking....i have yet to see significant difference in the quality of expensive and less expensive HDMI cables....my personal opinion is as long as they're built properly..especially the connectors and the housings are not loose and/or with out-of-spec gaps and such..i guess they work fine.

i am currently using audioquest, cardass and clicktronic....also tried with those that came free with DVD player and media player.....doesnt make much difference with the signal quality.....though the audioquest and cardass looks good in appearance...then again they're hiding behind the furniture
*

I share the same view with you.

Wow, saw something very expensive there rolleyes.gif

rthj
post Oct 3 2008, 11:47 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
eh...i realized i had an extra 's' in the spelling..it should be cardas...what a dishonor to the manufacturer...hehe

This post has been edited by rthj: Oct 3 2008, 11:48 PM
htkaki
post Oct 3 2008, 11:53 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



LOL! I didnt realise that too. My bro is using it for his Hi-Fi. Its performance is darn good! For the price, nothing to complain
rthj
post Oct 3 2008, 11:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
maybe the only thing to 'complain' is the price..hehehehe
ronaldjoe
post Oct 26 2008, 09:42 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
How's IOGear® Black-Label HDMI cable?
Is it a good product? sweat.gif
aerobowl
post Oct 26 2008, 10:17 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
556 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


i will go for cheap cable
but i will choose the shortest cable available (1M or 2M)
cable only to transmit signal not to enhance or boost
so if the 2 equipments' connectors are soso quality then no point to get an expensive cable
ronaldjoe
post Oct 26 2008, 11:24 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Monster is different compare to cheap cable (which I have tried so far) sweat.gif
Most noticeable difference is the colour more vivid.
kamarul_ilhan
post Oct 31 2008, 08:39 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
67 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: KL Sentral - Cheras, Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(rthj @ Oct 3 2008, 11:58 PM)
maybe the only thing to 'complain' is the price..hehehehe
*
yeah.. the price.. damn monster.. but i will consider to have it if i change my 32' lcd to full hd 40'/42'.. hmm.gif
DigitalTech
post Oct 31 2008, 10:54 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



QUOTE(kamarul_ilhan @ Oct 31 2008, 08:39 AM)
yeah.. the price.. damn monster.. but i will consider to have it if i change my 32' lcd to full hd 40'/42'..  hmm.gif
*
You can buy affordable genuine Monster HDMI cable here:

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/756138

Attached Image

This post has been edited by DigitalTech: Oct 31 2008, 10:56 AM
cmw_kwl_6923
post Nov 7 2008, 09:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
759 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Puchong Selangor


QUOTE(law1777 @ Sep 30 2008, 06:38 PM)
monster 800?? rm200+?? so expensive lo.. mine is monster m1000hd (latest) rm250+
*
Brother.

where did you got the ' monster m 1000 with rm 250++, is that original from monster UK? how's the condition output?
Are you satisfied with the product, kindly please give some comment, thanks for advanced, have a nice day. notworthy.gif rclxms.gif

nadky
post Nov 7 2008, 10:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


Try Nordost Wyrewizard or Nordost Silver Screen. Both have very good review. Wyrewizard is ard RM500 while Silver Screen is abt double of it..Significant increase in PQ anf AQ
mizie3505
post Nov 7 2008, 12:59 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
8 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
Sorry bro,

Just to ask on how the connection on HDMI cable? I bought LCD TV but without HDMI cable and the HDMI cable is from TV to where since when I looking at DVD no connection for HDMI cable? Sorry to ask. Many Thanks
cmw_kwl_6923
post Nov 7 2008, 01:19 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
759 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Puchong Selangor


QUOTE(mizie3505 @ Nov 7 2008, 12:59 PM)
Sorry bro,

Just to ask on how the connection on HDMI cable? I bought LCD TV but without HDMI cable and the HDMI cable is from TV to where since when I looking at DVD no connection for HDMI cable? Sorry to ask. Many Thanks
*
Brother ,

you have to look for the dvd player out put with hdmi, then you will get the different between anolog and hdmi. rclxm9.gif
callmevil
post Nov 7 2008, 01:22 PM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(nadky @ Nov 7 2008, 10:04 AM)
Try Nordost Wyrewizard or Nordost Silver Screen. Both have very good review. Wyrewizard is ard RM500 while Silver Screen is abt double of it..Significant increase in PQ anf AQ
*
hehe i call bs on this..
nadky
post Nov 7 2008, 01:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(callmevil @ Nov 7 2008, 01:22 PM)
hehe i call bs on this..
*
hehe i call bs on this..

What do u mean?
cloudwan
post Nov 7 2008, 01:51 PM

- Knob -
*******
Senior Member
8,524 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The Jungle Of Pahang


QUOTE(nadky @ Nov 7 2008, 01:47 PM)
hehe i call bs on this..

What do u mean?
*
He could meant:

BS = Taik Lembu @ Bull Shiet tongue.gif
99below0
post Nov 7 2008, 04:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
251 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Puchong


QUOTE(callmevil @ Nov 7 2008, 01:22 PM)
hehe i call bs on this..
*
I agree. Probably an optical illusion... smile.gif
nadky
post Nov 7 2008, 04:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(99below0 @ Nov 7 2008, 04:34 PM)
I agree. Probably an optical illusion... smile.gif
*
well, check this out...

http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volume_12_4...005-part-1.html

If you were to compare this to cheap HDMI, of course you would notice the difference. Seeing is believing while the reviews done by experts are complimentary.
rthj
post Nov 7 2008, 05:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
according to your link...that wyrewizard is quite cheap for those long HDMI cables (10m and 15m)
nadky
post Nov 7 2008, 10:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(rthj @ Nov 7 2008, 05:04 PM)
according to your link...that wyrewizard is quite cheap for those long HDMI cables (10m and 15m)
*
that's the entry level HDMI from Nordost..It's of 22AWG compared to what we normally would have i.e 26 or 28AWG..

Of course it would not be the best but IMHO, it worth the money spend...


honda6831
post Nov 7 2008, 10:55 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Klang


hi sifu sifu here...

seeking for pro advice...

my friend was quoted a set of projector system for his coming new house home theater room...

one of the item is the HDMI cable which is cost around RM1800++ (supra 10M cable)....

is it worth to buy....???

please advice...

thanks...

rgds,
jack

rthj
post Nov 8 2008, 12:06 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
22awg not as good as 26awg?
enemyofgod
post Nov 8 2008, 12:54 AM

Blu-Ray™ Geek
******
Senior Member
1,431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Dark Side Of The Moon


Get MONSTER Ultra800 HDMI, worthwhile..
htkaki
post Nov 8 2008, 08:30 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(honda6831 @ Nov 7 2008, 10:55 PM)
hi sifu sifu here...

seeking for pro advice...

my friend was quoted a set of projector system for his coming new house home theater room...

one of the item is the HDMI cable which is cost around RM1800++ (supra 10M cable)....

is it worth to buy....???

please advice...

thanks...

rgds,
jack

*

Is your friend getting 1080p pj? RM1,800 for the HDMI is quite expensive. I would rather order the cable online from US and ship it here. It would save a lot of moolah.



callmevil
post Nov 8 2008, 08:41 AM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(honda6831 @ Nov 7 2008, 10:55 PM)
hi sifu sifu here...

seeking for pro advice...

my friend was quoted a set of projector system for his coming new house home theater room...

one of the item is the HDMI cable which is cost around RM1800++ (supra 10M cable)....

is it worth to buy....???

please advice...

thanks...

rgds,
jack

*
10m? does he need 10m??? measure properly and buy accordingly.. (1m = 3feet)
honda6831
post Nov 8 2008, 10:27 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Klang


QUOTE(htkaki @ Nov 8 2008, 08:30 AM)
Is your friend getting 1080p pj? RM1,800 for the HDMI is quite expensive. I would rather order the cable online from US and ship it here. It would save a lot of moolah.
*
i not too sure, his buying an optoma hd-65

in tat case, which cable you recommend ???

his HT room about 14 x 11...the DVDP place below the screen and projector cable goes from the plaster ceiling and right to the player

please advice...


Added on November 8, 2008, 10:29 am
QUOTE(callmevil @ Nov 8 2008, 08:41 AM)
10m? does he need 10m??? measure properly and buy accordingly.. (1m = 3feet)
*
the room is about 14 x 11...

and the AVR is bottom of the screen....

so, i dont know 10m is it too long for his...

cheers,


This post has been edited by honda6831: Nov 8 2008, 10:29 AM
cmw_kwl_6923
post Nov 8 2008, 11:47 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
759 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Puchong Selangor


QUOTE(honda6831 @ Nov 8 2008, 10:27 AM)
i not too sure, his buying an optoma hd-65

in tat case, which cable you recommend ???

his HT room about 14 x 11...the DVDP place below the screen and projector cable goes from the plaster ceiling and right to the player

please advice...


Added on November 8, 2008, 10:29 am

the room is about 14 x 11...

and the AVR is bottom of the screen....

so, i dont know 10m is it too long for his...

cheers,
*
Brother, 10 feet or 10meter? 10 meter arround 30 feet leh! is that neccessary for the 14' x 11' room? blink.gif
nadky
post Nov 8 2008, 11:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(cmw_kwl_6923 @ Nov 8 2008, 11:47 AM)
Brother, 10 feet or 10meter? 10 meter arround 30 feet leh! is that neccessary for the 14' x 11' room? blink.gif
*
It might be depending where he install the projector and where he place the amplifier...
rthj
post Nov 8 2008, 02:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
i am using 15 m of hdmi cable in a room the size of 3.5mx5m, receiver sitting in the middle of the 3.5m width wall and projector is installed on the opposite wall, half way down from the ceiling. 10 m wasnt enough...12 or 13 would but....the one up from 10 is 15m
honda6831
post Nov 9 2008, 01:49 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
25 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Klang


QUOTE(rthj @ Nov 8 2008, 02:09 PM)
i am using 15 m of hdmi cable in a room the size of 3.5mx5m, receiver sitting in the middle of the 3.5m width wall and projector is installed on the opposite wall, half way down from the ceiling. 10 m wasnt enough...12 or 13 would but....the one up from 10 is 15m
*

bro,

how much for the 15m cable...

my friend was quoted RM1800++ for a 10M supra cable....

is this cable really cost so much $$$ ???

please advice any other choices...

cheers,


rthj
post Nov 10 2008, 02:00 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
my 15m is not branded stuff...it was about rm1200....supra being 1800 is not a surprise....still..can shop around, maybe?

Darkkopi
post Nov 10 2008, 07:05 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
10m.. 15m.. is too long for a HDMI cable without any signal booster especially if the cables are thin. The picture quality degraded.
rthj
post Nov 10 2008, 12:50 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
have you tested it before?
Darkkopi
post Nov 10 2008, 04:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(rthj @ Nov 10 2008, 12:50 PM)
have you tested it before?
*
Yes I have, it not only affects HDMI cables, VGA, audio cables etc are also affected, when it's too long, the signal degrades hence if you are going to use such long wires, you need a signal booster.
nadky
post Nov 10 2008, 04:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(Darkkopi @ Nov 10 2008, 04:05 PM)
Yes I have, it not only affects HDMI cables, VGA, audio cables etc are also affected, when it's too long, the signal degrades hence if you are going to use such long wires, you need a signal booster.
*
Yes, you need signal booster unless the HDMI you bought has guarantee from manufacturer (which they normal will mentioned the longest length before signal will be lost) that there'll be no signal lost for certain length. If you exceed that length then you need a booster.
Darkkopi
post Nov 10 2008, 04:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
156 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
QUOTE(nadky @ Nov 10 2008, 04:19 PM)
Yes, you need signal booster unless the HDMI you bought has guarantee from manufacturer (which they normal will mentioned the longest length before signal will be lost) that there'll be no signal lost for certain length. If you exceed that length then you need a booster.
*
and those HDMI cables which have quite a long length before any signal is loss is very thick and expensive tongue.gif
rthj
post Nov 10 2008, 04:28 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
in my setup, it seem there's no difference when i connect the 15m cable vs a 2m cable.....this was before the devices were in its current location.
sphiroth
post Nov 16 2008, 02:42 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Darkkopi @ Nov 10 2008, 04:05 PM)
Yes I have, it not only affects HDMI cables, VGA, audio cables etc are also affected, when it's too long, the signal degrades hence if you are going to use such long wires, you need a signal booster.
*
AFAIK, HDMI is digital signal (VGA and sound is analog). Therefore even if the signal degrade but still above the threshold level, it still will be interpreted correctly. hmm.gif
ronaldjoe
post Nov 17 2008, 01:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(sphiroth @ Nov 16 2008, 02:42 AM)
AFAIK, HDMI is digital signal (VGA and sound is analog). Therefore even if the signal degrade but still above the threshold level, it still will be interpreted correctly.  hmm.gif
*
AFAIK certain yahama speakers have monster cable as its internal circuits.
There is a reason for it ppl go for quality interconnects, where quality is demanded.
I dont see that it's a gimmick if the price is right. Certain stuffs in M'sia is just overpriced IMO.

Chapalang cable cant match the performance of quality cable. Good n bad & Price Vs performance.

sphiroth
post Nov 17 2008, 02:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 17 2008, 01:29 PM)
AFAIK certain yahama speakers have monster cable as its internal circuits.
There is a reason for it ppl go for quality interconnects, where quality is demanded.
I dont see that it's a gimmick if the price is right. Certain stuffs in M'sia is just overpriced IMO.

Chapalang cable cant match the performance of quality cable. Good n bad & Price Vs performance.
*
Speaker will benefit from using good quality wires because its use analog signal whereas HDMI is digital signal (1 and 0 bit ony).
latias93
post Nov 17 2008, 11:29 PM

Peminat Setia Exists
******
Senior Member
1,270 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Soviet State of Sarawak Status: Exiled



I got PS3 and need HDMI cable to reap full awesomeness.. bought a HDMI cable (short) for $15.90 Singaporean Dollars.. not bad.
ronaldjoe
post Nov 18 2008, 07:19 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(sphiroth @ Nov 17 2008, 02:16 PM)
Speaker will benefit from using good quality wires because its use analog signal whereas HDMI is digital signal (1 and 0 bit ony).
*
You have your point right too. icon_rolleyes.gif
May be it's physo, I see my M1000 come with better picture quality...
Colour is more vibrant like having the effect of switching on dynamic contrast. biggrin.gif
It's personal choice anyhow.
aerobowl
post Nov 18 2008, 08:36 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
556 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


i use 2 HDMI cables
1 is 2M panasonic provided cable (FOC with plasma)
1 is 1.5M carrefour made cable (RM22)

both work fine with my upscaling 1080 DVD and i happy with the PQ

HDMI is more like a PC/computer accessory to me, or i will think it is just a USB cable with alot more pins

ronaldjoe
post Nov 18 2008, 09:19 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
No very sure on DVD pq
I watch bluray nowadays...seems to be get addicted to it brows.gif
sphiroth
post Nov 18 2008, 11:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 18 2008, 07:19 AM)
You have your point right too.  icon_rolleyes.gif
May be it's physo, I see my M1000 come with better picture quality... 
Colour is more vibrant like having the effect of switching on dynamic contrast.  biggrin.gif
It's personal choice anyhow.
*
As long as you happy, thats OK. thumbup.gif

Just like those 'fuel saver' thingy, some said it works although scientifically proven not. laugh.gif

QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 18 2008, 09:19 AM)
No very sure on DVD pq
I watch bluray nowadays...seems to be get addicted to it  brows.gif
*
Me too. But BD is very expensive ler.. sweat.gif
ronaldjoe
post Nov 18 2008, 02:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(sphiroth @ Nov 18 2008, 11:53 AM)
As long as you happy, thats OK.  thumbup.gif

Just like those 'fuel saver' thingy, some said it works although scientifically proven not.  laugh.gif
Me too. But BD is very expensive ler..  sweat.gif
*
Get BD fr overseas. Around RM40 to RM50 per title. brows.gif
TSpiscesguy
post Nov 18 2008, 02:34 PM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 18 2008, 02:33 PM)
Get BD fr overseas. Around RM40 to RM50 per title.  brows.gif
*
So cheap meh?? I thought Rm80++ ..
aiman04
post Nov 18 2008, 02:53 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 18 2008, 02:33 PM)
Get BD fr overseas. Around RM40 to RM50 per title.  brows.gif
*
Where are you getting the BDs for RM40-50 bro? Care to share?
sphiroth
post Nov 18 2008, 04:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,804 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 18 2008, 02:33 PM)
Get BD fr overseas. Around RM40 to RM50 per title.  brows.gif
*
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Nov 18 2008, 02:53 PM)
Where are you getting the BDs for RM40-50 bro? Care to share?
*
I also interested.. nod.gif
htkaki
post Nov 18 2008, 05:38 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(aiman04 @ Nov 18 2008, 02:53 PM)
Where are you getting the BDs for RM40-50 bro? Care to share?
*

Cepat-cepat beratur dulu. Cheap BD oh drool.gif That's abt half the price that we are paying.

aiman04
post Nov 18 2008, 05:59 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(htkaki @ Nov 18 2008, 05:38 PM)
Cepat-cepat beratur dulu. Cheap BD oh  drool.gif That's abt half the price that we are paying.
*
Just don't cut queue ar bro. laugh.gif
rthj
post Nov 18 2008, 06:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,048 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
is that even possible at today's market's price and rate...

cheapest BD i got so far is Batman Begin from UK....that'd be about RM49.50 shipping included.
ronaldjoe
post Nov 18 2008, 07:10 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Search in ebay... biggrin.gif buy in a few and have combined shipping discount brows.gif
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...em=300273681014

aiman04
post Nov 18 2008, 07:18 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 18 2008, 07:10 PM)
Search in ebay...  biggrin.gif buy in a few and have combined shipping discount  brows.gif
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...em=300273681014
*
I thought you meant an online retailer. Everybody knows eBay, and we all know we won't get the best price all the time. Usually the cheapest is around RM70-80. RM40-50 is very rare, and usually only low-rated titles. Even that link you provided will cost RM60 already.

Another thing, be careful when buying BDs from UK, make sure it's region free before buying.
ronaldjoe
post Nov 18 2008, 07:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Just need to bid... haha
I saw one crazy malaysian in ebay bought 200+ BD shocking.gif
enemyofgod
post Nov 19 2008, 05:58 AM

Blu-Ray™ Geek
******
Senior Member
1,431 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Dark Side Of The Moon


Try Pioneer HDMI gold plated. Best as in my opinion..
ronaldjoe
post Nov 19 2008, 09:02 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
I have bad experience on pioneer FOC chapalang HDMI cable doh.gif
timothyy
post Nov 19 2008, 09:18 AM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
I bought a RM30 HDMI cable. Cheap cheap and no problem. Anyone care to bring their expensive HDMI to compare?
DigitalTech
post Nov 19 2008, 09:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



QUOTE(timothyy @ Nov 19 2008, 09:18 AM)
I bought a RM30 HDMI cable. Cheap cheap and no problem. Anyone care to bring their expensive HDMI to compare?
*
Try Monster Ultra 800 HDMI cable and you will see the difference.... nod.gif

Attached Image Attached Image


http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/756138

This post has been edited by DigitalTech: Nov 19 2008, 09:39 AM
ronaldjoe
post Nov 19 2008, 09:40 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Not sure bout cheap or not cheap
I changed my M1000 at midnight.
The next day I came back fr work.
My wife told me that 'tv is 'brighter' today' smile.gif
Ha ha then i laughed, she didn't know that it was actually d contrast and colour getting better.
Anyway, this is price Vs performance & affordability issue. Very much up to personal preference and different taste of life.
Like bread and butter; AVR and quality interconnects.

aiman04
post Nov 19 2008, 09:50 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


Guys, read through the pages of this thread. It has been discussed many, many times in this thread, and many other threads. Even in the Audiophilia Objective thread. HDMI is digital. Signal sent is in binary numbers of 0 and 1. Picture or audio quality will not be affected, either you get the signal or not. That's all. The only thing to look for is the physical built quality, durablility, etc.

If we're talking about analogue cables, then yes, different cable could actually bring some difference. What's still debatable is how much improvements each analogue cable can bring versus the price you pay.
ronaldjoe
post Nov 19 2008, 10:21 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
call off d topic.
dun mean any offense... sweat.gif

This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Nov 19 2008, 10:22 AM
timothyy
post Nov 19 2008, 11:44 AM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Nov 19 2008, 09:50 AM)
Guys, read through the pages of this thread. It has been discussed many, many times in this thread, and many other threads. Even in the Audiophilia Objective thread. HDMI is digital. Signal sent is in binary numbers of 0 and 1. Picture or audio quality will not be affected, either you get the signal or not. That's all. The only thing to look for is the physical built quality, durablility, etc.

If we're talking about analogue cables, then yes, different cable could actually bring some difference. What's still debatable is how much improvements each analogue cable can bring versus the price you pay.
*
Ha! Ha! Ya loh...
That is why I got the RM30 one.
And just wanna show to ppl... what diff can a good one make compared to my cheapo one.
DigitalTech
post Nov 19 2008, 12:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



For more information about HDMI cable details, read this article

http://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/index.htm
kamen rider #1
post Nov 28 2008, 06:06 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCZlCcxNCW8

try to view it....

its regarding cable comparison with nano eyes...
aiman04
post Nov 28 2008, 07:15 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


You guys are taking advice from cable manufacturers/sellers. They wanna sell their cables! laugh.gif

Fine, in the end it's your money and your eyes/ears. If you can see/hear the difference, good for you. notworthy.gif
ronaldjoe
post Nov 28 2008, 09:40 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Dont think what the manufacturers claim is wrong, if that the case they would get themselves in litigation for wrong representations in US.
I really can see difference with my M series tongue.gif ...
Btw I have one excess FOC 'Pioneer' HDMI 1.5m cable now
Anyone need it?? RM10... cheap sale RM10. brows.gif

This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Nov 28 2008, 09:48 AM
kamen rider #1
post Nov 28 2008, 07:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


This is what audiophiles stand for...

All of us want high end stuff and the best...

I bet u wont be here if u just a normal user who can watch tv3 & listen to FM all you life right ?... (No offense wink.gif)

we're here to search and research everything the best...

TQ
aiman04
post Nov 28 2008, 08:10 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


Check my sig, I will buy the highest end stuff I can afford, and I'm still eager to upgrade. I'm willing to spend more on analogue cables, interconnects and speakers cables. But nope, sorry, not gonna waste on digital cables.

Search and research smartly, don't take everything the salesman telling you.

Like I always say, in the end you'll be the one spending the money. Other than the internet, search and research hands-on where you can see and hear. We're here just to share knowledge and experience.

kamen rider #1
post Nov 28 2008, 10:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


nevermind...

I'll test myself and compare with my colleague...

and can post it in here...

it's a great science right ?...
mys_terious
post Nov 29 2008, 05:37 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Nov 28 2008, 07:15 AM)
You guys are taking advice from cable manufacturers/sellers. They wanna sell their cables! laugh.gif

Fine, in the end it's your money and your eyes/ears. If you can see/hear the difference, good for you. notworthy.gif
*
i havent been following this thread but these links might help http://www.audioholics.com/education/cable...hdmi%20shootout .. according to the links, el cheapo hdmi and super branded ones do have some diff.. that is the super ultra expensive MIGHT be future proof .. but for me i would go for normal hdmi and if the format changes its still not too late to change to a better 1.. THESE ARE THE RESULT OF THE TEST http://www.audioholics.com/education/cable...testing-results
aiman04
post Nov 29 2008, 08:02 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


We all know how length can attenuate the signal (this can still be solved by using a booster actually).

Those expensive brands passed the 5m test probably because their cables uses better technology to maintain the bandwidth longer. However, all the expensive "high quality" brands still failed the test at 10m.

So that’s about it. At standard 2m length, all of them, cheap or otherwise, passed the test. Now, anyone still want to RM1k for a 2m HDMI cables?

PS: Everyone should know by now, there's no such thing as future-proof. We're already talking about a whole new digital display cable now, supposed to be capable of 2160p resolution, the DisplayPort. tongue.gif

ronaldjoe
post Nov 30 2008, 01:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
Monster is selling for around USD100 (+/-RM300) in US.
It's only overprice in M'sia doh.gif
Agreed with aiman04 that d performance of a cable would degrade over increase in length.
But it's undeniable that monster is still a good quality cable and more superior to cheapo cables.
Personally I find there is performance difference so I am willing to spend the $$$ on the cable.
It comes back to price Vs performance and affordability issue at the end.
smile.gif icon_rolleyes.gif


This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Nov 30 2008, 09:15 AM
kamen rider #1
post Nov 30 2008, 03:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


is it ronaldjoe ?...

which model ?...

hmmm...

just went to harvey norman today...

monster cable 1000 hdmi cost u 1400 ++ Ringgit Malaysia...

Wonder who gonna purchase it...
iman_210
post Nov 30 2008, 07:56 AM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


m using the ultra 800 ones...good PQ to my eyes I would say

This post has been edited by iman_210: Nov 30 2008, 07:57 AM
ronaldjoe
post Nov 30 2008, 09:17 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(kamen rider #1 @ Nov 30 2008, 03:12 AM)
is it ronaldjoe ?...

which model ?...

hmmm...

just went to harvey norman today...

monster cable 1000 hdmi cost u 1400 ++ Ringgit Malaysia...

Wonder who gonna purchase it...
*
I have 10000hd... but very limited
Frankly I wont purchase cable @ 1.4k mad.gif doh.gif


Added on November 30, 2008, 9:27 am
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Nov 29 2008, 05:37 PM)
i havent been following this thread but these links might help http://www.audioholics.com/education/cable...hdmi%20shootout .. according to the links, el cheapo hdmi and super branded ones do have some diff.. that is  the super ultra expensive MIGHT be future proof  .. but for me i would go for normal hdmi and if the format changes its still not too late to change to a better 1..  THESE ARE THE RESULT OF THE TEST http://www.audioholics.com/education/cable...testing-results
*
Bear in mind that the cable used above for testing would not be equivalent to those chapalang FOC HDMI cable we got in M'sia. (at least they r of better built quality)
Those cables used for testing could cost any time >RM200 in M'sia.
Whereas a chapalang cable we got FOC would be a '99 cents' cable in US. icon_idea.gif
At the end, there is still built quality and performance difference between HDMI cables.
Personally I spent approx 10k for HT, I wont go for FOC or RM30 hdmi cable. (I know it's not a lot sweat.gif)
I would get something better.
And again, it's price Vs performance and affordability issue. smile.gif

This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Nov 30 2008, 09:37 AM
mys_terious
post Nov 30 2008, 09:56 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 30 2008, 01:22 AM)
Monster is selling for around USD100 (+/-RM300) in US.
It's only overprice in M'sia  doh.gif
Agreed with aiman04 that d performance of a cable would degrade over increase in length.
But it's undeniable that monster is still a good quality cable and more superior to cheapo cables.
Personally I find there is performance difference so I am willing to spend the $$$ on the cable.
It comes back to price Vs performance and affordability issue at the end.
smile.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
bro, just curious whether have u done any blind tests on the hdmi cables?.. i have done it n i couldnt tell the diff.. but i tested super cheap hdmi and bluejeans, no diff .. and according to my friend who works in hifi shop also claimed he couldnt find any diff between cheap hdmi and expensive ones (but did not say what brand)... maybe monster got diff compared to el cheapo in blind tests.. let me know ok

This post has been edited by mys_terious: Nov 30 2008, 10:05 AM
ronaldjoe
post Nov 30 2008, 10:22 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
When I swapped my FOC cable with Monster,
I see colour and contrast difference on my panel smile.gif
I haven't tried QED tho.
I have no equipment to perform blind test.
mys_terious
post Nov 30 2008, 02:39 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 30 2008, 10:22 AM)
When I swapped my FOC cable with Monster,
I see colour and contrast difference on my panel smile.gif
I haven't tried QED tho.
I have no equipment to perform blind test.
*
u just need a friend to help u. he change the cable (or not change the cable) then u see whether there is a diff or not.. after 10 times then just match what u see n what he did
ronaldjoe
post Nov 30 2008, 06:18 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Nov 30 2008, 02:39 PM)
u just need a friend to help u. he  change the cable (or not change the cable) then u see whether there is a diff or not.. after 10 times then just match what u see n what he did
*
If that's the case. That's what I did...
I swapped cable with d source on, put tv in standby mode, swapped cable then switched on the tv again immediately icon_rolleyes.gif
kamen rider #1
post Nov 30 2008, 06:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


What RonaldJoe ?...

99cent for FOC cable?...

U sell me at RM10, how could u ?...

Guess it include shipping cost, he he he icon_idea.gif ...

thanks for the cable...

better than watching my younger brother playing with the yellow, white, red...
mys_terious
post Nov 30 2008, 10:41 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 30 2008, 06:18 PM)
If that's the case. That's what I did...
I swapped cable with d source on, put tv in standby mode, swapped cable then switched on the tv again immediately icon_rolleyes.gif
*
bro the cable changing part is not supposed to be done by u icon_question.gif .. u need some1 to do it (randomly change between cables) without telling u which is which.. do 10 test n see how many times u guess it right at the end ..anyway i am just curious... dont have to do it if u r not interested... peace icon_rolleyes.gif
ronaldjoe
post Nov 30 2008, 11:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(mys_terious @ Nov 30 2008, 10:41 PM)
bro the cable changing part is not supposed to be done by u  icon_question.gif  .. u need some1 to do it (randomly change between cables) without telling u which is which.. do 10  test n see how many times u guess it right at the end ..anyway i am just curious... dont have to do it if u r not interested...  peace  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
The difference was so obvious to me. Even my wife 'complained' the tv was brighter and sharper. doh.gif
She didn't know that I changed the cable until i told her.
Btw I cant perform any test going forward... I dun have any FOC cable with me.
It's with kamen rider...
Plugging on n off with d M1000 rapidly would cause 'scar' on the gold connectors sweat.gif

This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Nov 30 2008, 11:30 PM
mys_terious
post Dec 1 2008, 01:24 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Nov 30 2008, 11:29 PM)
The difference was so obvious to me. Even my wife 'complained' the tv was brighter and sharper. doh.gif
She didn't know that I changed the cable until i told her.
Btw I cant perform any test going forward... I dun have any FOC cable with me.
It's with kamen rider...
Plugging on n off with d M1000 rapidly would cause 'scar' on the gold connectors  sweat.gif
*
Noted... by the way u dont have to plug it on n off rapidly.. u should get some1 plug in or out slowly if u wanna do the test
cannavaro
post Dec 1 2008, 03:02 AM

CATTENACIO
*******
Senior Member
3,008 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: T.T.D.I, Bukit Damansara


QUOTE(kamen rider #1 @ Nov 30 2008, 03:12 AM)
is it ronaldjoe ?...

which model ?...

hmmm...

just went to harvey norman today...

monster cable 1000 hdmi cost u 1400 ++ Ringgit Malaysia...

Wonder who gonna purchase it...
*
You can buy it cheaper in LYN.
Here:
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...l=monster+cable

ronaldjoe
post Dec 1 2008, 07:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
QUOTE(kamen rider #1 @ Nov 30 2008, 06:22 PM)
What RonaldJoe ?...

99cent for FOC cable?...

U sell me at RM10, how could u ?...

Guess it include shipping cost, he he he  icon_idea.gif ...

thanks for the cable...

better than watching my younger brother playing with the yellow, white, red...
*
I mean those cables sell for RM30 in M'sia is '99 cents' cable in US tongue.gif
Your one is Pioneer FOC HDMI cable.

This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Dec 1 2008, 07:46 PM
yed
post Dec 1 2008, 11:46 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
375 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Selangor


In my opinion if the cheap hdmi also support ver1.3 than go for it (if you happened want to utilised the anynet-CEC, maybe deep color etc)

I noticed my monster 400 does not support anynet compared to my ultra 800 and M1000HD
ar188
post Dec 2 2008, 02:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
eh? how come digital cables like HDMI, wah! got people experience improved color brighter, sharper etc? all analog "audiophile type" symptoms biggrin.gif

for HDMI cables under 3-5Meters most of all cheapo and expensive ones produced same pass results for 1080p at 12bit color i.e. to pass digital "Eye pattern" tests using tektronix digital analyzer...

from the earlier posted article below.
http://www.audioholics.com/education/cable...tion-conclusion

digital artifacts are as such = (described for a super long 65ft HDMI double jointed cable)
"What was occurring was real-time video, but with frequent, rapid-fire areas of snow on the picture which made the movie pretty much unwatchable. Periodically, the entire picture would turn to snow or flicker off for a moment before it came back and attempted to render itself to the best of the double cable's potential."



kkng77
post Dec 2 2008, 04:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
66 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
Hi all, need assistance from u guys...

I am using component cable for my dvd player (do not have HDMI) with my 32" LCD, show that it is running at 576p...

will I get better quality if I invest a HDMI DVD player and link to my 32"LCD? will I get 720p or 1080i or 1080p?
ronaldjoe
post Dec 2 2008, 05:37 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,569 posts

Joined: Apr 2007
My FOC cable and M1000 yield different results icon_idea.gif
I never look back ever since then ... wink.gif


Added on December 2, 2008, 5:41 pmIn case your lcd is full hd, you can consider dvd player with upscaling.

This post has been edited by ronaldjoe: Dec 2 2008, 05:41 PM
iman_210
post Dec 5 2008, 09:01 AM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(kkng77 @ Dec 2 2008, 04:49 PM)
Hi all, need assistance from u guys...

I am using component cable for my dvd player (do not have HDMI) with my 32" LCD, show that it is running at 576p...

will I get better quality if I invest a HDMI DVD player and link to my 32"LCD? will I get 720p or 1080i or 1080p?
*
depend on ur 32 inch lcd capabilities...my best guess it can only upscale max 720p with the HDMI cable. check my sig if u want a hdmi cable mate
ar188
post Dec 6 2008, 09:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(ronaldjoe @ Dec 2 2008, 05:37 PM)
My FOC cable and M1000 yield different results  icon_idea.gif
what kind of results to be more specific? and what length cable between this 2 (FOC vs M1000) ?

htkaki
post Dec 6 2008, 09:25 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(iman_210 @ Dec 5 2008, 09:01 AM)
depend on ur 32 inch lcd capabilities...my best guess it can only upscale max 720p with the HDMI cable. check my sig if u want a hdmi cable mate
*
Giraffe cable is quite good. Btw, a very good you got there thumbup.gif
myqd
post Dec 6 2008, 01:31 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


so conclusion is if u need longer HDMI cable like 10m,it's better to choose GOOD HDMI then normal non-brand HDMI cable? The thing is a GOOD hdmi count on length so 10m easily cost u arround RM800-RM1000,so mind to share what's the 10m hdmi cable u guys using now ?
aiman04
post Dec 6 2008, 01:45 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 6 2008, 01:31 PM)
so conclusion is if u need longer HDMI cable like 10m,it's better to choose GOOD HDMI then normal non-brand HDMI cable? The thing is a GOOD hdmi count on length so 10m easily cost u arround RM800-RM1000,so mind to share what's the 10m hdmi cable u guys using now ?
*
I'm only using 2 and 3 meter HDMI cables only because I don't use a projector. Some forumers here use quite a reliable long one but really affordable. Htkaki should know it.

This post has been edited by aiman04: Dec 6 2008, 01:46 PM
myqd
post Dec 6 2008, 03:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(aiman04 @ Dec 6 2008, 01:45 PM)
Htkaki should know it.
ya,i bought a 10m HDMI at quite affortable price from HTkaki.wonder any clear diff if replace it with a better QED hdmi cable at 7m,less then 1k. hmm.gif

mys_terious
post Dec 6 2008, 05:27 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 6 2008, 01:31 PM)
so conclusion is if u need longer HDMI cable like 10m,it's better to choose GOOD HDMI then normal non-brand HDMI cable? The thing is a GOOD hdmi count on length so 10m easily cost u arround RM800-RM1000,so mind to share what's the 10m hdmi cable u guys using now ?
*
mine i think 9m jin biru
myqd
post Dec 6 2008, 05:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(mys_terious @ Dec 6 2008, 05:27 PM)
mine i think 9m jin biru
apa itu 9m jin biru ? u mean brand is "jin biru" @ 9m? good kah? hmm.gif

btw,apart from future shop,can anyone recommend some online shop selling cables and can ship to M'sia ? ( too bad amazon cant ) sad.gif

This post has been edited by myqd: Dec 6 2008, 05:38 PM
myqd
post Dec 6 2008, 05:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


i'm thinking of getting this QED hdmi 7m,now offer with shipping arround $60 pound,any advice? ( what's the rate today huh? )

This post has been edited by myqd: Dec 6 2008, 05:52 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
bryanlee
post Dec 6 2008, 06:32 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
111 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
From: Kit Long Boh


[quote=myqd,Dec 6 2008, 05:36 PM]
apa itu 9m jin biru ? u mean brand is "jin biru" @ 9m? good kah? hmm.gif

I think jin biru mean Blue Jean Cable.

www.bluejeanscable.com



mys_terious
post Dec 7 2008, 01:26 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
[quote=bryanlee,Dec 6 2008, 06:32 PM]
[quote=myqd,Dec 6 2008, 05:36 PM]
apa itu 9m jin biru ? u mean brand is "jin biru" @ 9m? good kah? hmm.gif

I think jin biru mean Blue Jean Cable.

www.bluejeanscable.com
*

[/quote]

betul betul laugh.gif
ar188
post Dec 7 2008, 10:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 6 2008, 01:31 PM)
so conclusion is if u need longer HDMI cable like 10m,it's better to choose GOOD HDMI then normal non-brand HDMI cable? The thing is a GOOD hdmi count on length so 10m easily cost u arround RM800-RM1000,so mind to share what's the 10m hdmi cable u guys using now ?
*
yes that's a good conclusion based on length required..
and if the HDMI cable does show problems, they show DIGITAL artifacts like "image snow" or Purple video, video flashing white frames etc.

HDMI DIGITAL cables doesn't give you improved color, improved visual definition, improved Y/C definition etc. those are S-video/component/composite analog cable attributes. I'm gonna laugh to death if another HDMI cable seller start claiming these beneifits for their digital cables.. biggrin.gif biggrin.gif
aiman04
post Dec 7 2008, 11:06 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 7 2008, 10:47 AM)
yes that's a good conclusion based on length required..
and if the HDMI cable does show problems, they show DIGITAL artifacts like "image snow" or Purple video, video flashing white frames etc.

HDMI DIGITAL cables doesn't give you improved color, improved visual definition, improved Y/C definition etc. those are S-video/component/composite analog cable attributes. I'm gonna laugh to death if another HDMI cable seller start claiming these beneifits for their digital cables..  biggrin.gif  biggrin.gif
*
Totally agreed. I've grown tired of trying to convince this to some.

And that digital artifacts, if those happens the cable can already be considered as faulty, not picture quality issue.
myqd
post Dec 7 2008, 11:54 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


ok,just to confirm,the conclusion is even HDMI cable at longer length,say 10m or more,as long as it doesnt show problem like image snow or purple video, video flashing, white frames etc,the cable consider PERFECT ? If yes,that means even u change to better quality cable which cost 5-10 times more,it wont improve the PQ,not even in brightness,contrast..... ? hmm.gif
aerobowl
post Dec 7 2008, 01:46 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
556 posts

Joined: Oct 2007


however HDMI does have different specifications and i think what in the HDMI market now is either 1.3 or NONE 1.3

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Definiti...media_Interface
it does mention something about Deep Color for 1.3

therefore for people who claim they see the difference between cheap and expensive HDMI cable maybe is due to one of the following:
1) it is true, PQ is different (i dont own expensive cable so i cant say anything)
2) one is 1.3 version cable and the other is not
3) using different HDMI ports to test (each port has its own PQ settings)
4) using different equipments to test

This post has been edited by aerobowl: Dec 7 2008, 01:48 PM
ar188
post Dec 7 2008, 02:03 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 7 2008, 11:54 AM)
ok,just to confirm,the conclusion is even HDMI cable at longer length,say 10m or more,as long as it doesnt show problem like  image snow or purple video, video flashing, white frames etc,the cable consider PERFECT ? If yes,that means even u change to better quality cable which cost 5-10 times more,it wont improve the PQ,not even in brightness,contrast..... ?  hmm.gif
*
if the cheapo 10meter cable that you have, doesn't show any problems listed then it's fine to use it.. you won't get better results using something that costs 10x more.. LOL... it's not a video processor to "Add/subtract" or "improve/degrade" any analog video elements into the digital signal..


"If yes,that means even u change to better quality cable which cost 5-10 times more,it wont improve the PQ,not even in brightness,contrast..... ?"

by asking this question, means you don't understand the difference between digital and analog.
no point to go further until we understand what is digital and analog signal concept.. smile.gif cheers!

aiman04
post Dec 7 2008, 02:12 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


Not sure about those using different version of the cable or not, but a comparison is only fair if they're both the same version.

And about Deep Color, can anyone find any source using it? On DVD? BD? The Blu-ray specification for movies (BD-ROM) does not support Deep Color or the new xvYCC color space. Even the RGB is not relevant, YCbCr is the only way.

In order to get Deep Color, everything must supports it. The source, the player, the receiver (if applicable) and the TV. The only real source currently is the consumer handycams, etc. Read more here:

http://www.audioholics.com/tweaks/calibrat...evels-xvycc-rgb


ar188
post Dec 7 2008, 02:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(aerobowl @ Dec 7 2008, 01:46 PM)
however HDMI does have different specifications and i think what in the HDMI market now is either 1.3 or NONE 1.3

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Definiti...media_Interface
it does mention something about Deep Color for 1.3

therefore for people who claim they see the difference between cheap and expensive HDMI cable maybe is due to one of the following:
1) it is true, PQ is different (i dont own expensive cable so i cant say anything)
2) one is 1.3 version cable and the other is not
3) using different HDMI ports to test (each port has its own PQ settings)
4) using different equipments to test
*
1. no need to have expensive cables to know there is no difference. it's digital. biggrin.gif
it's like your digital USB2.0 cable or SATA..
you have a file say 10MB size which you copied from hard disk A to harddisk B , suddenly you notice the file size of the file has grown 5% to 10.5MB after the transfer .. or suddenly your Word document which contains 1000words suddenly have extra 10words after transfering to another HDD biggrin.gif

this is what these people are saying in relation to improved video quality and different priced HDMI 1.3 cables.... as though the digital signal can "improve" or "degrade" the analog video source, in the traditional manner (i..e improved/degrade analog attributes like contrast, Y/C , etc) used to compare analog video cables.

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 7 2008, 02:28 PM
mys_terious
post Dec 7 2008, 05:00 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 7 2008, 02:19 PM)
1. no need to have expensive cables to know there is no difference. it's digital.  biggrin.gif
it's like your digital USB2.0 cable or SATA..
you have  a file say 10MB size which you copied from hard disk A  to harddisk B , suddenly you notice the file size of the file has grown 5% to 10.5MB after the transfer ..  or suddenly your Word document which contains 1000words suddenly have extra 10words after transfering to another HDD  biggrin.gif 

this is what these people are saying in relation to improved video quality and different priced HDMI 1.3 cables.... as though the digital signal can "improve" or "degrade" the analog video source, in the traditional manner (i..e improved/degrade analog attributes like contrast, Y/C , etc) used to compare analog video cables.
*
so case close yet? any1 still claim there is a diff in pic quality between cheap n expensive 1.3 hdmi cables?
myqd
post Dec 7 2008, 05:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 7 2008, 02:03 PM)
by asking this question, means you don't understand the difference between digital and analog.
no point to go further until we understand what is digital and analog signal concept..  smile.gif  cheers!
frankly,i dun understand,that's why i ask smile.gif

...anyway,juz curious,then why all those manufacturers who make cables for QED,VDH,IXOS,CHORD still make different class/price of hdmi cables? Only market strategi ? Are they so bodoh to think all the ppl using hdmi are bodoh ? brows.gif

This post has been edited by myqd: Dec 7 2008, 05:23 PM
ar188
post Dec 7 2008, 06:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
ever heard the saying: fools and their money soon depart. Hahaha.
Anyway for normal length 2-3mtr branded hdmi cable between the same brand low end and high end also cant see difference how to justify the diff in price? If want better visuals better spend more on the screen. I..e. tv/proj.


This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 7 2008, 07:03 PM
kepco
post Dec 7 2008, 10:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


different HDMI version cater for different transfer speed (in lay man term). HDMI 1.3a being the highest transfer speed over non-HDMI 1.3a.

I think everyone agreed that HDMI is inter-changable with DVI (de-facto standard for computer monitor connection ), some one who still believe in expensive HDMI cable, can hook up the HDMI cable ( need two adapter ), then compared with RM10 DVI cable, see whether there is different or not. In PC, 30" monitor need 2xDVI cable instead one DVI cable, why, because more "digital" data need to transfer to support resolution of 2560x1600. ( so, 1920X1080 resolution is still at the bottom of transfer speed).

ar188 quoting good example, the different between USB 2.0 vs e-SATA is the transfer speed, but the "digital" content, a.k.a. "file" is the same after transferring. rclxms.gif

http://www.audioholics.com/education/displ...ng-hdmi-ver-1.3
callmevil
post Dec 7 2008, 11:59 PM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


or.. if u guys bother to just read the earlier pages.. i entered into a debate explaining this...
ar188
post Dec 8 2008, 12:14 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(kepco @ Dec 7 2008, 10:38 PM)

ar188 quoting good example, the different between USB 2.0 vs e-SATA is the transfer speed, but the "digital" content, a.k.a. "file" is the same after transferring.  rclxms.gif

and just to add, if there is indeed some error on the files or data being transfered, it will be corupted digitally..
as for corrupted HDMI video signal, won't suddenly be less sharp or slightly blur or lower contrast/brightness.. biggrin.gif it'll will be very drastic like flashing white frames, sparklies, purple image, snowing etc.. you will know it's something wrong when you see it. biggrin.gif


justone
post Dec 8 2008, 12:20 AM

justone
******
Senior Member
1,067 posts

Joined: May 2005


for cables, jz get the expensive ones(hdmi or others) when u had nth else to upgrade

kepco
post Dec 8 2008, 09:04 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(justone @ Dec 8 2008, 12:20 AM)
for cables, jz get the expensive ones(hdmi or others) when u had nth else to upgrade
*
lol..some time a man just have to made themselves happy...just like woman buying shoes.
ar188
post Dec 8 2008, 11:45 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(kepco @ Dec 8 2008, 09:04 AM)
lol..some time a man just have to made themselves happy...just like woman buying shoes.
*
haha liddat also can wan ar? biggrin.gif
aiman04
post Dec 8 2008, 11:59 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


Callmevil, we've been discussing this over and over again all through the pages. Nobody even bothered to read them, hence the same discussion keep coming back. I think we can close this thread, everybody can always refer through the pages. biggrin.gif
myqd
post Dec 8 2008, 03:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(aiman04 @ Dec 8 2008, 11:59 AM)
Callmevil, we've been discussing this over and over again all through the pages. Nobody even bothered to read them, hence the same discussion keep coming back. I think we can close this thread, everybody can always refer through the pages. biggrin.gif
hehe,sorry sorry boss tongue.gif juz read the previous posts till page 7,most answers are "digital is digital,as long as the signal can get through properly,there's no diff in PQ " smile.gif .

just curious,mind to share what's the hdmi cable u guys using now,the one come free with the BD player ? or < RM100 one ?
kepco
post Dec 8 2008, 03:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 8 2008, 11:45 AM)
haha liddat also can wan ar?  biggrin.gif
*
like it or not, the "diameter" of Monster HDMI cables is still a wow factor, if someone not familiar with working of HDMI, the impression given by Monster HDMI cable is still impressive. Imagine we can speak loudly to our friend, 'hey, I just spend RM1K++ for this cable', I think the show off effect is the same as flashing a BMW car key at the bar counter.

gosh, sometime I wish i can do that...flashing a BMW car key. cool2.gif
ar188
post Dec 8 2008, 03:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
ask megatron to give u his spare 525 msport key. Hehehe.
justone
post Dec 8 2008, 03:50 PM

justone
******
Senior Member
1,067 posts

Joined: May 2005


thickness does it meant hav additional sheilding? does it necessary for hdmi? i tot its only useful for power cables

regarding bmw, unless d bmw is fully paid then they deserve d notworthy.gif, if still under hp... remember to pay on time, later kena finance tow back d bmw laugh.gif


kepco
post Dec 8 2008, 05:39 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


different diameter can be due to use in different material or just simply fall under the category of "the bigger the better".

haha...don't care whether is fully paid out or not, as long as I own a BMW flex.gif

okay, off topic...this is too far off, from HDMI to BMW... rclxub.gif
callmevil
post Dec 8 2008, 07:27 PM

80 Druid
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(aiman04 @ Dec 8 2008, 11:59 AM)
Callmevil, we've been discussing this over and over again all through the pages. Nobody even bothered to read them, hence the same discussion keep coming back. I think we can close this thread, everybody can always refer through the pages. biggrin.gif
*
LOL thats what u call 'FAIL' bro!

QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 8 2008, 03:15 PM)
hehe,sorry sorry boss  tongue.gif  juz read the previous posts till page 7,most answers are "digital is digital,as long as the signal can get through properly,there's no diff in PQ "  smile.gif .
*
lol my answer went well above and beyond 'digital is digital' though myqd smile.gif haha

--
so bored man.. dunno what movie to watch next :\
myqd
post Dec 8 2008, 08:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(callmevil @ Dec 8 2008, 07:27 PM)
LOL thats what u call 'FAIL' bro!
lol my answer went well above and beyond 'digital is digital' though myqd smile.gif haha
hehe,but my limited knowledge can only understand up to "digital is digital" lor tongue.gif

ar188
post Dec 8 2008, 11:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(justone @ Dec 8 2008, 03:50 PM)
thickness does it meant hav additional sheilding? does it necessary for hdmi? i tot its only useful for power cables

regarding bmw, unless d bmw is fully paid then they deserve d notworthy.gif, if still under hp... remember to pay on time, later kena finance tow back d bmw laugh.gif
*
yeah sometimes the thickness has to do with the external sheath and shielding, and not the wire cores it self..

as for the BMW... it's between the finance company and the owner whether they pay or not pay or kena tow..
anyone talking like this, sounds like having a big case of inferiority complex... sorry, just my 2 cents.. biggrin.gif
htkaki
post Dec 9 2008, 08:22 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 8 2008, 11:08 PM)
yeah sometimes the thickness has to do with the external sheath and shielding, and not the wire cores it self..

as for the BMW... it's between the finance company and the owner whether they pay or not pay or kena tow..
anyone talking like this, sounds like having a big case of inferiority complex... sorry, just my 2 cents..  biggrin.gif
*

OT : Bro, can lend your 'MyVi 1.3 Turbo SE' to me for the weekend? tongue.gif

myqd, as for my case the Audioquest HDMI cable, Giraffe and was it the wireword HDMI cable (sorry cant remember as have quite a number of HDMI cables before that) do not outperform those OEM Panasonic HDMI cable. Even I do not find any difference between these branded with those freebie HDMI cable (Pioneer) and the 5m made in China cable (REM) that I bought. No audible differences.

Then again, if you ask me to fork out near to 1 grand for a better HDMI cable, I wont do so as I think the money will be better spent elsewhere since my setup is of peasant level sweat.gif

pillage2001
post Dec 9 2008, 08:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,991 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kalamazoo, MI
Did we debate about signal integrity instead of the digital is digital thingy??? I think we did....not sure if it was in here.....Other than 1s and 0s, I think the signal integrity is an issue as well.....
timothyy
post Dec 9 2008, 10:06 AM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 8 2008, 03:15 PM)
hehe,sorry sorry boss  tongue.gif  juz read the previous posts till page 7,most answers are "digital is digital,as long as the signal can get through properly,there's no diff in PQ "  smile.gif .

just curious,mind to share what's the hdmi cable u guys using now,the one come free with the BD player ? or < RM100 one ?
*
I am using a RM30 got from Lelong.com HDMI cable from my PS3 to my Denon Amp.
Still having the same fun like previously.

Anyway... some of u asked why they make expensive HDMI cables although it is known as digital...

We asked a manufaturer before on similar question (different product la, it was surge arresters for coax cable, i.e. Astro signal cable), and their reply was simple.
When there is demand, here is production.

So, they manufactured it because people demanded it... And the company sells it for RM1000 each. Still lotsa stupd ppl buy.

The story like that lo.





fevercrash
post Dec 9 2008, 12:18 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
671 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


lol..so i dun nid to spend much on HDMI cables anymore rclxms.gif
myqd
post Dec 9 2008, 12:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(htkaki @ Dec 9 2008, 08:22 AM)
myqd, as for my case the Audioquest HDMI cable, Giraffe and was it the wireword HDMI cable (sorry cant remember as have quite a number of HDMI cables before that) do not outperform those OEM Panasonic HDMI cable. Even I do not find any difference between these branded with those freebie HDMI cable (Pioneer) and the 5m made in China cable (REM) that I bought. No audible differences.
thanks Htkaki for the reply,very "sincere and warm" reply i must say tongue.gif


QUOTE(timothyy @ Dec 9 2008, 10:06 AM)
I am using a RM30 got from Lelong.com HDMI cable from my PS3 to my Denon Amp.
Still having the same fun like previously.
Glad to know u're having fun and thanks for sharing the price of ur hdmi cable ya thumbup.gif anyone else mind to share ? As for myself,i'm using Panasonic hdmi(white colour,bought arr RM170 from Brunei) from PS3 > 876.And from 876 > AE900,i'm using a 10m hdmi from htkaki (thanks again biggrin.gif ) cost arr same price with my pana hdmi if not mistaken.
mpyw
post Dec 9 2008, 12:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,603 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


me using

1. 2 x FREE HDMI cable from Samsung DVD player (2006)
2. FREE HDMI cable from Pioneer
3. RM59 HDMI cable from Jusco

all no problem & I think the Jusco & samsung cable should be only ver 1.1 or 1.2 only.....
kepco
post Dec 9 2008, 03:00 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(pillage2001 @ Dec 9 2008, 08:25 AM)
Did we debate about signal integrity instead of the digital is digital thingy??? I think we did....not sure if it was in here.....Other than 1s and 0s, I think the signal integrity is an issue as well.....
*
if read previous post, signal integrity is discussed, such as:

1) when use long HDMI cable, choosing a HDMI cable need be consider due to signal loss. But as long as cheapo brand can show up sharp/clean picture, then is good to go.
2) Digital cable such as HDMI/DVI doesn't enhanced PQ/Audio unlike analog cable, other equipments such as whether we're using Plasma or LCD, better AV receiver, equipment setting is more prominent than digital cable itself.
3) Digital cable still go back to 0 and 1, is either we have it or don't have it, don't have complexity of analog world for multistage performance in PQ/Audio if different cable is used. (Signal Integrity)


kamen rider #1
post Dec 9 2008, 06:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
51 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


Question guys...

When I watch Spiderman 3 BD,

There's noise at black part...

why aaa ?...

i watch with ps3, HD ready, 100hz 32"...

Does the problem come with cheap HDMI ?...

I dont have any other BD to test );
iman_210
post Dec 10 2008, 01:30 PM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(kamen rider #1 @ Dec 9 2008, 06:36 PM)
Question guys...

When I watch Spiderman 3 BD,

There's noise at black part...

why aaa ?...

i watch with ps3, HD ready, 100hz 32"...

Does the problem come with cheap HDMI ?...

I dont have any other BD to test );
*
I believe u have to set the LCD tV.
timothyy
post Dec 10 2008, 06:12 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(kamen rider #1 @ Dec 9 2008, 06:36 PM)
Question guys...

When I watch Spiderman 3 BD,

There's noise at black part...

why aaa ?...

i watch with ps3, HD ready, 100hz 32"...

Does the problem come with cheap HDMI ?...

I dont have any other BD to test );
*
That is not noise...
It is actually clarity...
If u were to watch on CRT... u see smooth only.
Your LCD is the problem... not the BD...

ar188
post Dec 10 2008, 06:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(kamen rider #1 @ Dec 9 2008, 06:36 PM)
Question guys...

When I watch Spiderman 3 BD,

There's noise at black part...

why aaa ?...

i watch with ps3, HD ready, 100hz 32"...

Does the problem come with cheap HDMI ?...

I dont have any other BD to test );
*
I did discuss with with mpyw (another big time bluray fan and previously Sony TV supporter) tongue.gif
this movie and a few other BD got lots of "digital grain or specks" showing thro their sony 1080p TVs at the sony store demos, I also dunno why.. maybe the sharpness is dialed maximum??
I really donno this weird phenomena..



htkaki
post Dec 10 2008, 06:47 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



Bro, is it like those grain that we see on our tv during heavy rain during old days or those that we see when the channel is not properly tuned in (RF)?
ar188
post Dec 10 2008, 07:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(htkaki @ Dec 10 2008, 06:47 PM)
Bro, is it like those grain that we see on our tv during heavy rain during old days or those that we see when the channel is not properly tuned in (RF)?
*
yeah something like that.. during certain dark scenes very distracting..
myqd
post Dec 10 2008, 07:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


wow,that's quite bad actually,so is that becos of the cables? Maybe should try with other cables like componet or composite then only know...
ar188
post Dec 10 2008, 08:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 10 2008, 07:45 PM)
wow,that's quite bad actually,so is that becos of the cables? Maybe should try with other cables like componet or composite then only know...
*
yeah it pretty bad, but I don't think it's the HDMI cable.. maybe the settings in the TV.. but strange the sony shop people can't notice these artifacts wan.. what;'s the use of selling 20k Full HD TVs.. tongue.gif
timothyy
post Dec 11 2008, 12:26 AM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
U use S video or component... sure wont see already. He! He! He!
fevercrash
post Dec 11 2008, 06:48 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
671 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


OK..just came back from a shop to test the HDMI cables between "Cap Ayam" VS Branded (Sharp) & AudioQuest,
Setup> Pioneer Plasma Kuro 60inch > Pioneer BDP-LX70A > Pioneer VSX LX60
1: "Cap Ayam" Vs Sharp HDMI Cables (Both at 2m )
Can't really notice any diferent between the two cables..
2: "Cap Ayam" VS AudioQuest (Both at 2m)
Picture colours improvement noticeable especially with more rich colours...others almost the same..

biggrin.gif




myqd
post Dec 11 2008, 06:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


if what most sifus here are correct,it wont be any diff esp at 2m.....better prepare some kind shields b4 kena tembak,hehehe rclxm9.gif
fevercrash
post Dec 11 2008, 06:57 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
671 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


haha..i dunno..i only said what based on what i saw.. biggrin.gif kena tambak oso no choice! biggrin.gif
myqd
post Dec 11 2008, 07:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


hehe,no worry la,sifus here wont be so "cruel" one,just kidding icon_rolleyes.gif
kancheong
post Dec 12 2008, 10:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
Sifus Any shop except pasar road to get an el cheapo hdmi cable ?
TIA
aiman04
post Dec 12 2008, 10:44 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


Carrefour/Tesco for around RM25 only, but stocks are limited.
LeechFever
post Dec 12 2008, 11:01 AM

DodoBird
*******
Senior Member
2,841 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: The East of the Motherland


Cables are essentially conductor wires connected to one device to another. What it do is just transmit pulses of electrical signal (digital signal) from one end to the other. In a way, only thing that matters probably is the quality material of the cable itself and the length of it. Shielding and other good quality material used in making the cable like the insulation bit could be the contributing cause for the higher cost. Brand could also be a factor. Normally static inteference wont be that high enough to interrupt the signal nor do much loss of voltage due to the short length. So in a way, cheap cable will do just fine as long you dont mind the "made in China" brand.
attap
post Dec 12 2008, 04:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
Another interesting article on HDMI cable.

Spend more on Cables?

This post has been edited by attap: Dec 12 2008, 04:15 PM
ar188
post Dec 12 2008, 05:55 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 11 2008, 06:55 PM)
if what most sifus here are correct,it wont be any diff esp at 2m.....better prepare some kind shields b4 kena tembak,hehehe  rclxm9.gif
*
it's very simple, to proof it one and for all, just take photo of the image of of the TV screen.. like they do when comparing projector A and projector B image quality.

cos for video quality , no need the "golden eyes" to see the diff, photo shots with the same room conditions and camera settings and pause at certain scenes can already proof if there is difference or not.
(unlike those mythical golden ears elites when comparing Subwoofer/amp/speaker/CD player)

so far I still haven't come across any professional website/magazine who review the HDMI cables this way (they seem to only review it with the digital signal analyzer for signal integrity)

which is surprising cos they do so this way (image capture) with different projectors to analyze the whole image quality down until sub pixel level quality (like those out of aligment subpixels and even screen door effect)..
so why is that?

iman_210
post Dec 12 2008, 08:13 PM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(attap @ Dec 12 2008, 04:15 PM)
Another interesting article on HDMI cable.

Spend more on Cables?
*
so not worth spending on cables?
sinclairZX81
post Dec 12 2008, 08:20 PM

Change for the better
*******
Senior Member
2,013 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: USJ
QUOTE(attap @ Dec 12 2008, 04:15 PM)
Another interesting article on HDMI cable.

Spend more on Cables?
*
Yep, first time I read about those HDMI details.
attap
post Dec 12 2008, 08:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(iman_210 @ Dec 12 2008, 08:13 PM)
so not worth spending on cables?
*
Depends on your hardware and budget hmm.gif

I just got a China brand HDMI 1.3b cable for my NMT. Comparing with the free HDMI cable came along with my pioneer dvd player, the picture is now slightly brighter then before. tongue.gif

This post has been edited by attap: Dec 12 2008, 08:54 PM
ar188
post Dec 12 2008, 09:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(attap @ Dec 12 2008, 08:53 PM)
Depends on your hardware and budget hmm.gif

I just got a China brand HDMI 1.3b cable for my NMT. Comparing with the free HDMI cable came along with my pioneer dvd player, the picture is now slightly brighter then before.  tongue.gif
*
if china HDMI1.3b vs Monster cable, I wonder if it's even more "clear" biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 12 2008, 10:10 PM
attap
post Dec 12 2008, 10:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 12 2008, 09:35 PM)
if china HDMI1.3b vs Monster cable, I wonder if it's even more "clear"  biggrin.gif
*
Not too sure about that hmm.gif

Seriously I am now seeing more of the "rainbow" effect on 720p movies which is not seen before. However with 1080p movies there is no "rainbow" effect blush.gif
ar188
post Dec 12 2008, 10:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
wah..rainbow.. you using DLP ar?
htkaki
post Dec 12 2008, 11:11 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



DLP with low speed color wheel kua
attap
post Dec 12 2008, 11:50 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 12 2008, 10:56 PM)
wah..rainbow.. you using DLP ar?
*
Dunno the technical terms for it but it is those rainbow like vertical lines due to compression lost.
aiman04
post Dec 13 2008, 12:52 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


Just saw at Carrefour Kepong a 2m HDMI cable for only RM23.50. nod.gif
myqd
post Dec 13 2008, 01:29 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


ok,below are 2 screenshot taken using 2 different HDMI cables,one "MP Acoustic( RM35 )" and the other " Panasonic RP-CDHG15 ( RM170,maybe kena potong:P)".Both picture taken with same camera/setting/time/place/scene,original pic without processing,reduce size in CS3 for posting.

1)
user posted image

2)
user posted image

i'm sure there're some kind of compression and lost in quality during the process of "reduce size,web hosting" but both using excactly same methob for above action,no a proper serious comparison,just corious to know the result,guess which one by which cable? Or no different at all? tongue.gif
ar188
post Dec 13 2008, 02:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 13 2008, 01:29 PM)
ok,below are 2 screenshot taken using 2 different HDMI cables,one "MP Acoustic( RM35 )" and the other " Panasonic RP-CDHG15 ( RM170,maybe kena potong:P)".Both picture taken with same camera/setting/time/place/scene,original pic without processing,reduce size in CS3 for posting.

1)
user posted image

2)
user posted image

i'm sure there're some kind of compression and lost in quality during the process of "reduce size,web hosting" but both using excactly same methob for above action,no a proper serious comparison,just corious to know the result,guess which one by which cable? Or no different at all?  tongue.gif
*
looks like exposure levels/lighting conditions from camera's each shot are different... (did you use the SOP** i.e. "graycard" and manual white balance, shot in RAW)

could say that the top one is more white balanced (bottom photo, lefthand blue screen side looks white washed)..
but then again the the bottom one can see more details near the right side, on the darker feathers.. so how?

maybe a rm1k HDMI cable would have best from both images? tongue.gif




"The single WhiBal card is light Gray, certified to recommended Luminance level of L* = ~75, which is optimum for use in all RAW converters.

Having a "GrayCard" reference is the best assurance that the digital pictures that you capture will have the ability to be properly White Balanced. Only with a proper White Balance can you be ensured of proper and accurate color, regardless of lighting conditions. Unlike your eyes, a digital camera does not automatically see whites as white. It sees the color of the light reflected from it, hence blue-ish in Daylight and Orange-ish in incandescent lighting. By photographing a Gray Card reference for each lighting situation that you are in, you are assured of being able to achieve a proper White Balance for all of your pictures.The Gray Card reference picture can be used with today's software to balance the color casts that various lighting conditions produce with all digital cameras. The best method to properly White Balance your digital pictures is by using a Gray Card properly and shooting RAW. RAW Conversion Software such as Adobe Camera Raw and RawShooter can then perfectly adjust all the captures that were shot under the same lighting conditions."

myqd
post Dec 13 2008, 05:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


thanks ar188,i'm using the same AE900 like urs tongue.gif

Both pics taken without grey card but with 40D,mount on tripod,shoot in RAW at iso100,F4.5,speed < 1sec and AWB.Tripod was not move at same location and lighting condition everything same.I din adjust the WB when open in CS3,just cropped and resize.I found both pics the white part wash out.One thing i found quite hard is when u try to pause the scene(maybe only in PS3?),the still image is not "sharp" compare to the when the playback the movie.That lost a lot of details from the original pics.

For me,the difference in both pics is on the 2nd pic,the brightness looks a bit high,can see more details on the black portion and the contrast is good.The advantage is even the brightness is higher,the black portion still doesnt looks too "grey",almost same compare to 1st pic.The wash out on the "white" portion maybe becos of the contrast was setting a bit too high.( i'm using "cinema 3",contrast at +10 and brightness at -8 ). Bro arr188,mind to share which mode u normally use and what's the setting? U got Happy Feet US version too?

However,the different only can be seen after taking the pics and do comparison like above.When in movie playback i cant really tell the different.Hopefully can pinjam someone 1k HDMI cable? tongue.gif

below is another pic taken with Pana HDMI,i adjust WB a bit with the RAW pic tongue.gif

user posted image

This post has been edited by myqd: Dec 13 2008, 05:09 PM
ar188
post Dec 13 2008, 06:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
myqd.. off topic, our AE900 can accomodate any firmware updates ar? hehe!
myqd
post Dec 14 2008, 12:12 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 13 2008, 06:02 PM)
myqd.. off topic, our AE900 can accomodate any firmware updates ar? hehe!
hehe,our panny like old men oledi,still can makan,but never can take too spicy 1080p's food tongue.gif U can try to hack the firmware to enable pure 1080p (not downscale to 720p),make sure u let me know only,otherwise panny jepun tau sure they are at ur door step tomolo biggrin.gif
iman_210
post Dec 14 2008, 07:34 PM

1.0 bar @ 221WHP
*******
Senior Member
2,684 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: Central Region


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 13 2008, 02:00 PM)
looks like exposure levels/lighting conditions from camera's each shot are different... (did you use the SOP** i.e. "graycard" and manual white balance, shot in RAW)

could say that the top one is more white balanced (bottom photo, lefthand blue screen side looks white washed)..
but then again the the bottom one can see more details near the right side, on the darker feathers.. so how?

maybe a rm1k HDMI cable would have best from both images?  tongue.gif


"The single WhiBal card is light Gray, certified to recommended Luminance level of L* = ~75, which is optimum for use in all RAW converters.

Having a "GrayCard" reference is the best assurance that the digital pictures that you capture will have the ability to be properly White Balanced. Only with a proper White Balance can you be ensured of proper and accurate color, regardless of lighting conditions. Unlike your eyes, a digital camera does not automatically see whites as white. It sees the color of the light reflected from it, hence blue-ish in Daylight and Orange-ish in incandescent lighting. By photographing a Gray Card reference for each lighting situation that you are in, you are assured of being able to achieve a proper White Balance for all of your pictures.The Gray Card reference picture can be used with today's software to balance the color casts that various lighting conditions produce with all digital cameras. The best method to properly White Balance your digital pictures is by using a Gray Card properly and shooting RAW. RAW Conversion Software such as Adobe Camera Raw and RawShooter can then perfectly adjust all the captures that were shot under the same lighting conditions."

*
i can c that the contrast bit too strong on top part and below pic looks more natural. same length for both HDMI cables?
jep
post Dec 14 2008, 08:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Key Ell, Blkg



In terms of signal i believe there's not much difference right?..i mean..it's digital signal '101010101'..but if we're talking about the built...then probably got difference..
attap
post Dec 14 2008, 10:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
199 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
QUOTE(jep @ Dec 14 2008, 08:03 PM)
In terms of signal i believe there's not much difference right?..i mean..it's digital signal '101010101'..but if we're talking about the built...then probably got difference..
*
Simple way of looking at it, the newer version of HDMI cable (v1.3a & b) is all about faster transfer speed plus other stuff.
htkaki
post Dec 14 2008, 10:39 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



not forgetting to support deep colour too.
SUSMatrix
post Dec 14 2008, 11:32 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


Just to share.

I run a cheap RM70 5m HDMI cable from PC to my Sharp Aquas LCD( non FullHD)..it passes audio and video from my ATI 4850.....my Benq 22" monitor uses DVI from the same PC.

So far, the Sharp is looking great...in fact much better than the Benq monitor despite the Sharp is only 1360 x768 (lower resolution) compared to the Benq's 1680 x 1050!!

I guess the Sharp is simply superior product...so even a longer HDMI cable still doesn't affects a good output.

I can't say whether an expensive HDMI cable will be better....but a better display is more important than expensive cables!!!

This post has been edited by Matrix: Dec 14 2008, 11:43 PM
ar188
post Dec 14 2008, 11:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(Matrix @ Dec 14 2008, 11:32 PM)

I can't say whether an expensive HDMI cable will be better....but a better display is more important than expensive cables!!!
*
definitely.. as I have mentioned few pages back.. people obsessing too much with the digital cables rather than the screen it self..
myqd
post Dec 15 2008, 11:44 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(iman_210 @ Dec 14 2008, 07:34 PM)
i can c that the contrast bit too strong on top part and below pic looks more natural. same length for both HDMI cables?
ya,same length,2m smile.gif


QUOTE(htkaki @ Dec 14 2008, 10:39 PM)
not forgetting to support deep colour too.
so the cheapo old version HDMI 1.2,1.3 may not support deep colour? shocking.gif

*** OK,OT a bit,so anyone with USED good quality longer HDMI cable,arround 7-8 meters,prefer brand like Audioquest or QED,if u want to sell off,pls PM me,thanks. thumbup.gif

zzzxtreme
post Dec 15 2008, 11:48 AM

Synth Freak
*******
Senior Member
4,299 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Your girlfriend's bed


im convinced vga has better picture quality output. higher bandwidth and frequency.
SUSMatrix
post Dec 15 2008, 12:10 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(zzzxtreme @ Dec 15 2008, 11:48 AM)
im convinced vga has better picture quality output. higher bandwidth and frequency.
*
VGA can't support resolution like 720p, 1080i, 1080p etc. Only native resolution.

in terms of image quality, almost the same though, as long as the display is of good quality, but i still prefer digital...HDMI can deliver sound and video in one cable...save a lot of mess!!!
zzzxtreme
post Dec 15 2008, 12:15 PM

Synth Freak
*******
Senior Member
4,299 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Your girlfriend's bed


"VGA can't support resolution like 720p, 1080i, 1080p etc. Only native resolution."

not really
SUSMatrix
post Dec 15 2008, 12:20 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(zzzxtreme @ Dec 15 2008, 12:15 PM)
"VGA can't support resolution like 720p, 1080i, 1080p etc. Only native resolution."

not really
*
Are u sure? Can show some example to share? Well,at least my sharp LCD can't.
Goneraz
post Dec 16 2008, 10:50 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
432 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


anyone here have any expereince with supra cable from sweden... heard that its atc approve. How much issit selling here?
myqd
post Dec 19 2008, 06:28 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


supra should be ok,at least is a known brand tongue.gif

me just get myself a QED HDMI-P 8m,looks good,not sure it will perform as good as its look tongue.gif ( tomolo my DENN HDMI 10m should be retire/on sale liaw smile.gif )
swine
post Dec 19 2008, 06:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 19 2008, 06:28 PM)
supra should be ok,at least is a known brand tongue.gif

me just get myself a QED HDMI-P 8m,looks good,not sure it will perform as good as its look  tongue.gif ( tomolo my DENN HDMI 10m should be retire/on sale liaw smile.gif )
*
how much ur QED hdmi-p??
shud be not cheap... blink.gif
myqd
post Dec 19 2008, 06:39 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QED on sale now brows.gif

http://www.futureshop.co.uk/qed-new-perfor...-7m-p-1926.html

This post has been edited by myqd: Dec 19 2008, 06:43 PM


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
BeastX
post Dec 19 2008, 06:49 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(Matrix @ Dec 14 2008, 11:32 PM)
Just to share.

I run a cheap RM70 5m HDMI cable from PC to my Sharp Aquas LCD( non FullHD)..it passes audio and video from my ATI 4850.....my Benq 22" monitor uses DVI from the same PC.
I extended 1080p signal with a 8m DVI cable (with an DVI to HDMI adapter), at a cost of only RM40 for the cable..... to my 46' Bravia

VGA has higher bandwidth than DL-DVI.... 40MHz RAMDACs... up to and surpass 2560x1600@60Hz resolution (at around 2x 1080p)... However signals degrades slightly at such high bandwidth... I have VGA powering up dual 1920x1200 displays or (3840x1200@60Hz)

This post has been edited by BeastX: Dec 19 2008, 06:52 PM
justone
post Dec 19 2008, 07:38 PM

justone
******
Senior Member
1,067 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(Matrix @ Dec 15 2008, 12:20 PM)
Are u sure? Can show some example to share? Well,at least my sharp LCD can't.
*
i guess its ur sharp lcd's pc input cant display full hd resolution...
not many lcd tv provide full hd resolution(vga)
instead they will output some weird resolution for pc input(vga)

newer lcd tv(i.e. samsung a550 onwards) provides 1080p resolution via component n vga as well

This post has been edited by justone: Dec 19 2008, 07:39 PM
swine
post Dec 19 2008, 10:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 19 2008, 06:39 PM)
i tot many ppl are againts getting branded hdmi cable..
so is there any real diff btw those who get expensive cable and those cap ayam?? blink.gif
i tot of getting a monster
ar188
post Dec 19 2008, 11:40 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(Matrix @ Dec 15 2008, 12:10 PM)
VGA can't support resolution like 720p, 1080i, 1080p etc. Only native resolution.

in terms of image quality, almost the same though, as long as the display is of good quality, but i still prefer digital...HDMI can deliver sound and video in one cable...save a lot of mess!!!
*
VGA supports 1920x1080 (and higher) and any lower resolution in between no problem..

but digital would be a better signal path from source to display.. especially LCD monitorss (which have to convert analog VGA back to digital and introduce much rounding errors during signal conversion)

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 19 2008, 11:46 PM
BeastX
post Dec 20 2008, 06:56 AM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 19 2008, 11:40 PM)
VGA supports 1920x1080 (and higher)  and any lower resolution in between no problem.....
Higher... much higher... the 400MHz RAMDACs can go high, even slighly beyond DL-DVI... pushing mine to 3840x1200@60Hz... and 30 inchers resolution of 2560x1600@60Hz no problem too, but no monitor this resolution size have analog signal processor(s) for this resolution.

The VGA signal can benefit from short & good quality cables...


Added on December 20, 2008, 7:02 am
QUOTE(swine @ Dec 19 2008, 10:40 PM)
i tot many ppl are againts getting branded hdmi cable..
so is there any real diff btw those who get expensive cable and those cap ayam?? blink.gif
i tot of getting a monster
Digital signal.. 1 or 0... either the cable works or don't, copper/gold/silver.. all conduct electricity. If 1 dollar cable or 100 dollar cable works the same, which would you rather part your money on?.

This post has been edited by BeastX: Dec 20 2008, 07:02 AM
ar188
post Dec 20 2008, 09:29 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(BeastX @ Dec 20 2008, 06:56 AM)
Higher... much higher... the 400MHz RAMDACs can go high, even slighly beyond DL-DVI... pushing mine to 3840x1200@60Hz... and 30 inchers resolution of 2560x1600@60Hz no problem too, but no monitor this resolution size have analog signal processor(s) for this resolution.
yeah it can go really high, but the caveat it that its valid for shorter lengths probably 1-2 meters is best... at ultra high rez it's pretty prone to signal sync problems at long foot runs say 3-5meters.... not very good solution for projectors..unless you use a VGA signal booster...

BeastX
post Dec 20 2008, 12:08 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 20 2008, 09:29 AM)
yeah it can go really high, but the caveat it that its valid for shorter lengths probably 1-2 meters is best...  at ultra high rez it's pretty prone to signal sync problems at long foot runs say 3-5meters.... not very good solution for projectors..unless you use a VGA signal booster...
Or with powered digital VGA switches and(or) a VGA spiltter box (like Matrox's TH2Go) I can get to power 3 separate SXGA projectors with decent pixel quality for a panorama 3840x1024pixels@60Hz view ... with a distance of about 4 meters of combined cables/VGA sockets.

This post has been edited by BeastX: Dec 20 2008, 12:09 PM
myqd
post Dec 20 2008, 05:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(BeastX @ Dec 20 2008, 06:56 AM)
Digital signal.. 1 or 0... either the cable works or don't, copper/gold/silver.. all conduct electricity. If 1 dollar cable or 100 dollar cable works the same, which would you rather part your money on?.
maybe it's just my mind trying to convince me,my 1st impression for QED HDMI-P 8m VS previous DENN 10m HDMI,there's definately some different,i see the colour is more saturated on QED,brightness/contrast/sharpness didnt notice any much different,maybe need to change spectacle tongue.gif .

Dun shoot,i'm just getting the best i can afford now. tongue.gif
swine
post Dec 21 2008, 09:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 20 2008, 05:25 PM)
maybe it's just my mind trying to convince me,my 1st impression for QED HDMI-P 8m VS previous DENN 10m HDMI,there's definately some different,i see the colour is more saturated on QED,brightness/contrast/sharpness didnt notice any much different,maybe need to change spectacle  tongue.gif .

Dun shoot,i'm just getting the best i can afford now.  tongue.gif
*
ty bro..
i believe certainly there will be a diff betwwen cap ayam n branded..
i will go for the best i can afford.. tongue.gif
ar188
post Dec 21 2008, 10:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 20 2008, 05:25 PM)
maybe it's just my mind trying to convince me,my 1st impression for QED HDMI-P 8m VS previous DENN 10m HDMI,there's definately some different,i see the colour is more saturated on QED,brightness/contrast/sharpness didnt notice any much different,maybe need to change spectacle  tongue.gif .

Dun shoot,i'm just getting the best i can afford now.  tongue.gif
*
it's always good to get decent cables.. if only for it's decent materials used and construction and physical ruggedness/long lastingness.
as mention before, digital cables do not have the ability to change the color/video characteristics of the video digital signal, only the ability to corrupt it in very abrupt manner flashes of white frames/sparklies purple video etc....
but of coz, this is engineering point of view,
subjectively people feel differently.. even blind A/B test with the same audio or video material can produce different remarks or choices...
myqd
post Dec 21 2008, 12:24 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 21 2008, 10:52 AM)
it's always good to get decent cables.. if only for it's decent materials used and construction and physical ruggedness/long lastingness.
as mention before, digital cables do not have the ability to change the color/video characteristics of the video digital signal, only the ability to corrupt it in very abrupt manner flashes of white frames/sparklies purple video etc....
but of coz, this is engineering point of view,
subjectively people feel differently.. even blind A/B test with the same audio or video material can produce different remarks or choices...
ya,i agreed with u.Like u mentioned in another thread " Mind tricks? Doesn't matter, it makes me happy " thumbup.gif

Maybe i should take some pics for AB comparison like the other day see how. smile.gif

This post has been edited by myqd: Dec 21 2008, 12:28 PM
ar188
post Dec 21 2008, 01:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 21 2008, 12:24 PM)
ya,i agreed with u.Like u mentioned in another thread " Mind tricks? Doesn't matter, it makes me happy thumbup.gif

Maybe i should take some pics for AB comparison like the other day see how. smile.gif
*
agreed, and it's also good to know that all the components including cables in the AV chain is decently built and good quality. since already paid 5 figures (for example for bd source/display/av amp speakers etc) no point not to spend few hundred on nice decent interconnects..
swine
post Dec 21 2008, 06:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
while choosing hdmi cable..some claim suppoting full HD, some are not? so gettting a fullHD hdmi wiser for future proof?
BeastX
post Dec 21 2008, 07:10 PM

Genomics Revolution; Proud to be a Scientist
*******
Senior Member
5,987 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: North Borneo & South Nihon/Nippon


QUOTE(swine @ Dec 21 2008, 06:37 PM)
while choosing hdmi cable..some claim suppoting full HD, some are not? so gettting a fullHD hdmi wiser for future proof?
No difference, same amount of wires/connectors
robertngo
post Dec 21 2008, 08:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(swine @ Dec 21 2008, 06:37 PM)
while choosing hdmi cable..some claim suppoting full HD, some are not? so gettting a fullHD hdmi wiser for future proof?
*
why does HDMI cable material matter? the signal is digital not analog, it either transfer every bit perfectly or it does not work at all, have anyone really see a improvement using gold plated super expensive HDMI cable?
atomica
post Dec 21 2008, 09:04 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
340 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
any idea where i can get really short HDMI cables? less than 1m? don't want the wires to trail everywhere.
swine
post Dec 21 2008, 09:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(robertngo @ Dec 21 2008, 08:27 PM)
why does HDMI cable material matter? the signal is digital not analog, it either transfer every bit perfectly or it does not work at all, have anyone really see a improvement using gold plated super expensive HDMI cable?
*
somehow if a cable can support 1080i might not succed in 1080p
because the data send is twice the amount..
and therefore traffic congestion is there..so it is not that simple as u think just transfering 1,0 laugh.gif
maskedchan
post Dec 21 2008, 09:52 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,022 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(robertngo @ Dec 21 2008, 08:27 PM)
why does HDMI cable material matter? the signal is digital not analog, it either transfer every bit perfectly or it does not work at all, have anyone really see a improvement using gold plated super expensive HDMI cable?
*
how about transfer speed?
dont that affected the quality?

i did see quite different improvement on color and more smooth if compare with gold plated with oem non-gold plated.


Added on December 21, 2008, 9:56 pm
QUOTE(swine @ Dec 21 2008, 09:48 PM)
somehow if a cable can support 1080i might not succed in 1080p
because the data send is twice the amount..
and therefore traffic congestion is there..so it is not that simple as u think just transfering 1,0 laugh.gif
*
agree...
even usb also 1,0..how come can data lost when transferring large amount data on usb..
i believe it will same concept apply to hdmi

This post has been edited by maskedchan: Dec 21 2008, 09:56 PM
ar188
post Dec 21 2008, 10:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(maskedchan @ Dec 21 2008, 09:52 PM)
agree...
even usb also 1,0..how come can data lost when transferring large amount data on usb..
i believe it will same concept apply to hdmi
*
if data is lost while transfering via USB, then the file becomes corrupted..

if you have a letter in word file transfered via corrupted USB link, I don't think suddenly a few new meaningful sentences or words will appear in your letter right?

most likely you get garbled ascii text or the word document refuse to open.

same with HDMI, if signal doesn't go thro properly then you get abrupt video frames error.. not suddenly it become "less" sharp picture or less contrast or reduced resolution... how come people still have those "analog Audio cable" mentality ar?

SUSMatrix
post Dec 21 2008, 10:10 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


I believe in cheap cables, it works very well for me.

Here, read this:

http://boardsus.playstation.com/playstatio...=828972#M828972

IMO, if you are running < 10m, you'll do fine for HDMI. I'm running a 5m cheap HDMI and it looks (and sounds) great. Now i'm looking for a cheap 5m optical cable...anyone got one?

btw, i remember i have a cheap optical and an expensive one i bought for my old xbox. Both was about 1m long. There's no difference at all when the sound comes out of my HT system!!

This post has been edited by Matrix: Dec 21 2008, 10:15 PM
kepco
post Dec 22 2008, 07:40 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


ar188, I solute for your patience. rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
robertngo
post Dec 22 2008, 08:08 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(maskedchan @ Dec 21 2008, 09:52 PM)
how about transfer speed?
dont that affected the quality?

i did see quite different improvement on color and more smooth if compare with gold plated with oem non-gold plated.


Added on December 21, 2008, 9:56 pm

agree...
even usb also 1,0..how come can data lost when transferring large amount data on usb..
i believe it will same concept apply to hdmi
*
all usb cable at usb 1.0 transfer data at same speed the problem you have should be windows does not copy over some of the files due to timeout, have you see any god plated usb cable that said it is better at data transfer that normal cable? it make no sense because the same usb spec cable will have the same speed, so all HDMI 1.3 version cables should have the some transfer speed because they are same spec.


Added on December 22, 2008, 8:18 am
QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 21 2008, 10:07 PM)

same with HDMI, if signal doesn't go thro properly then you get abrupt video frames error.. not suddenly it become "less" sharp picture or less contrast or reduced resolution... how come people still have those "analog Audio cable" mentality ar?
*
Monster are depending on this mentality to make money.

This post has been edited by robertngo: Dec 22 2008, 08:18 AM
swine
post Dec 22 2008, 09:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(robertngo @ Dec 22 2008, 08:08 AM)
all usb cable at usb 1.0 transfer data at same speed the problem you have should be windows does not copy over some of the files due to timeout, have you see any god plated usb cable that said it is better at data transfer that normal cable? it make no sense because the same usb spec cable will have the same speed, so all HDMI 1.3 version cables should have the some transfer speed because they are same spec.

Added on December 22, 2008, 8:18 am
Monster are depending on this mentality to make money.
*
usb thumbdrive altot the same version..still can vary in speed..try diff brand u will find out soon..
so depends on the material used.. tongue.gif

i dun believe a cheap HDMI can support 1080p, the EYE diagrame normally use for the HDMI test explain everything..it will suffer data congestion..
actually many ppl againts monster because of ther superior pricing, but no ones deny thier quality (the hi end series)..den how about the QED, Audioquest, Wireworld..etc
ar188
post Dec 22 2008, 09:47 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(kepco @ Dec 22 2008, 07:40 AM)
ar188, I solute for your patience.  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
*
hehe! patience is a virtue mah.. tongue.gif


Added on December 22, 2008, 9:53 am
QUOTE(swine @ Dec 22 2008, 09:43 AM)
i dun believe a cheap HDMI can support 1080p, the EYE diagrame normally use for the HDMI test explain everything..it will suffer data congestion..
actually many ppl againts monster because of ther superior pricing, but no ones deny thier quality (the hi end series)..den how about the QED, Audioquest, Wireworld..etc
*
few pages back, there is a link on thereview of cables using super expensive tektronix equipment lent to by Monster cable to test the eye pattern...

interesting fact is all cheapo HDMI1.3 cables at below 3meter passes the test..

above that maybe 5-10meter range, maybe 1-2 cables begin to show the eye pattern collapsing (but still valid pattern) and still data integrity is intact (pass the test)... and this is with 1080p deep color signal.

and when the cables fail at higher test, the video show abrupt video symptoms not minor loss of detail or reduced contrast/sharpness etc..

so if HDMI cable not meet the spec then it should fail the video transmisson totally.. it's either you got a major problem which can notice immediately or not have any visible video problem. this is the Digital transmission characteristic..


Added on December 22, 2008, 9:57 am
QUOTE(swine @ Dec 22 2008, 09:43 AM)
usb thumbdrive altot the same version..still can vary in speed..try diff brand u will find out soon..
so depends on the material used.. tongue.gif
yes, but if it's slower speed, then it's not rated at readyboost compliant 6MBps or it will just state as 3MBps write /rewrite etc..

if it's already compliant then it'll reach that speed.. unless it's fake.

so maybe the only logic for cheapo HDMI cables not performing is that maybe it's just a cheap 1st gen HDMI rebadged to 1.3 spec..

hehe!

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 22 2008, 09:57 AM
maskedchan
post Dec 22 2008, 10:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,022 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


i have a two eom HDMI cable... one cannot even get signal 1080p signal on my ps3...

so for me...i still think cheapo hdmi cable is not up to par with a branded hdmi...

that is what i feel...
Goneraz
post Dec 22 2008, 12:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
432 posts

Joined: Oct 2006


??? what do you mean cant get 1080P signal? Any HDMI cable can transmit HD 1080p signal regardless. Can your tv support full hd? The more likely problem would be your setting. Also how do you know your tv are not getting 1080P?
1tinydino
post Dec 22 2008, 04:09 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
14 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
What Hifi Sound & Vision..on Why We're No 1:

WE'RE COMPLETELY IMPARTIAL
"Every verdict is that of the magazine, not of an advertiser or press officer. When we say something's good, it is"

Unless the entire world's HDMI's cable producer, QED, Monster, VDH, Chord etc etc etc pakat with reviewers like whathifi, what homecinema, sterophiles, cnet, bla bla bla to con consumers...then yes, there are difference between good and bad HDMI cables.

it doesn't mean cheap cables doesn't work, they do, to a certain extend...they probably offer you output...but you're then probably not getting the most out of your source and your display...as simple as that...

also it doesn't mean you should get the most expensive HDMI cables around...a decent one...to a layman's eyes & ears, differences are probably not very visible...but for pros, they make a mountain of difference...

a car is a car, whether it is a RM40k car or a RM400k car, both has got 4-wheels, both got a stering and most importantly, both can take you to A-B..but some ppl like to get from A to B feeling secured, ie, cars with Air-Bags, electronic stability controls, some like to feel more comfortable in the car if distance from A to B is 600miles...some like to use their notebook in the car, some like to watch DVD movies in the car...obviously, the RM40k car don't offer you this...so, there are differences between a RM40k car with a RM400k car...

for those who know & quoted digital bits is a lots of 0's and 1's...they probably don't know a voltage pulse is required to drives them to produce the bunch of 0's and 1's...there are differences when u measure the output of a cable at the end of it, when u inject a 5V pulse thru a low resistance cable and a high resistance cable (V=I*R) ...to make a cable low resistance, there are different manufacturing methods and its certainly more complex than simply putting a bunch of cables in a core...the way u arrange the conductors in a core, even the type of cables used matters...

during the high-time of copper trading, the LME (london metal exchange) rate for copper went up to about 75-80%...for a lot of ppl, that's a lot of margin to lost...so, some manufacturers in the south east asia, to save cost and remain competitive, instead of having pure copper conductors, they mixed it with steel and what-not...to bring down the cost of copper conductors...i know this because i'm an electronic & electrical graduate, and i'm in the electrical line...

obviously the metal-mixed copper conductor were a lot cheaper compared to the pure copper conductors, and the downside, they exhibits much lower current carrying capacity...test a 40kA fault current test on the similarly size pure & not pure copper conductor, pure conductos will pass test, while copper mixed steel conductor will burn...

so, my point is, there are differences between good & pricey cables, and cheap-er cables...otherwise, manufacturers like QED & Monster won't hv to sell their cables at a premium when they can sell it so much closer to cheap cables and make a huge profit out of volumes & not margins..

not to forget reviewers won't need to crack their heads to test and sample the cables they received...
mpyw
post Dec 22 2008, 04:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,603 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


CMY once offer me to take back a QED HDMI cable that are selling fro RM350 to test it on my system....they said if I cannot see any difference...take back the cable at no charge at all.....hmm.gif
htkaki
post Dec 22 2008, 04:26 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(mpyw @ Dec 22 2008, 04:22 PM)
CMY once offer me to take back a QED HDMI cable that are selling fro RM350 to test it on my system....they said if I cannot see any difference...take back the cable at no charge at all.....hmm.gif
*

Taukeh, you should have taken it and test it out.



mpyw
post Dec 22 2008, 04:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,603 posts

Joined: Feb 2007


but i'll need at least 2, 1 from player to AVR. the other from AVR to TV to get proper result.....and I'm not gonna spend RM700 on 2 x 1m HDMI cable sweat.gif

peasant can't afford luxury thing...tongue.gif
swine
post Dec 22 2008, 04:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(1tinydino @ Dec 22 2008, 04:09 PM)
for those who know & quoted digital bits is a lots of 0's and 1's...they probably don't know a voltage pulse is required to drives them to produce the bunch of 0's and 1's...there are differences when u measure the output of a cable at the end of it, when u inject a 5V pulse thru a low resistance cable and a high resistance cable (V=I*R) ...to make a cable low resistance, there are different manufacturing methods and its certainly more complex than simply putting a bunch of cables in a core...the way u arrange the conductors in a core, even the type of cables used matters...

*
very good explanation..salute u rclxms.gif
yeah HDMI are digital, but that is not that simple as 1 & 0 signal sending from 1 end to another..
cables don't deal wit digits, they deal with real world analogue signals that are used to represent those digits..
so the tricks are lying between there.. tongue.gif
hsiengloong
post Dec 22 2008, 05:58 PM

~Bass Maniac~
*****
Senior Member
899 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: Sumwhere


Dear all, so is there a difference between a RM30 HDMI cable and Rm300 monster cable?? Personally, i feel the difference maybe at most 10% and it does not justify the 1000% price difference...
kepco
post Dec 22 2008, 06:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


no body said cable manufacturing is a simple process, the argument is whether when different price of HDMI cables having meet the same standard is it going to have different in PQ, example, RM100 HDMI ver 1.3 vs RM1000 HDMI ver 1.3 won't give PQ different.

If anyone care to read all the pages and understand simple english do realized that HDMI would have signal loss as well, if someone run it very long. Again, this is nothing to do with PQ.

for the example of the car, let look at this way, why do you think BMW selling Mini One more expensive than Honda, Toyota, Citroen, Renault 1.6 litre car. Is simple, low pricing could damage their branding strategy and their pricing in the market. Same goes to QED/Monster, just imagine if you buy Monster HDMI cable same price as said "Cap Ayam" HDMI cable, what kind of damage will do to thier other products line.

This post has been edited by kepco: Dec 22 2008, 06:14 PM
ar188
post Dec 22 2008, 06:51 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(1tinydino @ Dec 22 2008, 04:09 PM)
for those who know & quoted digital bits is a lots of 0's and 1's...they probably don't know a voltage pulse is required to drives them to produce the bunch of 0's and 1's...there are differences when u measure the output of a cable at the end of it, when u inject a 5V pulse thru a low resistance cable and a high resistance cable (V=I*R) ...to make a cable low resistance, there are different manufacturing methods and its certainly more complex than simply putting a bunch of cables in a core...the way u arrange the conductors in a core, even the type of cables used matters...
you really sound like you don't know what you are talking about.. the output is measured with a Tektronix Signal analyser and the output is in the form of "eye pattern"..
if a USD10.00 cable passes the HDMI 1080p bandwidth test using this 6figure machine (which the article few pages back confirmed), all your reasoning about 5v/high.low resistance/copper prices etc doesn't matter.

biggrin.gif


Added on December 22, 2008, 6:58 pm
QUOTE(1tinydino @ Dec 22 2008, 04:09 PM)
What Hifi Sound & Vision..on Why We're No 1:
alamak.. no wonder la.. UK mag reader.. doh.gif (analog audio cable mentality)

UK mags are good for audio reviews and such.. but when it comes to AV (especially the "V" as in video..), best leave the reviews to USA AV mags..

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 22 2008, 06:58 PM
timothyy
post Dec 22 2008, 07:09 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
Man... u guys are still at this.

Can't u all just accept it?
ar188
post Dec 22 2008, 07:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(timothyy @ Dec 22 2008, 07:09 PM)
Man... u guys are still at this.

Can't u all just accept it?
*
just for clarity,.. accept what? that expensive cables does or doesn't make a difference compared to good but cost effective cables?

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 22 2008, 07:33 PM
swine
post Dec 22 2008, 08:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
157 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
QUOTE(kepco @ Dec 22 2008, 06:08 PM)
for the example of the car, let look at this way, why do you think BMW selling Mini One more expensive than Honda, Toyota, Citroen, Renault 1.6 litre car. Is simple, low pricing could damage their branding strategy and their pricing in the market. Same goes to QED/Monster, just imagine if you buy Monster HDMI cable same price as said "Cap Ayam" HDMI cable, what kind of damage will do to thier other products line.
*
seriously a mini cooper will beat altis,civic flat..
mini cooper give u fun and more importantly the "sheer driving pleasure" by bmw
then the selling point is there, is just the consumer need those products or not.. tongue.gif
nadky
post Dec 22 2008, 09:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 22 2008, 07:22 PM)
just for clarity,.. accept what? that expensive cables does or doesn't make a difference compared to good but cost effective cables?
*
Just think about this, if you are a businessman, do you 1st invest a lot of money in research, manufacture and sell something that does not has demand? If expensive HDMI cable does not improve PQ and AQ I believe all cable manufacturers would not have their flagship cables.

There are always people who can afford expensive cable, to them, maybe 1k investment to have PQ increase by 10% would worth the money while to some others, it's totally a waste of money. So, it's subjective and whether you think you would want to spend that kind of money.
ar188
post Dec 22 2008, 09:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(nadky @ Dec 22 2008, 09:22 PM)
Just think about this, if you are a businessman, do you 1st invest a lot of money in research, manufacture and sell something that does not has demand? If expensive HDMI cable does not improve PQ and AQ I believe all cable manufacturers would not have their flagship cables.

There are always people who can afford expensive cable, to them, maybe 1k investment to have PQ increase by 10% would worth the money while to some others, it's totally a waste of money. So, it's subjective and whether you think you would want to spend that kind of money.
*
yes, if it improves 10% of the quality then I would even buy them even if it costs 1k.. then that's where the reasoning breaks down, how can a digital cable improve anything? it's just a copper cable not a Hidef Video Processor.. (unlike analog AV cables which can degrade a analog audio/video signal)

still you don't get the gist of what I'm trying to say from a technical point of view.. the USD10 cable and the USD300 cable all pass the HDMI1.3 test.. using super precise testing equipment loaned by monster cable themselves.

if you say, people want to spend on 1k cable just because they got money, go ahead, that's nothing wrong with that, just don't tell me that a lesser good quality cable won't pass the data thro properly. cos at the end of the day,
it's whether if the digital data goes thro 100% or it doesn't and if it doesn't, you will know it cos it will be abrupt.

it cant make it 5% better or 10% less from it's source to the TV..

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 22 2008, 10:01 PM
kepco
post Dec 22 2008, 10:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(swine @ Dec 22 2008, 08:41 PM)
seriously a mini cooper will beat altis,civic flat..
mini cooper give u fun and more importantly the "sheer driving pleasure" by bmw
then the selling point is there, is just the consumer need those products or not.. tongue.gif
*
personally, I owned Monster's HDMI 1080p cable, I just don't see any PQ different between Monster's and those HDMI cable bundled with blu-ray player on my Pioneer 42" plasma. In fact, if anyone using HTPC, then there is others that can affect PQ, such as TV settings, choice of player, source etc.

Yes, if paid more for mini one driving pleasure, than we paid more for a reason, but we merely paid more for mini one just mere want to transport from point A to point B, a Perodua vehicle would just do the trick. Monster HDMI vs Chap Ayam fall under "just mere want to transport from point A to point B, a Perodua vehicle would just do the trick' category. We just want something adhere to the HDMI transfer speed, it just didn't add value beside than that.


samlee860407
post Dec 22 2008, 10:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,631 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


guys, want to ask, how much is a branded 2m and 3m HDMI cable (version 1.3)?

please state the brand and price if you guys know

PS: i dont wan get conned , so need help abit >.<
kepco
post Dec 23 2008, 12:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


harvey selling Monster HDMI between RM800 to ~RM1600
samlee860407
post Dec 23 2008, 12:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,631 posts

Joined: Oct 2005


for 2m and 3m only wo..... >.<
ar188
post Dec 23 2008, 12:23 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(kepco @ Dec 23 2008, 12:11 AM)
harvey selling Monster HDMI between RM800 to ~RM1600
*
I wonder if it improves the visual quality as much as a USD250 BD-35 player.. since they are in the same price range.. brows.gif

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 23 2008, 12:28 AM
TSpiscesguy
post Dec 23 2008, 06:26 AM

私の名前はりゅうです
*******
Senior Member
3,963 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
My bet will go for the BD35..
kepco
post Dec 23 2008, 07:12 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


beside BD35, next one is Pioneer Kuro series.


Added on December 23, 2008, 7:23 am
QUOTE(samlee860407 @ Dec 23 2008, 12:13 AM)
for 2m and 3m only wo..... >.<
*
wonder why this thread is so hot.... rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by kepco: Dec 23 2008, 07:23 AM
nadky
post Dec 23 2008, 08:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 22 2008, 09:57 PM)
yes, if it improves 10% of the quality then I would even buy them even if it costs 1k.. then that's where the reasoning breaks down, how can a digital cable improve anything? it's just a copper cable not a Hidef Video Processor.. (unlike analog AV cables which can degrade a analog audio/video signal)

still you don't get the gist of what I'm trying to say from a technical point of view.. the USD10 cable and the USD300 cable all pass the HDMI1.3 test.. using super precise  testing equipment loaned by monster cable themselves.

if you say, people want to spend on 1k cable just because they got money, go ahead, that's nothing wrong with that, just don't tell me that a lesser good quality cable won't pass the data thro properly. cos at the end of the day,
it's whether if the digital data goes thro 100% or it doesn't and if it doesn't, you will know it cos it will be abrupt.

it cant make it 5% better or 10% less from it's source to the TV..
*
why not you write to cable manufacturer who can answer your question? There's no point arguing. Everything sells for a reason.
ar188
post Dec 23 2008, 09:27 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(nadky @ Dec 23 2008, 08:56 AM)
why not you write to cable manufacturer who can answer your question? There's no point arguing. Everything sells for a reason.
*
why need to write? they can't proof it themselves from a scientific and engineering point of view, that theirs is better than those OEM 1.3 spec good quality but way way cheaper cables.

just don't tell me their 1k cable is gonna transfer digital data meeting the 1.3 spec while other OEM freebies doesnt?.
DigitalTech
post Dec 23 2008, 09:29 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
974 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: Petaling Jaya



frankly, if one can afford to buy a good hdtv and player, I don't see why he/she not getting a better build cable to connect both. Don't forget that premium hdmi cables are high speed cable.

I am sure there's a differences between an cheap RM50 with RM500 cable. If you are seriously into audiophile, then you should get a better built quality cable to match your high performance TV and player. If you not into quality, then stick to al-cheapo cables.

Another example is, why would someone buy a BD player now which cost more than RM2k and also need to buy original bd for more than RM100? Because that person demand for quality goods in their life.

There's no wrong or right answer to this. It's all about individual preferences.

By the way, you don't need to pay through your nose to get a premium quality hdmi cable like Monster. Click here for more info:
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/756138
ar188
post Dec 23 2008, 09:40 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(DigitalTech @ Dec 23 2008, 09:29 AM)
frankly, if one can afford to buy a good hdtv and player, I don't see why he/she not getting a better build cable to connect both. Don't forget that premium hdmi cables are high speed cable.

I am sure there's a differences between an cheap RM50 with RM500 cable. If you are seriously into audiophile, then you should get a better built quality cable to match your high performance TV and player. If you not into quality, then stick to al-cheapo cables.

Another example is, why would someone buy a BD player now which cost more than RM2k and also need to buy original bd for more than RM100? Because that person demand for quality goods in their life.

There's no wrong or right answer to this. It's all about individual preferences.

By the way, you don't need to pay through your nose to get a premium quality hdmi cable like Monster. Click here for more info:
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/756138
*
if people want to buy expensive cables because it looks good and have good thick cable construction and use good quality materials by all means go ahead.. no arguement here.

the discussion here is that people think only expensive cables meets the HDMI 1.3 spec while cheap cables doesn't meet HDMI 1.3 spec.. because that's all you need to care about as far as digital cables are concern whether it meets the spec or not...

hence why we don't care about monster cable 2.0 USB cables if there is such a thing compared to normal freebie 2.0 cables. only the analog audio/video community will fall for these $$$ traps cos they don't understand digital concept at all...
aiman04
post Dec 23 2008, 09:53 AM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


ar188, don't bother, look at his sig. His a salesman. Would he say something that will hurt his sale? tongue.gif
nadky
post Dec 23 2008, 10:38 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
117 posts

Joined: Aug 2008


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 23 2008, 09:40 AM)

the discussion here is that  people think only expensive cables meets the HDMI 1.3 spec while cheap cables doesn't meet HDMI 1.3 spec.. because that's all you need to care about as far as digital cables are concern whether it meets the spec or not...
I agreed that both expensive and cheap hdmi cables would be able to meet HDMI 1.3 spec. The only difference between them are the quality of material used, construction method, speed of transfer, etc...
SUSMatrix
post Dec 23 2008, 10:45 AM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(nadky @ Dec 22 2008, 09:22 PM)
Just think about this, if you are a businessman, do you 1st invest a lot of money in research, manufacture and sell something that does not has demand? If expensive HDMI cable does not improve PQ and AQ I believe all cable manufacturers would not have their flagship cables.

There are always people who can afford expensive cable, to them, maybe 1k investment to have PQ increase by 10% would worth the money while to some others, it's totally a waste of money. So, it's subjective and whether you think you would want to spend that kind of money.
*
Ahh...that is not quite correct. All these luxurious thing are rather artificial demand created to sell to people. That's how business in the 21st century works. Like those MLM companies, they'll convince you that you'll die tomorrow if you don't consume their products. There's a lot of things in this world no one actually needs, but big companies thought up of the idea, dump in heavy investment on promotion to brainwash people to think you need it. Well, for most part, you don't.

Coming back to the topic, i still holds that digital is either it works or it don't. Nothing to affect picture quality. Sure, signals are still being sent as analog, but since it is view as digital format, example, where a high pulse exceeding upper limit regconized as '0' and a low pulse regconized as '1' and everything else in between are just thrown out as errors and will be asked for re-sent. So if you have a bad cable, there'll probably be loads of re-sending and thus affecting ur image with jittery or or some other artifacts which is immediately regconized.

And yes, i do agreed for long cable exceeding certain limit, a high quality cable is better as the risk of sending error is lower, but for most cases, most people HDMI cables will not exceed 3ft...so paying a few hundred bucks for 3 foot Monster cable is a monstrous joke.

Hey, i'm running on 5m HDMI and it works just fine, and i think i read somewhere the limit is 25m b4 u can see benefits of expensive cables.

Here's some good read

No difference at 13ft cable.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology...de/4235717.html

QUOTE
The Results
None of our editors could tell the difference. The fact is, HDMI is digital, meaning you either get the feed or you don’t. High prices and gimmicks like gold-plating don’t affect 1s and 0s. Our advice: Purchase your wiring online for cheap, and use the saved money to upgrade to a larger flat screen.
==========================================================
Ultimate 50ft cable test - with a very good unbiased conclusion.

http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/hdmi-cable-batt...-iii-282725.php


QUOTE
      For the love of God, what does it all mean???
      I have to say I for one have learned a few things with all of this testing, and I hope you have too. The way I see it:

      • It never pays to buy a Monster cable first. It doesn't even make sense to buy the "marked down" $50 cable you can buy if you don't want Monster. Go online, order your cables, and wait.

      • Even if you're going for the long haul, try a cheaper cable from a reliable vendor first. Monoprice isn't the only one. During this process I've spoken with good people at FireFold, DataPro International, and others, and tested an assortment of discount products, with no noticeable problems. I am confident that, if a vendor has a solid return policy and satisfaction guarantee, you should feel free to buy even a super-long cable from a discount house. In the case of my 50-footer noise, a quick return would have been all that was required.

      • Monster has a point about future-proofing. I have no doubt, given our testing, that Monster cables can outperform other cables in video formats that are not yet in use. What does this mean for a consumer? Does it make sense to spend $300 now on a 50-foot cable, assuming you will spend thousands to upgrade all of your video equipment around it in the next few years? Logic dictates that the answer is no.

      • The only people who should buy Monster cable are people who light cigars with Benjamins. Fortunately for Monster, there are plenty of those people. They're not even suckers, they are just rich as hell, and want the best. This testing did not prove that Monster is not the best. It just proved that the best is, for the most part, unnecessary.

      This was not the easiest task to undertake, and I appreciate everyone who helped out with encouragement, tips, wisdom and wild speculation. I hope it was both entertaining and educational. For me, if I never look at another cable it will be too soon.
This post has been edited by Matrix: Dec 23 2008, 11:05 AM
robertngo
post Dec 23 2008, 11:12 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(nadky @ Dec 23 2008, 10:38 AM)
I agreed that both expensive and cheap hdmi cables would be able to meet HDMI 1.3 spec. The only difference between them are the quality of material used, construction method, speed of transfer, etc...
*
HDMI licensing require company to make cable with lest them one pixel lost per billion during transmission. if you cable is not a fake, it will be make to comply with HDMI spec, there is not risk of performance degradation.
ar188
post Dec 23 2008, 11:19 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(aiman04 @ Dec 23 2008, 09:53 AM)
ar188, don't bother, look at his sig. His a salesman. Would he say something that will hurt his sale? tongue.gif
*
seriously I dun mind getting those branded cables.. it makes my setup looks nice and complete... thumbup.gif

but I never for 1second will accept the argument that any lesser priced good quality (no bells and whistles) plain 1.3 spec cable will not be able to pass thro HDMI 1.3 data properly and will result in data corruption of the video.
kepco
post Dec 23 2008, 03:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 23 2008, 11:19 AM)
seriously I dun mind getting those branded cables.. it makes my setup looks nice and complete...  thumbup.gif

but I never for 1second will accept the argument that any lesser priced good quality (no bells and whistles) plain 1.3 spec cable will not be able to pass thro HDMI 1.3 data properly and will result in data corruption of the video.
*
ar188, we're good friend (in educated way)...I've tons of ohmy.gif ohmy.gif ohmy.gif ohmy.gif from my friends when they look at my HTPC and the monster cables I used. flex.gif flex.gif flex.gif
htkaki
post Dec 23 2008, 10:58 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 23 2008, 11:19 AM)
seriously I dun mind getting those branded cables.. it makes my setup looks nice and complete...  thumbup.gif

but I never for 1second will accept the argument that any lesser priced good quality (no bells and whistles) plain 1.3 spec cable will not be able to pass thro HDMI 1.3 data properly and will result in data corruption of the video.
*
erm... Taukeh, I am amazed by the amount of patience notworthy.gif that you have here trying to explain abt digital thingy rclxms.gif It is always good to share.

It is too hard to discuss any further. Btw, I have a few HDMI cables with me as I mentioned earlier. Audioquest HDMI, Giraffe HDMI, Panasonic original HDMI cable (1.3a), Pioneer freebie cable with nice cable jacket, Another one from Sharp, Another one cheap looking freebie cable from Panasonic, and 2 OEM China mari HDMI cable (5m & 10m). Oh yes, there is another one which has been given to a cust. Wireworld Chroma HDMI if my me didnt fail me sweat.gif Tried all these with my cheapo system.

Maybe my age is catching up with me blush.gif . My eyes didnt transmit any difference in PQ to my aging brain nor SQ to my ears.

Incidentally, there is a case with these few cheapo HDMI cables. Actually, it were meant to connect to the rows of LCD TVs in the shop. About half of them failed upon installation rclxub.gif . No signal. Upon checking, the installer bend these fragile cables to put it through the shelf doh.gif
ar188
post Dec 23 2008, 11:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(kepco @ Dec 23 2008, 03:57 PM)
ar188, we're good friend (in educated way)...I've tons of  ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif  ohmy.gif from my friends when they look at my HTPC and the monster cables I used.  
*
OMG from me also.. HTPC with Monster?? wah... rclxms.gif

as for me since 1990 already started using monster 300 and 400 series interconnects and also S-video 3meter cable to connect my LD player to my Yamaha DSP AV amp/TV.. so surely I know the importance of good analog signal interconnects.. but when it comes to digital cables that's another ballgame all together..


QUOTE(htkaki @ Dec 23 2008, 10:58 PM)
Btw, I have a few HDMI cables with me as I mentioned earlier. Audioquest HDMI, Giraffe HDMI, Panasonic original HDMI cable (1.3a), Pioneer freebie cable with nice cable jacket, Another one from Sharp, Another one cheap looking freebie cable from Panasonic, and 2 OEM China mari HDMI cable (5m & 10m). Oh yes, there is another one which has been given to a cust. Wireworld Chroma HDMI if my me didnt fail me  sweat.gif Tried all these with my cheapo system.
wah you got so many branded cables.. drool.gif
if got freebie you know who to pass to... brows.gif

This post has been edited by ar188: Dec 23 2008, 11:24 PM
timothyy
post Dec 23 2008, 11:25 PM

Do Not Underestimate the "Pawa" of the Dark Side
*******
Senior Member
4,504 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: Planet Naboo
QUOTE(htkaki @ Dec 23 2008, 10:58 PM)
erm... Taukeh, I am amazed by the amount of patience  notworthy.gif  that you have here trying to explain abt digital thingy  rclxms.gif  It is always good to share.

It is too hard to discuss any further. Btw, I have a few HDMI cables with me as I mentioned earlier. Audioquest HDMI, Giraffe HDMI, Panasonic original HDMI cable (1.3a), Pioneer freebie cable with nice cable jacket, Another one from Sharp, Another one cheap looking freebie cable from Panasonic, and 2 OEM China mari HDMI cable (5m & 10m). Oh yes, there is another one which has been given to a cust. Wireworld Chroma HDMI if my me didnt fail me  sweat.gif Tried all these with my cheapo system.

Maybe my age is catching up with me blush.gif . My eyes didnt transmit any difference in PQ to my aging brain nor SQ to my ears.

Incidentally, there is a case with these few cheapo HDMI cables. Actually, it were meant to connect to the rows of LCD TVs in the shop. About half of them failed upon installation rclxub.gif . No signal. Upon checking, the installer bend these fragile cables to put it through the shelf  doh.gif
*
laugh.gif laugh.gif Ur eyes no problem la.
Well, I guess it is down to ego problem with some...
He! He! He!
If any of u try to do some reading in the electronic matter, you will know, at the end it doesn't matter whether RM30 or RM3000 HDMI.

But because some got high ego... no matter how, they got to fight back... why? Coz they rushed in and bought the RM3000... now need to justify to the wife... whistling.gif whistling.gif
htkaki
post Dec 23 2008, 11:29 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 23 2008, 11:19 PM)
wah you got so many branded cables..  drool.gif
if got freebie you know who to pass to...  brows.gif

Eh, I didnt give it to you? hmm.gif My mem really failing me tongue.gif Ok, noted. Previously, I have got 2 extra Audioquest HDMI cables. Given to a reg customer and another one to a big cust.


QUOTE
laugh.gif  laugh.gif  Ur eyes no problem la.


phew.... that's comforting enough. Less a worry for me wink.gif

This post has been edited by htkaki: Dec 23 2008, 11:30 PM
mys_terious
post Dec 24 2008, 12:57 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
1) Misleading or Not
For those of u who bought expensive hdmi cable there is nothing wrong with it. But for a noob like me who only relies on reviews and articles, until now i havent seen any articles by engineers (not your local hifi saleman) who state that super hi price hdmi cable give better pq. Then i see ppl here claiming it does. I am confused now. I have done a blind A/B blindtest between good built (not super branded) bluejeans hdmi cable with cap palang hdmi cables but no diff. I just wanna know the truth abt the performance (pq). Durability and built quality aside, just wanna know has any1 done a A/B blind test and can really tell the diff in pq. If there is a diff then i might consider investing more in hdmi cables. If there is none then pls dont mislead noobs like me saying it does.

2)Why cant i spend more on hdmi cables when i have spent so much on AV?

BEcoz i have other things to spend on like room acoustic, pj screen and bd player that will definitely IMPROVE the overall performance. So if a branded hdmi cable is only better in durability, carrying signal for a longer distance and looks better then its not for ppl like me.

My point is if a branded hdmi cables doesnt improve pq pls dont say so bcoz it will mislead newcomers who has ALOT of other things to spend on. If it does improve the pq then pls state the brand n model and which cap palang hdmi cable did u compare with and izt a blind A/B test (did u play the same movie for the test) bcoz alot of us will appreciate it

This post has been edited by mys_terious: Dec 24 2008, 01:21 AM
myqd
post Dec 24 2008, 01:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


i think to buy or not to buy a expensive branded HDMI all still come back to our own decision.The decision u make depends on either u urself can "see or feel" the different,no matter it's real or just mind trick,as long as u urself can tell the different( even it might be just ur mind trick ),and if u can afford it now,i dun see any problem why shouldnt we cant get ourself a better HDMI cable smile.gif

as for me,i was using a 10m OEM HDMI < RM200 and frankly,sometimes during the BDs playback, i do feel the PQ can be better if i change to a better HDMI cable.Recently i bought a 8m QED HDMI cost few hundred rm and i actually found it change the PQ in term of colour saturation.I know some might said it's just my mind tongue.gif ,ok,maybe it's,but i feel more comfortable with the new cable and i'm happy with it.So if spending few hundred ringgit in a decent HT system and can make myself happy,why not,right? biggrin.gif

i'm thinking of taking pics with AB comparison these few days,everything same setting,including the camera.I wonder if there's different in PQ,will others say that's becos when process the pics,saved and post,it will affect diff PQ to both pics ? hmm.gif Or can anyone enlighten me how to make it "fair" if i want to take pics for the same scene,with diff HDMI cables? Thanks in advance. thumbup.gif
robertngo
post Dec 24 2008, 03:23 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,027 posts

Joined: Oct 2004


QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 24 2008, 01:42 PM)
i think to buy or not to buy a expensive branded HDMI all still come back to our own decision.The decision u make depends on either u urself can "see or feel" the different,no matter it's real or just mind trick,as long as u urself can tell the different( even it might be just ur mind trick ),and if u can afford it now,i dun see any problem why shouldnt we cant get ourself a better HDMI cable smile.gif

as for me,i was using a 10m OEM HDMI < RM200 and frankly,sometimes during the BDs playback, i do feel the PQ can be better if i change to a better HDMI cable.Recently i bought a 8m QED HDMI cost few hundred rm and i actually found it change the PQ in term of colour saturation.I know some might said it's just my mind  tongue.gif ,ok,maybe it's,but i feel more comfortable with the new cable and i'm happy with it.So if spending few hundred ringgit in a decent HT system and can make myself happy,why not,right?  biggrin.gif

i'm thinking of taking pics with AB comparison these few days,everything same setting,including the camera.I wonder if there's different in PQ,will others say that's becos when process the pics,saved and post,it will affect diff PQ to both pics ?  hmm.gif  Or can anyone enlighten me how to make it "fair" if i want to take pics for the same scene,with diff HDMI cables? Thanks in advance.  thumbup.gif
*
are the two HDMI cable you compare the same version and speed?
myqd
post Dec 24 2008, 03:43 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(robertngo @ Dec 24 2008, 03:23 PM)
are the two HDMI cable you compare the same version and speed?
emm....the OEM i dunno the spec as it doesnt come with box but the QED is 1.3 version,as stated in their website.The speed ma.......i not sure la,but the 8m HDMI is connected between my AVR and PJ,and between PS3 and AVR i'm using MP-Acoustic/Panasonic at the moment,might change to Chord since i just got it recently. smile.gif

mys_terious
post Dec 24 2008, 04:08 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
882 posts

Joined: Jul 2007
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 24 2008, 01:42 PM)
i think to buy or not to buy a expensive branded HDMI all still come back to our own decision.The decision u make depends on either u urself can "see or feel" the different,no matter it's real or just mind trick,as long as u urself can tell the different( even it might be just ur mind trick ),and if u can afford it now,i dun see any problem why shouldnt we cant get ourself a better HDMI cable smile.gif

as for me,i was using a 10m OEM HDMI < RM200 and frankly,sometimes during the BDs playback, i do feel the PQ can be better if i change to a better HDMI cable.Recently i bought a 8m QED HDMI cost few hundred rm and i actually found it change the PQ in term of colour saturation.I know some might said it's just my mind  tongue.gif ,ok,maybe it's,but i feel more comfortable with the new cable and i'm happy with it.So if spending few hundred ringgit in a decent HT system and can make myself happy,why not,right?  biggrin.gif

i'm thinking of taking pics with AB comparison these few days,everything same setting,including the camera.I wonder if there's different in PQ,will others say that's becos when process the pics,saved and post,it will affect diff PQ to both pics ?  hmm.gif  Or can anyone enlighten me how to make it "fair" if i want to take pics for the same scene,with diff HDMI cables? Thanks in advance.  thumbup.gif
*
bro if u can get some1 to help u out by swapping the cables without telling u which is which then it would be good enuf.. repeat it for 10 times n match the result.. no need take pic la.. i will believe u
kepco
post Dec 24 2008, 04:30 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
108 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 24 2008, 01:42 PM)
i think to buy or not to buy a expensive branded HDMI all still come back to our own decision.The decision u make depends on either u urself can "see or feel" the different,no matter it's real or just mind trick,as long as u urself can tell the different( even it might be just ur mind trick ),and if u can afford it now,i dun see any problem why shouldnt we cant get ourself a better HDMI cable smile.gif

as for me,i was using a 10m OEM HDMI < RM200 and frankly,sometimes during the BDs playback, i do feel the PQ can be better if i change to a better HDMI cable.Recently i bought a 8m QED HDMI cost few hundred rm and i actually found it change the PQ in term of colour saturation.I know some might said it's just my mind  tongue.gif ,ok,maybe it's,but i feel more comfortable with the new cable and i'm happy with it.So if spending few hundred ringgit in a decent HT system and can make myself happy,why not,right?  biggrin.gif

i'm thinking of taking pics with AB comparison these few days,everything same setting,including the camera.I wonder if there's different in PQ,will others say that's becos when process the pics,saved and post,it will affect diff PQ to both pics ?  hmm.gif  Or can anyone enlighten me how to make it "fair" if i want to take pics for the same scene,with diff HDMI cables? Thanks in advance.  thumbup.gif
*
and just look at your scene that you are familiar, for myself, I use two scene to tweak my system. One is Transformer where the air control tower glasses is shuttering, and the another one is from King Kong, where the Kong fight with dinosaur, there is a lot leaf moving here and their. (the Kong battle scene is the one that made me spend RM9K to get Kuro after compared with Samsung Plasma )

oh yeah, I trust you also, no need picture since you're not charging anything from the rest of us.

This post has been edited by kepco: Dec 24 2008, 04:32 PM
swaichia
post Dec 24 2008, 05:00 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
511 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Future
I'm getting 10m HDMi for rm530:
user posted image
user posted image
rx330
post Dec 24 2008, 05:11 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
11,809 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
macam macam ada......
anyway , this flat one not bad for me, cos i go thru the carpet ler... but too bad the price sad.gif

weird, u notice the word 1080i max?
swaichia
post Dec 24 2008, 05:16 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
511 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Future
QUOTE(rx330 @ Dec 24 2008, 05:11 PM)
macam macam ada......
anyway , this flat one not bad for me, cos i go thru the carpet ler... but too bad the price sad.gif

weird, u notice the word 1080i max?
*
smile.gif isn't that the 1080i max is for 20m??? the one I get is 10m... shud be able to support 1080P...
myqd
post Dec 24 2008, 05:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


QUOTE(mys_terious @ Dec 24 2008, 04:08 PM)
bro if u can get some1 to help u out by swapping the cables without telling u which is which then it would be good enuf.. repeat it for 10 times n match the result.. no need take pic la.. i will believe u
thanks bro but if blind test 10 times,same time same place,i bet even cheapo S-video and 10 times more expensive S-video(analog video signal) also hardly tell the different cos oledi "blur-blur" liaw my eye,hahaha.

One thing,normally to do AB comparison,is it good to do it in "still" or normal playback? ( the other day i'm doing still scene,AB comparison result with pics oledi posted last week in one of the thread),maybe during playback better to compare?


QUOTE(kepco @ Dec 24 2008, 04:30 PM)
and just look at your scene that you are familiar, for myself, I use two scene to tweak my system. One is Transformer where the air control tower glasses is shuttering, and the another one is from King Kong, where the Kong fight with dinosaur, there is a lot leaf moving here and their. (the Kong battle scene is the one that made me spend RM9K to get Kuro after compared with Samsung Plasma )

oh yeah, I trust you also, no need picture since you're not charging anything from the rest of us.
thanks bro,i love King Kong too,waiting for the realse of its BD.

QUOTE(swaichia @ Dec 24 2008, 05:00 PM)
I'm getting 10m HDMi for rm530:
10m at RM530 is not too bad,i love the "Flat" design,my Chord Lo-Pro hdmi 1.5m also same.For 10m,i was choosing between AudioQuest-X and QED HDMI-P the other day,but settled with QED finally becos of better deal tongue.gif I saw some branded hdmi if > 10m they got "built in line amplifier" to ensure meet the spec of 1.3,wow...

swaichia
post Dec 24 2008, 05:24 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
511 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Future
QUOTE(myqd @ Dec 24 2008, 05:20 PM)
10m at RM530 is not too bad,i love the "Flat" design,my Chord Lo-Pro hdmi 1.5m also same.For 10m,i was choosing between AudioQuest-X and QED HDMI-P the other day,but settled with QED finally becos of better deal  tongue.gif I saw some branded hdmi if > 10m they got "built in line amplifier" to ensure meet the spec of 1.3,wow...
*
smile.gif I'm getting the quote of rm620 for AudioQuest HDMI-A 12m, but need to place order as the shop don't have stock in hand, I dun want to wait so just grad the 10m at rm530 la...
ar188
post Dec 24 2008, 05:42 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
the final word on HDMI is that whether the cable is good enough to meet the "minimum" bandwidth to transfer digital Data at Full rated speed of HDMI 1.3 spec.

video/audio signals doesn't matter.. as far as the HDMI interface is concern, they don't "See" or know that they are transmitting analog audio/video. just transmitting pure digital data.
so why say it "slightly" improves sound or video?

I think these people better not study engineering cos sure fail wan.. sorry but that's the truth...

if you got money to buy expensive cables, we just take it as that, it's your money you can do anything you like with it.. fine by me. not gonna argue, I like branded nice things as well.

Just don't try to convince other people about otherwise, especially about electronics theory and suchs.. even monster cable can't shoot down or disprove other cheaper but good quality brands. how you expect lay person "so called audiophiles" to argue from engineering point of view that 1k HDMI cables do make a difference compared to good quality 200 bucks HDMI cable?

aiman04
post Dec 24 2008, 07:58 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


My final verdict: yawn.gif

Just kidding. laugh.gif tongue.gif

You absolutely right ar188. I know I said many times digital is digital, and how version 1.3 HDMI for both cheap or expensive 5m or shorter won't give any difference, and I still believe that, but I just bought myself a top-end QED HDMI-SR! Why? I don't know, maybe because I'm just a crazy HDphile freak! laugh.gif

Again, this doesn't change my believe about digital cables. When I connect the new cable, honest to God I never expect to see any difference. But the feeling of satisfaction and pride of owning high end stuffs is priceless. Like someone said before, maybe just ego, but I would rather like to be known as an HDphile freak instead. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by aiman04: Dec 24 2008, 07:59 PM
myqd
post Dec 25 2008, 10:49 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,247 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


hehehe,Mr.HDphile freak,whatever the reason,as long as we can afford to buy the best at the moment,why not,right?

but honestly,until this moment i still beleive there're some different,either it's juz mind trick or real,and that make me happy,maybe juz another Xmas present biggrin.gif

Merry Christmas to all,esp ar188 and aiman04 for u guys patience thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by myqd: Dec 25 2008, 10:50 AM
ar188
post Dec 25 2008, 11:11 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
merry christmas and hepi new year.. hohoho! hehehe!
edbe
post Dec 25 2008, 11:23 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
78 posts

Joined: Sep 2008


I'm using Chord and Supra HDMI cables for my setup, glad I bought them from the UK, it is a lot cheaper than buying them here. These cables are actually not that expensive overseas and you can get further discounts if you buy a few together.
ar188
post Dec 25 2008, 11:28 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(edbe @ Dec 25 2008, 11:23 AM)
I'm using Chord and Supra HDMI cables for my setup, glad I bought them from the UK, it is a lot cheaper than buying them here. These cables are actually not that expensive overseas and you can get further discounts if you buy a few together.
*
yeah could be that local prices are super marked up..



aiman04
post Dec 25 2008, 08:08 PM

THX-Certified Geek
*******
Senior Member
2,316 posts

Joined: Jul 2007


I saw at the last KLIAV they're selling QED Silver Aniversary XT for more than RM1k, and that was supposed to be special offer exclusive to the show. But I bought it online just few weeks before that for less than half of that price! laugh.gif
ar188
post Dec 25 2008, 08:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
so its normal for local 'audiophiles' to pay twice the internet or us/uk price?
htkaki
post Dec 25 2008, 11:07 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



QUOTE(ar188 @ Dec 25 2008, 08:21 PM)
so its normal for local 'audiophiles' to pay twice the internet or us/uk price?
*

Seems like they are making a lot of profits from the cables than the equipments

ar188
post Dec 25 2008, 11:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(htkaki @ Dec 25 2008, 11:07 PM)
Seems like they are making a lot of profits from the cables than the equipments
*
better you say some people spend more on HDMI cables than even a good video source like BD35 .. biggrin.gif
htkaki
post Dec 25 2008, 11:52 PM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



LOL....

I have come across some cust that they insisted on 'premium cable' for their Pioneer entry level separate HT system; 1 AVR with 5 spkrs. I was dumbfounded blink.gif by that. What's the point of your Honda Civic shod with Pirelli Zero Nero tires, that are meant for supercar. You cant utilise it anyway as the car couldn't reach that kind of blinding speed.

As for me, nothing more than 10% of the cost if my setup. Since mine is a cheapo setup, I only buy cheap cables blush.gif . Cheapskates eh? tongue.gif
ar188
post Dec 26 2008, 12:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(htkaki @ Dec 25 2008, 11:52 PM)
As for me, nothing more than 10% of the cost if my setup. Since mine is a cheapo setup, I only buy cheap cables blush.gif . Cheapskates eh?  tongue.gif
our "deal" considered cheapskate or not? brows.gif

htkaki
post Dec 26 2008, 12:10 AM

Maxx Audio Visual
********
Senior Member
14,193 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sbn / KL



Erm... I guess it is not the appropriate word to be used for our 'deal'. The correct word should be 'practical' tongue.gif
imperialrealcs
post Feb 10 2009, 01:01 AM

IMPERIAL DEATH STAR!
*******
Senior Member
6,724 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seri Petaling



recently i've bought a sharp aquos 32" and i was promised to be given original sharp hdmi cable as extras..
while they failed to find it, the boss gave us other brand which i think is a malaysian brand HDMI cable..
it is called Cool Ray and the boss claimed that it was made by hitachi factory which is eventually better than the sharp ori.. so should i insist on sharp hdmi or just take this cool ray?
choontoy
post Feb 10 2009, 12:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
837 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
From: Penang


QUOTE(imperialrealcs @ Feb 10 2009, 01:01 AM)
recently i've bought a sharp aquos 32" and i was promised to be given original sharp hdmi cable as extras..
while they failed to find it, the boss gave us other brand which i think is a malaysian brand HDMI cable..
it is called Cool Ray and the boss claimed that it was made by hitachi factory which is eventually better than the sharp ori.. so should i insist on sharp hdmi or just take this cool ray?
*
If possible,better insist for Sharp cbl since they promise u.BTW i never heard abt Cool Ray or perhaps new entry level ?

SUSMatrix
post Feb 10 2009, 05:58 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(imperialrealcs @ Feb 10 2009, 01:01 AM)
recently i've bought a sharp aquos 32" and i was promised to be given original sharp hdmi cable as extras..
while they failed to find it, the boss gave us other brand which i think is a malaysian brand HDMI cable..
it is called Cool Ray and the boss claimed that it was made by hitachi factory which is eventually better than the sharp ori.. so should i insist on sharp hdmi or just take this cool ray?
*
If it just a short short 1.5M cable, cheap brand also ok, heck even cheap 5M HDMI cable i am using also ok. But the problem is the seller is ripping u off. promised branded stuff and then rip u off with el-cheapo stuff. If the item is stated in ur bill clearly, then u can demand it from him, if not, too bad, just take the cheap cable and never buy from him again.
imperialrealcs
post Feb 11 2009, 10:31 AM

IMPERIAL DEATH STAR!
*******
Senior Member
6,724 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Seri Petaling



should be the 1.5m punya doh.gif
too bad, this item is a courtesy free gift and it is not stated in the bill.. guess i'll live with it biggrin.gif
btw, he insist to claimed that this cable made by hitachi factory doh.gif
lone_rider
post Feb 20 2009, 10:13 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
87 posts

Joined: Apr 2007


I just discovered the weakness of cheap hdmi cable..
i wall mounted my lcd tv last week and after install the whole thing including
cable, i found out there is no picture come out when i play my bluray..

after adjusting the "duck brand" hdmi cable position then picture is coming..
this is due to cable is too close to the wall and the cable cant be bended too much..
try with my sony hdmi cable..no problem..

just sharing anyway smile.gif

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1684sec    0.75    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 12:07 PM