QUOTE(Topace111 @ Jul 28 2008, 05:46 PM)
Actually FO3 was not out yet, so i can only comment from E3 demo & Bethesda latest past game (oblivion).
It true that oblivion was not perfect (bugs, 3rd person view) but how many other games can match this feat
- aggregate score of 94% on both game ranking & metacritic .
- editor choice for IGN, Gamespy, Gamespot, Pc gamer Us & uk.
- sold over 3 million copies by January 2007.
Can you name a decent / better action-Rpg game that can match Oblivion ?
i used your 'metacritic' and searched for Diablo. also a 94%. d:
and look at the awards!
* Game of the Year - Computer Gaming World
* Game of the Year - Computer Game Entertainment
* Role-Playing Game of the Year - Computer Games Strategy Plus
* Role-Playing Game of the Year - Computer Net Player
* Role-Playing Game of the Year - Online Game Review
* Role-Playing Game of the Year - Gamecenter
* Role-Playing Game of the Year - runner-up - PC Gamer
* 1998 Best Role-Playing Game - Software Publishers Association
* 1998 Best Multiplayer Online Game - Software Publishers Association
* Best Role-playing Game of the Year, Editor's Choice Awards - PC Games
* Ranked second Best Role-Playing game of All Time - Gamecenter
* Editors' Choice Award - PC Gamer
* CG Choice Award - Computer Gaming World
* #5 Reader's Top 50 - PC Gamer
* A+ rating - GamePen
* 90 Percent rating - PC Gamer
* 10 out of 10 rating - Computer Net Player
* 10 out of 10 rating - Online Game Review
* 9.6 out of 10 rating - Gamespot
* 5 out of 5 rating - Gamecenter
* 4.5 out of 5 rating - Computer Gaming World
taken from blizzard's website. d:
i cant find the figures for the sales though. im assuming by diablo2's sales figures which hit 4 million, i think 3 million was achievable.
btw. those figures for sales of oblivion. are they for the pc+ps3+360? d:
what im trying to say is that critics and game magazine reviews arent everything. alot of times these reviews are done in the least amount of time, the industry is one where the fastest reviews win. the quality of the game isnt really tested. they probably just touched the surface and decided hey, its a nice game. had they spent more time they might have tried to kill themselves. it works vice versa as well. games which are good arent played thoroughly enough and are given mediocre reviews, and thus dont get the "ratings" that you are so proud that oblivion has.
ps. used metacritic again, and found that Zelda twilight princess had a score of 95%! zomg! it beat oblivion! FO3 should totally be made using the Zelda engine! D:
d:
This post has been edited by kyLL: Jul 29 2008, 12:08 AM