Let's leave the previous issues behind. No point discussing it further - we're merely reiterating our points.

As to your question, well if you place it that way, of course I would choose the latter for obvious reasons - the lesser of two evils.

I think a better way to ask the questions would be:
I would DEFINATELY choose the latter. I just don't think either one applies to FO3 that Beth is trying to promote.

Cant believe ppl already judging the game from nothing but a trailer! Are people still wanting to play a 2D game ? We're at a stage where technology allows developers to produce an immersive game world and introduce better game play.

So the game looks like Oblivion, so is that a bad thing ? Oblivion is wicked and has put single player rpg into another level. It worked and proven successful. Its a benchmark hence why people already comparing games to it.

Wait for the release, play the game and judge it. Otherwise its just a premature ejaculation of unnecessary rant.

The sad thing is Diablo 3 is more faithful to its predecessor compare to Fallout 3.

Plus, one of the original Fallout team member is now working in Blizzard, as the lead world designer of DIABLO 3, who shared his though about isometric angle.