Deswai islam say kenot simply piap.

Now the aftermath..

Hopefully malaysia wont become worst like this, need more clamping on ILLEGAL prostitution

Deswai islam say kenot simply piap.

Now the aftermath..

Hopefully malaysia wont become worst like this, need more clamping on ILLEGAL prostitution

LoL

u think LEGAL prostitution owned by honest businessman and not mafias or triads??

oldest profession in the world so it should be legalized?

that my friend, a false dichotomy.

Btw, got demand so need to supply? So people asking for recreational drugs so we should legalize drug use and purchase? No.

Oh yeah, even in so called "legal" prostitution, u think their basic labour rights is being practiced? go look for more documentaries covering prostitutes and porn actors lah, how fucuk up their so called "basic rights" being trampled.

its all fine and dandy when you are the consumers, but for the suppliers? even the girls themselves are suffering lah, have u seen billionaire prostitutes? no...

This profession is the LAST RESORT for desperate, gullible, naive, or those who rely on superficial features to earn money because they have no other skills to rely on.

Its a cancer thats what it is.

Kesian, oblivious to the reality of the industry.

its ok, kids will be kids.

Alvin Tan was desperate too, ran from Msia, seeking refuge in US lol

No more porn vids from his production? or no demand for small didi?

LoL ever heard of documentaries?

LoL ever heard of documentaries?

LoL my fondness towards their choice has nothing to do with their reason for doing so.

And no it is NOT false causality. Not even close.


Nobody says anything about since its an old profession, it would CAUSE prostitution to be legalized.

LoL.

TS is saying since its an old profession, It SHOULD be legalized.

But under what justification does these two factor related to each other? So if hired assasin is an old profession, it should be legalized without any reason? LoL

These two factors does not relate.

Which means, it is false dichotomy, kid.

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Oct 31 2017, 11:39 AM

WTF

gila bodo this guy, do you even know those meaning or not?

first u said its false causality, now put forward false dilemma and ergo propter apa lanjiao..

first time got dictionary is it? why pancuting all these jargons that u know jack shit about?

haih.....

Oh next time please kid, PLEASE do apply these fancy terms u coined and use it as an example to explain the comments made by TS.

I dont need your to post wiki links, I need substance, the real fucuking reason your brain is thinking it is not false dichotomy.

LOL

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Oct 31 2017, 06:37 PM

It is, like TS said, that profession is very old and cannot be abolished so IT MUST BE LEGALIZED.

He already assumed that old profession are by default legal and he already assumed that the society need face either legal prostitution or non legal prostitution since it cannot be killed.

Whereas there are other possibilities where a society can in fact function without prostitution in this current era.

So he already assumed its either we accept legal prostitution or non legal prostitution, which means, it is false dichotomy.

Faham tak kid?

Haih.. fail la this fella

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Nov 1 2017, 09:09 AM

U already grad from uni in oz or not?

I already got masters from UWA, i think u also study in perth right?

Pass or not? Or still buttsek john kor?

Granted my examples was weak kid, but TS did put forward an either / or situation, hence the either legal or non legal prostitution. He already rejected other possibilities where a society can exist without prostitution at all.

Which fits the bill it is false dichotomy.

Haih...

Aduiyai...

I wasnt "attacking" the legal side of it, that part of the comment was to point out his naive thinking that illegal prostitution opens the door to mafia, gangsters, and criminals ownership.

I replied ridiculing his naivety asking whether legal prostitution are only owned by honest businessman.

My post wasnt so narrow that im stuck with just one point to cover, I have my angles in one post so it is best for you, who had nothing to do with my replies towards TS to just mind your own business.

If you keep on digging my post that were meant for others you will keep on making stupid arguments based on your distorted assumptions and understanding.

Do u understand what im saying? Do i have to describe to u again?

Which part of my post have logical fallacies again?

Haih...

See?

The fact that you are referring back to post 111 shows you lack comprehension on my reply to that post.

haih...

read properly my post, digest, and try to comprehend its meaning.

Another guy trying to meddle halfway in.

Sorry I have no time explaining, this is what happen when I replied to one guy, somehow some smart ass want to interfere halfway and missed the WHOLE point of discussion, start talking as if I was replying to them.

point of the whole story,

It was false dichotomy, a society CAN function without prostitution, theres no either legal or illegal prostitution situation AT ALL

I dont care whether some smart ass want to start dig another point of my posts and start arguing other things instead, not worth my goddamn life entertaining some kepochi kids who tries to butt in when adults were talking.

owh yeah Im a post grad guy, and I LOVE to talk kok here in k/ u dont like it? tough luck kid.

haih...

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Nov 1 2017, 04:50 PM

I said a society, doesnt mean they have to be a whole country.

One example? Those who lived in mecca.

This area are restricted to muslims only.

Wow..there are numbers of reports by prostitutes themselves (from these first world country u mentioned) reported the abuse and scams within the industry.

In fact, you can find lots of these documentaries are covering the porn industry in US.

Even the hollywood industry are rife with sex and human rights abuse , wanna bet the porn industry would do any better?

Of course they are not just due to religion per se, many factors involved which give rise to this profession.

Im just saying based on the aftermath this is why Islam prohibited such profession, even during the prophet Muhammad time there are prostitutes in their society, and that time Islam wasnt known to them.

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Nov 1 2017, 05:48 PM

Sure thing, but that doesnt mean its good for the society as a whole.

We dont need to think too much bro, go look at the prostitution and porn industry in the US, the human right, mental, sex, abuse and also scams involved within this industry.

That alone is enough for me to say it will bring more harm than good to the society.

Of course it doesnt, but prohibition will act as deterrence to those who are afraid of getting caught.

Which leave it to those who arent afraid to go agaisnt the law (and time to time we will see them on tv caught by law enforcers).

Im not saying we have to make it dissapear, heck for some group of people their didi is ruling their head, but personally I dont see it will do good for the society as a whole.

Economically it might be good, but at what cost? See the aftermath in the video by TS?

THAT IS THE COST.

Legal or no legal, its a cancer for society, thats what i think.