Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Intel Penryn 40% faster?
|
TSedwin3210
|
Apr 18 2007, 12:59 AM, updated 19y ago
|
|
well, base on the main page of lowyat.net. it seems that the 12MB of cache help to elevate the performance. i believe, the 40% increase is mainly due to the additional 2-core, and it is only for multi threaded application. correct me if im wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSedwin3210
|
Apr 18 2007, 11:18 PM
|
|
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070...mance-sse4.html what the...f, even penryn got some numbers for us to see. but where is Barcelona numbers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSedwin3210
|
Apr 19 2007, 02:27 AM
|
|
 more info here.looks like it will be a serious contender for K10, IF ONLY K10 perform what AMD claim now. This post has been edited by edwin3210: Apr 19 2007, 02:27 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSedwin3210
|
Apr 24 2007, 04:08 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Thunderbolt @ Apr 24 2007, 04:04 AM) I think we should stop this  shuld close this thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSedwin3210
|
Apr 25 2007, 01:53 AM
|
|
QUOTE(salimbest83 @ Apr 25 2007, 01:26 AM) with all these talk.. which one do u think much faster or better... intel Quad core or Barcelona.... calmez vous maintenant. READ
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSedwin3210
|
May 7 2007, 10:24 AM
|
|
QUOTE(salimbest83 @ May 6 2007, 03:18 PM) then X2900 XTX cant beat 8800 ultra why this Penryn thread morph into a graphic vs graphic card thread anyway, it seems that SSE4 can boost performance by up to 50%. i dunno how true is that. but it seems that previous SSE versions doesnt boost performance that much. anyone hav more info on these? This post has been edited by edwin3210: May 7 2007, 10:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|