How you grade by inferior? If inferior engine parts, reliability would be an issue. But both cars are equally reliable

In terms of body parts, both cars get upgraded aeros at the same time.

Switching team and performance drop is natural no? Especially if you switch to a lower tier team? What happened to Bottas now?

So by your logic, in 2014 RBR suddenly decided to screw over Vettel for Ricciardo? Some times the car's characteristics just suit 1 driver more than the other

Anyway the way RBR works is they will kick anyone who didnt perform up to their expectation, even though some of them is down to bad luck. They have too many people in their academy to experiment with

Inferior parts again? Can tell or prove how inferior perez's car is? AFAIK, in terms of top speed, perez's car was never behind max's. If it's indeed inferior, there should be some compromise be it reliability or power. But that wasnt the case

You're saying former redbull drivers were not doing well, so I'm giving you example Bottas also left Mercedes and not doing well. What's your point? You need a good car to compete

Yeah you better get out of here la. You cant even explain how and why "inferior parts" are made as you've claimed

As far as I know, f1 parts are CNC machined in-house by the teams themselves. Makes no sense to machine "quality parts" and "inferior parts" when both have to go through stringent inspections to check for micro imperfections to ensure reliability.

Backing away from a fight is a good choice for a self-proclaimed "F1 veteran" like yourself, who cant even answer a simple question. Save yourself some dignity

Parts are inspected regardless which car it goes into. Inspection is either pass of fail. So how do you grade passed parts as lower or higher grade? Teach me ol'mighty knowledgeable "F1 veteran". I'm just a stupid newbie in F1.

And you haven't even explained how the supposedly "rigged" and inferior car achieved same reliability and having higher top speed than the "higher quality" car

Also dont try to spin and talk about driver performance vs car performance. You're the one who said ex-rbr drivers performance drop after leaving the team. I'm just saying ex-merc driver also nowhere near top runners after leaving. Everyone knows car plays important role in F1.

About Bottas, yes his performance has dropped compared to last year.

Oh btw, I never mentioned parts are perfect, which is why they go into inspection in the first place. I just mentioned they're manufactured in-house with CNC machines, no mention of perfect parts

Who's hitting own leg? You? Wanna win in argument also backup with facts and logic la please. And most importantly don't put words into others' mouth just to win.

But seeing you name-calling the team and driver you dislike....already expected it from you

Tulis sikit, already considered as essay, yet advised others to read. You do contradict yourself often

Post rbr domination era from 2014 onwards, there's only a handful of 2nd driver that quit rbr
Kyvat - totally gone case
Gasly - partnered with yuki who was new.
Albon - now partnering with sargeant who's new.

So teach me how you judge the performance of these ex-no2's of rbr

Eh btw dont pusing la sifu. Still haven't tell me how you grade passed parts as lower or higher grade

And also how the supposedly "rigged" and inferior car achieved same reliability and having higher top speed than the "higher quality" car

At least backup your claims la adoi

Hahaha. Betul-betul expert. That's why I call you sifu. CPU and F1 car parts are created from different manufacturing process. How do you even pull them into same comparison?

No one said F1 cars win via top speed alone, but to consistently reach higher top speed and still being reliable, the parts of course cannot be a "rigged" or "inferior parts". So hard to understand?

Talking about having "higher quality" parts in the lead car, mv's car already went through a gearbox change that warrants a grid penalty. How's that "quality parts" in the lead car?

Btw, I dont support rbr ya. Dont put words in my mouth. I support MCL only. To me, rbr/mv is currently doing a heck of a job and should be credited.

If anything, I really hope merc/ham will start winning so there will be less crying from that camp.

Talking about brain, dont go there la. You have limited brain capacity la. Cant even explain how inferior parts performs the same and the supposedly superior parts car has a gearbox change. Duh

Driving performance? I listed few ex-rbr 2nd drivers, and most of them paired with new drivers in new team. Of course they would look good

Seeing you constant name-calling teams you dont like, says a lot about you.

Again credits where it's due. RBR got it right this time with the new regulations. Merc got it right at the start of turbo hybrid era.

Every team has it's own time of dominance like the MCL and williams in the 80's 90's. You claimed to be an F1 veteran, you should know better

When you have a dominant machine, its down to the drivers to make the most out of it. There's always a better driver out of 2.

If one driver beats the other, dont claim "inferior parts" as the reason.

And yeah I'm MCL fan since 90's.

Team's mistake and they're getting piastri to pay. Cant get any more obvious of the favouritism

But its not the first time they screw piastri anyway. Before this they gave him suboptimal strategies despite leading the race