QUOTE(AlamakLor @ Oct 4 2007, 12:13 PM)
The one shinchan quoted is the one I touched up...removed eyebag and some facial imprefection + face smoothing. Not the original unedited picture.
Typical job you'd see done when cosmetics company send the pictures in for retouching job. Whether people like it or not, that's how things are done in the cosmetics industry...there's not that many girls with perfect face out there

I still remember watching shiseido ad and wah lau...the girl with perfect straight hair and perfect face that is fair + smooth and silky...
Ops, my bad for the misunderstanding.
QUOTE(ac98 @ Oct 4 2007, 12:36 PM)
Everyone is witness ... you FFK you DIE!

Quicky quick tell me when!

QUOTE(ac98 @ Oct 4 2007, 12:48 PM)
What Alamaklor did was DIGITALLY removing the entire buldge area of the human eye, that's the problem with human intervention into a photographic image. Now you see how bad the image had turned into? What COSMETICS does is do concealing work, not hide facial 'imperfections'. The human face is never perfect ... the reason why there's an outcry that Caryn looked fake is becoz you all have seen the ORIGINAL imperfect image. Problem with most girl-shooters are: the never know what to do more when faced with a pretty girl ... as long as she's pretty, female, cute, sexy, friendly, they just shoot. Compo, exposure settings, ISO, metering and white balance sometimes go out the window also. A portrait photographer on the other hand would look into necessary details and see what more can be done in order that his images would turn out just the way he wanted.
I dunno why Travis didn't remove her heavy eyebags ... maybe he didn't know, maybe he didn't care. Judging from his feedback to the comments he got, most likely he didn't care becoz he was too 'mesmerized by her smile'.
I more like didnt know how to remove it due to my lack of skills in PS. But seriously a smile is worth a thousand words here.

. Will take note more on exposure settings and metering in the future portrait shoots.