QUOTE(Noyoudontcare @ Sep 28 2017, 03:44 AM)
Im just as curious as you are. Anything need to compare with KL as if we're the only example of excellence. We're just as 3rd world like them. Jst go compare with Sinkapoh, korea Japan etc lah.
Thais are really like Indonesians. I follow mrt jakarta and their gelora bung sukarno stadium IG. Each time i see their citizens comment something like " why mrt KL is driverless , but ours (mrt jakarta) has drivers? " are you going to install marbles at the platforms like mrt malaysia " " mrt jakarta needs to be better than mrt malaysia amen" " why are the columns not like mrt malaysia? " and the ceaseless questions that never fail to bemuse us. Then, others reply " malaysia is smaller so they can build more expensive mrt" . "theyre 30 million jiwa vs indonesians with 250mil" . " jokowi is distributing development to be patient "
On the stadium or stadion as they call it there which is under renovation for Asian games 2018.
You will see comments like " why our stadion isn't bright like SNBJ (stadium nasional bukit jalil) ? " why is the grass not as Good as SNBJ? " the led lightings must be better than SNBJ because we're hosting Asian games" then there will be replies that downgrade us saying " bukit jalil has no budaya.. It's a new stadium. Gelora bung karno has sooo much history so that makes our stadium better" ..as if everything must be compared with Malaysia in fact the stadium in Singapore is muchhh better and well equipped. So just compare with them lag, why malaysia. I doubt when KJ decided to upgrade our stadium, he said let's beat stadium bung karno as there our benchmark.
Same like when we're building mrt or pnb118, I doubt najib had any idea about super tower 615m and thaialnd mrt,and when he gave fund,dont think he'd say let's beat the hell out of Bangkok super tower and our mrt KL must be +9999 better than mrt bangkok.
They don't think for a second like Malaysia really wanted the best for major projects like mrt sbk line and pnb118. I'm very sure our yardstick was and is Singapore for most of it.
I notice that only the Filipinos are quite cool about our projects. They don't demean us instead they realize that their laggards in infrastructure is due to their own leaders. Not by ridiculing us.
You can see that most of Malaysian forummers(non kopitiam) dont make such noise about other neighbours development.
Msia tend to compare itself with Singapore because master race never once did thought of the tiny island's achievement can come this far after they ditched them away 50 years agoThais are really like Indonesians. I follow mrt jakarta and their gelora bung sukarno stadium IG. Each time i see their citizens comment something like " why mrt KL is driverless , but ours (mrt jakarta) has drivers? " are you going to install marbles at the platforms like mrt malaysia " " mrt jakarta needs to be better than mrt malaysia amen" " why are the columns not like mrt malaysia? " and the ceaseless questions that never fail to bemuse us. Then, others reply " malaysia is smaller so they can build more expensive mrt" . "theyre 30 million jiwa vs indonesians with 250mil" . " jokowi is distributing development to be patient "
On the stadium or stadion as they call it there which is under renovation for Asian games 2018.
You will see comments like " why our stadion isn't bright like SNBJ (stadium nasional bukit jalil) ? " why is the grass not as Good as SNBJ? " the led lightings must be better than SNBJ because we're hosting Asian games" then there will be replies that downgrade us saying " bukit jalil has no budaya.. It's a new stadium. Gelora bung karno has sooo much history so that makes our stadium better" ..as if everything must be compared with Malaysia in fact the stadium in Singapore is muchhh better and well equipped. So just compare with them lag, why malaysia. I doubt when KJ decided to upgrade our stadium, he said let's beat stadium bung karno as there our benchmark.
Same like when we're building mrt or pnb118, I doubt najib had any idea about super tower 615m and thaialnd mrt,and when he gave fund,dont think he'd say let's beat the hell out of Bangkok super tower and our mrt KL must be +9999 better than mrt bangkok.
They don't think for a second like Malaysia really wanted the best for major projects like mrt sbk line and pnb118. I'm very sure our yardstick was and is Singapore for most of it.
I notice that only the Filipinos are quite cool about our projects. They don't demean us instead they realize that their laggards in infrastructure is due to their own leaders. Not by ridiculing us.
You can see that most of Malaysian forummers(non kopitiam) dont make such noise about other neighbours development.
it's an insult to take other Asean countries minus SG as the yardstick, why should we?
Even during Mahathir's time never once did he mention of the benchmark of other Asean states other than SG, instead he went as far as using Japan as our benchmark
Oct 2 2017, 02:23 PM

Quote
0.0122sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled