there is always conflicting interpretation between what is written (marketing speak) vs what is designed to behave (computation/mechanic/rules).
i can intepret that "every 2xRM100" and the "weekly" words are meant literally, hence the copywriter could've meant "every" is for every subsequent weeks i.e. "weekly" and you can earn "RM10 cb every week"
the part "max cb RM50 per week" may not specific to 2xRM100 because we are eligible for either tier but only max RM50 due to 2xRM500 tier.
another is this: if 10xRM100 gets RM50 max cb, then why introduce a high tier of 2xRM500 with RM50 cb?
why not illustrate as follows:
1) 2xRM100 for RM10 cb
2) 4xRM100 for RM20 cb
3) 6xRM100 for RM30 cb
4) 8xRM100 for RM40 cb
5) 10xRM100 for RM50 cb <-- this is redundant with the 2xRM500 tier
again, different ppl can interpret it differently, especially the way marketing design the campaign illustration in its simplistic view.
too bad the T&C doesnt give examples of spending vs cb scenarios
let's see Week 1 cb for those spending with "every 2xRM100".

This was a very good explanation. I'm sure we'll be quoting it many times in the coming weeks
.