Buying Advice 350D? 400D? D40?, help me out
|
|
 Apr 4 2007, 02:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 4 2007, 01:27 PM) the most will be 3K... 3K can get 400D already. I think without accesories lah  Added on April 4, 2007, 1:28 pmthanks for yr opinion goldfries and nairud... hope to heard more from others;)  |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2007, 03:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 4 2007, 03:01 PM) ya, that is true..but i'll be broke at that time Canon KitLens not that bad as describe by certain ppls. ...arhh...really dunno which to chose..And i heard that canon kit lens is not as sharp as Nikon 1...that make me step back from canon... er...how??  Used the Kitlens first. Later got $$$$ then get the 'L' Lenses lah  D40 have limitation. Better get 350D. |
|
|
Apr 6 2007, 08:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 6 2007, 08:05 AM) If i can get 400D at RM2699. Do u all think it is worth to buy? with kit lens. Getting cheap camera. Buy at your own risk. |
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 09:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 8 2007, 09:01 PM) oh..thanks..how bout 70-300mm? which 1 guve better quality? and is it important to hv IS?? 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 IS USM is about RM3K you can get the 70-200mm F4L USM lens for about RM2.9K  much more better quality than the 70-300mmThis post has been edited by chrisoys: Apr 8 2007, 09:08 PM |
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 09:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 8 2007, 09:09 PM) walau eh...dont suggest me L lens...but i remember the 70-300mm IS is about 2.3K...while with no IS, it is slih\ghtly over 1k? Here is the list of Zoom lenses & latest pricinghttp://www.canon.com.my/canon_new/product/lenses/zoom.php |
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 09:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
Here is the link that all the Canon & 3rd party lenses review
http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/index.html It seem Canon lenses are perform way much better than the 3rd party lenses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 8 2007, 09:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 8 2007, 09:17 PM) so is it good? mind to share the result If you are old man with shaky hand then better go for IS  i wonder with no IS or VR, those avoid vibration thingy, will it affect alot??  Just kidding, IS did help abit it taking sharp image. But, if your hand did shake alot then it wouldn't help you much. You still need a steading hand to hold the camera to take nice pics. |
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 09:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 10 2007, 07:26 AM) wow...thanks for yr effort, appreacite it;) Taking this pic at 12midnight. No software editing just cropping only. BTW, these 2 pics are zoom at 300mm? Added on April 10, 2007, 8:37 amAnyone know this lens' price, Sigma AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG macro?? Canon 400D with EF 70-200mm F4L USM  |
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 02:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 10 2007, 10:54 AM) wow..thanks for sharing the pic.. Don't think the lens make the moon shape like that. the L lens no doubt is very great..but i need at least 300mm... BTW..is the lens that make the moon shape like this? |
|
|
Apr 10 2007, 08:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
99% pro photographers now a day depend on software editing. This is also due to photos taken in digital format not like last time using film. So, there is nothing to shout about in a pro photographers now a day.
Not everyone that own FilmSLR/DSLR must become a pro photographers. Everyone can own one or more FilmSLR/DSLR if they got $$$$$$. They can use expensive camera & lens to snap normal pics, there is nothing wrong about it. "Photo speak a thousand word". So stop your nonsense and post more photos and let the photos speak for themself. Cheers  |
|
|
Apr 11 2007, 12:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
My turn showing my doggie pics here using 70-200mm
     Blue Sky with White Cloud   This post has been edited by chrisoys: Apr 11 2007, 12:33 PM |
|
|
Apr 12 2007, 01:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Junior Member
321 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
|
QUOTE(jian.see @ Apr 12 2007, 12:24 PM) huh? who told u that i get 70-200mm zoom lens?? I think g88 going to get one soon i dont have this lens wo  |
| Change to: |  0.0184sec
 0.39
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 02:57 AM |
Quote