Reverse Parking..

Thanks for the mini-review.. Keep it coming. Nice to know real world usage info..

Read your blog review and would appreciate some insights.
*Any particular reasons to avoid the TCP variant? We are tempted to get the top spec cuz Honda Sensing, etc.. But debating if we'll use such extra features regularly enough to justify the added costs.
*How's noise levels inside the cabin at city speeds and highway speeds. I read on FB that it's noisy from 100km/h?
*Bluetooth phone connectivity? Performance? Calls clarity? Mic sounds pickup comfortable?
*I alternate between podcasts, radio stations and hi-res music on phone storage. Mainly podcasts. So how's the speakers? Voice/speech clarity levels in particular. In your previous review, you mentioned it lacked bass. So there's that.
*Had the chance to lug around 4 fully grown adults... Power still sufficient for zippy overtaking and hill climbs?
*Lastly, the front sensors. I'm also coming from an older vehicle and want a relatively easy to maneuver vehicle for the missus.. So front parking sensors is a must. How's the one on the CRV? Particularly in regards to road side kerbs, those low ones that one has to park perpendicular/angled lines. It's performance here is a make or break deal for us.

Thanks and feel free to addon to the above...

Many thanks again...

I don't think it's wise to addon the door visor as that will result in more wind noise.

If you do find out any more pros and cons, please return to update. Keep them manufacturers on their toes.

I actually prefer the no faux wood panels on the 2.0 variant. Was actually my first complaint about the vehicle when I went to see it in person. But it's definitely the 1.5t engine for me. But yeah, the interior is quite improved over the previous gen.. Wasn't expecting that as we took one look at the previous gen earlier this year and ruled it out immediately. Shifted to the CX-5 instead. So good on Honda this time. Here's to hoping that the cars being rolled out of the factory are continually subjected to high quality standards.

Nah, Waze only just supported Android Auto. Fairly certain that they'd be working on releasing for CarPlay.. Releasing for Android first is expected cuz well market share and owned by Google.. Have more access etc.

Thanks for the mini-review...

IMO, not worth it as the current paint is pretty durable.. Just wash every week or so and apply wax/polish occasionally. Park wisely too and don't let certain stains to sit on the paint for long. As for swirl marks, have a decent car wash place. I've patronized the same joint for years and pals with the elderly owner, so when the car comes around, extra care and the good stuff is used. How do I know this? Civic 08, only had to be repainted once (all round) for around 2K, paint today still looks like new when clean..No rust.. After a wash? glistens.. I've also got a good car guy who knows how to mix the right blend of metallic paint to match mine for those minor touch-ups.

However, it is not a bad idea to coat the car, for added peace of mind i guess... But here's the question I always ask the coating fellas (don't matter if ceramic or bla bla)..
1. After coating, how much taking care should I still do? Ans: They reply same as above.
2. After coating, am I 100% protected against stone/rock chips, swirl marks, rust, keying and scratches? They reply nope, not 100%..

See, Some scratches can be buffed right out if they don't penetrate all the way through the clear coat. So if I'm going to keep doing all the above (care, etc) that I currently do? Why would i fork out at least 4K for a good coat all around the car. When I can keep that cash and repaint the whole car in say 5 years. Also, if you get into an accident and parts replaced, you'd have to re-coat again.. Oh yeah, between proper wax and Rain-X application on all windows, I get the exact or nearly identical hydrophobic effect all over the car as most coatings do too..

Now paint protection films or wraps are a different story. I'm completely not into wraps.. but still on the fence towards PPF. I'm definitely going to put on security tint on all windows, cuz while I may be able to react coolly in an incident, the missus will probably freeze up and so some smash protection is required.. My 2 cents.

Wow, 1st time I've heard that someone isn't interested in using the superior GPS navigation built into the phone... Good on you.

Going to check this out next..

This post has been edited by voncrane: Jul 31 2017, 03:57 PM

Read the updated review... Nice.

You are welcome... Paint defects from the factory??


Oh yeah, for those who are waiting for Waze on Apple CarPlay, you would have to wait longer than anticipated and quite possibly indefinite. As Apple at the moment has blatantly refused for third-party maps to co-exist with their Maps app. No official Waze support until Apple specifically allows access to their APIs.

Yes, you'd have to. It's possible, can't recollect exactly but I've seen a video where the wallpaper was changed. Check on YouTube.

Earlier, stopped by a showroom to check out the vehicle with significantly less people than last time around. Asked to test the front sensors detection level and wasn't impressed. The top variant repeatedly failed to detect objects directly in front of it or roadside kerb-like heights. Only those objects of a certain height to the left and right extremities were detected...

That and in addition to where the sensors are positioned and pointing towards. Now, the ground clearance is high and so should not pose an issue for most kerbs in the city. But say a concrete/similar pillar or even a big flower pot that's positioned smack in the middle... Driving towards either of those raised no warnings. Others can test this.. Could be the vehicle I was given to test and I only tested for that (holding out for a full proper test drive) as I've pointed out earlier in the thread, it's a make or break decision for me.

Wasn't aware I'm supposed to have a reference. Earlier this year, I remember testing the CX-5 and it too failed to detect low roadside kerbs and I can't remember how well it detected other objects or if I specifically tested for such as in the CRV. But I do remember being disappointed and decided to wait for the soon to be launched 2017 models. The incoming CX-5 shows 4 sensors up front vs the 2 on the outgoing model and the latest CRV. So we'll see about that when it launches. Theoretically, 4 is better than 2.


On another note, the color for me is definitely Dark Olive Metallic. It looks quite good. For those interested in booking this color, was informed 3 - 4 months waiting time. But that production is being ramped up and so should be delivered sooner than later.

Cuz:
1. Added cost.
2. Warranty void.. I asked and got that response.

Okay, perhaps I wasn't detailed enough in my previous post... The sensor is able to pick out objects from the frontal sides, so a motorcycle passing by or a crisscrossing vehicle/human or whatever from the side, WILL get detected if close enough. Things I got no detection from were objects that were tall enough and wide enough to be detected, if approached from at an angle.. But NOT from pitch center.. Vehicle was less than 2 ft away, got down to check.

Thanks for pointing out the other 2 sensors and I'm not worried about hitting a vehicle or wall in front, those are large and visible enough.. Plus, I have no issues parking it anywhere, my sensor concerns are based on the missus. Who's more of a sedan vs CSUV person. Wouldn't want unnecessary bumps and scrapes.

Now, it could very well be that the two front-most sensors on the vehicle being tested were...for lack of a safer description.. "switched off", hence the low detection rate. I did mention that I didn't drop by for a detailed test drive and others could check and report back. Just gathering data points.



Nope, I did think of it, but not looking for an aftermarket front camera.. At least, not to lose warranty over such. Also, with the CRV's ground clearance and as pointed out in my earlier post, roadside kerbs or car park stops are non-issues. So it's not about how low, it was about solid (not vehicle-sized) objects in the center point/view.

This post has been edited by voncrane: Aug 5 2017, 12:55 PM

Yup, some detection occurred.. Please refer to my previous post again.

Yes, both were switched on before testing.

No offense, but why do you have to be so defensive? I get that you just bought the ride and love it with all your heart and all that. But if you can't trouble yourself to actually read my posts objectively, then commenting will be pointless. I walked in to an SC, was offered to test drive within the compound, solely to checkout the front sensors. I refused to do a proper test drive, so as not to waste the SA's time as I wasn't ready to purchase cuz waiting on competition and test back to back. That's the point of a test drive, to notice as many things possible and consider if we can live with them or not. I don't know about you, but if I can completely avoid or significantly reduce some personal pet peeves, the lower the buyer's remorse.

I'll say it again.. Objectively read my posts. During my testing, the vehicle had a blind spot of sorts. Go on YouTube, etc, there are tons of videos showing kids being run over cuz high riding, can't see below or just plain not paying attention. I can imagine such front sensors stopping me or the missus from accidentally running over a kid and having to deal with the nightmare. Wouldn't you? Should you renact the test and not find any blind spots, then great... Means the fault was limited to that particular vehicle and future buyers can check for this before accepting their vehicles, as a matter of precaution. I'm not looking for a unicorn-like CSUV, just one that performs the best to my requirements.

This post has been edited by voncrane: Aug 6 2017, 10:56 AM

Of course there's no perfect 10 for all.. There can be a perfect 10 for some. I'm seeking a close to perfect 10 for me. Same as most car buyers, if I wasn't, I'd simply walk in, purchase and deal with the issues later. I'd rather not, hence pre-purchase research. So yeah, to each his own. No worries, I appreciate your real world reviews..

Have no such problems with the reverse sensors on my older civic... It's even able to detect those slim and cylindrical metal bars that are found in some parking lots. Thanks for the suggestion.

I think it's too early to tell... Allow the engine some distance to break in..

Ding! Ding!

Berroooowwww...!

Paddle shifters...Think manual transmission... Sometimes used together with the "S" mode. Each time you pull the + (right), the transmission shifts to a higher gear. Pull the - (left) to downshift. You should see the selected gear number on the instrument panel.

S also means secret mode active. Theres a few steps to take to take advantage of this mode.
1. Shift to S and turn off ECO mode
2. Honk 3 times.
3. Hold brake hard to the floor with left foot.
4. Press accelerator pedal down with right foot to reach 5000rpm.
6. Let go left foot when light turns green and keep right foot on accelerator pedal to the floor.
7. Turn on hazard light if you pass people driving next to you.
Thats it.

Hmm, makes sense to leave the gps hardware connected to boost its usage for AA/CarPlay. As the phones are generally tucked away and may have trouble seeking gps signals.. FYI: Absolutely haram, the second pic.. Later some silly butthurt fellow hit the report button on your post.. Don't give in though

I agree.

You can download the apk from apkmirror and no it won't void your warranty.

Yeah, I'm aware of such. That "ding" was a congratulatory bell noise.

I'm kinda torn on the idea. I get the practicality part and wouldn't mind an organ type. However, I do drive using the top part of my foot, making the alternative an easier drive sometimes. Either way, safety first right..

Yes, it's a good idea. But then, sensors can fail and manufacturers will end up being blamed when the airbags deploy but the doors don't auto-unlock. Bad publicity gets the most news and to tell the truth, the average Malaysian car owner is known to not bother about checking/repairing non-critical components.

Can't compare like that. Civic buyers and CRV buyers have completely different needs from a car.

She's a keeper..

Mine is the other way around.. The missus prefers a sedan cuz low riding and I, an SUV cuz I'm a giant and easier to enter and exit, plus more space. The Camry hybrid's boot is much smaller. We almost bought the Toyota Camry Hybrid cuz the Accord doesn't cut it. Mazda 6 was fancy and all but was too driver-focused for a family car...not our deal. We were attracted to and decided to view the CX-5 in the same showroom. It's practicality instantly appealed to me and after much haggling and a couple test drives, she realized that our current and future needs would be better served by a CSUV. So camry went off the table. Fortuner was too big and weird to handle. Tiguan appeals to me but then VW Malaysia . Now it's the CRV vs the incoming CX-5.

To avoid getting the "I told you so" lecture and sleeping on the couch, I'm doing as thorough a research as I can on both vehicles.

This post has been edited by voncrane: Aug 18 2017, 12:15 AM

Hmm, didn't notice the lack of a lamp. Not particularly troublesome but it would have come in handy for some occasions. I completely agree with the rest, particularly BSM+RCTA (Very practical), remote start to pump liquids around the engine for cold starts and pre-cool the cabin, and memory seats. I did notice, while honda lane watch takes care of the left side, nothing for the driver's side. Was disappointed at the showroom for that. Oh well, still a decent package. Face-lift maybe.