Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Against pirated games CD/DVD?, Government says No to Pirated CD/DVD!!

views
     
Abyssio
post Jan 2 2009, 03:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


You know what I hate about pirates? Not only they do not feel ashamed for buying pirated software, and they somewhat feel its universally acceptable to do so. They give childish excuses for what they do when confronted, refusing to learn what dreadful consequences will emerge when they keep up their illegal practice. Some pirates feel proud on what they do, openly "supporting" piracy! This disgust me the most, as the shameless pirates are even bold enough to insult ori-supporters. Pirating software are FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG i feel frustratingly angry when pirates believed there's nothing to be ashamed of, continue to destroy my beloved gaming industry. For the love of anything still righteous, this forum actually does not welcome pirates here! How dare you pirates to show your face and spit your foul reasons here? Begone!
Abyssio
post Jan 16 2010, 10:18 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Jan 16 2010, 09:59 AM)
piracy - morally its in a grey area
*
No it is not. It is dead wrong.

"Pirate games to punish game company being greedy" -- I guess it is an excellent excuse to pirate games, which make pirates feels proud when doing so.
Abyssio
post Jan 16 2010, 03:57 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Jan 16 2010, 10:32 AM)
and why is it wrong? if granted i do share my games with a few friends i lose nothing and my friend loses nothing. the corporation however loses market share, now based on most proper business moral theories (im not talking about pendidikan moral) the above sentence doesnt seem wrong in anyway.

the same moral argument applies for corporate espionage and information stealing which happens pretty often in the B2B world (espically in technologically related items). these "exchanges" of information did build up industries, companies and threaten a bigger market share, however because its corporations dealing it we take it as a norm.

in simple terms, if we "steal" software and information it is piracy; if they do it its corporate espionage.
*
No analogy can justify the act of piracy. Wrong is wrong, piracy is wrong no matter how we put it. When authorities fail to clearly define technical terms to distinguish lawfully right or wrong still does not mean piracy is morally acceptable.

P/S: you know what im kinda getting tired rebutting all the piracy talks. I firmly believe this board stand against piracy, and therefore we do not need any more arguments to minimize the negative impact of piracy. Trying to stand up for piracy and spread the wrong idea around the board...is not really in the spirit of this board.

We are gamers, we love playing games and we show respect to game developers by (financially) supporting them. There's a catch line in TSB, says True Gamer Plays Original, while it is cheesy but it really show how we gamer do our part in this industry, not giving excuses to enjoy the work of labor of game developers for nothing.

Abyssio signing off.

This post has been edited by Abyssio: Jan 16 2010, 04:09 PM
Abyssio
post Jan 16 2010, 06:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Jan 16 2010, 04:39 PM)
wrong? morally unacceptable? tell me why, personally ive been studing corporate responsibility and ethics for years and this sperads into a lot of industries and all. i can still not see how is it that wrong, it is only wrong however when the company doesnt liek it. (oxymoron)
So your years of studies it comes to you that pirating is morally acceptable? Is it what you meant? I couldnt comprehend.
I dunno about corporate responsibility, but i do know that it is a consumer responsibility not to buy pirated goods.

QUOTE
well personally i dont give a damn of corporate propaganda, if buying original games make you feel more like a "true" gamer then so be it. personally when it comes to corporate dealings i refuse put morals into them, its like judging the devils work based on moral values.
Once in a blue moon a corporate catchline can make perfect sense.

QUOTE
but really, in a sense of it credit where credit is due is something i do have problems with. most of these games are made by teams of professionals that normally come underpaid while the corporate machine uses its earnings on acquisitions and CEO, CFO, etc etc spending. this theme works in almost every industry, thus the writers strike, musicians being underpaid, countless lawsuits on credit and so on.
Yes, recent bloom of indie devs shows many of them wanted to escape the clutches of evil corporation. But that doesnt stop their games being pirated. Sad.

QUOTE
as far as it goes, you might be against piracy but unlike you i condone it but not support it. simply because i dont hold corporations in good light. the rather ironic thing is that they would do the same just on a B2B level
Im glad you do not support piracy. Sure corporates are evil, but by "condoning" i feel you are giving the wrong idea like "we should pirate to show how corporates being greedy", which do no good to our beloved game industry.

p/s: i swear this is the last time i rebutt against piracy talks

This post has been edited by Abyssio: Jan 16 2010, 06:05 PM
Abyssio
post Jan 17 2010, 11:17 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Jan 16 2010, 09:58 PM)
again i condone, basically i dont pass judgement and i disregard the arguements for and against. but really i follow the same thought as these businesses do, simple and yet understandable - i exploit. i believe in a rather consumer version of miltons argument of businesses, firms are there to make money and exploit markets; i am there to exploit markets and save personal value.

the rather odd thing is that most businesses agree with me, just that they do it in their courts
*
Wow. this shows you are just a lowly pirate, with no less of evil than the greedy corporations. You have a believe that corporations are to be punished by pirating, you stick to that and that gives you all the reasons you need to commit piracy. Good for you.

And we can help the indie game developers by not pirating their work. It CAN be helped. We just need to stay away from piracy.


Abyssio
post Jan 18 2010, 06:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(heaven @ Jan 18 2010, 11:35 AM)
I think the main issue would be what like what +3kk! said:
Those teams of professionals may get some bonuses if their game is a blockbuster, but compare to CEOs which get millions is kind of an insult to their professionalism, yeah sure CEOs determine the direction of the company and provide jobs, but the income difference is imbalance to the core, isn't this the "I exploit" at it's finest?
*
Yeah thats right. Game publisher "exploit" game developers, then its totally fine for consumer to "exploit" back at the game publisher. I guess that would really help the oppressed, and underpaid game developers by "exploiting" their game publisher. Awesome. How come i cannot see that.

Well it is game developer who chooses it's publisher, and it's not like every professionals are conscripted in the industry. It's their choice for a publisher, and to help the developers getting more appreciation then the only way to do is support their game. Not the other way around.

Oh btw, i dont dine at JCO (or Krespy Kreams lol), and i got my handphone from an authorized dealer. I have great respect for intellectual properties.
Abyssio
post Jan 18 2010, 08:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Jan 18 2010, 07:57 PM)
that is called capitalism  smile.gif

the gaming industry even despite piracy is flourishing, i could never understand the use of help and support in arguments. its not like the industry is failing thus the failure to support dev's, but actually the other direction, growths have always increased significantly over the years. actually if you cross referenced with other firms regardless of industry the trend of the poor brains always stay the same.

so given the fact that the industry is booming the developers still need support doesnt make very good sense.

also mind you read up about corporate espionage, business model copying, information stealing and so on. the AP models, JCO are just few examples. the japanese automotive industry started with corporate espionage (toyota, eg), starbucks is a copy from european (specifically italian, coffee cafes), the ibanez guitar's was a pirate back then. there are heaps more, you just dont know that what you used is a copy of the original.

personally if i held your mentality i would be a rather hard call to buy anything, the design for a PC is also a copy if you didnt know that (early mac's "invented" the PC, introduced the mouse, etc etc etc) wonder how a PC would be like if mac patented the mouse like how the patented multi touch now.
*
So you are saying that if gaming industry have enough suckers to fork out their hard earn money to buy their game so every other cheapskate can get the game for free? Wow that's a great mentality. Why don't everyone go and pirate every game they wanted? I wonder why anyone wants to be that sucker huh? How strange.

How could you compare business models with gaming piracy? Oh man how come you cannot tell the difference of copying a digital copy of an intellectual property and your "corporate espionage"?

Oh man this is so funny if you want to take this to the beginning of the big bang, ok not so early like the rest of the civillization stole the paper technology from the Egyptians back in 4000bc, or the blackpower technology from the chinese, or the words technique from Phoenician, or light bulb from thomas edison or....

i believe i made my point here, so it is really up to you to decide what really gaming piracy and "corporate espionage" is.
Abyssio
post Jan 18 2010, 11:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Jan 18 2010, 09:58 PM)
im asking why the gaming industry is flourishing yet the development teams still need help and support. will you send aid to a rich man?

piracy is piracy, in the early years japanese and korean companies DO get piracy lawsuits even before intellectual digital software exist. credit where credit is due cannot be only limited to software you know.

lol, the early ages of civilization capitalism and the argument of interllectual property didnt exist. if you want to use a rebuttal use something more relevant to current times.

honestly, i provided examples of companies copying each other for personal gain, how piracy did build up some companies, also provided a very clear cut argument that the industry is flourishing thus further "help" sounds rather superficial. all you can use to rebutt are just questions, but never provide solid points, examples, facts (all my points can be traced back to its source). if you really want to convince me that digital piracy IS wrong show me something solid, instead of pummeling me with questions.
*
Yes, im giving my money to rich men because they put their money to good use, and develop an awesome game. I'm paying them as provide me a good entertainment, i respect that and they definitely deserve my money as i want them to develop more of the good game for me in the future. Hell they did a good job as game developer/publisher in the first place so thats why they get rich.

it is not a matter of why rich ppl need more money, it is the matter of a publisher and developer did a good job, and they deserve the money for making a great game. You ask me that why send aid to a rich man, and i there's my answer: they deserve it for the good job. But pirates, do not deserve to play a game he didnt work for. It is very simple, no? Do you give money to a kid that can work but decided to lay in bed all day? Now do you think it IS right to get something you didnt pay for? I bet you do.

Yes, so it seems that you do know time changes, and pre-capitalism piracy doesnt count as piracy. Good. Now things change even in modern times, and thus copying a digital copy of an intellectual property is now worlds different from "corporate piracy". Previously there are no such thing as gaming piracy. Like, well, there are no digital games yet. So new technology get introduced, thus new definition and new ideas.

Corporate piracy/espionage exist, and it is clearly WRONG. So it is up to the corporates to settle it between themselves, bringing it to court or whatever if they suspect any breach of intellectual property laws. This happens all the time. But there's time corporates get away with it, as sometimes authority fails to draw a clear line/or the victim does not choose to pursue their rights (humans are not perfect). Sadly, you took it like it is perfectly normal to pirate because corporates do so and got away!

Phew i hope i made myself clear this time.

edit: typo

This post has been edited by Abyssio: Jan 18 2010, 11:56 PM
Abyssio
post Jan 19 2010, 09:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(+3kk! @ Jan 19 2010, 06:16 AM)
and i believe that i cannot judge based on rightous moral values, supporting such corporations to me aint exactly right either. what goes around comes around and what they deserve is not 300 bucks a game lol. dont point me to steam, the internet quota itself would mean that i can only dl the game in half a year and makes things worse - selfish to others but that is also the reason why i do not pirate.
Okay some games does not deserve 300 bucks, then ppl will stop buying it. That's cool. And of course you need to remember...ppl are not force to buy stuff from any game publisher, and they are happily being "exploited" as they trust in that company.

QUOTE
the idea you have that corporations will take your money and do the right thing is kinda wierd, ive seldom seen a corporation doing the right thing; i know who did "right" things and who didnt. the market for games is an oligopoly and granted without piracy (rather accurate to the model id say) its perfectly clear what will happen. i will not give someone who is lazy money, but i will also not fiercely support something that is out to exploit markets.
again your biased view on corporations (like corporation should only do charities, not business) makes you think all corporations are no good than pirates. If you read cheesenium's post, or pay more attention the gaming news around the forums you'll see not all corporations out there are trying to suck your soul dry.

QUOTE
on the bolded line, tell me why is it different? so basically based ont hat argument it is right to pirate goods? that doesnt make sense.
Like i said, copying ideas among the industry is different from copying a digital copy from an intellectual properties. Sometime evil corporation tries to pattern a very general idea for purpose of monopoly, but when put to court the evil corporation lost (i remember that a corporation patterned MMO gaming...lol great stuff). Copying a digital game is not like trying to copy an idea. When copying a digital copy of intellectual property you are not just stealling a general idea. You are stealling a work where thousands of people put their hearts and soul to create masterpiece. A digital game cannot monopoly or "exploit" anyone. If you still cannot understand the difference between an idea, a pattern, or a video game then i sorry i have no more volcaburary in my brain to explain this. Maybe I just suck at explaining. Maybe a little bit of help here, from my fellow forum ppl?

QUOTE
its an oxymoron and irony thus my argument, if i were to use the same mentality as these corporations i would infact be a very efficient pirate. but for the sake of the discussion lets say its wrong and i should not do so; but there always comes a time where a friend pops by and ask "dude, can i borrow your dragon age?" and will i never be snobbish to say no and turn him away because it is not "right". once upon a time it is good to share what you have, and granted if you ask me to make a choice of my friend vs a corporation - i pick my friend.
i will never support corporations or support piracy, but i will also never turn down a friend when it comes to sharing games.
*
Yes you can borrow your games to your friends, but if you choose to install the game you are subjected to all the fine prints imposed by the evil corporation. The uber long EULA is just for show? definately not. If you do accept the EULA then you agree to face the consequences. Its not like they force you to sign the EULA anyway.


Added on January 19, 2010, 10:39 am
QUOTE(enemyuavonline @ Jan 19 2010, 01:07 AM)
yes, i too would prefer paying the game publishers for what they deserve. Rm 200 per game is not what they deserve.
*
Yeah, if you think they dont deserve it then you dont purchase it. Thats completely normal. Its not like every gamer is a bloody video game addict that need to swallow up all the games out there in the market. But if you pirate it because you think they dont deserve it, then thats another story...nobody deserve anything for free. Geez i cant believe i need to quote myself again and again.

This post has been edited by Abyssio: Jan 19 2010, 10:39 AM
Abyssio
post Jan 20 2010, 02:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


Hello again +3kk!

To make myself clear, you presented a few points why piracy is not wrong, or "morally grey"? i just wanna joint down your argument and so i can firmly debate them, to prevent me to drag on with my speeches too far away from the main issue. Therefore lets see what we have here, shall we?

Point 1:
You said corporates copy each other and the world is okay with it, therefore ppl should have no problem with gaming piracy. You also said that gaming piracy is the same as corporates copying each other, correct? if i misunderstood please point it out.

Point 2:
Gaming industry is in oligopoly state, so corporates are exploiting the general masses. Therefore when people pirating their stuff it is no problem at all as corporates already so wealthy from exploiting the gamers. You said that corporates can get away by exploiting the general masses so people should have no problem with piracy. Again if i misunderstood your point please enlighten me.

Point 3:
After reviewing your posts i found it all only goes to two points above. If i somehow missed an important point kindly joint it down for me please.

Abyssio
post Feb 24 2010, 01:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
196 posts

Joined: Sep 2007


QUOTE(AlexLee277 @ Feb 24 2010, 12:45 PM)
nope, i mean. when the game is hot, sure people wanted to play it and people are talking about it, but some people cant really afford the ori games

let say, how can a 13 year old afford a RM100 game? they cant afford it right

but that 13 year old wanna play that game

that is one of the reason why people nowadays still buying pirated

sweat.gif
*
yeah i want a Nvidia GTX295 but i cannot afford for it. But i really want to play games using that graphic card. How can they charge the card so expensive? FFS why there's no pirated GTX295 around so i can use without have to pay? Why? WAAAAIIIIIII!!!! cry.gif

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0593sec    1.04    8 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 06:04 PM