Anyone can help my WMP11 problem? Here is the link

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/431465

Playing avi file.. Until now still no solution

Yup, all the same.. no porblem using other player. My problem is exactly like this

The error happens most often when a video file is done playing and I close
the player. Immediately after closing the player I receive a pop-up saying
that "Windows Media Player has stopped working". The problem event name is
always APPCRASH. The latest exception code is c0000374 with an exception
offset of 000aa0fb.

wmp 11 comes with Vista and there is no way to get
rid of it or reinstall it. If you need to reinstall media player you have to
reinstall Vista.

Can i like just uninstall the previous codec pack and intall klite? Will it work? Hmm, no point of asking this. gotta try myself la.

My previous er i mean now using XP Codec. Using it mostly to open rmvb file as well as .avi la. CCCP codec huh? Nv heard b4. I thought of installing StormCodec too..

At last solve this problem by uninstalling XPCodec.
Now using K Lite Mega pack. At first was using k-Lite full but cannot play .rmcb file. Now only i know that K Lite Mega Pack can play .rmvb.
Problem solved!

Wow, can use this to check also ah? I remember i always use this to test game requirement back when using Xp. Hehe

Wow, that long?? I did a defrag b4 but it took me only bout an hour. How big ur hdd is?

Then something muct be wrong. for my notebook 80Gb hdd, it took only bour an hour. So urs should be arouind 2 hours most to most. Btw, how many % u utilise both ur hdd?

Strange but i dun seems to have the solution.

---

Added on April 3, 2007, 9:31 amAhh, another well said this is what i am trying to stress out from last month.. Balik balik complain Vista memory eating la, make pc slow la.. Macam macam la..

This post has been edited by adriankhoo153: Apr 3 2007, 09:31 AM

Tomolo will be exactly a month of me using Vista. Well of course there is some minor hicups here and there. Buggy here and there. But i am glad that all those bugs being sorted out. One need to encounter some bugs to learn to fix it. Now my Vista are good to go.

Guys, got a question. I check that my display adapter in Device Manager are dated on 1 June 2006. When i update it, it shows that i already have the best and latest edition. But when i check Intel website, they have a new one release on 26 Feb 2007. Do i need to download the exe from Intel or it's just the same to update driver in Device Manager?

Btw, my graphic card is Intel GMA 945 chipset

Well the problem is i do have the some minor issue..When start up (boot up), after the vista logo screen and b4 the the password screen, i encounter some flickers in between. Duno installing a new driver will be ok o not

Please refer to this.
WMP Delay Solution



Solved this problem by updating to the latest driver

This post has been edited by adriankhoo153: Apr 4 2007, 08:17 AM

So this mean all Vista User also face this problem? I mean the dfrag took long time problem..

I just found out that we dun really need to defrag Vista as it will defrag itself on idle mood.

[QUOTE]irascian wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You are saying "Don't take a copy as a base - wait until some magic time when you're not at your PC so it can defrag". No! I want to start work NOW not wait for some mythical time when Vista MIGHT have got round to doing its defrag.



even if vista was telling you the time left (the XP defragger wasn`t doing that) it wouldn`t never be accurate. it could show you 1% remaining, but then it could get stuck on some big file for hours.


irascian wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I went through this last night. I could either wait until a scheduled run on Wednesday or get on and do some work NOW. I chose now! No indication as to how long it might take, or how far it had got four hours later when I decided I might as well go to bed.




you don`t have to wait for the scheduled run, all the times you`re away from your PC, even a few minutes, defrag starts and ends in the exact moment you move your mouse or press a key on your keyboard (breaking the idle time).


irascian wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The previous version of Defrag would have given me a fairly realistic estimate, AND showed me visually how bad the situation was before I started. The new version shows me NOTHING.


[/quote]

how bad? I think you have a vague idea of what kind of fragmentation causes performance loss.

a fragmented file is created when: you write multiple files at the same time, when you run out of disk space forcing windows to create fragments because it can`t save a single stream, when you reopen an existing file and add content to it (only on XP, vista doesn`t save the files all stacked one next to each other).

you get a real performance loss only when your system and applications files become fragmented (causing applications taking longer to load), and this doesn`t happen unless you use buggy installers that save multiple files at the same time and you also get a real performance loss only when the number of fragments on the partition becomes extremely high (causing too much overhead in the filesystem).

I`ve preinstalled system for entire years, and all this "OMG my computer is so fragmented that I`m getting fragged at Q3!" are just users obsessions: defragmentation, unless you run always fill your HD, unless you have a data center or unless you are a man-machine that creates and delete files 24/7 is a task that doesn`t require all the extreme attention you give to it.

most defragmenters (including vista`s) most of the time waste a lot of time just to stack files together and that surely doesn`t help much the performance (system and applications files aren`t loaded alphabetically): they call it "consolidating free space" but it`s pretty useless and this is what give the users the impression of the partition being fragmented (because it takes a lot of time for the defragger to complete its task) while it`s not (there`s no performance loss in having a "fragmented free space").


irascian wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How ANYBODY can think this doesn't matter at all is totally beyond me!



how can ANYBODY be so worried about fragmentation even just after installing windows is too totally beyond me. on XP clean installs I install office, I install NETFX (1,2,3), I install hotfixes, I install the antivirus, I install adobe reader and, can you believe it, reversi... whoops... WinRAR all without defragmenting. And without even the slighliest performance slowdown (yes, I ran benchmarks with sandra, winbench and others), weird isn`t it?[/QUOTE]

More info at http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=284308

This post has been edited by adriankhoo153: Apr 4 2007, 03:08 PM

I install every single update. So far no problem at all..

Hmm, so good.. If like that i ask a student to give me la. Sell to me Rm10 one.

Me lagi sad. Last time i study there also tak dapat.. Err, that time they laucnh XP tak bagi free pun