You already assume the vietmoi is lying with your statement above, hence biased d.
For me, it is very simple only:
- Vietmoi- alleged victim, let the police investigate lah, why need to defame her based on assumption?
- Mob participants- Definitely wrong, criminal offence already regardless of vietmoi alleged molestation true or not.
- Driver- victim as in the case of the mob justice. Whether or not criminal in the molest accusation up to police to investigate.

baca la the statement. at first amoi said molest and got video proof. after the guy was beat up vietmoi said no video. ko yg bodoh tahap monyet x membaca ni.

Macamlah pepek mak ko wangi sangat.

does the uber app provides passengers with the phone number of the driver?

That ahbeng rather plotek plotek vietmoi than org kito. Lets see whos the winner

worry will be killed due to misunderstanding?

eh i thought people claimed that buddhist all very peaceful one what happened

ah beng pasal one vietmoi pussy willing to beat people. imagine 10 vietmoi pussy.

Kalau kena sendiri punya mak/adik/awek ko cakap lain la.

So siapa punya version betul? Saudara atau mangsa?

So semua couple tak beranak ialah pelacur dan pimp

Wow. Logic monyet ke babi ni

aiya, the subject here is women as passenger la.

who the fuck care uber driver insist passenger sits in front or not.

go stand at taxi/uber/grab pick place, see how many women will sit in front with the driver if she's alone like in this case.
insist my ass, who pay you to drive?

I was there during the meeting after the lowyat incident.
You will be surprise the actual story

The Chinese TV news already say it like the driver is a molester if you guys watched the news. Totally didn't sound like he was accused but guilty...

8TV.

rumah tak jauh kg attap aje...singgah ler

YG CINA KENA PUKUL SBB HON CAMNE PULAK

inb4 MANA BUKTI DIA HON