May 24 2007, 08:55 PM
Alright, so the game took such a long time to develop, 3 engine changes, so HOW GOOD can this game possibly get? Heck, I reckon they just switched to the Source engine and started from scratch since 2004...
Scott Miller is an *****le. Here is the proof :
"First, we fully admit we're screwed up the development of DNF, and it's now an industry joke. I laugh (and cry) when I think about it, too. Our fault is that we set the bar too high, and we tried too hard to make the game to beat all games. In the last 18 months we've taken a much more realistic look at the project, we've hired a truckload of experienced help, and I personally believe we are now on the right track...finally."
That was March 21 2007 news...
Bloody. I feel like going to Remedy and shooting them all themselves...
Anyway I played the 2D games and of course the superb Duke Nukem 3D.
If they're on the right track...finally, then why are they still HIRING staff ? I believe some of the staff (or most of them) have left...and because Scott Miller is such a hard head he is adamant the game MUST finish no matter how long it takes, even 2009 or 2010.
Is the game released in 2007? Hell no. Hell no!!!
2008 ?
2009 ? (Likely, but the would have switched to Unreal Engine 4.0).
And please God don't tell me they are interested in DirectX 10... 
Quote
The article reads, “We actually got to see the truth of Duke curator George Broussard’s many past claims, including environmental puzzles and interactivity, a host of finished weapons, the existence of an in-game forklift, and plenty of heads and arms being blown off.”
) 's model is really looking awesome ! 
0.0173sec
0.62
7 queries
GZIP Disabled