Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 t-test

views
     
TScboys00
post May 29 2017, 09:00 PM, updated 7y ago

Casual
***
Junior Member
346 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
need some help

Berdasarkan gambar di bawah Ujian t adalah 1.47 dan nilai p= 0.001. Nilai signifikan ini lebih kecil daripada aras keertian 0.05 (p<0.05), maka dapat dirumuskan bahawa hipotesis nol yang pertama (H01) ditolak.

**soalannya tafsiran ini betul???

jika salah, dimana salah

adakah hipotesis diterima???


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
spicy.jalapeno
post May 29 2017, 09:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
130 posts

Joined: Aug 2013
but...what's the hypothesis?
Blofeld
post May 30 2017, 09:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,457 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
From the table above, the Levene's test is statistically significant at 0.001 with the F statistic of 10.55. It means that your group variances is unequal.

Since it's not equal, you look at the second row for your t-test. The t-test (1.45) is not significant at 0.15. So, it means that your means are not significantly different between the two groups. This is the more important test. It shows that you can combine the two groups for your later analysis, which i assume it's your regression.
TScboys00
post May 30 2017, 09:56 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
346 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(Blofeld @ May 30 2017, 09:15 AM)
From the table above, the Levene's test is statistically significant at 0.001 with the F statistic of 10.55. It means that your group variances is unequal.

Since it's not equal, you look at the second row for your t-test. The t-test (1.45) is not significant at 0.15. So, it means that your means are not significantly different between the two groups. This is the more important test. It shows that you can combine the two groups for your later analysis, which i assume it's your regression.
*
ok...faham

maksudnya....hipotesis saya diterima

H01 tidak terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan literasi digital terhadap penggunaan Internet mengikut jantina
Blofeld
post May 30 2017, 11:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,457 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(cboys00 @ May 30 2017, 09:56 AM)
ok...faham

maksudnya....hipotesis saya diterima

H01 tidak terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan literasi digital terhadap penggunaan Internet mengikut jantina
*
yup

If your hypothesis states that there is no difference between the two genders, then indeed it is supported that there is no significant difference between male and female.
TScboys00
post May 30 2017, 01:57 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
346 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(Blofeld @ May 30 2017, 11:13 AM)
yup

If your hypothesis states that there is no difference between the two genders, then indeed it is supported that there is no significant difference between male and female.
*
tqvm rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
SUSCherryx
post May 30 2017, 09:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
440 posts

Joined: Nov 2014
From: Ipoh, Perak


Since sig 0.001 < alpha 0.05, therefore we reject the null hypothesis.

This post has been edited by Cherryx: May 30 2017, 09:22 PM
TScboys00
post Jun 2 2017, 06:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
346 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
hasil bincang dengan kawan, mereka mengatakan guna 3 way anova dgn merujuk hipotesis dibawah:

H07 Tidak terdapat perbezaan signifikan terhadap literasi digital antara kemudahgunaan dan kebergunaan terhadap kekerapan penggunaan Internet.

tetapi masalah sekarang adalah tafsirannya sama seperti 2 way anova???

kenapa mencari anova 3 hala tidak dijumpai dalam goole??? tapi dlm english 3 way anova, ada??

boleh saya guna anova 3 hala?????





 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0127sec    0.48    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 08:49 AM