Firstly we have to decide whether we want to use scientific methodology and terminology, or we want to use wishy washy watery words in the realm of faith.
As far as science is concerned, "poorly justified truth belief" is a bunch of contradicting words joined together.
Science adopts the notion that given time, things can move through different phases of classification. A belief is belief. Poorly justified is poorly justified. You cannot put the POSSIBILITY of future into the current classification, and claim to have something called "a poorly justified truth" ! Also, science has the notion of unknown, it is not anywhere in the diagram.
And science notion of unknown can be anything outside KNOWLEDGE; basically anything under TRUTH (not overlapping belief), POORLY JUSTIFIED TRUE BELIEF, or just BELIEF.
The former is total absent in awareness, (like radio waves to a caveman) and latter with possibility like anti-universe being speculated (or it can end up being mere belief only)
Note; Btw, this is just a model. If you have a better one in mind, pls do share
This post has been edited by duHwaN: Aug 21 2017, 01:16 PM