Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 HelloGold - Ask Me Anything, related to HelloGold or gold in general

views
     
TSrobincflee
post Oct 1 2017, 02:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(pergimakanpekpek @ Oct 1 2017, 12:23 PM)
So you mean the smallest denomination is 1kg??? What do you mean by "fractional ownership of the 1kg into the appropriate size"??? You mean you melt in down and give out smaller bar...that makes no sense at all?? Pls explain...
*
HelloGold enables our customer to buy gold at spot no matter how small the value - our minimum transaction size is RM1. We are able to do this because we buy 1kg bars each time. We sell our customer fractional ownership of these bars at the prevailing spot price. And when they want to sell, we buy the gold at the prevailing price at that time. Some customers choose to take physical redemption of gold rather than cash. For these customers, we help them to convert their fractional ownership of the 1kg bar to the nearest whole gram eg 2 x 1g coins if they only have 3 or 4 g of gold
TSrobincflee
post Oct 1 2017, 02:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(pergimakanpekpek @ Oct 1 2017, 02:00 PM)
If that is the case can robincflee answer me the pricise amount in ringgit I have to pay for the current market price of Rm173/gram for a 100g 999 gold bar assuming I go take this 100g gold bar from hellogold and I do not want hellogold to keep any of my gold...I just want to know the amount I have to pay for a physical 100g gold bar from hellogold assuming the current market price of rm173/gram...pls answer me this simple question ...tq...
*
I will give you the theoretical quote on Monday when our office opens
TSrobincflee
post Oct 3 2017, 09:41 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(robincflee @ Oct 1 2017, 02:40 PM)
I will give you the theoretical quote on Monday when our office opens
*
Hi there

I was in Singapore on Monday and had too many meetings to get my team to get the quote.

Anyway, here it is

the cost of 100g is RM17,915.60

to get it delivered to your address, we would charge the following - shipping RM107.27 and insurance RM53.76 - an additional of RM161.03

by way of comparison, you can look at
https://publicgold.com.my
http://powergold2u.com
https://www.nubex.my/index.php/bullion/gold...ght=4038%2C4041


TSrobincflee
post Oct 3 2017, 09:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(jack2 @ Oct 2 2017, 05:18 PM)
He is busying on ICO nod.gif
*
Yes. we are closing our token sale this week. and my focus is on making sure the tokens are ready for listing for our supporters
TSrobincflee
post Oct 4 2017, 11:34 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Sep 29 2017, 11:08 AM)
Here is the 5 year rolling return for gold price from 1980 to 2017. I used the yearly numbers instead of the monthly numbers. Over 38 years, a yearly rolling returns should be good enough an indication vs the monthly rolling returns to gauge the historical return of gold investment.

The source of data are from :

http://onlygold.com/Info/Historical-Gold-Prices.asp
http://www.canadianforex.ca/forex-tools/hi...y-average-rates
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DEXMAUS
US$ Gold Price

    US$    5 year
Year  Gold price rolling return
 
1980  594.90 
1981  400.00 
1982  447.00 
1983  380.00 
1984  308.00 
1985  327.00  - 11.28%
1986  390.90  -  0.46%
1987  486.50  + 1.71%
1988  410.15  + 1.54%
1989  401.00  + 5.42%
1990  386.20  + 3.38%
1991  353.15  -  2.01%
1992  333.00  -  7.30%
1993  391.75  -  0.91%
1994  383.25  -  0.90%
1995  387.00  + 0.04%
1996  369.00  + 0.88%
1997  287.05  -  2.93%
1998  288.70  -  5.92%
1999  290.25  -  5.41%
2000  272.65  -  6.77%
2001  276.50  -  5.61%
2002  342.75  + 3.61%
2003  417.25  + 7.64%
2004  435.60  + 8.46%
2005  513.00  +13.48%
2006  635.70  +18.12%
2007  836.50  +19.54%
2008  869.75  +15.82%
2009  1,087.50  +20.08%
2010  1,420.25  +22.59%
2011  1,531.00  +19.22%
2012  1,664.00  +14.75%
2013  1,204.50  +  6.73%
2014  1,199.25  +  1.98%
2015  1,060.00  -  5.68%
2016  1,128.80  -  5.93%
2017  1,284.01  -  5.05%
RM Gold Price

      RM    5 year
Year  Gold price rolling return
 
1980  1,320.68 
1981    896.80 
1982  1,038.16 
1983    887.30 
1984    748.13 
1985    791.34  -  9.74%
1986  1,015.95  + 2.53%
1987  1,210.90  + 3.13%
1988  1,111.51  + 4.61%
1989  1,083.10  + 7.68%
1990  1,044.62  + 5.71%
1991    971.26  -  0.90%
1992    847.90  -  6.88%
1993  1,008.29  -  1.93%
1994  1,005.53  -  1.84%
1995    970.34  -  1.46%
1996    928.20  -  0.90%
1997    808.70  -  0.94%
1998  1,133.25  + 2.36%
1999  1,102.94  + 1.87%
2000  1,036.10  + 1.32%
2001  1,050.84  + 2.51%
2002  1,302.35  +10.00%
2003  1,585.40  + 6.95%
2004  1,648.25  + 8.37%
2005  1,942.80  +13.40%
2006  2,331.15  +17.28%
2007  2,877.45  +17.18%
2008  2,897.01  +12.81%
2009  3,818.83  +18.30%
2010  4,573.83  +18.68%
2011  4,682.62  +14.97%
2012  5,137.70  +12.29%
2013  3,793.85  + 5.54%
2014  3,924.98  + 0.55%
2015  4,141.38  -  1.97%
2016  4,678.12  -  0.02%
2017  5,584.62  + 1.68%
As we can see above, gold investment returns over the years fluctuate greatly. With a range of -11% to +23% (in US$) and -10% to +19% (in RM)

Gold prices, as in other investment, fluctuate over time. If we look at gold price in 1980 and gold price in 2005 :

1980 US$594
2005 US$513

Over the 25 years, gold price did not go up but stagnant/decreased. So during this period, there is no "inflation" in gold price over a prolonged period

However, since 2005 :

2005 US$513
2012 US$1664

Over the 7 years, gold reached its peak, and from 2012, it has retreated back to US$1200-1300 now

robincflee do show us how you get a rolling 5 year return of 7% without cherry picking the period ?
*
Your numbers look correct. Based on that data set, some conclusions are:
1. average CAGR over the entire period = 5.2%
2. average 5-year return = 33.6%
3. average rolling CAGR if you hold for any 5 years = 5.0%
4. if you held for 5 years over the time period, you would have made a positive return 70% of the time

Our analysis was done based on numbers from www.oanda.com/currency/historical-rates/. Some conclusions from our analysis were:
1. average CAGR over the entire period = 8.1%
2. average 5-year return = 63.3%
3. average rolling CAGR if you hold for any 5 year = 9.5%
4. if you hold for 5 years over the time period, you would have made a positive return 97% of the time

The 2 analyses are slightly different as:
1. Our sources provide different currency rates
2. We use monthly gold prices instead of annual
3. Our data set goes back to 1995 instead of 1980
TSrobincflee
post Oct 5 2017, 10:11 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Oct 4 2017, 04:51 PM)
Robin,

Looks to me you are AVERAGING the “5 year rolling return”

I think we should first establish why we need “5 year rolling returns” vs “average return”.

Average return is not a reliable indicator as opposed to 5 year rolling return

Maybe this explanation is useful :
Now, it looks to me you are AVERAGING the 5 year rolling return. Your numbers become chapalang by mixing the “average” to “5 year rolling return”. You have defeated the purpose of having a “5 year rolling return” which in the first place is formulated to overcome the shortcoming of “average return”

Just curious, which field are you from ?
*
we averaged out the rolling 5-year CAGR because it is simpler to talk about one number than 1) to explain the extreme ends - high and low - these can be similarly misleading as they are the extreme ends and may not be the norm 2) to find the 'mode'
TSrobincflee
post Oct 5 2017, 10:29 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Oct 4 2017, 04:55 PM)
Your numbers start from 1995 to 2017, my numbers starts from 1980 to 2017.

Both have different results.

What if I pick only 1980 to 2005 ? The result of gold investment will look real bad. Yes, I am cherry picking.

But if your numbers are derived from 1995 to 2017, you are cheery picking as well. Both of us are cherry picking

Why not just pick the most recent 5 years ? The numbers do not look good either.

At the end of the day, all investment return calculation must be based on certain period. You can’t calculate without a period. So sales people will cherry pick the best period to their advantage

That’s where rolling returns provides clearer pictures for an investment, with a range of return outcome over the selected period (still cherry picking), but a better picture over time

In the case of gold, the 5 years rolling returns ranges from -11% to +23% over 2-3 decades. That is the true picture of gold investment instead of a sweeping statement of 7% that doesn’t depict the true risk and return profile of gold investment
Having talked about the past data, ultimately it is only a guide. It doesn’t necessarily provide a good guidance for future performance. It is always good that you include the statement like “historical returns are just an indication of past performance, but do not necessarily provide similar returns in the future” or something to the effect.

I don’t oppose to sales people’s cherry picking numbers and use historical data to support the sales pitch. But at least explain the assumptions you use and warn them of the risk of losing money
*
we took the data as far back as we could get from datasets that are readily available. that said, i don't believe that choosing a 5 year cycle is good as gold tends to run in longer cycles than 5 years. in an ideal world, you want to see gold's performance in as long a period as possible. and as you rightly said, looking at rolling cars gives a better picture which is what we did and then we averaged it out to smooth out the volatility of the returns and to reduce the impact of the returns at either end of the distribution.

you are correct that historical performance is no indication of past performances but i think you will find that gold has tended to perform in line with inflation in the attached slide.





Attached File(s)
Attached File  gold_v_ccy.pdf ( 47.46k ) Number of downloads: 72
TSrobincflee
post Oct 5 2017, 05:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Oct 5 2017, 01:20 PM)
You were the one who mentioned “5 year rolling return” a few times that's why my calculation is made around this timeframe. Are saying now it is not a good indicator ?

Which period do you recommend your customer to invest for ? 10 years, 20 years or 30 years ?
*
we use 5 year rolling because i think 1) 5 year is probably the minimum investment period that people should consider and 2) rolling CAGR is a better indication of the kinds of returns you can expect. the averaging of the rolling 5 CAGR provides a smoothing of the outliers and gives a point of reference

whether you hold something for 10-,20-,30-years should be a function of your investment needs - are you saving for retirement, children' education, buying a house etc
TSrobincflee
post Oct 5 2017, 05:28 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(Showtime747 @ Oct 5 2017, 01:14 PM)
Actually there is no problem with using average, provided you say it outright it is an average. However, when you talk about rolling return, it is not about average anymore. Please spend sometime reading the link I provided above to understand the shortcoming of average and how rolling returns address it’s disadvantages
1. In fact giving the range is a better indication. Average does not give the true picture. Let’s have this analogy. There are 2 bus companies. Both companies’ buses travel an average of 80km/h from KL to Penang. Seems like no difference between the 2 companies. But what if I tell you company A buses travel between 70km/h and 90km/h, while company B buses travel between 10km/h and 150km/h ? Both also clocked average 80km/h. Which bus would you prefer your family to travel with ? Company B buses seem like very dangerous

Therefore, providing a range allows the customers with better information to choose which is best for them. Same goes with gold. Using average painted a picture that gold investment gives 7% return. But if the customer knew that gold investment may lose -11% and gain 23% over a 5 year period for a 20-30 years timeframe, he may make a better informed decision
2. you average the 5-year CAGR to find the mode ? I read a few time but still do not understand what do you mean

BTW, mode = A statistical term that refers to the most frequently occurring number found in a set of numbers. The mode is found by collecting and organizing the data in order to count the frequency of each result. The result with the highest occurrences is the mode of the set.

Read more: Mode http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mode.asp#ixzz4ubjmXToB
*
ideally i believe you want the most common / frequent occurrence i.e. the mode - but that is not possible with this kind of data

providing a range doesn't necessarily give the picture e.g. if a dataset had one occurrence that is -100% and another that is +50%; and the rest around +/- 2%. the reader might assume that the returns are very volatile when in fact there are only 2 outliers. so i don't agree that given the range is better. if you really want to understand completely the performance of a return, you should look at the data in its entirety and draw your own conclusion.

i still maintain that the use of the average of a rolling CAGR is better than a simple average and a range of the distribution
TSrobincflee
post Oct 29 2017, 11:48 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(qachak30 @ Oct 21 2017, 03:10 PM)
My 2 cent...

2008 gold price average MYR90/g
2012 gold price average MYR170/g
2017 gold price average MYR180/g

assuming saving in your gold investment programme at MYR180/g but resell back to you at MYR168/g which i have not include annual financial inflation

so can i safely "assume" that once i join the programme means i automatically lose money?
*
I am not sure i understand what you are trying to infer. but yes, anything that anyone buys at a higher price and then sells at a lower price will mean that you will definitely lose money. that's true for everything
TSrobincflee
post Oct 29 2017, 11:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(aodabc @ Oct 24 2017, 06:19 PM)
gold did have a good run from  around 2001 to 2012 . But other than that it has basically stuck in mean reversion mode ever since , which means if you buy gold in 2012 , you are not making any money.

Using gold to diversify your investment is good  , but it is not much different from investing say SP500 which is in strong trend since 2009 .
*
Yes. SP500 would be a good diversification against malaysian risk. and if you are wealthy enough and have access to SPY, that would be an option for most market conditions. however, for anyone that has RM100 to invest on a monthly basis, SPY is unfortunately not really a viable option.

I fundamentally believe that the amount of money is a person's wallet should not be barrier to his/her ability to access all financial products. Unfortunately that is not a view that is widely shared by most financial services providers

This is why we have set up HelloGold to start to remove affordability and accessibility as obstacles from financial inclusion
TSrobincflee
post Jul 17 2019, 11:30 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(TheBestICould @ Jul 16 2019, 11:13 PM)
Not sure if the CEO of hellogold @robincflee is still here. Would like to ask if you are hedging your portfolio with gold currently? If yes, how many % of gold are u holding against your portfolio?

Thanks in advance..
*
Hi there

I have two portfolios - one that is managed by 3rd parties and I have no control over that. And my own personal portfolio that I manage myself. For my own personal portfolio, I am 100% long hold.

If the question is how much gold investors should have, the World Good Council has written papers on this. I personally think it can be anything between 5% and 15% depending on circumstances, risk appetite etc
TSrobincflee
post Jul 27 2019, 09:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(dayamin @ Jul 26 2019, 02:11 PM)
Hello , just recently knew about HG , signed up , is now a good time to purchase gold ?
*
I posted this article from Lombard Odier on my FB page. I personally think people should start accumulating now if they haven’t already done so. That’s what I am doing
TSrobincflee
post Aug 4 2019, 12:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(SGLT2 @ Aug 4 2019, 06:51 AM)
Gold price in HG stagnant at 192.58 since yesterday. Before this always change every minutes. Is it normal or something wrong with the app?
*
Global markets close on Friday evening New York and reopen with Tokyo on Monday. That’s roughly 4/5am Saturday through to 6am Monday KL time. What we do is to offer the last price quoted on the Friday close and use that over the weekend
TSrobincflee
post Aug 8 2019, 06:49 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(CardNoob @ Aug 8 2019, 06:19 PM)
Which GIA in MY pays interests?
*
I don’t know of any allocated gold accounts anywhere in the world that gives a yield. If you do find one, I would advise you to check very carefully

There are gold products that gives a yield eg gold leasing but that tends only to be offered between corporates, banks and central banks. We are looking at bringing that product into HelloGold in the future. But it isn’t an allocated gold product - you are leasing your gold to a counterparty and getting a fee for the counterparty risk and the leasing arrangement
TSrobincflee
post Dec 24 2019, 07:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(abcn1n @ Dec 24 2019, 07:12 PM)
Don't think it matters much as he will likely sell it off soon every time he buys.  Truth is its not easy to make $ from gold except only during certain times like market panic or usually people/professionals use it as a hedge or during promos.  Looking at the gold graph and other stocks graph will show that.
*
When we built HelloGold, the ambition was clear - to create a platform for people to invest in essential financial products with whatever they can afford or have

The typical rule of thumb for 1) investment is 3-5 years and 2) speculation/trading is less than 1 year. HelloGold is designed for investment rather than for trading.

And you are right, Gold is not an easy asset to trade in and out of because it doesn’t have huge price volatility - unless you inject leverage into the position. It is an asset that is safer than most other asset classes - and so you should expect lower returns. Low risk / Low returns vs high risk / high returns

On a related note, you can see the Bloomberg interview on gold by Kiyosaki - https://youtu.be/RiTALLmVHkc

Happy holidays

This post has been edited by robincflee: Dec 24 2019, 07:47 PM
TSrobincflee
post Feb 24 2020, 10:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(whyseej00 @ Feb 21 2020, 10:04 PM)
Please ask your boss why is he scamming HGT early investors?
Did not fulfil his promises and 0 development in that space.
*
To say that we have not spend significant effort on the blockchain is wildly off the mark. Bearing in mind that we started building the blockchain back in 2017 when the technology was very nascent, we have done a number of things which we wouldn’t have tried then if we knew then what we know now.
We tried to replace CWS (transaction engine written in Ruby) with blockchain where every transaction was recorded in blockchain with plan to connect HG mobile clients directly to our blockchain nodes.
To support that idea, we designed the HG mobile clients that we have today to create a key and store it securely when user signs up / recover account and it's not stored in the cloud. It works like multisig contract.
On consensus side, we first tried with PoW (Geth), followed by PoA Clique (Geth) and lastly on PoA Aura (Parity).
We developed our own ERC20 token explorer as well (front-end in React, back-end in Go).
When all this was completed and when we ran the blockchain transaction engine in parallel with CWS for few months, we found that it was too slow and couldn't catch up with CWS.
The first migration itself took us around 20 hours to generate keys, deploy smart contracts for our customers (we saved private keys in server for our customers in the first phase of the project), airdrop ETH and MYR/GLD tokens.
We also built helper daemons that monitor keys with low ETH balance and auto-topup them with ETH from coinbase/etherbase account.
We also built an API service for CWS to call when customer completed account recovery (to change multisig owner from old key to new key). But, we have no chance to integrate it with CWS because the focus was just to evaluate blockchain performance at handling big transactions capacity and not covering all mutation points in CWS.
We then moved to PoA Parity and removed the gas requirement when submitting transactions - but we still couldn't catch up with CWS transaction speed.
Next we changed our strategy and focused on DB backups where we store DB hashes in the PoA chain (hourly and daily) and form merkle root tree using the hashes. And this is where we are at
TSrobincflee
post Mar 20 2020, 09:51 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(Joshua_ambrose @ Mar 20 2020, 09:41 AM)
Paper gold is not necessarily backed by physical gold. There are many articles online which you can read to understand the difference between paper and physical gold.
*
That is correct - futures contracts are not typically backed by physical gold. As an example, if you look at COMEX, the amount of physical gold backing its open contracts is a fraction of the total value outstanding
TSrobincflee
post Mar 20 2020, 10:32 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(!@#$%^ @ Mar 20 2020, 10:21 AM)
yes, i mean HG claimed all purchases are backed by physical gold before this. shouldn't affect existing holders prior to the gold shortage? or did i read wrongly?
*
Yes. The bullion in HelloGold is physically backed and fully allocated.

If you already hold gold with HelloGold and when you sell your gold, we sell it back to the market/supplier and we provide the price that the market/supplier gives

This post has been edited by robincflee: Mar 20 2020, 10:33 AM
TSrobincflee
post Mar 20 2020, 10:43 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
125 posts

Joined: Apr 2017


QUOTE(!@#$%^ @ Mar 20 2020, 10:36 AM)
yup, what i don't understand is why is there additional fees on SELL on existing holders when they claim they have physical gold to back it? from example if one bought 1KG of gold in 2019, HG should have ALREADY allocated the 1KG for them then. so fast forward now, if the person wants to sell or redeem the 1KG, shouldn't it be waiting for that person in the vault?

why the need of 'HelloGold purchases its bullion from its supplier at the physical bullion price quoted by the supplier which, under normal circumstances, reflects and is aligned with global spot market. During these turbulent times however, where the physical bullion price is disconnected from the global spot market, many gold sellers will now have to follow the physical bullion price.' for gold that is supposed to be in the vault since 2019?

maybe i misunderstood, ur clarification is appreciated.
*
If any customer wants to redeem/sell their gold, it is always available to be redeemed/sold. The issue is that the price changes all the time. In this case, the physical price is now at a premium to the spot.

As I said earlier, we take the quote from our supplier now because of the dislocation (just as before, we took the quote from the spot market). For example, if gold was at RM100/RM102 and you bought at RM102. And when you sell in x months time, it is at RM150/152, you sell at RM152 and another at RM100. This is still the same situation except that there is a dislocation in the physical price and we have to switch to that. Because when you sell the gold back to us, we sell it back to the supplier

5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0248sec    0.85    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 05:57 PM