QUOTE(A.B.D. @ Apr 18 2018, 12:07 AM)
don't tell me to follow topic when you are talking about renewing landed leasehold in this condo thread. does what you say apply to condo?
i made it clear i was responding to your statement "If the land become valuable after 99 years, how on earth will your unit become 0?"
why not? you think all lease impossible to expire?
i have earlier attached the link of sg people losing their leasehold homes they have bought with lease shorter than their lifespan, so not every government is like petaling jaya and not every generation of pj government is guaranteed to be unchanged.
Then, you are the one saying all this assumption, meanwhile mine is based on current policy and current practices. Yes, everything can be change so I only can use current practice to judge.
Yes, this all apply to all leasehold property. By the way, this is not only in PJ, but we have an act with the extension of leases for leasehold properties is governed under section 197 of the National Land Code (Act 56 of 1965) pertaining to the applications for approval of surrender of the whole of the land, as well as the land rules of the various states.
For the state of Selangor, the extension of lease is governed by the Selangor Land Rules 2003 and Selangor Quarry Rules 2003.
And if you follow the argument of my statement "If the land become valuable after 99 years, how on earth will your unit become 0?", here some are stressing that even if they are given opportunity to renew, the owner might not want to renew which I said does not make sense as why someone will rather loss their ownership than renew.
Some even argue that the price of the property might be lower than the renewal fees that does not make sense as the maths calculation use for the formula to calculate the fees is making sure the fees won't be above the market price of the property.
This is where my argument come from, I believe majority will renew their leasehold instead of giving up the property if they will be offer to renew the leasehold period. Basically, the whole point is I don't believe the old condo price will decrease every year, the worst will be it will remain static on certain period of time after reaching peak of the price. Most of us have a loan of 30 years and here, we are been told, after 30 years, our condo will be decreasing in value? If yes, who will go buy the condo anymore just merely for the sake of staying?
This shock me if this kind of scenario happen like after 30 years of servicing my loan for this property then out of sudden someone telling me this property is worthless anymore. Property buying should be an investment, why out of sudden this become a liability instead to me in the point me retiring? This means you are losing money if you keep this property for long term.
This post has been edited by stevenkkh: Apr 18 2018, 12:51 AM