I am using infinite 150 but doesn't have any issue for me.

BTW, even digi control your speed during peak hour, this is NOT a hard cap.
With limited bandwitdh, as network admin, they must control the traffic. Or else, you could see every plan of digi are facing 3-5m during peak hour or worse.

RM150 for 5m still "a not bad deal" compare with streamyx.
This plan is not used to replace fibre, for demanding a 30m+ stable line.

Digi is good enough by using soft cap method. If [M] must use hard cap way.

Use your current digi plan (if you have any) or buy a prepaid to test at the following time:
6am-8am (to test super off peak time)
10am-5pm (peak hour for commercial area)
8pm-12am (super peak hour for most area)

If the off peak hour is not much different or less than 30%. It consider not congested.
If difference is more than 80%, or less than 5m for 4G, it is congested.

This 5mb GPRS is to prevent someone without a data plan, turned on data accidentally, give them a tolerance before being charged. That's why it is hidden and nothing important for it.

How to you define data abused?

I agree with your term but it is just not simply determine by data usage.
If it use for business purpose (since this plan is not commercial plan), 1kb already consider abuse.
If it use for individual, 10tb is still not consider abuse.

I don't know anyone can spend so much for a month. But it is just an example to explain to you that usage is not a guideline to determine someone abuse or not. Using TB as example maybe is too much, but 2-4hours streaming + some personal usage could be 200-300gb per month easily. And important is, this is "infinite(unlimited) plan, so usage should not become the term/guideline, but the contain is.
So digi is controlling by what to surf/download (eg: limited p2p / block illegal website), but not impose quota how many you can download.

Data abuse define by the contain, not quantity or users.
There is no tnc disallow for sharing, just not allow for commercial or any illegal activities.

If defined by moral, yes, i will agree that this may be data abuse.
But this is a deal/business between a seller and a buyer. A willing to pay, and a willing to give, and it based on contract (or the tnc) which agreed by both.
And the hidden quota is 999GB, and i assume digi agree that this is an acceptable level for this plan before they conclude it as data abuse. This is the black & white, not something determined by a random usage, and everyone has different view on it.

And a business is based on moral (which is without black&white and how to justify), it would bring a lot of disaster.

Alcohol is not really a good example to compare with the case from my view. Alcohol already a problem beginning when compare moral and religion, and it comes with limited quantity, and it may comes with problem when over drink it. Over download may not create problem (although maybe create congestion but it doesn't happen every time or every area).

And if i agree that data abuse is decided by quantity, still the amount is not decided by you or me, but digi.

If i give you a scenario like this. I spend 2TB per month. I use it to backup my 20 IPCAM to cloud for safety reason. How to you view this case?

This post has been edited by wc_how: Apr 13 2017, 06:59 AM

No, you point it out.
My argument is data abuse based on contents(how to you use it), not usage(how much you use it).
In some points, i very agree that majority of high usage involved with illegal download. BUT still, we cannot judge that simply seeing the amount only.

For telco's stand, digi release unlimited plan, the intention is utilizing the unused bandwidth to the niche market.

And i can tell you that, 2-3TB users definitely not the main reason who congest the network. 2TB usage probably equal to 100-200 normal usage users. But he are just spending 10mbps by average at the same time. But 100-200 normal usage users surfing at the same time, definitely kill the network more.

Yes, this is what i want to mean.

When network is congested, prioritize other users first. If no congested, share equal bandwidth.
If found high usage customers, check his background. If he spend on illegal activities, ban the server, or ban the user account.

Not simply judge or ban user simply because he spend X amount of data without proving what did he do.
This is not unlimited plan.

5 devices only limit to the hotspot pass, which is apply on i80 package only.
i150 is native tethering, which is unlimited for all.

Digi didn't fully block P2P.
I leave torrent overnight. It downloaded next morning.

What is your modem?
Some older modems have problem to detect newer sim card.

64% is good enough. It almost won't boost speed anymore, but will increase your ping if you buy antenna. But yagi gives you an option to change another tower when you face congestion.

No harm to try, if you willing to invest, antenna is not expensive.
BTW, what is your modem?

Why dont just replace the ADSL to 4G router, and use external antenna put outside the windows?
Much simple and more efficent way.

I think yagi is the best for LTE.
I am using old 3G antenna.

Hmm... not sure how is your situation but if me, i will think some solutions just replace the ADSL to 4G. I see your current setup, should be no problem, but increase some ping.
Quality cable for antenna can reach to 10m.
Cat 6 Lan can reach up to 100m.
What do different house mean? Next door or opposite street?