i have 18-55,55-200,and 70-300
should i let go 18-55 and 55-200 to get a 18-70?
thank
Buying Advice [WTA]let go 18-55and55-200 get a 18-70?, should get 18-70 if currently own 70-300
|
|
 Mar 11 2007, 01:03 AM, updated 19y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
 
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Nov 2006 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2007, 01:36 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
Senior Member
4,695 posts Joined: Jan 2005 
|
why don't let go all three & get a 18-200 VR instead?
or perhaps a Tamron 18-250. |
|
|
Mar 11 2007, 01:45 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Nov 2006
|
18-200VR is exspansive
|
|
|
Mar 11 2007, 02:00 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
Senior Member
2,502 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Kuching,Kuala Lumpur, Gifu,Japan
|
don let go if its just for a 18-70.. your zoom reach too lil
|
|
|
Mar 11 2007, 02:29 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
QUOTE(bloodymax @ Mar 11 2007, 01:03 AM) i have 18-55,55-200,and 70-300 Sell off the 18-55mm and get a 18-200mm VR should i let go 18-55 and 55-200 to get a 18-70? thank   |
|
|
Mar 11 2007, 02:49 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
VR function is not very useful before 70mm, if you can; go for 70-300VR.
18-55 is good for beginner and for keeping your sensor from dust  Go for 17-70Sigma sharper than 18-70Nikon and has macro functionality. |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 11 2007, 03:48 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
Senior Member
2,849 posts Joined: Aug 2005
|
ur 70-300 is VR?
|
|
|
Mar 13 2007, 01:32 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
|
Junior Member
40 posts Joined: Nov 2006
|
if i have 18-55/18-135 55-200 and 70-300G which one should i let go?
shpould i let go 18-55 and 55-200? |
|
|
Mar 13 2007, 01:59 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
Senior Member
3,589 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: Bolehland
|
well, im not expert, if u not need zoom until 300, why not sell off all of them and get 18-200mm VR
|
|
|
Mar 14 2007, 12:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
3,758 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: Selayang
|
Wanna ask you a question Bloodymax ... are you a photographer or just sitting at home and letting go lens? I notice you dun even know what are the usage of each of the lenses you have and you're considering letting go everything from Wide zooms to Tele zooms and you're just asking and asking without replying to any of the answers given to you.
|
|
|
Mar 14 2007, 09:18 PM
|
Junior Member
337 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Subang Jaya
|
ouch.. ac98.. that gotta hurt.
get the 18-200 VR. There is NO lens like it. If its too exp, dun get anything till u can get it. ur 18-55 is already excellent. I would stay away from any off brand lenses QUOTE(tiktir @ Mar 11 2007, 02:49 AM) VR function is not very useful before 70mm, if you can; go for 70-300VR. U dun shoot much do u? when shooting low light, longer exposures, even shooting at 18mm (lens setting), VR is of great help.18-55 is good for beginner and for keeping your sensor from dust Go for 17-70Sigma sharper than 18-70Nikon and has macro functionality. This post has been edited by polkiuj: Mar 14 2007, 09:20 PM |
|
|
Mar 14 2007, 09:49 PM
|
|
Senior Member
963 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Actually, y u wanna change ur lens?
|
|
|
Mar 14 2007, 09:52 PM
|
Senior Member
650 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: Klang>Melbourne>OUG>PJ>KL 
|
70-300 zoom lens ??
|
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 01:49 AM
|
|
Junior Member
34 posts Joined: Dec 2006
|
18-55 is excellent ?
 for a new user maybe, after a while even PhotoShop USM doesn't meet your sharpen expectations. QUOTE(polkiuj @ Mar 14 2007, 09:18 PM) ur 18-55 is already excellent. |
| Change to: |  0.0159sec
 0.45
 5 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 09:04 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.