Any improvement on wireless range coverage?
Xiaomi Router 3, Flash Padavan - unifi
Xiaomi Router 3, Flash Padavan - unifi
|
|
Apr 3 2017, 03:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,741 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
Any improvement on wireless range coverage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2017, 04:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,741 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(akecema @ Apr 3 2017, 03:57 PM) yes Hehe... I mean does this padavan firmware perform better than Xiaomi own?2.4ghz better than my old router asus N12U old about 2 or 3 bar from 4, now 4 bar consistently. (2 wall) if but 5ghz got problem if got wall(only 2 bar from 4) well its simultaneously 2 band router. so no problem because both band is active |
|
|
Apr 3 2017, 04:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,741 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2017, 09:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,741 posts Joined: Jan 2007 |
QUOTE(muncheno @ Apr 3 2017, 08:54 PM) It is better from my perspective with Padavan Thanks for the explanation. 😀More stable in every aspect especially on wifi and functions while give option to support for unifi vlan tagging and VPN server. It also allow to work as 5gz repeater which default Xiaomi only repeat at 2.4ghz. Only disadvantage from me is does not support QOS. |
| Change to: | 0.0181sec
0.82
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 07:31 AM |