Question for the morally conscious :

There's five (5) person living happily under the same roof.

1. Should just one person get on infinite 150 and share to the other four or should each one of them get their own infinite 150 ?

2. If all five persons have valid reasons for regular heavy downloads (FOSS/streaming/what-not) and all five persons insists on having their own infinite 150 and each does 1TB worths of data every month, does that mean they're morally wrong for already adhering to existing Digi's terms of use ?

3. Isn't it morally wrong for Digi to offer unlimited quota plans if their infrastructure is unable to cope in the first place ? So, why blame the users morality first and not the provider ?

The way I see it : If Digi says they're giving out infinite plans that means they are prepared for the data bandwidth onslaught, which incidentally reminds me of MagicSIM internet burung hantu by Celcom back then in June 2015. The quota was 2TB and the whole episode only lasted 6 months.

All port-in to digi best will become Digi Prepaid Best 2016. The Super Long Life 365 days validity for Digi prepaid best 2016 is RM108 .....

If you require something comparable to tunetalk's old rm2 100mb weekly then I suggest that you check out onexox season pass .....

Old prepaids with pay-per-use will deduct credits. All recent prepaids from big 4 telco does not have pay-per-use nemore and fallback to 64kbps basic internet. Usually prepaid mobile internet plans comes with unlimited usage after past quota from Celcom/Umobile.

Some older postpaid users who have not upgraded are still being charge pay-per-use, some with a RM250 gprs cap limit. There are still reported cases of user accidentally turned on their mobile data for a week and get a bill shock at the end of the month.

and have gst increased to support this by gahmen ? what you're smoking bro ?
those big telcos already making billions ... they can pool 2G roaming resources if they really want to .....