QUOTE(Darkcity212 @ Mar 12 2018, 01:09 PM)
like what u said, someone offer issurance A for 100k coverage and someone else offer u insurrance B for 150k coverage. Surely your interested in company A because its more value but that someone call u a cheapskate or cheapo going for that option when he didnt even know jackshit about it

QUOTE(rooney723 @ Mar 12 2018, 03:31 PM)
wat kind of stupid analogy is dat?? wtf i dun even understand wat u r trying to say
come let me giv u the correct analogy since u die die wan use insurance
1) i ask about A insurance review from real users who really subscribed to A insurance, it looks cheap rm100 for 150k coverage (same as darkcity ask about cheap budget landsail tyres from REAL landsail users)
2) some smartass come in and say all insurance frm company A sucks even though he never used A insurance before cos company A is sucks and tell me to buy B insurance frm reputable company B but its rm200 for 150k coverage (same as dat 6uest guy saying he never used landsail before but claimed all cheap tyres frm china sucks n shuld use expensive premium tyre brands)
3) i dismissed the advice frm dat smartass as irrelevant and insist that i oni wan reviews from real users who bought A insurance, i dont care about using cheap insurance (same as darkcity dismissed 6uest comments about using premium tyres cos he asked about real reviews of landsail and not hearsay frm 6uest)
4) smartass got butthurt that i dont listen to his 'godly' advice n say that im cheapskate, poor etc (same like 6uest calling darkcity cheapskate, poor for not listening to his advice n insist on using landsail tyres)
if u still dont see the whole picture then u r obviously dumb
and its not about being helpful or not, its about giving correct advice, yes 6uest is being helpful for giving advice to use good quality premium tyres to darkcity, but if he is going to give advice then give the relevant advice and not something irrelevant to the question being asked by darkcity, then dont expect ppl to listen to him if he is going to give irrelevant answers, and worst still getting angry n go personal attack ppl when ppl dun listen, wtf attitude is dis?
Fellors, can you properly read what i wrote with the insurance example :
1) A company RM100 for 100k coverage
2) B company RM100 for 150k coverage
Assuming all else being same, why still A? With the same RM100, why pay A when B gives you additional 50% coverage/benefits??
From what i observed, the posts have been read into "too much" into distorting the main intent of the message.
The insurance was an example given to describe the simple point that for landsail money (or top up a little more), can get another brand that is more established product and proven performance.
If even this seems offensive, then well....just let it be....
This post has been edited by wkc5657: Mar 12 2018, 04:22 PM