L1001025
By Franz-Stefan Gady
March 25, 2017
   


India and Russia have failed to make progress on one of their most prestigious defense deals—the co-development and production of the Sukhoi/HAL Fifth Generation Fighter Aircraft (FGFA), known in India as the Perspective Multi-role Fighter (PMF).

The most recent stumbling block to a successful continuation of the project has been Russia’s unwillingness to share sensitive aircraft technology with India. New Delhi is demanding a full-scale transfer of technology in order to boost India’s domestic fighter-manufacturing capabilities.

In September 2016, both sides agreed to a detailed work-sharing agreement. “From a preliminary document that was barely two dozen pages, we have agreed on a 650 page detailed plan that specifies exactly what all will be shared,” an unidentified Indian defense official was quoted at the time. However, India has so far not signed the agreement. “We are awaiting the Indian side’s decision on the FGFA project. We are fulfilling our obligations and are prepared to continue work,” a Russian defense industry official told TASS news agency on March 22.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.
Before moving on, India wants a guarantee that Russia will be able to upgrade the fighter jet in the future without Russian support, which would require Moscow sharing source codes (sensitive computer code that controls the fighter jet’s various systems — the key to an aircraft’s electronic brains).  In addition, the FGFA should directly support India’s advanced medium combat aircraft (AMCA) program—a separate Indian fifth generation fighter project. “This is mandatory,” an Indian defense source told The Times of India on March 9.

As I explained previously:

The FGFA/PMF project has been hampered by repeated delays since the start of the project in 2007 and the signing of a preliminary $295 million design contract in 2010. In 2015, Indian Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar decided to make one last push toward reaching an agreement with Russia.

Furthermore, I noted:

Delays were caused by New Delhi and Moscow disagreeing over many fundamental aspects of the joint development project including work and cost share, aircraft technology, as well as the number of aircraft to be ordered. After evaluating the first PAK FA T-50 prototype (the Russian prototype of the PMF), the Indian Air Force (IAF) wanted more than 40 changes addressing, among other things, perceived weaknesses in the plane’s engine, stealth, and weapon-carrying capabilities.

Another reason for the repeated delays were disputes over the number of aircraft to be produced:

Russia announced in late 2015 that it would only induct a squadron (18-24 aircraft) of PAK FA fighter aircraft, and procure additional Sukhoi Su-35 aircraft instead. The original deal involved Russia procuring 250 and India 144 aircraft at a cost of around $30 billion by 2022. As a result, India threatened to abandon the project in its entirety. Russia in turn made a number of concessions including an offer to cut down its financial contribution from $6 to $ 3.7 billion for three PAK FA T-50 prototypes and substantial technology transfers.

As always, the devil remains in the details and the joint project remains stalled for the moment. The Russian version of the new fifth generation fighter jet appears to be doing better. According to Russia’s Deputy Defense Minister Yuri Borisov, the Russian Air Force could start receiving the first serial-produced T-50 (PAK FA) multi-role fighter jet already in 2018. However, Russian defense officials admit that Russia has so far failed to develop a new engine, called Product 30, for the aircraft, which could potentially push back the induction date.

http://thediplomat.com/2017/03/will-india-...tealth-fighter/

WASHINGTON • China appears to have largely completed major construction of military infrastructure on artificial islands it has built in the South China Sea and can now deploy combat planes and other military hardware there at any time, a US think-tank said.

The Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI), part of Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the work was carried out on what it calls the "Big Three" airbases - on Fiery Cross, Subi and Mischief reefs - in the Spratly Islands.

The bases have air, naval, radar and defensive facilities. The think-tank cited satellite images taken this month, which its director Greg Poling said showed new radar antennas on Fiery Cross and Subi. "So look for deployments in the near future," he said.

China has denied US charges that it is militarising the South China Sea, although Premier Li Keqiang said last week that defence equipment had been placed on islands in the disputed waterway to maintain "freedom of navigation".

A Pentagon spokesman, Commander Gary Ross, declined to comment on the specifics of the AMTI report, saying it was not the Defence Department's practice to comment on intelligence.



But he said "China's continued construction in the South China Sea is part of a growing body of evidence that they continue to take unilateral actions which are increasing tensions in the region and are counterproductive to the peaceful resolution of disputes".



AMTI said China's three airbases in the Spratlys and another on Woody Island in the Paracel chain farther north would allow its military aircraft to operate over nearly the entire South China Sea, a key global trade route that Beijing claims most of. Several neighbouring states have competing claims in the sea, which is widely seen as a potential regional flashpoint.

The think-tank said advanced surveillance and early-warning radar facilities at Fiery Cross, Subi and Cuarteron reefs, as well as Woody Island, and smaller facilities elsewhere gave it similar radar coverage. It said China had installed HQ-9 surface-to-air missiles at Woody Island more than a year ago and had deployed anti-ship cruise missiles there on at least one occasion. China had also constructed hardened shelters with retractable roofs for mobile missile launchers at Fiery Cross, Subi and Mischief, and enough hangars at Fiery Cross for 24 combat aircraft and three larger planes, including bombers.

US officials told Reuters last month that China had built almost two dozen structures on Subi, Mischief and Fiery Cross that appeared designed to house long- range surface-to-air missiles.

In his Senate confirmation hearing in January, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson angered China by saying it should be denied access to islands it had built up in the South China Sea.

Mr Tillerson subsequently softened his language, saying that in the event of an unspecified "contingency", the US and its allies "must be capable of limiting China's access to and use of" those islands to pose a threat.

In recent years, the US has conducted a series of what it calls freedom-of-navigation operations in the South China Sea, raising tensions with Beijing.

REUTERS