Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Buddhism Spiritual Thread

views
     
SpikeMarlene
post Mar 12 2017, 10:53 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
6,237 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(xpmm @ Mar 11 2017, 10:16 PM)
The question has often asked: Is Buddhism a religion or a philosophy?
It does not matter what you call it. Buddhism remains what it is whatever label you
may put on it. The label is immaterial. Even the label  "Buddhism" which we give to
the teaching of the Buddha is of little importance.
The name one gives it is inessential.
What's in a name? That which we call a rose,6
By other name would smell as sweet.
In the same way Truth need no label: it is neither Buddhist, Christian, Hindu
nor Moslem. It  is not the monopoly of anybody. Sectarian labels are a hindrance to
the  independent understanding  of  Truth,  and  they produce harmful prejudices  in
men's mind.
This  is  true not only  in  intellectual and  spiritual matters, but also  in human
relations. When,  for  instance, we meet  a man, we do not  look  on him  as  a human
being, but we put a label on him, such as English, French, German, American, or Jew,
and  regard him with all  the prejudices associated with  that  label  in our mind. Yet
he may be completely free from those attributes which we have put on him.
People are so fond of discriminative labels that they even go to the length of
putting  them  on  human  qualities  and  emotions  common  to  all.  So,  they  talk  of
different 'brands' of charity, as for example, of Buddhist charity or Christian charity,
and  look down upon other  'brands' of  charity. But charity cannot be  sectarian;  it  is
neither Christian, Buddhist, Hindu nor Moslem. The love of a mother for her child is
neither Buddhist nor Christian: it is mother love. Human qualities and emotions like
love,  charity,  compassion,  tolerance,  patience,  friendship,  desire,  hatred,  ill-will,
ignorance,  conceit,  etc.,  need  no  sectarian  labels;  they  belong  to  no  particular
religions.
To  the  seeker  after  Truth  it  is  immaterial  from  where  an  idea  comes.  The
source and development of an idea  is a matter  for the academic.  In fact,  in order to
understand Truth, it is not necessary even to know whether the teaching comes from
the  Buddha,  or  from  anyone  else.  What  is  essential  is  seeing  the  thing,
understanding it.
*
We put a label for communication purpose. If something fits a definition of a word, then we label it as such. Imagine if you were to meet an esoteric Buddhist but refrain from speaking it, instead trying to describe his brand of Buddhism in some other ways, how long would it take before you start to grasp the general concepts? As we learn, the concept becomes more and more complicated and the brain categorizes these concepts in a convenient way so ideas can be transmitted efficiently. For example, the concept of a website, is it a spider in a certain location?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0382sec    0.29    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 07:55 AM