Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Sony Sony Xperia XZs -- Discussion, Motion Eye Camera&S-Force stereo speaker

views
     
kingkingyyk
post Apr 13 2017, 07:21 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(zzzz52 @ Apr 13 2017, 02:51 PM)
Then I really need to give up on this XZ premium already. Sad.
*
Sony camera needs some knowledge to use. If you have steady hand, with the manual mode, it can even beat Pixel XL. cool2.gif
kingkingyyk
post Apr 14 2017, 08:55 AM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(zzzz52 @ Apr 14 2017, 08:27 AM)
I'm those point and shoot type. And most of the photo I take are in door with subpar lighting.
Will wait for some more comparison photos with full auto mode to decide. Decision, decision.
*
http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_xzs-review-1600p9.php

The potential is there, but Auto mode doesn't bring it out. Auto mode tends to have high shutter speed to reduce your handshake, by sacrificing image quality. You want blurry photo or high noise? I would rather have high noise, which can be cleaned up later, if wanted. When pixel peep, the image isn't sharp, but if you perform downsampling to identical pixel count with other phones, you will see the detail is sharper.

This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Apr 14 2017, 10:57 AM
kingkingyyk
post Apr 14 2017, 03:10 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(davidletterboyz @ Apr 14 2017, 02:58 PM)
Any pics that support this claim?
And can beat Pixel XL on the same manual mode and settings?
With this kind of JPEG algorithm, I doubt it's among the very best. Even if you downsample the pics into to the same 12MP resolution, the artifacts still persist. You can go gsmarena.com and check out the low light studio shot.

Another thing is Sony's lens corners sharpness. Very very blunt in corners.
*


Admittedly, the corner sharpness issue does exist, but since it is wider than other phones, personally find it acceptable, given the sensor size, the focal length, aperture and no camera bulge. The focal length & distortion is not suitable for casual shoots, works well landscape. Generally the camera is too specific for it's use + demanding on the user ability. The "artifacts" can be removed with mild denoise in post processing, but I prefer to have that to keep the details. For a casual user who posts on social platform, the compression itself already kill the information of the picture, let alone artifacts.

This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Apr 14 2017, 03:13 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0138sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 06:22 AM