Everyone should have this thinking.. Logic is logic and cannot be faulted.. If everyone questioned things and only applied logic and fairness, the world won't have idiots today who think
it's okay to grab a gun or strap on a vest to blow people up, just because a book written by someone else says its very much justified to do so or they can't handle the way the world works now. Good, you too are entitled to your opinion (this is a public forum after-all). If you can't accept it doesn't mean the logic is flawed.. I posted my comments to avoid others simply accepting flawed logic as true. I know the things I know, because I put in the work and not sit around expecting people to tell it all down to the last bit.. There's spoon-feeding and then there's extreme spoon-feeding. In this your very post, you already contradict yourself..
[*]Help page -
https://help.netflix.com/legal/termsofuse (only mentioned quality is depends on internet line performance and subject to device capabilities **).. That is a warning given by Netflix already.. Simplest obvious meaning is to tell you that performance is dependent on your Internet Speeds and
Device used..No? Plus they already offered free 1-month trial for you to test before payment starts.. Isn't one month more than enough for you to test current devices capabilities and if you require a different one or a lesser plan (I mentioned this in my previous post but as usual you don't have logical comebacks for such). Anyways, You say Google pulling out of Amazon devices is a business interest and has nothing to do with hardware capable or not.. Good grief! I never thought anyone could be that dense. How is it not related? Aren't Amazon devices more than capable of running YouTube or YouTube Red?.. Isn't Netflix requiring that certified devices actually be certified by them to get full capabilities a business decision?

.. At least many are grateful (and this is another prime example of Netflix's fairness and customer-friendly policy) that Netflix didn't completely disable and disallow these non-certified devices from using their services. But allowed them to work unlike the Google and Amazon examples you brought up earlier to use in supporting your argument.. If you subscribe to TIME's 500Mbps package but only have devices at home with max real world speeds of up to 100Mbps, who's fault is it again? TIME's or you? Perhaps you want TIME to list on their website that "Hey, this package is only for those who have 100% verified 500Mpbs capable devices at home"... Bruh!!
You say the User already know that their device is capable.. Oh okay.. I'm unaware of any scenario where an end user who is incapable of simple googling, much less understanding hardware specs and software limitations, is able to know more than the producer of the service. I love giving people analogies to see the illogicality of the thought processes..In total finality, should my counterarguments be wasted on you, I hope others took note.. I always base my purchases on real world performance and not theoretical. Do your homework before pulling the trigger on any media device, lest you suffer a fate where what you thought it can do is different from real world performance..
Just continue bickering for your fukken self inflating ego, everyone here knows your petty ego especially ur rap against TS previously, no one cares anyway. But don't drag religion into this. Everyone knows your thinly veiled attempt of mockering Islam in above remark. Pathetic Minix fan boy