QUOTE(buffalowings @ May 4 2007, 02:34 PM)
it sounds attractive because hey! it's a sony, and they market their products very nicely...Sony T100, March
Sony T100, March
|
|
Jun 26 2007, 12:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 26 2007, 11:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(firewir3 @ Jun 26 2007, 01:41 PM) Anyone found that this camera is fantastic?anything special with this camera?can someone post up any nice photos taken....thank you! here's one taken out of the t100, macro mode and with flash (Auto mode as well), straight out of the camera and resized that's all...my comments is on the evident purple fringing & ISO noise, other than that, it does what a camera does, which is take pictures anyway... and with style... hmmm.. This post has been edited by wlcling: Jun 26 2007, 11:51 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Jul 12 2007, 01:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(temptation1314 @ Jul 12 2007, 10:06 AM) Here's some comparison for the T-100 macro function I try to examine Those pictures isn't really a true representation of the macro functions... because it makes as if the mode used in your second picture is no use... when actually, it just needs to be further away No Zooming occured here. With macro for extreme close-up ![]() With macro for close-up ![]() Without macro(off) ![]() For extreme close-ups, you need to get really near in order for it to focus (Zooming is disabled in this mode) For normal macro, maybe a few cm away from the lens And for macro off, it seems to have focused on the background anyway |
|
|
Aug 13 2007, 01:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
i think you would find most compacts suffer from excessive noise above ISO400 (except the fuji f31fd,etc...)
you pay for a t-100 for the design, so that's what you got... |
|
|
Aug 13 2007, 01:24 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
QUOTE(calvin_gsc @ Aug 13 2007, 01:05 AM) So, you're saying actually most P&S cameras suffer this problem at above ISO400? not sure about other brands but yeah, so far I seem to disagree with Sony compacts... the way i look across compacts right now is that fuji offers great night shots, canon (and a few others) offers 28mm, olympus offers waterproof, and then Sony offers design... Next time around I think I will change to program auto mode so that I can limit it to ISO200-400, so that even it's not bright enough, the pictures wont be noisy. I think under AUTO mode, I can't set the ISO. After using my D80, I never had ISO problems. :-p but yes, you should limit the ISO... unless you want to capture motion in a no-flash low-light situation.. actually after having my d200, i still have ISO problems... at 1600 and above... hehe |
|
|
Sep 30 2007, 07:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,711 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0149sec
0.81
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 02:01 AM |