Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

1553 Pages « < 802 803 804 805 806 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 FundSuperMart v18 (FSM) MY : Online UT Platform, UT DIY : Babystep to Investing :D

views
     
[Ancient]-XinG-
post Dec 29 2018, 09:03 AM

20k VIP club
*******
Senior Member
5,750 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(Krv23490 @ Dec 29 2018, 01:17 AM)
That is exactly what I am saying. The average(and most 'pro' investors can't time the market . Hence strong discipline for DCA is proven to be good .

5 years is still quite a short horizon. And maybe I am mistaken but pretty sure the result would not be the same if DCA every month compared to a 5 year return chart.

Oh well, I agree with you regarding the certain bad funds as well but I also can bring up the best example. Just the s&p 500 .

Can try checking out Benjamin Graham's book

Ps, I agree there are certain pitfalls as you mentioned , DCA is most deal for ETFs or broad index funds . I can only tell you the result when going to retire biggrin.gif
*
don't be me wrong.... I support DCA.

and yes... no one can time the market.... but we can know the market trend slightly...

I mean 2018.... when the street starting to ask about recession... econ down.....

that's the time you have to stop most of the investment but going for safe investment.
Krv23490
post Dec 29 2018, 10:33 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,175 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(Ancient-XinG- @ Dec 29 2018, 09:03 AM)
don't be me wrong.... I support DCA.

and yes... no one can time the market.... but we can know the market trend slightly...

I mean 2018.... when the street starting to ask about recession... econ down.....

that's the time you have to stop most of the investment but going for safe investment.
*
I agree too ! That's why it's healthy to have a ratio of bond funds . It's mostly for people who cant take the fluctuations of the markets and to prevent people from buying high and selling low.


kart
post Dec 29 2018, 07:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,597 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
QUOTE(howszat @ Dec 28 2018, 10:37 PM)
No, it's not the best way. It can even be a really lousy way.

For Cost Averaging to be profitable, it depends on the average-cost in future to be higher than the average-cost today.

Or put it another way, if you look at the fund performance chart, it should trend upwards over time, given a few up/down blip every now and then, but the general trend should be upwards.

But many funds do not achieve this. Quite a number are negative over time, and others barely keep their head above water, on average. Hence, the common impression that the return is around FD or worse.

When fund agents (and even fund houses) tell you about cost-averaging, they "forgot" to tell you about this particular point - the fund MUST trend upwards over time.

To demonstrate, from the old FSM performance 5-year table, 111 funds are 0-4% returns, and 75 are NEGATIVE returns. Cost averaging is not going to help in these cases.

I haven't come across where the new FSM tables are, but in general, the new website is a backward step.
*
Just to summarize, is the following method a better way to perform dollar cost averaging (DCA), in general for any unit trusts?

1) Downtrend in NAV is anticipated over the next few months.
- Completely stop DCA. Deploy the fund (meant for DCA) for e-fixed deposit, or in money market.


2) Downtrend severity in NAV starts to reduce (NAV price curve starts to reduce and gradually flattens), with the possibility of NAV rebound within the next month (economy may start to be better)
- Perform DCA with partial fund.


3) NAV starts to rebound, with uptrend in NAV expected within the next few months.
- Perform DCA, with full intended fund every month.


Is my understanding correct, about the proper way to perform DCA? Appreciate a few tips, from FundSuperMart expert inventors here. notworthy.gif thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by kart: Dec 29 2018, 08:01 PM
besiegetank
post Dec 29 2018, 08:56 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
918 posts

Joined: Aug 2009


QUOTE(kart @ Dec 29 2018, 07:59 PM)
Just to summarize, is the following method a better way to perform dollar cost averaging (DCA), in general for any unit trusts?

1) Downtrend in NAV is anticipated over the next few months.
- Completely stop DCA. Deploy the fund (meant for DCA) for e-fixed deposit, or in money market.
2) Downtrend severity in NAV starts to reduce (NAV price curve starts to reduce and gradually flattens), with the possibility of NAV rebound within the next month (economy may start to be better)
- Perform DCA with partial fund.
3) NAV starts to rebound, with uptrend in NAV expected within the next few months.
- Perform DCA, with full intended fund every month.
Is my understanding correct, about the proper way to perform DCA? Appreciate a few tips, from FundSuperMart expert inventors here.  notworthy.gif  thumbup.gif
*
Those 'anticipation, expectation and possibility' sounds a lot like timing the market instead of DCA tongue.gif Ultimately I think it depends if those possibility comes true or not.
kart
post Dec 29 2018, 09:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,597 posts

Joined: Aug 2014
besiegetank

Judging from the opinion of howszat and jorgsacul, it is inappropriate to perform DCA in the severe market downtrend, and they suggest to stop DCA.

Probably, they think that after the end of market downtrend, the total investment value has significantly shrunk.

That is why I am asking howszat the proper way to perform DCA. smile.gif

coolguy99
post Dec 29 2018, 09:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
7,349 posts

Joined: Aug 2015



QUOTE(kart @ Dec 29 2018, 07:59 PM)
Just to summarize, is the following method a better way to perform dollar cost averaging (DCA), in general for any unit trusts?

1) Downtrend in NAV is anticipated over the next few months.
- Completely stop DCA. Deploy the fund (meant for DCA) for e-fixed deposit, or in money market.
2) Downtrend severity in NAV starts to reduce (NAV price curve starts to reduce and gradually flattens), with the possibility of NAV rebound within the next month (economy may start to be better)
- Perform DCA with partial fund.
3) NAV starts to rebound, with uptrend in NAV expected within the next few months.
- Perform DCA, with full intended fund every month.
Is my understanding correct, about the proper way to perform DCA? Appreciate a few tips, from FundSuperMart expert inventors here.  notworthy.gif  thumbup.gif
*
It is difficult to predict the market, while your understanding is correct, it is just theory. If one can predict how the market will go in the next few months, one can be filthy rich.
Krv23490
post Dec 29 2018, 10:20 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,175 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(kart @ Dec 29 2018, 09:54 PM)
besiegetank

Judging from the opinion of howszat and jorgsacul, it is inappropriate to perform DCA in the severe market downtrend, and they suggest to stop DCA.

Probably, they think that after the end of market downtrend, the total investment value has significantly shrunk.

That is why I am asking howszat the proper way to perform DCA. smile.gif
*
Exaclty, but when can you tell the end of the market downtrend
skynode
post Dec 29 2018, 10:46 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
175 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
If based on lessons from the past, it's not timing but ultimately the time in the market that matters.

howszat
post Dec 30 2018, 09:54 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,932 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
QUOTE(kart @ Dec 29 2018, 09:54 PM)
besiegetank

Judging from the opinion of howszat and jorgsacul, it is inappropriate to perform DCA in the severe market downtrend, and they suggest to stop DCA.

Probably, they think that after the end of market downtrend, the total investment value has significantly shrunk.

That is why I am asking howszat the proper way to perform DCA. smile.gif
*

The DCA way is "regular" and "fixed-amount", by DCA definition.

The point I was making was you should not do DCA in isolation, believing it will work out to be profitable in the end. Because it depends.

You also need to question whether the fund you are DCA'ing is the right one to continue investing in.

Because there are profitable, no-so-profitable, and NOT-profitable funds. So, in addition to DCA, you must also review whether the fund is the correct one for you, and switch if not.



Ramjade
post Dec 30 2018, 09:59 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
24,334 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(kart @ Dec 29 2018, 07:59 PM)
Just to summarize, is the following method a better way to perform dollar cost averaging (DCA), in general for any unit trusts?

1) Downtrend in NAV is anticipated over the next few months.
- Completely stop DCA. Deploy the fund (meant for DCA) for e-fixed deposit, or in money market.
2) Downtrend severity in NAV starts to reduce (NAV price curve starts to reduce and gradually flattens), with the possibility of NAV rebound within the next month (economy may start to be better)
- Perform DCA with partial fund.
3) NAV starts to rebound, with uptrend in NAV expected within the next few months.
- Perform DCA, with full intended fund every month.
Is my understanding correct, about the proper way to perform DCA? Appreciate a few tips, from FundSuperMart expert inventors here.  notworthy.gif  thumbup.gif
*
DCA is simple. Put in fixed amount of money every month regardless market is cheap or expensive.

QUOTE(skynode @ Dec 29 2018, 10:46 PM)
If based on lessons from the past, it's not timing but ultimately the time in the market that matters.
*
Actually both helps.
Time in the market and timing the market can do wonders.
[Ancient]-XinG-
post Dec 30 2018, 10:09 PM

20k VIP club
*******
Senior Member
5,750 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Dec 30 2018, 09:59 PM)
DCA is simple. Put in fixed amount of money every month regardless market is cheap or expensive.
Actually both helps.
Time in the market and timing the market can do wonders.
*
wow looks who's back

so, what's your take on 2019? is the bear really come for real? Dow touched 22k. but bounced. even from 26k point....
Ramjade
post Dec 30 2018, 10:22 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
24,334 posts

Joined: Feb 2011


QUOTE(Ancient-XinG- @ Dec 30 2018, 10:09 PM)
wow looks who's back

so, what's your take on 2019? is the bear really come for real? Dow touched 22k. but bounced.  even from 26k point....
*
Bears aren't coming yet.
Hansel
post Dec 30 2018, 11:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,348 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
Watch March 1st., and sometime in March,...

1) Trade War decision by Trump.
2) Brexit.
Krv23490
post Dec 30 2018, 11:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,175 posts

Joined: Mar 2016
QUOTE(Ramjade @ Dec 30 2018, 09:59 PM)
DCA is simple. Put in fixed amount of money every month regardless market is cheap or expensive.
Actually both helps.
Time in the market and timing the market can do wonders.
*
Exactly, if you feel the market is cheaper than usual, increase your normal allotment so in a way you can 'time' the market !
river.sand
post Dec 31 2018, 10:31 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,806 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
What US funds (or funds which invest substantially in US market) which I can consider in the next few months?
xcxa23
post Dec 31 2018, 10:34 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,649 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(Ancient-XinG- @ Dec 30 2018, 10:09 PM)
wow looks who's back

so, what's your take on 2019? is the bear really come for real? Dow touched 22k. but bounced.  even from 26k point....
*
10% correction
20% bear
30% crash

Theoretically, those are the numbers to watch out.

Anyhow, afaik the big event happening in 2019 are in march..

DJI have been up trending for almost 10 years.. what goes up, must come down.. so be prepare..
infested_ysy
post Dec 31 2018, 11:48 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,061 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka
QUOTE(HayashiAska @ Dec 27 2018, 08:32 PM)
Damn unlucky me.
Just started investing via FSM in 2017 Nov.
Being a beginner that time, I bought some "recommended" funds as well as some others.
Tried to diversify my portfolio by picking out those uncorrelated ones.
Then GE14 came and now Trump... >_<

Rugi banyak.

Portfolio (current allocation %):
CIMB Dyn Inc MYR - 23.00%
CIMB Titans - 17.23%
Commodities - 4.56%
Global Emerging Mkt - 22.88%
Manulife India 16.79%
TA Global - 11.44%
TA Small Cap (bought later) - 4.10%

Also have some KGF not bought through FSM previously.

I didn't bother to care about it much in the beginning, thinking that i'll just invest and forget about it.
But seeing that now my portfolio has been splattered with lots of tomato ketchup recently, I think it's time for a change of plans.

Any advice from the experts? Should I move them to Bonds or Fixed Income?

[EDIT]
Oh, and since it's my first post...
I should say "Hello!"
*
So what did you do in the end? Stay the same, withdraw?

I'm in the same boat as you, am wondering what I should do now. At this rate I'm quite tempted to just pull out and put my money in ASM3, at least government backed and guarantee 6% every year.
real55555
post Dec 31 2018, 12:06 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
309 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(infested_ysy @ Dec 31 2018, 11:48 AM)
So what did you do in the end? Stay the same, withdraw?

I'm in the same boat as you, am wondering what I should do now. At this rate I'm quite tempted to just pull out and put my money in ASM3, at least government backed and guarantee 6% every year.
*
Look through all the funds that you have now, you have to review them periodically. Take the pain in cutting losses by selling them all off and reinvesting them in another fund if you find that there is no more chance of rebounding. How to evaluate?

1. Look at their fund size. If fund size is decreasing every month, fund manager wont have cash to capitalize on this correction, your rebound will be slow or worse not moving.

2. Look at past performance of this fund during previous corrections or market downturn.


real55555
post Dec 31 2018, 12:19 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
309 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(kart @ Dec 29 2018, 07:59 PM)
Just to summarize, is the following method a better way to perform dollar cost averaging (DCA), in general for any unit trusts?

1) Downtrend in NAV is anticipated over the next few months.
- Completely stop DCA. Deploy the fund (meant for DCA) for e-fixed deposit, or in money market.
2) Downtrend severity in NAV starts to reduce (NAV price curve starts to reduce and gradually flattens), with the possibility of NAV rebound within the next month (economy may start to be better)
- Perform DCA with partial fund.
3) NAV starts to rebound, with uptrend in NAV expected within the next few months.
- Perform DCA, with full intended fund every month.
Is my understanding correct, about the proper way to perform DCA? Appreciate a few tips, from FundSuperMart expert inventors here.  notworthy.gif  thumbup.gif
*
1. if you do this, you are timing the market, which is essentially 100% opposite of DCA. If you can know the market movements, you don't need to do DCA.

2. and 3. not sure how to answer but see below

The main purpose of DCA is to invest a fixed amount at regular intervals, so investor don't have to time the market as this could result in heavy losses or very high profit but this comes with higher risk. So if you've decided to do DCA, you just get ready your funds, and do it with discipline (e.g. RM500 every month for 3 years). I'd say 3 years is minimum.

And next is fund selection. Never go for new funds, because we do not know how they perform, whether the market will like this fund etc. A lot of new funds go dead because lack of funds so in the end if you do DCA in such funds, you'll be stucked. Instead, go for master funds. Every fund house will have 4-5 master funds e.g. balanced, growth, income, small cap etc. Look at their performance and see which suits your risk appetite and investing profile.

If you want to be more aggressive, you can incorporate an additional strategy say every 5% drop in unit price then you invest another block of RM500 in it.
Drian
post Dec 31 2018, 01:25 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,999 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(howszat @ Dec 28 2018, 10:37 PM)
No, it's not the best way. It can even be a really lousy way.

For Cost Averaging to be profitable, it depends on the average-cost in future to be higher than the average-cost today.

Or put it another way, if you look at the fund performance chart, it should trend upwards over time, given a few up/down blip every now and then, but the general trend should be upwards.

But many funds do not achieve this. Quite a number are negative over time, and others barely keep their head above water, on average. Hence, the common impression that the return is around FD or worse.

When fund agents (and even fund houses) tell you about cost-averaging, they "forgot" to tell you about this particular point - the fund MUST trend upwards over time.

To demonstrate, from the old FSM performance 5-year table, 111 funds are 0-4% returns, and 75 are NEGATIVE returns. Cost averaging is not going to help in these cases.

I haven't come across where the new FSM tables are, but in general, the new website is a backward step.
*
True true.


1553 Pages « < 802 803 804 805 806 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0261sec    0.25    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 01:29 AM