1) How did you know when to change your portfolio to a conservative one? Is it 1 or 2 or 3 months into the downturn?
2) Is there transactional costs that you incur when you change your port? Did you incur inter or intra switching costs? Or time costs when you switch from equity of UT fund A into bond of fund A, then bond of fund B and finally equity UT of fund B.
3) How long are you going to stay with your conservertive port? How do you know when to switch?
4) Why did you go into TA Global Technology Fund when it is so volatile is it because of performance?
5) How do you define pokemon style? Is it more than 6 UT types? Is it 8 types? Why limit yourself to 4 types of UTs?
6) Is pokemon style really bad? The transactional costs of monitoring and comparing the different UTs performance against each other with fundsupermart is so low and can be done easily. There is "chart center" and "fund selector" which allows one to easily compare. All these can be done within less than 30 mins once or twice a year.
There is no transactional cost for my port because I use wrap account.
I will stay with this port fomposition until Jan 2019. Algozen ver four will tell me plus I have been using UTF since 2005 as a wealth management tool, I have a certain flair, a certain je ne sais quoi so to speak.
TA tech has been my alpha for a long long time. I think I have it in my port composition since 2015. It has brought me joy and happiness. TA Tech is not that volatile lah! Try China fund for comparison and see...
I think above six UTFs is considered Pokemon style already.
Pokemon style = dilute your alpha. You earn peanuts here and there... no syiok factor.
There is no transactional cost for my port because I use wrap account.
I will stay with this port fomposition until Jan 2019. Algozen ver four will tell me plus I have been using UTF since 2005 as a wealth management tool, I have a certain flair, a certain je ne sais quoi so to speak.
TA tech has been my alpha for a long long time. I think I have it in my port composition since 2015. It has brought me joy and happiness. TA Tech is not that volatile lah! Try China fund for comparison and see...
I think above six UTFs is considered Pokemon style already.
Pokemon style = dilute your alpha. You earn peanuts here and there... no syiok factor.
Xuzen
Correct me if I am wrong, you are optimising the 1) risk and return 2) min the correlation between the different UTs in your portfolio?
Very impressive approach than intuitive way. Did you compare the algozen performance with other approaches?
I too invested in TA tech. Good performance for me so far.
I have also looked at morning star and the correlation analysis it produces. What other resources or anything else I missed.? I just started investing in Mar this year.
Correct me if I am wrong, you are optimising the 1) risk and return 2) min the correlation between the different UTs in your portfolio?
Very impressive approach than intuitive way. Did you compare the algozen performance with other approaches?
I too invested in TA tech. Good performance for me so far.
I have also looked at morning star and the correlation analysis it produces. What other resources or anything else I missed.? I just started investing in Mar this year.
Yes, you are right. I proudly declare I am a follower of Markowitz's Modern Portfolio Theory.
Algozen ver four did not lose money vis-a-vis FSM Managed portfolio. Admitedly the return has been lacklustre but at least she did not lose money. The case is different with FSM managed portfolio given the grievences laid bare by the participants here.
And why it is so darn difficult to make money for the past 3 quarters? Trump lah... he is a pariah leader, one day talk like this, the next day can go 180 degrees U-turn without thinking of consequences. He thinks the world revolves around him. He has the ego the size of Jupiter.
You have the data from morningstar. But what you are missing is the algorthm to assist you make the decision. What you have is just raw data. You cannot use raw data without an algorithm to make the data useful.
Xuzen
This post has been edited by xuzen: Aug 26 2018, 11:11 AM
Yes, you are right. I proudly declare I am a follower of Markowitz's Modern Portfolio Theory.
Algozen ver four did not lose money vis-a-vis FSM Managed portfolio. Admitedly the return has been lacklustre but at least she did not lose money. The case is different with FSM managed portfolio given the grievences laid bare by the participants here.
And why it is so darn difficult to make money for the past 3 quarters? Trump lah... he is a pariah leader, one day talk like this, the next day can go 180 degrees U-turn without thinking of consequences. He thinks the world revolves around him. He has the ego the size of Jupiter.
You have the data from morningstar. But what you are missing is the algorthm to assist you make the decision. What you have is just raw data. You cannot use raw data without an algorithm to make the data useful.
Xuzen
Most people just copy and paste your portfolio
Having seen your port; can I say there are just 4 broad classes of UTs that are not strongly correlated to each other:
1) the US camp (eg TA Tech, Global Titans, etc)
2) the China camp (eg Asia-pacific UT funds, KGF, etc all tend to follow China. If China shares goes up, all the Asian shares also goes up and vice versa)?
3) other asset classes like Reits where they don't quite behave like 1 and 2. 4) ofc bond funds.
BTW, lets wait till Nov election - if democrats win big, trump may not last and we are on the way to big win
This post has been edited by ChessRook: Aug 26 2018, 03:13 PM
Having seen your port; can I say there are just 4 broad classes of UTs that are not strongly correlated to each other:
1) the US camp (eg TA Tech, Global Titans, etc)
2) the China camp (eg Asia-pacific UT funds, KGF, etc all tend to follow China. If China shares goes up, all the Asian shares also goes up and vice versa)? 3) other asset classes like Reits where they don't quite behave like 1 and 2. 4) ofc bond funds. BTW, lets wait till Nov election - if democrats win big, trump may not last and we are on the way to big win
President Trump said the stock market would crash “everybody would be very poor” if he was ever impeached in a new interview.
“If I ever got impeached, I think the market would crash,” he said said in a Fox and Friends interview that aired Thursday. “I think everybody would be very poor. Because without this thinking you would see – you would see numbers that you wouldn’t believe in reverse.”
President Trump said the stock market would crash “everybody would be very poor” if he was ever impeached in a new interview.
“If I ever got impeached, I think the market would crash,” he said said in a Fox and Friends interview that aired Thursday. “I think everybody would be very poor. Because without this thinking you would see – you would see numbers that you wouldn’t believe in reverse.”
It is a typo. Should be August instead of September.
Also, let me take this opportunity to state that currently my port has reached the desired eq to fi ratio of 70 to 30.
My non pokenon port consist of the following members:
1) TA Tech 20%
2) Eastspring Equity Income 25%
3) Selina reits at 25%
4) Anita Bond 30%
This, according to my good friend Algozen ver four, sits at an optimal risk to reward ratio point, only consisting of four members, unlike some professional managed account, play Pokemon style here and there.
p/s I play retail only UTF that are available in FSM universe. I am purely a retail investor who does not have access to any kind of " wholesale " fund whatsoever.
Xuzen
no China/HK/Taiwan (Greater China)?
no Asia Pac non Reits Equities funds?
currently giving up on Asia Pac regions for the next half year?
25% in Malaysia Eq.....must have confident that M'sia will be better in the coming months (before the next portfolio change?)
at 50% of the port heavily on asset class that are abit sensitive to the interest rate......(which are the trend moving forward)?
This post has been edited by yklooi: Aug 27 2018, 09:23 AM
you think all FI will be spared? when Eq falls, many corporate may default on issued bonds, thus.... not all FI funds are the same
if, he is to be impeached.....the 1st 'hints' of him to be charged...would cause the markets to vibrate..... just that , it is the subsequence actions/events that would see how our port would escapes the fall out...ex whether the FMs would believes it or not to be that severe...thus hold, sell or do nothing...
you think all FI will be spared? when Eq falls, many corporate may default on issued bonds, thus.... not all FI funds are the same
if, he is to be impeached.....the 1st 'hints' of him to be charged...would cause the markets to vibrate..... just that , it is the subsequence actions/events that would see how our port would escapes the fall out...ex whether the FMs would believes it or not to be that severe...thus hold, sell or do nothing...
chills.
rest assured the fall of FI (of course need see what type) won't be the same as EQ
President Trump said the stock market would crash “everybody would be very poor” if he was ever impeached in a new interview.
“If I ever got impeached, I think the market would crash,” he said said in a Fox and Friends interview that aired Thursday. “I think everybody would be very poor. Because without this thinking you would see – you would see numbers that you wouldn’t believe in reverse.”
Only the US stocks would crash temporarily, new regime in the US is likely not to be so crazy with the trade war. So most of the stocks in the world will rise after the dust has settled.
BTW Stocks crashing will not impact on a companies abilities to pay their debts. These companies will continue to earn money selling products and services. So not to worry.
This post has been edited by ChessRook: Aug 27 2018, 11:59 AM
Only the US stocks would crash, temporarily new regime in the US is likely not to be so crazy with the trade war. So most Asia Pacific stocks will rise. It will be interesting!!
he being eliminated does that mean CN unofficially win the war?
Having seen your port; can I say there are just 4 broad classes of UTs that are not strongly correlated to each other:
1) the US camp (eg TA Tech, Global Titans, etc)
2) the China camp (eg Asia-pacific UT funds, KGF, etc all tend to follow China. If China shares goes up, all the Asian shares also goes up and vice versa)? 3) other asset classes like Reits where they don't quite behave like 1 and 2. 4) ofc bond funds. BTW, lets wait till Nov election - if democrats win big, trump may not last and we are on the way to big win
There are about 250 UTFs in the FSM universe. My first step is to select the top ten most desirable UTFs and this is based on what I read and understand from various media sources including reports from the various Fund Houses. This is the part which is subjective and is solely based on my biased opinion and personal gut feel. This part takes a certain je ne sais quoi.
Out of these ten short-listed candidate I will throw them into Algozen ver four and let her do the computation. Then I will use her to churn out various scenario & outcome. This is the analytical part. Pure computational work. Too tedious for human to do it, only a computer can do it.
Then of the many outcomes that are churned out, I will select the outcome that in my opinion, which I am most comfortable with. Again, this is based on personal experience. So, if let say I choose outcome A, and suddenly the world changes with some new info that will move the market wildly, I will already have in my library outcome B, C, D... so forth and I can quickly change my port accordingly. That is why I rarely lose money. Lackluster ROI yes, lose money no, except in this 2018... in the 12 preceding month of tracking, my port made 5 months of lost and that is a record for my port. Prior to 2018, I rarely lose money. But prior to this, we do not have a mad Trump to disturb the market. But nonetheless, the port as a whole made money 12 mths preceding.
QUOTE(yklooi @ Aug 27 2018, 09:09 AM)
no China/HK/Taiwan (Greater China)?
no Asia Pac non Reits Equities funds?
currently giving up on Asia Pac regions for the next half year?
25% in Malaysia Eq.....must have confident that M'sia will be better in the coming months (before the next portfolio change?)
at 50% of the port heavily on asset class that are abit sensitive to the interest rate......(which are the trend moving forward)?
China centric and emerging market is very reactive to what Trump say. It is too volatile and hence I discard it for the time being until Trump gets booted out or the market decide to ignore Trump tantrum.
Surprisingly ES Eq Income is very uncorrelated to the other UTF in my port and hence that is why it is there.
On Reits, it is something I have to be more concern with, thank you friend Yklooi for highlighting it.
QUOTE(T231H @ Aug 27 2018, 10:22 AM)
maybe this can helps....Calculating his Portfolio Risk Level
This calculation of risk is not correct. The proper way is
Now try to do the above manual calculation with ten risky assets. Thank god there is Algozen ver four.
BTW, my port risk aka Std-Dev is 4.XX which is lower than that of FSM's balanced fund definition.
Xuzen
This post has been edited by xuzen: Aug 27 2018, 12:27 PM