Basically, I am not saying the PRS is "bad", as this other guy has misinterpreted.
What I am trying to point out is, since the government was trying to encourage youngsters to save elsewhere in addition to the EPF, why did they just hand them a portfolio of unit trusts for them to manage, which is a totally unsuitable medium for savings, moreover complex and risky, as you have also analyzed ?
What they should have started was some kind of other provident or saving fund with a basic annual interest, dividend or incentive, like that of the EPF.
As one PRS member here has also agree, he finds It
too risky and speculative, something he does not have
the skill and experience to manage, being far too easy to
make losses.
I was at the EPF branch at Shah Alam two weeks ago
talking to one of their advisors.
The EPF has their own Members' Investment Scheme,
unit trusts, an option for members to draw out their savings
to invest in.
The advisor said that even he does not go for this - preferring to self-contribute to the EPF, because unit
trusts are risky.
UT is actually much easier than stock. You just need to learn how to pick good funds.