Car Tint Advise Needed, RayTech, VKool, Huper Optic, 3M or .....
|
|
 Oct 14 2013, 12:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
683 posts Joined: Jun 2008 
|
what is the recommendation for dugong tinting ? It is a 2011 2nd hand vios.
budget: under Rm1.6k Requirement: 1.Solar film on front(GPS smart targ friendly) and rear windscreen 2.Solar + Security film on side windscreen 3. I prefer darker film but I need it to be safe from SAMAN, trouble free with JPJ people, how dark(in%) we can get ? This post has been edited by linkinawe: Oct 14 2013, 12:37 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 14 2013, 03:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
683 posts Joined: Jun 2008
|
QUOTE(Dwango @ Oct 14 2013, 08:15 AM) Recommendation for tinting is dependent on the choice of brands available in the market. Almost all come with solar and security films. As for GPS and smart tag friendly films, some are compliant while some are not so compliant. So far I know Huper Optik is GPS and Smart tag friendly. Others not so sure. Other popular brands include V-kool, 3M, Raytech and Sahara. brand wise , with this budget of 1.6k , able to get Huper/V-kool ?As for your point no. 3, this question on "how dark can we get" to be safe, this depends on the level of expectations as everyone's expectations are not similar. Theoretically VLT50% is the permissible limit for side and rear windscreen but many people have VLT40% on these windscreens as they still don't look too dark. Some people have VLT30% films on the sides and rear and feel they are not too dark either, while others may regard VLT30% as too dark. Some people even have VLT below 30% which is certainly too dark already. In my opinion, if you want to play safe just stick with VLT70% and above for front windscreen and VLT50% and above for side windscreens. If you want darker, you can still choose VLT60% and above for front and VLT40% and above for sides and back. Anything below these figures for VLT and the chance of you getting into trouble will be higher, not recommended actually. Having said that there will still be people who would be willing to take the risk though.  |
|
|
Oct 23 2013, 07:09 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
683 posts Joined: Jun 2008
|
QUOTE(yaz_inseven @ Oct 23 2013, 06:05 PM) Do we really need security tint??? These criminal already have a target to snatch , eg: if they saw u put ur handbag or anything precious on the side passenger seat. Always place your precious stuff underneath your legs, so they have nothing to snatch  If criminals can do like this.. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=493211...&type=2&theater  . |
|
|
Oct 24 2013, 01:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
683 posts Joined: Jun 2008
|
QUOTE(yaz_inseven @ Oct 23 2013, 08:20 PM) Yes..thats right..i know the vistim was targeted.. IMO, security tint just delaying snatchers to break your window, after that you will still need to replace the window + tint .. In snatchers perspective, every second count, they wont simply break a window without actually confirm they can snatch something. Just try not to be their target But the way he pull out the power window, seems so easy right? Without breaking the glass.. so with or without security tint,they still able to do their crime...   ,then we have no reason to spend for security tint |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0221sec
 0.87
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 01:28 PM |
Quote