Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
pocket size camera
|
DaddyO
|
 Jan 17 2017, 06:18 PM
|
|
QUOTE(xoxo1943 @ Jan 17 2017, 03:58 PM) hi all, im looking for suggestions for pocket size camera which i would use it mainly in daily life for capturing photos and videos children (running, playing etc), landscape, sunset. i have seen for this category mostly suggested sony rx100. i would like to find out if sony rx100 iii, iv, v differences and for my usage. or is there any better choice other than sony rx100? thank you for your input. If you want 4k, rx100iv and above. If just photo and ordinary video that doesn't eat up sdcard, rx100mkiii is good enough plus an eye viewfinder. Depend on your budget and picture quality preference, rx100 may even suffice. Alternatively Canon g7x ii or g5x or even some of panasonic compact cameras like the DMC. |
|
|
|
|
|
DaddyO
|
Jan 18 2017, 10:13 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(xoxo1943 @ Jan 18 2017, 09:48 PM) Just braced myself with two kiddos to the shop today, the sales assistant told me the difference between m3 and m4 is the 4K video, and rx100 image quality is not much better than phone, is that true? In return he recommends the alpha6000, and I think personally it's not for me because it seems bulky and heavy for the handbag. It's motion blur, how do I overcome that if using camera? Sorry for all these questions, I'm too used to just capture image with phone, abit overwhelming with the actual camera 😱😱 Wrong. Img quality of A6000 with kit lens lose to rx100mkiii with zeiss lens. If you dont intend to change lens, stick with rx. If you dont have 4k TV, really, no point in rx100mkiv. Kids blurry mostly due to motion blur. Rx100 should have a function allowing you to set higher shutter speed, of course under good light. As for img quality between rx100mk3 and phone is subjective. Landscape in daytime, maybe you wont notice the difference but other aspect like low light and autofocus tend to beat phone camera. |
|
|
|
|
|
DaddyO
|
Jan 20 2017, 07:44 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(xoxo1943 @ Jan 20 2017, 03:58 PM) very nice comparison you have there, thank you so much. i think the salesman intention is to get the money more well spent as alpha6000 is around the same price, he also showed me the depth of the images with alpha with various lenses. but i think its just not for me due to its bulkiness and weights, also i don't plan to buy various lenses. now i just gotta check out the canon g7 and g9 in the store before making the final decision! phew...so much to learn these days for a small camera! Just click above on the testing and comparison done between cameras. Hover over the "i", to see what lens they use for the shot. In this case a6000 + Zeiss 55mm f1.8 which cost roughly RM3000 on top of the camera body itself, RM2000. With this lens, RX100mkIII at 50mm lost to a6000+Zeiss combo, but quality wise is already very good for a fixed lens. a6000 with kit lens is really not that sharp under not too bright area. You can even compare them to the canon G7 and G9 if you want to. This post has been edited by DaddyO: Jan 20 2017, 07:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0172sec
0.89
6 queries
GZIP Disabled