QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jun 4 2009, 12:41 PM)
I think from your sentence you're actually suggesting that grand mal = generalised convulsions with the exception of petit mal; which literally means grand mal = generalised tonic-clonic (GTC), tonic, clonic, atonic, and myoclonic seizures.
My understanding is that "grand mal" = GTC and nothing more.
I could be wrong though, or maybe there has been changes made in the neurology realm which I missed.
lol...yes coz i think grand mal dated way back...in the 1800? (not too sure) but that time GTC is not around yet...so its imprecise to still use grand mal...
Added on June 5, 2009, 12:48 amQUOTE(limeuu @ Jun 4 2009, 10:30 PM)
for oz residents and citizens, the higher taxes translates into better healthcare, education, social services, pensions, parks, good public toilets, good roads and highways and hardly any toll in sight......etc.......
you pay less taxes in msia, but you get practically nothing in return.......unless you belong to the privileged class and ethnicity, you will eventually need to pay for private healthcare, education, pay tolls for your roads, and hardly any social service at all........you tax money goes to bail out crony companies, lost in projects like patrol boats and free trade zones........and collapsing stadiums........
given the choice, i would choose oz over msia........not to mention needing to work less time to pay for almost everything.....(eg, for a basic car like toyota corolla....YES that is a basic car in most parts of the world, except msia where it is a 'luxury' car!!.......you need to work 3 years in msia, but 6 months in oz to get one).........
don't look at taxes in the short term.....but look at it as what you will get in return over your lifetime.......
purchasing power!...the value of the currency comes to picture...coz i think the figures are about the same...working i aus / sg / msia....but the things u can buy with that figure is different...but if msia wanted to retain the docs n prevent braindrain, msia hav to raise the income value so that the docs can hav the sorta like smiliar buying power....but then again...it would be disproportionate...as that would make docs uber rich....
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jun 4 2009, 07:59 PM)
AUD of course.
It's the doctor's job to educate patients about medications. There are still many people who expect antibiotics for viral URTIs. You try to educate them, they will say OK and probably head off to the clinic next door for antis. It's hard to get people into the right mindset, but that doesn't mean we can't try.
One won't be rich until >20 years down the road... and even so, "the seriously rich" is probably limited to hardcore specialists who does fancy high-tech procedures (mainly surgeons to be honest).
hmm....there is a scheme where docs in aus can buy stuffs (cars, houses, even cafeteria food) using pretax money....that's why most of them have beach houses, hobby farms, big cars (and they change cars every 5 years...coz if tak pakai then rugi la)....surgeons lagi best....alot own 911s....once i saw DB9...

spoilt brats....
Added on June 5, 2009, 12:58 amQUOTE(Optiplex330 @ Jun 4 2009, 06:22 PM)
After paying that RM30, the patient expect you to give some medicine regardless of whether it is called for or not.
That is why separation of dispensing right may also be a good thing. At least doctor will no longer be pressured to give medication.
big supporter of taking of dispensing right...i think alot of msia docs are just doing it coz they wanted to buy generic stuffs and charge pt's the brand prices....and most of them giv meds in those plastic zipper bag thingy...instead of giving the pt a name of a drug that one can hang on to....one can remember....most (generalizing here) would not want to give away drug names.....coz sked the pt would go to the pharmacy n buy....
it might be a hassle for pts but at least that maintains good practice....and pharmacy can act as another safety net to double check....say some dodgy doc prescribe erm...beta blocker to an asthmatic pt to control bp?

then at least the pharmacy can sorta pick that up....if the doc does dispense that.....sei lor....pak Abu sure in deep shit...
apart from the travelling expenses....i think it should come up to about the same....say a doc charges rm30 for consult + meds...tehn if docs no longer prescribing....then maybe can charge the 'actual' consult fee...say sth like rm25 then that rm5 instead of being charged by the doc...its ppaid to the pharma...i mean c'mon...if the doc is prescribing...he gets a cut too right...not like he charge consult fee but charge drugs at cost price? so it should work out to about the same...and 'that MOH excuse - tak cukup pharmacy around...then causes inconvenience" well i would rather be safe....than ending up like Pak Abu...going out to town to see the doc....and usually in the town there will be a pharmacy around....and most klinik kesihatan in small daerah's hav their own pharmacy alrdy...so i dont see why the docs are still dispensing
This post has been edited by bhypp: Jun 5 2009, 12:58 AM