Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
[wta] 4k hdr brand?
|
tankiasu
|
 Feb 13 2017, 01:57 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(Vannus @ Jan 25 2017, 07:16 PM) I just surveyed rm8.2k for lg oled 55 b6t. High end but 55 inch only. Im also looking at sharp 65 630x really good color and black when i see it at the shop. Price around 5.7k cheapest i can find. I dont have have a chance to look with my own eye the lg 65 770T quantum dot local dimming HDR pro for only rm6.9k. Dilemma which one to choose. Currently using 55 samsung fhd. Wanna have a significant upgrade with best bang for buck. The Sharp's 630x range doesn't come with HDR though. IMHO, HDR is a more important feature than the 4k itself |
|
|
|
|
|
tankiasu
|
Feb 13 2017, 01:57 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(SteadyPana @ Feb 2 2017, 06:26 PM) My current setup 4K UHD TV : Panasonic 65" DX700 4K UHD Player : Samsung UBD K8500 Happy with setup of this set for Astro Beyond, FHD Blu Ray, 3D FHD Blu Ray. Ordered HDR Blu Ray, hopefully will receive by this week.  Cool, u got that Samsung 4k bluray player d ;-) |
|
|
|
|
|
tankiasu
|
Feb 13 2017, 09:37 PM
|
Getting Started
|
QUOTE(Vannus @ Feb 13 2017, 02:49 PM) Right bro, so for that range if I'm aiming 65 inches with HDR price around 6k to 8k, what do you suggest? sony 65 KD-X850D? or samsung 60 inch KS7000? or LG 65 UH770T? actually I'm in dellema is it quantum dot and HR-10 is it really that important? My dad owns that Sony X850D, so I have first hand experience with both the models. Personally I feel both of them perform pretty well with Astro, Blurays, 4k and HDR videos on YouTube. Never try the LG before so can't comment about it. HDR would be a good feature to have because that's the feature that will bring the more obvious difference to your TV images compared to the previous generation TVs. It dramatically increases the range of the brightest and the dimmest colors. |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0205sec
0.92
7 queries
GZIP Disabled