u mean u hv q10pro box already?



take note the sharp ua330x is a lower end 4k tv - non androidtv and does not have the same engine as the sharp ue630x.
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3811168/+1080

however, if u have the q10pro, u may not really need the tv's androidtv.

comparing the 2 sharps, it may not make much of a diff for low-mid level videos but will be when playing the higher quality videos.

also note both do not have HDR as they are 2014-2015 models - hence cheaper.


the sony model will have both hdr and google's androidtv - highest price.

This post has been edited by AVFAN: Apr 21 2017, 10:29 AM

Thanks mate. Yes need to replace old tv to fully enjoy Q10 😁.
Looks like I need to increase by 1k to get better specs? Will check out Sony and others ard rm6k. Need to budget again.

Sony KD65X8500D 4KHDR RM5899 <-- this is good price, when I was hunting this a month ago, lowest i saw was rm 7.5k and above.

With q10pro, u shud stretch yr budget to the full!

The box can do 4k, hdr, dolby vision which is 12 bit.

So, get a 4k hdr dolby vision tv too!

Yup get the Sony to fully utilized your q10...sharp ue330x didn't have hdr unless u are in tight budget...if size and budget not a issue for u try look for LG oled tv.....otherwise Sony definitely a good buy for the price

The Sony if not mistaken that price is for 65x7500d .

is the android tv os that comes with the sony tv support hdr? will it better than himedia since the android is fully integrated with the tv.

i don't have the latest sony tv, my old sony tv youtube video looks much better than the youtube video output from my himedia q6. probably it is more optimized and fully integrated with the tv.

should we get q10 if we have the latest sony tv that run on android tv os platform? heard that it is quite powerful as well.

Bro himedia q boxes only got 2 bad things. Both are netflix and youtube both not supporting full hd and qhd/4k respectively.

So you need the build in tv os to play 4k netflix and youtube.

When i first got my q10pro i also got shocked why..then someone here said himedia box is not the official authorized device from netflix and youtube.

Hope this help but 8500d sony got triluminus and 65 inches is sweet with 4k hdr support. At that price nothing to ask more. If you look at samsung ks7500 65 inches, its more than double the price.

I bought the q10pro because it can play 4k content smoothly and nicety preinstall all the ehem apps to watch those free movies, live tvs and etc

This post has been edited by Vannus: Apr 21 2017, 08:46 PM

My bad! It's KD65X7500D not 8500D. Typo...
Is it still a good price at rm5899 with 5 yr warranty over the samsung u6000?

Also thanks to d sifus for feedback!

the androidtv in sony should be same as those found in sharp and philips.

so, i will say it is good - more so if u already know how to sideload apps, maintain.

google's androidtv in tv's is the only way to do netflix 1080p and 4k; boxes cannot do except what is approved by netflix:
https://help.netflix.com/en/node/13444

on top of that, netflix already has many titles in HDR and Dolby Vision:
https://help.netflix.com/en/node/42384


but for media playback, the player in tv's are not so good, incl audio output.

to playback 4k, hdr, dolby vision, dsthdma, ddatmos, dtsx, u will need a player like q10pro.

for future proof 5 years, need to have player, avr and tv... all 4k, hdr, dolby vision.

and these 2 logos are what u wanna look for when buying a super-duper tv!





This post has been edited by AVFAN: Apr 21 2017, 10:33 PM

Separate android box is always better if u need better audio output..built in android in tv is ok too but the audio quality will follow with the tv spec

Bro between minix and himedia which model is best for better audio output

i have not used a minix before, cannot comment.

himedia q5/q10pro will give u all the audio u maybe looking for - dtshdma, ddtruehd, ddatmos, dtsx.

😋 I bought minix for my brother with nicety few months ago now looking for me too...have to ask which of them have better output looks like himedia better let see will ask nicety

hey guys, i'm looking for a uhd tv for my small room. the tv would not be much farther than the foot of the bed so i think 50" should be sufficient.
i have my eye on:-

Sony 49" 4K HDR Andriod LED TV KD49X7000D - RM2,699 (lazada)

Sharp AQUOS LED TV 50 inch LC50UE630X - RM2,799 (lazada)

having a smart/android tv will be handy and being in a room, i dont really want too many devices connected to it (wire clutter). however, at times i will connect my laptop to the tv.

which one would be better in terms of picture quality? and overall best buy?
any other tv's around that size, price bracket to recommend?

thanks guys

I like sharp colour quality if compare to Sony because I'm using one now...but I suggest u to go with the Sony because Sony hdr supported while sharp not..

the 2 are similar in many ways.

both run on androidtv, very handy.

the sharp is non-HDR. the sony advertises it as HDR but this website says "This feature will be made available via future firmware update -see Sony support website for details/updates." - best to confirm it.
http://www.sony.com.au/electronics/televis.../specifications

since price is similar, go to the stores, let your eyes decide after watching them side by side!

This post has been edited by AVFAN: Apr 23 2017, 09:11 AM

You cannot really use your eyes to check at the shop...they are all too bright and not color correct. You can only check viewing angles, response time, ghosting, reflection, etc. I'd trust more pro reviews that properly calibrate the panel...

Hi, thanks for the replies. Anyone using the two models have anything they dislike about it? Fiddly ui? Poor remote? Any comments on the little things besides picture quality?
I have been searching for relevant pro reviews but without much luck as different models are available in different countries. US/UK seem to have diff offering to us. And also the reviews generally focus on the best series instead of the entry level variants.
Looks like I might have to toss a coin to help me decide!