Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography [UPDATE]Beginner Problem, What is the best shooter
|
DaddyO
|
Dec 31 2016, 06:08 PM
|
|
Meh. Either zoom or prime, both are equally ok. Just go with whatever you are comfortable with within budget. I go for prime primarily cause its cheaper and fast. If don't like the prime's constraint, just save enough and get a good zoom cause it ain't cheap, or just stick with kit if you cannot tell the difference. Good Photography does not necessary means it has to be sharp if you plan for photos with story behind.
To TS, camera choice will depend on your shooting style. Even smartphone camera is good enough, if you only plan to upload your life story to instagram. For high autofocus hit rate on formula 1 car or sports, fast APSC like D500. If you like those creamy bokeh in portrait shots, FF camera. If you r into street shots and travelling light, m43 will do just fine. If you want to look hip to impress your girlfriend, Fuji (sony a6XXX is ugly).
|
|
|
|
|
|
DaddyO
|
Dec 31 2016, 06:32 PM
|
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 31 2016, 06:21 PM) eh most expensive lenses are prime lor. btw kit lens term - there are really good kit lenses too. ...............I'm talking about standard prime lens, not primes like Zeiss and comparing to zooms with similar f stops like f2.8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DaddyO
|
Dec 31 2016, 07:20 PM
|
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 31 2016, 06:34 PM) What's standard primes?  To some people their standard primes are Canon L, Nikon gold ring, Zeiss and whatever those I can't even think of. Oh not forgetting those 400mm primes and so on. Dude.....  If you are dont know what Im talking about it, then why you giving advice for beginners. Who tells beginner to start of with Canon L or Zeiss? I'm talking about the cheap standard 50mm lens or 30mm which can cost less than RM1k or RM2k depending on brand or second hand use. Unless you think TS so noob that he straight jump to L or Zeiss lens without comparing price simply basing his choice on wild recommendation. This post has been edited by DaddyO: Dec 31 2016, 07:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
DaddyO
|
Dec 31 2016, 09:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(goldfries @ Dec 31 2016, 08:15 PM) I know what you talking about aaaaahhhh, I was just responding to this part.  When you say prime without being specific, I add on lor say that primes are the ones that cost more. What to do, you don't put more details later people 'prime is always cheaper' so I chip in lor. Where got such thing as 'standard' prime wan la? Your standard is not other people's standard what. Furthermore normally when people stay 'standard' when it comes to lens it refers to a certain focal length. https://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/standard-lensesYou are the first person that get confused by the word "standard" for whatever reason. Sure there are many ways to interpret "standard" but most people I talk too immediately think of 30-50mm focal length without resorting to too much specifics on how to correctly use the word "standard". It's like "photoshoping" is not a verb, but people gets its meaning even if you technically misuse the word. PS: I didn't say primes is always cheaper. I said "I go for prime primarily cause its cheaper and fast." There is a difference. Lastly, not going for anymore debate on this as I hate deviating from topics. This post has been edited by DaddyO: Dec 31 2016, 09:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
DaddyO
|
Jan 1 2017, 09:53 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Lego Warfare @ Jan 1 2017, 12:56 AM) Just a FYI, mirrorless isn't that light either if you take account to the weight/size of good lenses plus the extra batteries unless you go for prime lenses only. Personally speaking it should have been lighter and compact as envisioned by the mirrorless companies in the early days. But somehow alone the way they forgot that and gone full blown pro to sell expensive heavy lens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DaddyO
|
Jan 16 2017, 04:57 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ervinlew @ Jan 16 2017, 04:16 PM)  hello fellow sifus, newbie here. want to get some humble opinion on this photo.  thank you in advance A decent shot. Not wow but decent.
|
|
|
|
|