Because Singtel TV is an IPTV operator.
Satellite TV are subject to expensive, limited transponder bandwidth capacity, so DTH pay TV operator have to carefully handpick channels that they want to offer it in HD.
IPTV however, are subject to network bandwidth capacity instead. As long you got a lot of bandwidth, you can offer as many HD channels as you like.
So this somewhat explains why the video bitrate for Hypp TV's HD channels are slightly higher than Astro's.
Talking about our previous discussion about Astro's HD channel quality, well of course, Astro can offer as better HD quality like Hypp TV by increasing video bitrate a little from 5Mbps to around 8Mbps, but that will result in lesser HD channels in each transponder.
So, if you would choose, you want a better HD quality channel than now but lesser HD channels in return, or you want more HD channels, or you want something in between?
Sorry to say la, majority of the consumers are somewhat materialistic where they want
more more more channels, and that will attract customers to subscribe it, and Astro can earn more. Only the minority of viewers like us, would bother the slightly lower video bitrate and complain that Astro HD channels doesn't look like "true HD".
Really, try to think, customers request more HD channels vs customers complain for poor HD quality, which complaint or feedback you heard often on anywhere?
I can see that, Astro can choose to be stingy by save more money in utilising lesser satellite transponders while offer even more HD channels, and customers pay more for those HD channels in return. But Astro themselves, they also need to jaga their reputation of the quality of service also, cuz that will result in poorer HD quality especially in fast moving scenes. So it is good to see that Astro balances between the two by maximising the amount of HD channels possible in each transponder while providing good HD quality channels. Not to say excellent quality, but "overall good enough/above average" quality.
So what happen when we customers want more HD channels? Still remember back in 2014 when Astro one shot introduced 8 new HD channels?
http://www.malaysiandigest.com/technology/...d-channels.htmlWell, that's involving the long-term costs in new Measat 3b transponders leased by Astro. At the same time of course, Astro want to earn profit also, where got 100% money for the RM5 increment of HD service for transponders one. You know la, Astro punya pattern.
So, Astro's HD channels is consider good enough already. If you cannot tahan the Astro's HD quality cuz you see lots of image artifacts, adjust your TV's sharpness setting all the way to 0. Because I did this, I am satisfied with Astro's HD quality.
https://www.cnet.com/how-to/turn-down-your-...rpness-control/If you can't get used to it cuz picture doesn't look sharp, try look closer to the screen, you will realise that don't see much image artifacts anymore. By doing so, it also means you are somewhat watching original quality from source (Astro), and your TV don't sharpen the image to "enhance" the quality, but actually it's not. And another tip, if your TV has MPEG Noise Reduction or just Noise Reduction setting, set it to Low or Off. Set as High will make the picture look like water colour painting.